Elon Musk was pointing to a case cited by USAID in which a Syrian national was charged with diverting millions of dollars in humanitarian assistance to an al-Qaida affiliate group.
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has drawn attention to cases where US-funded humanitarian assistance was diverted to terrorist organisations, reigniting debate over whether aid distributed through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) can be misused in conflict zones.
Musk was reacting to a 2024 case cited by USAID in which a Syrian national was charged with diverting millions of dollars in humanitarian assistance intended for civilians, to an al-Qaida affiliate group. Tagging an X post, he wrote, “USAID funding was used for terrorism.
USAID funding was used for terrorism https://t.co/ZIJtYYA75s
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 23, 2026
Syria case at the centre of debate
In a press release issued in 2024, USAID said Mahmoud Al Hafyan, a 53-year-old Syrian national, was charged in a 12-count indictment.
According to the indictment, Al Hafyan, also known as Abu Abdo Al-Homsi, headed the regional office of a non-governmental organisation in Syria and managed around 160 employees.
He was accused of illegally diverting more than $9 million in US-funded humanitarian aid intended for Syrian civilians to armed combatant groups, including the Al-Nusrah Front (ANF), a designated foreign terrorist organisation affiliated with al-Qaida in Iraq.
The indictment was announced by US Attorney Matthew M Graves, USAID Office of Inspector General (USAID-OIG) Special Agent in Charge Jason Donnelly and FBI Washington Field Office Counterterrorism Division Special Agent in Charge Sanjay Virmani.
“This defendant not only defrauded the US government, but he also gave the humanitarian aid he stole to a foreign terrorist organization,” Graves said at the time.
He added that while the organisation was fighting the Assad regime, civilians who were meant to receive the aid suffered instead.
“This office has a history of pursuing criminals around the globe, no matter how many years it takes, and will do all it can to ensure that Mahmoud Al Hafyan is held accountable for these crimes,” Graves said.
Virmani said Al Hafyan diverted millions of dollars in USAID funding to support the Al-Nusrah Front and enrich himself. “Not only was Al Hafyan supporting violent terrorists, but he was stealing money from the US government that was meant for humanitarian efforts,” he said.
Donnelly said USAID-OIG works to ensure humanitarian assistance does not end up with terrorist organisations and pledged continued cooperation with law enforcement agencies.
What the evidence shows
Documented cases show that USAID-funded aid has, in some instances, been diverted to extremist groups. However, this differs from claims that USAID systematically funds terrorism.
The strongest publicly available evidence comes from Inspector General findings, criminal investigations and oversight reports highlighting diversion risks, particularly in conflict zones such as Syria and Gaza.
USAID-OIG stated in a 2024 advisory that assistance in Gaza faced a high risk of diversion and misuse. The advisory noted that oversight relied on partner self-reporting, third-party monitoring and vetting procedures.
At the same time, USAID said it uses anti-terrorism clauses, sanctions checks and partner screening systems to prevent assistance from reaching Hamas or other designated organisations.
USAID oversight concerns
Concerns about aid diversion are not new. A 2007 internal USAID audit warned that the agency could not “reasonably ensure” that its funds would not end up in the hands of terrorist groups in fragile environments.
In 2018, USAID suspended a $44.6 million Syria food-aid programme after an Inspector General investigation found local NGO staff had supplied food kits to members of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, a successor organisation to the al-Qaida-linked Jabhat al-Nusra.
In 2025, USAID-OIG reported an investigation into a Syria voucher scheme in which aid vouchers were diverted away from intended beneficiaries. A deputy chief of the party involved in the programme was later debarred for three years.
