Running is one of the most familiar forms of exercise for heart health. But a new study in lab rats found that swimming may actually do more for the heart, and on several measures, the gap between the two was wider than expected.
Researchers at the Federal University of São Paulo published their findings in Scientific Reports after comparing the two exercise types under identical lab conditions. Swimming produced bigger hearts and stronger heart-muscle performance, while running at the same effort level did not trigger the same degree of cardiac growth. Both improved overall fitness, but when it came to the heart itself, swimming had the edge.
Not all heart growth works the same way. When the heart enlarges due to disease, such as chronic high blood pressure, that growth is often harmful. But when the heart grows in response to exercise, the enlargement is considered healthy, preserving or even boosting the organ’s ability to contract and relax. Knowing which exercises drive this beneficial remodeling could eventually inform how doctors think about physical activity.
Swimming Outperforms Running on Heart Size and Muscle Strength
Researchers divided male lab rats into three groups of 24: a sedentary group, a running group training on a motorized treadmill, and a swimming group exercising in a heated water tank. Both exercise groups worked out five days a week, 60 minutes per day, for eight weeks at roughly 75 percent of their maximum oxygen capacity.
Rats in both exercise groups improved their peak oxygen consumption by more than 5 percent, while the untrained group declined. Both exercise types equally boosted an enzyme in muscle tissue that reflects improved energy production at the cellular level, and at the whole-body fitness level, running and swimming were comparable.
Where things diverged was inside the chest. Only the swimming group showed a meaningful increase in heart mass relative to body weight and in the mass of the left ventricle, the chamber responsible for pumping blood to the rest of the body. Heart muscle cells in the swimming group were wider and their internal structures larger, both signs of healthy cardiac growth. Running group hearts looked statistically similar to those of sedentary rats on these measures.
Ultrasound imaging showed swimming produced a pattern in which the heart’s chambers grew larger in diameter, an adaptation tied to the high blood-volume demands of water immersion. Neither exercise type impaired the heart’s ability to fill or pump blood at rest. But when researchers tested isolated strips of heart muscle directly, swimming-trained rats developed significantly more force, and both the rate of force buildup and relaxation were greater than in the running and untrained groups.
Swimming’s Molecular Advantage Traced to a Key Growth Pathway
To understand why swimming outperformed running at the cellular level, the team examined signaling proteins known to drive healthy heart growth. One standout finding involved a protein called PTEN, which acts as a brake on a growth-promoting pathway. Only in the swimming group was PTEN significantly reduced, meaning the brake was released, allowing a downstream chain of signals to help heart cells build new structural components. Both exercise types activated some of these shared signals, but swimming pushed them further.
Part of the reason may come down to tiny genetic regulators called microRNAs, which act like dimmer switches for gene activity. Swimming drove significantly higher levels of five of these microRNAs compared to running, and two of them are known to suppress PTEN directly. In other words, swimming may be turning down the very brake that holds back heart growth. Notably, blood levels of IGF-1, a growth factor often assumed to be the main driver of exercise-related heart growth, were unchanged in all three groups. That points researchers toward mechanisms inside heart tissue rather than a simple hormonal explanation.
Source : https://studyfinds.com/swimming-heart-running-benefits/