• Home
  • About US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2019

Categories

  • Auto
  • Business
  • Climate & Earth
  • Coronavirus
  • Crypto
  • Entertainment
  • Happiness Basket
  • India
  • Learn | Unlearn | Relearn
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Research Discoveries
  • Science & Technology
  • Sports
  • Trending
  • Video
  • World
  • Home
  • About US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Read Selective
  • World
  • Politics
  • India
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Auto
  • Crypto
  • Coronavirus
  • Happiness Basket
  • Research Discoveries
  • India

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of digital arrest scams, seeks response from Centre, CBI

  • October 18, 2025

The Court expressed that it was aghast that the fraudsters behind such scams often use forged court orders to trick people into parting with their money.

Cyber crime

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of the Central government and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in a suo motu case initiated over the rise of ‘digital arrest scams’ across India.

A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi today expressed that it was aghast that the fraudsters behind such scams often use forged court orders to trick people into parting with their money.

The Court has also sought the assistance of the Attorney General of India in the matter.

“Ordinarily, we would have directed the state police to expedite the investigation and take it to the logical conclusion. We are, however, aghast that the fraudsters have fabricated multiple judicial orders in the name of the Supreme Court of India, including a freeze order dated 1st September, purportedly issued under the PMLA, bearing forged signatures of a judge, an officer of ED, and a court stamp also,” it said.

The Court added that using fake court orders strikes at the very foundation of the public trust held by the judiciary, and has the be viewed seriously.

“Various fictitious proceedings before the Bombay High Court and false claims of investigation by CBI and ED (were also used by fraudsters). The forgery of documents and the brazen criminal misuse of the name, seal and judicial authority of this court and the High Court is a matter of grave concern. Judicial orders with fake signatures of judges strikes at the very foundation of the public trust system on the judiciary. Such grave criminal acts cannot be treated as an orderly or routine offence of cheating or cyber crime,” the Court held.

Digital arrest scams refer to a kind of online fraud where cybercriminals impersonate law enforcement or government officials, like the police or CBI, to intimidate victims and to pressure them into parting with money.

Often, the victims are falsely made to believe that they have run into trouble with the law and that they would need to pay hefty monetary penalties to close legal proceedings against them.

The Court took judicial notice of the issue following a complaint sent to it last month by a senior citizen couple, who were defrauded of their life savings through a digital arrest scam carried out between September 1-16.

The victims said that they were contacted by persons impersonating as CBI, IB, and judicial authorities through video conferencing platforms (VC) and telephones. The fraudsters displayed forged orders of the Supreme Court through WhatsApp and VC.

Under the threat of arrest through those forged documents, the couple was coerced into transferring ₹1.5 crores through multiple bank transactions.

The Court today noted that two first information reports (FIRs) were registered at the cyber crime branch at Ambala, which indicated a pattern of organised criminal activities targeting senior citizens.

“The instant case is not a solitary instance. It has been largely reported many times on the media that such incidents have taken place in different parts of the country,” the Court observed.

Source : https://www.barandbench.com/news/supreme-court-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-digital-arrest-scams-seeks-response-from-centre-cbi

 

Previous Article
  • India

Supreme Court forms committee to ensure equal job opportunities, inclusive medical care for transgender persons

  • October 18, 2025
View Post
Next Article
  • India

Jharkhand High Court registers contempt case after viral video shows lawyer in heated exchange with judge

  • October 18, 2025
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • India
  • Trending

Indus Waters Treaty On Hold, India Builds First Rock Check Dam In Ladakh

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

Fraudster Arrested In Jalandhar. FBI Wanted Him Over $600,000 Scam

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

8 Students Dead In Kerala Crash. Their Car Rammed Parked Lorry Last Night

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

PM Modi Could Be Top Of Trump’s G20 Meeting List, US Ambassador Sergio Gor Says

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

Delhi body approves Manmohan Singh’s memorial at Rajghat, sets conditions

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

Swatantra Bhardwaj detained after big CJP protest, POCSO case filed after ‘rape threats’ to minor

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

Police Personnel ‘Assaulting Protesters Distressing’: Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on Jantar Mantar Incident

  • September 5, 2026
View Post
  • India

‘Whole of J-K, Ladakh Integral Part of India’: MEA On Birmingham Mayor ‘Kashmir Is Pakistan’ Remark

  • September 5, 2026

Recent Posts

  • Hedge fund giant Citadel seeking to buy US shale oil production assets, sources say
  • Brazil’s Supreme Court faces rare test as justices turn against each other
  • Witkoff, Kushner heading abroad to discuss Ukraine peace, Trump says
  • China’s Xi seeks to bring large CEO delegation on US visit, sources say
  • US, China gear up for mid-September AI safety talks
Categories
  • Auto (45)
  • Business (470)
  • Climate & Earth (16)
  • Coronavirus (18)
  • Crypto (28)
  • Entertainment (884)
  • Happiness Basket (7)
  • India (5,896)
  • Learn | Unlearn | Relearn (163)
  • Lifestyle (326)
  • Politics (98)
  • Research Discoveries (400)
  • Science & Technology (474)
  • Sports (1,001)
  • Trending (1,710)
  • Video (1)
  • World (9,842)
Read Selective

For Feedbacks, Advertisements or Any Other Concerns mail us at info@readselective.com

Pages
  • Home
  • About US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Categories
  • Auto
  • Business
  • Climate & Earth
  • Coronavirus
  • Crypto
  • Entertainment
  • Happiness Basket
  • India
  • Learn | Unlearn | Relearn
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Research Discoveries
  • Science & Technology
  • Sports
  • Trending
  • Video
  • World
© 2024 Read Selective | Developed by SUGARA Technologies
  • Home
  • About US
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Go to mobile version