The DMK has frequently accused Governor RN Ravi of acting on behest of the BJP to deliberately delay implementation of laws and scuttle the state’s development.
Tamil Nadu’s ruling DMK and Governor RN Ravi are at loggerheads, again.
This time it is over Mr Ravi alleging Chief Minister MK Stalin used the state police force to deter vice-chancellors from attending a conference chaired by him in the hill-town of Ooty.
Mr Ravi – whom the Supreme Court rebuked this month for withholding assent to 10 bills cleared, each twice over, by the Tamil Nadu government – declared Mr Stalin’s behaviour was reminiscent of the Emergency imposed by late former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi.
“Is MK Stalin afraid of the consequences of a rise in standards of state universities… that this could be a threat to his political future?” the Governor, roiled in a row with the state government over appointment of vice-chancellors to state-run colleges and universities, asked.
The DMK hit back quickly and declared “intimidation is in the BJP’s DNA”.
The Tamil party has frequently accused Mr Ravi of acting on behest of the BJP – which appoints governors – to deliberately delay implementation of laws and scuttle the state’s development.
“We have it in us to stand for the state’s rights. There is no provision in the Constitution to make governors chancellors of state universities,” Higher Education Minister Govi Chezhiaan said.
On existing vice-chancellors skipping the Governor’s conference, Mr Chezhiaan said they had “understood the Supreme Court verdict” and had chosen to boycott the event.
“How can the state government be responsible? The Governor convened the meet disrespecting the law… does that mean the vice-chancellors should do it too?”
The head-to-head between the Tamil Nadu government and Mr Ravi – at least on the issue of withholding assent for bills – came to a big denouement on April 8 after the Supreme Court said Mr Ravi had not acted in good faith, and that his actions were “illegal” and “arbitrary”.
The verdict was hailed as “historic” by Chief Minister Stalin, who said it was a win for all states, referring to similar disputes between non-BJP states and their respective governors.
In addition, the court also specified timelines for governors and the President to assent to bills passed by state legislatures; that section of the verdict led the BJP’s Nishikant Dubey to attack the judiciary.
