With minorities excluded from elections, sectarian violence and change slow to come, a UN envoy has warned of a “Libyan scenario” for Syria. Could the country find itself divided among regional governments?
Geir Pedersen, the UN special envoy for Syria, recently told the Financial Times newspaper that Syria is on a “knife-edge” and “risks turning into Libya” should promised changes stall.
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa “needs to do what I call a course correction,” Pedersen told the FT. The president needs to convince the population that “this is a new beginning” in the aftermath of the dictatorship of Bashar Assad, he said, “not a new autocratic regime.”
The revolution in Libya, a country about 2,400 kilometers (1,450 miles) from Syria in North Africa, also began during the Arab Spring protests of 2011, but the initial war ended much sooner, with the help of the United States, Britain and France. Libya has now been divided since the NATO-backed revolt toppled and killed dictator Muammar Gadhafi in 2011. Three years later, the country split into two rival administrations that have since controlled the east and west.
There are significant differences between Libya and Syria, Nanar Hawach, senior Syria analyst at the International Crisis Group, told DW. “The Syrian state never completely collapsed,” he said, pointing to December 2024, when a coalition of rebel groups led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) militia — who was headed by now President al-Sharaa — ousted Assad.
“While the country is partitioned into spheres of influence, local and international actors in Syria continue to operate in relation to this single central government,” Hawach said.
None of Syria’s neighbors, such as Turkey, Jordan and Iraq, nor invested powers like the United States and the Gulf countries, want the strategic nightmare of a truly failed state and the chaos it would unleash on their borders, he said.
Yet “the lack of trust and political common ground between al-Sharaa’s government and other Syrian communities is a serious issue for the new government,” Kelly Campa, Middle East deputy team lead at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War, told DW.
Relations with Kurds
Hours before Pedersen’s warning about Syria’s fragmentation was published, a skirmish between governmental forces and Kurdish fighters in the northern city of Aleppo ended with a ceasefire.
Though the US-brokered deal seems to be holding, the clashes still highlight the increasing tension between Syria’s largest ethnic minority group, with its semiautonomous homeland in the northeast of the country, and the central government in Damascus.
Despite a widely celebrated agreement in March between the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces and al-Sharaa’s government, progress the integration of Kurdish institutions into the central government’s structures has stalled. One of the key obstacles remains the integration of the around 60,000 Kurdish forces into the newly founded unified Syrian army.
The about 2.5 million Kurds were excluded from Syria’s first postwar parliamentary vote in October. Damascus cited security concerns and absence of central control, but promised to keep the allocated seats in the Syrian parliament vacant until elections will be held. The same is true for the seats of the other excluded minority, Syria’s Druze population.
Integrating the Kurds, whose homeland encompasses about 30% of Syria, would mean not only increase the amount of territory under government control, but also give the government access to the region’s oil and gas reserves. These are key for the country’s reconstruction which is an urgent matter after 14 years of civil war that also ended in December 2024 with the ouster of Assad. The World Bank estimates that reconstruction costs are between $400 billion and $1 trillion (€940bn).
Source: https://www.dw.com/en/un-official-fears-syria-could-resemble-libya-after-war/a-74292724