Russell Brand was described as “ruthless” and a “sexual predator” by the prosecution at the start of his trial for rape and sexual assault on Wednesday.
The 51-year-old actor and comedian faces three counts of rape, three charges of sexual assault and one of indecent assault.
The allegations, made by six female complainants, span a 10-year period between 1999 and 2009. He denies the charges.
Riel Karmy-Jones KC, for the prosecution, told Southwark Crown Court in London the women “did not know each other”, “have never met each other” and “came forward independently of each other”.
The barrister said: “The circumstances of the offending were as wide and as varied as the defendant’s career.”
She said that “regardless of who the women were and what they said or did, Brand was not deterred”.
“His desire, strong desire, for some form of sexual contact was indiscriminate and voracious,” she told the court.
The prosecutor told jurors that Brand would be “nice when he wanted to be, funny – undoubtedly – charming, likeable even, when he wanted something in return”.
But she said he would also be “demanding, entitled, a flirt with a huge sexual appetite – childlike in his expectation that his every desire should be met”.
The prosecutor said Brand would “appear indifferent, normal and untroubled by what had just occurred” after the encounters.
She added that “sometimes he would leave promptly after the incident, sometimes making an excuse to get away, or sometimes simply continuing as though nothing wrong had happened”.
On Wednesday, the jury heard details of the alleged offences.
The first complainant says she met Brand before he was famous in 1999, the jury was told.
She had attended the Labour Party conference and went to a fringe event where she spoke to Brand. He later allegedly raped her.
The prosecution said when Brand was questioned by police about this allegation of rape, “he said if it happened, he didn’t remember the incident”.
He added that he did not remember the first complainant’s name and that he “had never engaged in non-consensual activity”.
The second complainant worked for MTV at the time when she says Brand indecently assaulted her.
She said Brand asked her where the toilets were and the woman offered to show him.
When they reached the toilets, prosecutors say, Brand asked the woman to “come in” before grabbing her forearm.
She resisted by struggling and pulling back. He had what she described as a desperate, wild-eyed look on his face, as he said: “Please please come in – oh go on.”
The third complainant says Brand orally raped her in a toilet after meeting her at a party in 2004.
Within a minute of meeting, in the middle of a conversation, he lurched forward and grabbed her breasts and squeezed them with both hands, the jury was told.
The prosecution said the woman remembered he had a “big, weird grin” on his face as he did so, then grabbed her arm and pulled her towards the toilets.
The same woman said that as they were driving to another venue, Brand exposed himself, the court heard.
“He said, ‘Come on, come on, suck it’ – to which she just said, ‘No no’,” the prosecution added. “He simply laughed but appeared to accept her refusal.”
The fourth complainant says Brand pushed her up against a wall at Capital Radio in 2004 or 2005 and kissed her “sloppily and aggressively”, and “grabbed her body, at her breasts, sides and buttocks, aggressively”.
She was able to push him away and he “just sniggered, like it was a joke”, the prosecutor said.
The jury then heard how the fifth complainant says she met Brand when he was performing at the Hammersmith Apollo in London in 2009.
The prosecution said their encounter began with consensual activity, but that he raped her anally on a later occasion.
The jury heard how the woman “spent months and years blaming herself”, becoming anxious and unwell.
They were told Brand texted the woman after seeing her at an event the following summer, saying: “I wanna push you further.”
She is said to have replied: “I think you pushed me far enough – you treated me like an animal.” He allegedly replied: “I’m sorry.”
The sixth complainant – who has accused Brand of sexual assault – says he demanded a massage when she was on a work assignment in 2009.
He “fell to his knees and placed his head directly into her groin area”, the prosecution said.
After the accounts of the final two women were heard, the prosecutor said Brand told police in 2023 “he has never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity, and that any accounts had been reinvented or imagined after a defamatory documentary and subsequent press reporting”.
On Wednesday afternoon, Brand’s former flatmate Mark Pinheiro was the first witness to give evidence.
Pinheiro told jurors that Brand had told him he may have gone a “bit too far” with a woman when visiting the Labour Party conference in 1999.
