Both sides of the conflict in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have committed to disarming and disengaging their alleged proxies.
But there are dozens of non-state armed groups active in the region and it’s not clear whether all of them will adhere to the ceasefire.
Just hours before the deal was signed, one of them, the Codeco militia, attacked a displaced persons camp in Ituri province, killing 10 people.
Keeping these non-state actors in line will be a tall order. Part of the peace deal involves creating the conditions to allow the hundreds of thousands of people displaced by the conflict to return home.
That won’t be possible without a complete cessation of hostilities.
Due to the eastern DRC’s vast mineral resources, critical to modern technology including electric car and mobile phone batteries, the economic incentives for rebel groups are incredibly tempting, and this deal does not mention alternatives which may convince these groups to stop fighting over valuable territory. Integrating them into an under-resourced Congolese armed force is unlikely to prove enough of a deterrent.
It’s also still not clear what preferential access, if any, the US has been offered to the DRC’s minerals.
President Donald Trump has made it clear that this is one of his key incentives for agreeing to support the peace process. But granting the US unfettered access to the country’s mineral wealth is unpopular with many in the DRC, upset that the country’s resources have failed to provide a better life for its citizens.
As to the key questions of whether Rwandan forces will withdraw from eastern DRC, the US position is that once the Hutu-led FDLR, which Rwanda says is backed by the DRC and aims to overthrow the Rwandan government, is dismantled, then Rwanda will also row back on its “defensive measure”.
This appears to be an oblique reference to the presence of Rwandan armed forces in eastern DRC.
Source : https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9dgjn7p24vo
