The proposal reportedly transmitted through Doha establishes a clear blueprint for a potential cessation of hostilities
Tehran has formally laid out its specific terms for ending the war with the United States, transmitting a comprehensive proposal to Washington via mediators in Qatar.
The head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei, confirmed to Al Jazeera that Iranian officials are now awaiting a direct response from US President Donald Trump following the transmission of these conditions through Qatari and Pakistani diplomatic channels.
The Three Core Demands
The proposal transmitted through Doha establishes a clear blueprint for a potential cessation of hostilities. Iran’s primary stipulations revolve around three major geopolitical and economic demands:
- Complete Cessation of Hostilities: An immediate end to all combat operations across all active fronts, alongside regional conflict resolution involving allied fronts.
- Lifting the Naval Blockade: The complete termination of the US naval blockade targeting Iranian ports and maritime trade corridors.
- Unfreezing National Assets: The full release of Iranian state funds and financial assets currently seized or frozen under international sanctions.
Rezaei asserted that accepting these terms serves Washington’s strategic interests, warning that coercive threats will fail to produce concessions as Tehran remains prepared for sustained conflict if diplomatic efforts collapse.
Diplomatic Backdrop and High-Stakes Pressure
The Qatari diplomatic channel has emerged as a vital pipeline following earlier breakdowns in direct and indirect negotiations, including the collapse of previous memorandums of understanding. Washington has maintained intense pressure through naval deployments along maritime trade routes, while Tehran has signalled its readiness to escalate through military drills and missile tests near strategic waterways.
President Trump acknowledged the ongoing diplomatic signals, indicating that Washington is evaluating Tehran’s willingness to reach a broader deal. However, the White House has historically viewed similar demands as unrealistic without structural guarantees regarding regional security and maritime transit freedom.