Trump has on and off taken credit for the ceasefire claiming that he should get the noble prize for preventing wars.
US President Donald Trump during a meeting with Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House, in Washington, DC, USA (PTI)
Reiterating his claim on brokering a truce between India and Pakistan, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that Pakistan army chief Asim Munir credited him for ending a potential war.
Referring to his recent meeting with the Pak Army chief and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Trump said: “He (Munir) said to a group of people that were with us… that this man (Trump) saved millions of lives because he saved the war from going on. That war was going to get very bad… I loved the way he said it”.
Military conflict escalated between India and Pakistan in May this year after the launch of Operation Sindoor, as part of which India struck terror targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The military action was to avenge the killing of 26 civilians in the Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22.
At the height of the military conflict, a ceasefire was announced on May 10. Trump has on and off taken credit for the ceasefire claiming that he should get the noble prize for preventing wars.
“India and Pakistan were going at it. I called them both… They had just shot down seven planes… I said, if you do this, there’s not going to be any trade, and I stopped the war. It was raging for four days,” Trump said in his latest claim from the White House.
He further said that the Prime Minister and army chief were in the US, as he termed Munir as “a very important guy in Pakistan”. “I didn’t even realise it was as beautiful as he said it. He said to a group of people that were with us… that this man saved millions of lives because he saved the war from going on. That war was going to get very bad…” he said.
The statement comes as Trump noted his success with the Gaza peace plan. “Yesterday, we might have settled the biggest of them all. Although I’m not sure… Hamas has to agree. If they don’t, it will be very tough on them… All of the Arab nations, Muslim nations, have agreed. Israel has agreed. It’s an amazing thing,” he said.
Earlier on Monday, while announcing the Gaza peace plan with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump said, “The Prime Minister and the Field Marshal of Pakistan were with us right from the beginning. Incredible. In fact, they have just issued a statement affirming their full commitment to this pact… They back this 100%.”
Trump compared the potential peace settlement in Gaza to his previous claims of diplomatic interventions, including India-Pakistan, noting, “I’ve settled so many wars… Pakistan and India were very big. Both nuclear powers. I settled that. But yesterday could be the settlement in the Middle East. That hasn’t happened for 3,000 years.”
Trump’s latest bid for the Peace Prize comes a day after he unveiled the Gaza peace plan, which could become the eighth conflict he claims to have mediated.
US President Donald Trump has made fresh claims on the Nobel Peace Prize.(REUTERS)
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said it would be an “insult” to his country if he does not receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his self-proclaimed role in ending at least seven international conflicts.
The latest claim to the Nobel Peace Prize comes a day after Trump announced the Gaza peace plan, which, if accepted by Hamas, could be the eighth war the US President has claimed to have mediated.
“Will you get the Nobel Prize? Absolutely not. They’ll give it to some guy that didn’t do a damn thing,” Trump said while addressing top US military officers.
“It’d be a big insult to our country, I will tell you that. I don’t want it, I want the country to get it,” he said, adding, “It should get it, because there’s never been anything like it.”
The President’s latest push for the top award comes ahead of October 10, when this year’s Nobel Prize announcements will be made.
Trump has long been irked by the fact that former President Barack Obama, a Democrat, won the prize in 2009.
Trump’s claim of mediating wars
In his latest speech, Trump repeated his claim to have solved seven wars since he assumed office in January this year.
He further said that if Gaza peace plan, which he unveiled during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the US on Monday, works out, “we’ll have eight, eight in eight months. That’s pretty good.”
Last week, while addressing the United Nations General Assembly, the US President repeated his claim of ending “seven wars in seven months”.
“They said they were unendable, some were going for 31 years, one was 36 years. I ended 7 wars and in all cases they were raging with countless thousands of people being killed,” he said. He said he deserved the peace prize “for each one of them”.
Trump has claimed to have mediated the wars between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, Rwanda and Congo, Thailand and Cambodia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Egypt and Ethiopia and Serbia and Kosovo. However, India has repeatedly denied Trump’s involvement in the ceasefire during Operation Sindoor against Pakistan.
Does Trump have a chance?
Trump’s bid for the Nobel Peace Prize is not just about his mere claims. Several international leaders, including Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Pakistani leader Shehbaz Sharif among others, have nominated the US President for the prize. Other nations—including Rwanda, Gabon, Azerbaijan, and Cambodia—have also backed Trump for the award.
However, experts say that the chances of Trump winning the prize this year is considered to be close to zero. Oeivind Stenersen, a historian who has co-written a book on the Nobel Peace Prize, told AFP that Trump’s chances are “completely unthinkable”.
Over 66,000 people have been killed in Gaza in less than two years, Gaza’s Health Ministry’s saysImage: Ebrahim Hajjaj/REUTERS
Netanyahu ‘trying to maneuver’ in video message, Middle East expert says
US President Donald Trump has told Hamas to sign his peace plan for Gaza or it will “pay in hell.”
A few hours after agreeing to the plan in Washington, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put out a video in Hebrew that seemed to counter some of the core points of this peace plan, including the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza and the eventual creation of a Palestinian state.
Middle East affairs and international security expert H.A. Hellyer told DW it was worth paying “close attention” to the video.
“When you consider the history of the past two years, at multiple points Netanyahu has sabotaged negotiations and other peace plans and other plans that were meant to lead to a ceasefire,” Hellyer said, pointing to the matter being widely covered in Israeli media.
“So it’s no surprise that he’s trying to maneuver on this occasion as well,” Hellyer said.
He pointed out that the plan put before Arab states last week was “significantly different” to the one announced yesterday. These changes, he said, pertained to the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, anything to do with the Palestinian state and the disarmament of Hamas.
“They didn’t go back to the Arab Muslim states that had put their names and credibility on the line by endorsing. They simply had Netanyahu come to the White House yesterday, discuss with the president, and then the new … plan was announced,” Hellyer said.
On the question of the creation of a Palestinian state, Hellyer said: “I think that Netanyahu has made it abundantly clear he will not see a Palestinian state established in the Palestinian territories.”
Italy’s Meloni calls on Gaza aid flotilla to ‘stop now’
Italy has warned organizers of the Global Sumud Flotilla that Israel would consider their incursion as a “hostile act.”
The Italian Ministry of Defense announced that the Italian Navy frigate Apino, dispatched to the region, could take on board any participants of the flotilla who wished to transfer.
“A final warning will be issued tomorrow, October 1, upon reaching 150 nautical miles from the coast of Gaza, where the military vessel
will stop and remain available for any assistance and rescue operations,” according to a statement from the defense ministry.
The flotilla has been sailing towards Gaza with over 40 civilian boats carrying parliamentarians, lawyers and activists including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, with the goal of breaking Israel’s aid blockade.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni called on the flotilla to immediately stop their mission, arguing that a confrontation with Israel could upset the current “fragile balance” that could lead to peace based on the plan proposed by US President Donald Trump.
“Many would be happy to disrupt” that plan, Meloni said in a statement. “I fear that the flotilla’s attempt to breach the Israeli naval blockade could provide a pretext for this. Also for this reason, I believe the flotilla should stop now,” she added.
Italian spokeswoman for the flotilla, Maria Elena Delia, said that activists had been informed about Italy’s instructions for the ship to turn back, but she confirmed that the flotilla had no intention of heeding the warning.
Delia said activists were bracing for another strike in the coming hours. “Israel will probably attack us tonight, because all the signals point to this happening,” she said in a video on Instagram.
Israel has denied claims that it attacked the flotilla last week, but it has vowed to use any means to prevent the boats from reaching Gaza.
‘Majority in Israel want to end the war,’ Israeli political correspondent says
Tal Schneider, political and diplomatic correspondent for Israeli online newspaper The Times of Israel, spoke to DW about the significance of the Gaza peace deal.
“I think it is an impressive plan if it can go through,” Schneider said, adding that the picture is incomplete, but what matters to the Israeli people is the release of the hostages and how the plan would enable that.
“They’re going to be released. All of them. Not in small groups, you know, within 72 hours,” she said of the plan.
Schneider noted that the idea of the Israel Defense Forces withdrawing from Gaza and an international governing body taking over is something that Israelis would worry about. She added that people in Israel are weary of international organizations and their effectiveness.
Moreover, Schneider pointed out that a few hardline Israeli ministers could disrupt the plan.
“Because they disagree totally. They want annexation. They want the war to continue forever. They want, you know, to see the last person of Hamas being killed,” Schneider said, adding that for hardliners in Israel, the war with Hamas is a “never-ending event.”
“But obviously the people do not agree with that. The majority here wants to end the war,” she stressed.
Schneider also said that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the hardliners in his cabinet are likely betting on Hamas rejecting the plan, which would enable them to “get more of a free hand.”
Gaza peace plan is ‘foreign interference,’ Palestinian NGO tells DW
Ines Abdel Razek, a co-director of the Palestine Institute for Public Diplomacy (PIPD), spoke to DW about what the Gaza peace plan proposed by Donald Trump means for Palestinians.
“I think what what we need to really understand is what this plan is and isn’t,” Abdel Razek said. “It’s not a Palestinian plan. So Palestinians are not deciding for themselves. This is violating the first and foremost right of Palestinians to self-determination and to decide for themselves.”
“It’s an Israeli American plan to continue the violence and the genocide against Palestinians in other forms,” she added, noting that a lot of the conditions in the plan and its proposals “are completely illegal under international law.”
“I think it’s about understanding how this is coercion,” Abdel Razek said, adding that the plan has been formulated after the destruction of the entire strip and the displacement of 2 million Palestinians, after pushing people “towards the brink of death and desperation.”
She said the plan would normalize the very real possibility of an Israeli army occupation and eventual annexation of Gaza.
“This is pure colonization. This is pure foreign interference,” Abdel Razek said, denouncing that the plan seeks to bring foreign interference to Gaza from the very people who are responsible for the suffering of the Palestinian people.
UN not involved in preparing Trump plan, but ready to deliver aid
The United Nations said that although it was not involved in the preparation of Donald Trump’s so-called 20-point peace plan, it remains ready to increase deliveries of food and humanitarian aid to the people of the war-torn Gaza Strip as soon as conditions allow.
The UN, along with the Red Crescent, was namechecked in the proposal presented by Trump on Monday.
The international organization declared a famine in Gaza last month, blaming Israel’s monthslong “systematic obstruction” of food deliveries for the tragic situation.
Point 12 of Trump’s plan states that “full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip,” adding that it “will proceed without interference.”
Speaking in Geneva, UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) spokesman Jens Laerke emphasized that the UN was not involved in drafting the proposal, but said, “Aid is ready and available to move in from various agencies, and has been so for a long time.”
Laerke said UN humanitarian workers would, “do what we always do — try to deliver aid to the people who desperately need it.”
International humanitarian agencies have been largely shut out of Gaza since March, when Israel announced that aid deliveries would instead be carried out by the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
GHF, which has been overwhelmed by the task, will not be allowed to operate further should the plan go into effect, as it is associated with one of the warring parties, Israel.
Trump is ‘waiting for Hamas,’ gives them ‘three or four days’
US President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday that the Islamist militant group Hamas needs to quickly decide whether it wants to accept the terms of his Gaza peace plan.
Asked how long the group had to put down its arms and join a ceasefire, Trump said, “We’re going to do about three or four days.”
He then added, “We’re just waiting for Hamas, and Hamas is either going to be doing it or not. And if it’s not, it’s going to be a very sad end.”
Qatar has said it will hold talks with Hamas negotiators as well as representatives from Egypt and Turkey on Tuesday after the militants have reviewed Trump’s proposal.
Many international leaders have voiced approval for the plan, yet demands that Hamas disarm and be excluded from holding power in Gaza in the future would seem difficult for the group to accept.
Trump, however, made it clear that the group must accept the plan, otherwise Israel will have a green light to take whatever actions it deems necessary to pursue its ultimate aim of destroying the group once and for all.
Netanyahu says Israel will ‘forcibly resist’ Palestinian statehood
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday flatly rejected the idea of Palestinian statehood, the prospects of which were left open in US President Trump’s so-called 20-point peace plan.
In a video posted on the messaging app Telegram, Netanyahu said he had “absolutely not” agreed to the creation of a Palestinian state, an idea that he likened to “national suicide” for Israel last week when addressing the United Nations General Assembly.
The Israeli leader made clear that no clause stipulating the creation of such a state was contained in Trump’s plan before vowing to ‘forcibly resist’ any effort to create one.
Divided reactions to Tony Blair’s proposed Gaza role
US President Donald Trump surprised many on Monday by announcing that his plan for peace in Gaza included a “board of peace” to be headed by himself and former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Blair, who was an unapologetic supporter of George W. Bush’s ill-fated 2003 invasion of Iraq on claims that the country possessed weapons of mass destruction, is seen by many in the Middle East with great mistrust.
Moreover, considering Trump’s previous statements, as well as Britain’s highly complicated role in the region for the past century, many fear the board to be nothing more than a vehicle for the neo-colonial takeover of Gaza.
On Monday, Mustafa Barghouti, general secretary of the Palestinian National Initiative political party, told the Washington Post newspaper: “We’ve been under British colonialism already. He [Blair] has a negative reputation here. If you mention Tony Blair. The first thing people mention is the Iraq war.”
Francesca Albanese, the UN’s special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories and herself no stranger to controversy, blasted the idea in a social media post, writing, “Tony Blair? Hell No” and suggesting he should be put on trial at the International Criminal Court (ICC).
More positively, others point to Blair’s previous role leading the so-called Middle East Quartet representing the UN, US, EU and Russia in the region. In that capacity the former statesman was charged with fostering institution building and economic development.
However, critics say he did little to stop illegal Israeli settlements during his tenure, which stretched from 2007 to 2015.
More recently, he has led the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, which claims to advocate for “turning bold ideas into reality.”
Others, such as the current UK Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, say that although Blair’s appointment “will raise some eyebrows,” the former politician’s track record is not all bad, pointing to his role in brokering the 1998 Good Friday Agreement that ended decades of conflict in Northern Ireland.
“If he can bring those considerable skills there,” Streeting told the BBC, “in both diplomacy and statecraft… that can only be a good thing.”
Ambassador Nkosinathi Emmanuel “Nathi” Mthethwa’s body was discovered outside a Paris hotel. His death is being treated as a possible suicide, the local presecutor’s office says.
Before being appointed ambassador, Mthethwa held several high-ranking positions in the South African government [FILE: March 2021]Image: Gavin Barker/Sports Inc/empics/picture allianceSouth Africa’s ambassador to France, Nkosinathi Emmanuel Mthethwa, who was found dead outside a Paris hotel, had left a suicide message for his wife, the Paris prosecutor’s office said.
Mthetwa’s lifeless body was found on Tuesday in the interior courtyard of the upscale Hyatt hotel.
On Monday evening, his wife had reported her husband missing to the police after receiving a message “in which he apologized to her and expressed his intention to end his life,” prosecutor Laure Beccuau said in a statement.
“Initial investigations suggest that this could have been a deliberate act, without the intervention of a third party,” she said.
She emphasized the investigation would seek to collect all the details.
The ambassador, better known as Nathi Mthethwa, had booked a room on the hotel’s 22nd floor.
The safety mechanism of a window in his room had been forced open with scissors, the office had earlier said, but investigators found no signs of a struggle or traces of medication or narcotics.
58-year-old Mthethwa had been serving as ambassador to France since his appointment in December 2023.
‘A moment of deep grief’ — President Ramaphosa
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said Mthethwa’s “untimely passing” was “a moment of deep grief in which government and citizens stand beside the Mthethwa family.”
Ramaphosa said Mthwethwa had served South Africa in a number of capacities “during a lifetime that has ended prematurely and traumatically.”
South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) confirmed Mthethwa’s death in a statement and said he “was a distinguished servant of the nation, whose career was marked by dedicated service in critical ministerial portfolios, including Minister of Police and Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture.”
DIRCO said the circumstances of Mthethwa’s “untimely death” were being investigated by French authorities.
Leading military chiefs have lashed out at Pete Hegseth’s plan to overhaul the country’s defense strategy, according to a report.
Multiple Pentagon leaders, including Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have raised concerns about the proposals set out by the self-styled “secretary of war.” The plans could be confirmed at an unprecedented meeting in Virginia on Tuesday to which former Fox News host Hegseth has summoned hundreds of generals and admirals, according to a report in The Washington Post.
The issue stems from Hegseth’s plans to rewrite the National Defense Strategy (NDS) to list homeland defense as the nation’s top priority—rather than continuing to focus on global security threats from China, as it has for years—and to reduce the U.S. military presence in Europe and Africa.
Sources close to the rewriting of the NDS, which lays out U.S. military planning and strategy, told the Post that there are growing concerns within the military that Hegseth’s proposals are short-sighted and “potentially irrelevant” given Donald Trump’s often unpredictable and sometimes contradictory approach to foreign policy.
Caine has openly raised his objections to the plans with other Pentagon leaders, including policy chief Elbridge Colby, according to unnamed sources.
“He gave Hegseth very frank feedback,” one source told the Post. “I don’t know if Hegseth even understands the magnitude of the NDS, which is why I think Caine tried so hard.”
Caine is said to have wanted the NDS to remain focused on deterring and potentially defeating China in a conflict. Hegseth’s draft strategy does still mention China, but primarily in the context of its aggression toward Taiwan, according to the Post. Colby has also long feared that the U.S. is underprepared if China were to attack the country.
“There’s a concern that it’s just not very well thought out,” one former official told the newspaper about Hegseth’s China strategy.
Hegseth is also signalling that the Pentagon will move U.S. forces out of Europe, a move that could frustrate allies given Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Moscow’s incursions into NATO airspace.
The fallout from the NDS and chaos surrounding the Virginia meeting is the latest headache that Hegseth has caused during his tenure as Pentagon chief.
It was revealed that the former Fox News host is crumbling under the pressure of leading the Department of Defense, with insiders now complaining about his behavior. This includes being “obsessed” with his own security and appearing uncomfortable and fidgety during meetings.
“There’s a manic quality about him. Or let me rephrase, an even more manic quality, which is really saying something,” a source told the Daily Mail. “Dude is crawling out of his skin,” a second insider added.
“Secretary Hegseth has tasked the development of a National Defense Strategy that is laser focused on advancing President Trump’s commonsense America First, Peace Through Strength agenda,” Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told the Post. “This process is still ongoing.”
The NDS plans are expected to be discussed during an unusual meeting on Tuesday called by Hegseth, which he demanded top officers from American bases around the world attend in person.
A family sets up a tent near a UN school used as a shelter for displaced Palestinians in Khan Younis, Tuesday, Sept 30, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
Qatar said Tuesday that further talks were needed over details of U.S. President Donald Trump’s peace plan aimed at ending the nearly two-year war in Gaza, as Hamas weighed its reply. In Gaza, Israeli forces killed at least 36 Palestinians, local hospitals said.
The comments by Qatar, a key mediator, appeared to reflect Arab countries’ discontent over the text of the 20-point plan that the White House put out after Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced they had agreed on it Monday.
Three Arab officials told The Associated Press that changes had been made in the original proposal that Arab and Muslim countries had worked out with Trump – changes in favor of Israel. The officials, who came from regional powers involved in the talks, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the behind-the-scenes diplomacy.
The depth of the Arab countries’ discontent was not clear, and they have continued to express broad support for the plan. But Qatar’s comments indicated they could seek further negotiation over some of its terms — even as Trump told reporters Tuesday that Hamas has “three or four days” to respond.
Arab mediators and Turkish officials are to meet with Hamas representatives Tuesday in Doha to discuss the plan, said Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed Al Ansari.
The plan requires Hamas to release hostages, leave power in Gaza and disarm in return for the release of Palestinian prisoners and an end to fighting. The plan guarantees the flow of humanitarian aid and promises reconstruction. But it sets no path to Palestinian statehood. For the foreseeable future, Gaza and its more than 2 million Palestinians would be under international governance through a so-called “Board of Peace,” headed by Trump and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Qatar says more discussion needed
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani said the 20 points announced by the U.S. “are principles … that require detailed discussion and how to work through them.”
Speaking to the Qatar-based TV network Al Jazeera, he pointed to the issue of the Israeli troop withdrawal from Gaza, saying it “requires clarification.”
The plan’s text said Israeli troops would withdraw only as a planned international security force is able to replace them. It also indicated Israel would keep control of a band of territory around Gaza’s perimeter.
In a statement Monday night, Qatar, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other countries backing the plan said they wanted to work out a final version that includes a “full Israeli withdrawal,” as well as a clear path to a Palestinian state that integrates the Gaza Strip and West Bank — something Netanyahu’s government fiercely opposes.
The Arab officials who spoke to the AP expressed frustration with the White House’s 20 points. “This is not what we agreed on,” said one. “This is the Netanyahu plan.”
Palestinians are skeptical
Many Palestinians in the decimated coastal enclave are wary of the proposal. To some, the international governance smacked of the colonial British Mandate that ruled Palestine from 1920 to 1948.
“They want to impose their own peace,” Umm Mohammed, a history teacher who sheltered with her family in Gaza City, said. “In fact, this is not a peace plan. It’s a surrender plan. It returns us to times of colonialism.”
Mahmoud Abu Baker, a displaced Palestinian from Rafah, said the proposal favors Israel and implements all its demands without giving concessions.
“(The proposal) tells that we, as Palestinians, as Arabs, are not qualified to rule ourselves and that they, the white people, will rule us,” he said.
Families of Israeli hostages see hope
With the peace proposal, families of Israeli hostages still held by Hamas were torn between heightened hopes and a realism that past signs of progress have fallen apart. Hamas is thought to be holding 48 hostages, 20 of whom are believed by Israel to be alive – and under the plan, they would be freed within 72 hours of both sides’ accepting the deal.
“For two years now, I have been waiting for Elkana, my husband, in endless pain,” said Rivka Bohbot, wife of hostage Elkana Bohbot, in a statement released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum.
“Now I demand that these impressive words be turned into even greater and more impressive actions — actions that bring the hostages home,” she said.
Israelis visiting a memorial for the music festival where 364 people were killed during the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, 2023, expressed skepticism.
“Everyone pins their hopes on (Trump),” said Amit Zander, whose daughter, Noa Zander, was killed at the festival. “It’s up to Hamas. Israel wants it, and beyond that, it’s no longer in our hands.”
More than 30 Palestinians killed
In the Gaza Strip, Israeli troops opened fire, killing 17 Palestinians and wounding 33 others while they were attempting to access humanitarian aid in central Gaza, according to nearby Al-Awda Hospital, where the casualties were taken. The Israeli military said troops fired when individuals approached their position “in a manner that endangered them.”
Israeli strikes in central and southern Gaza killed 19 others, according to local hospitals.
One of the strikes hit a tent housing a family that had fled Gaza City earlier this month, killing seven people, including four women and a child. Another killed a man, his 7-months-pregnant wife and their young child, Nasser Hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis said.
The Israeli military said in a statement that over the past 24 hours, its troops killed several armed militants and struck more than 160 targets of Hamas infrastructure, including weapons storage facilities and observation posts.
As Singapore pushes towards an entirely cleaner-energy vehicle population by 2040, what will happen to petrol stations and will there be enough EV chargers?
Singapore will stop registering new petrol cars by 2030. What will happen to petrol stations and will there be enough EV chargers? (Illustration: CNA/Clara Ho)
Car enthusiast Leong Yi Chong bought an internal combustion engine (ICE) car in February and hopes to extend its Certificate of Entitlement beyond the 10 years, and past 2040.
He thinks that being behind the wheel of an ICE car is a “raw, visceral” experience that driving an electric vehicle (EV) cannot replicate.
But while the 31-year-old is enjoying his ride on his second-hand 2006 Subaru Impreza WRX, he is concerned that his time with the vehicle may be cut short.
This is because plans have been made by the authorities for a total transition to cleaner-energy vehicles, such as EVs and hybrids, and a phasing out of all ICE vehicles, such as Mr Leong’s.
To this end, the commercial recruiter thinks there may be several hurdles standing in the way of these plans, and is hoping against hope that he can still drive his car post-2040.
For one, he thinks that car enthusiasts like himself will be resistant to the push towards EVs.
“Classic and performance cars form part of car culture, and EVs don’t replace that emotional connection,” he said.
And he believes there is good reason ICE cars will still be sought beyond 2030, when all new car registrations will have to be of cleaner-energy models.
He thinks that charging infrastructure may not expand quickly enough, and that certain vehicles – particularly emergency vehicles – may need to remain as ICE variants because of their superior range, faster refuelling and greater durability.
“I feel like there will always be a need for ICE vehicles, even in a cleaner environment with EVs.”
But regardless of the sentiment towards petrol cars, the numbers show that EVs are becoming more popular among Singapore motorists.
The number of EVs in Singapore has grown from 26,200 at the end of last year to 39,800 so far this year – a 52 per cent jump.
So far this year, EVs have made up about 41 per cent of new car registrations.
But amid Singapore’s strong push for a cleaner-energy vehicle population by 2040, some motorists like Mr Leong have questions on how infrastructure will change.
What will happen to petrol stations as ICE vehicles are phased out? Can EV charging infrastructure keep up with the growing demand as the EV population grows?
There is also the existential issue of car mechanics and workshops, most of whom service and repair ICE vehicles. Has this become a sunset industry as well, given the push for electrification?
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO PETROL STATIONS?
With the shift to a cleaner-energy fleet, petrol stations in Singapore – at least in their current form – will see a decline in the next 15 years, said experts.
Professor Lawrence Loh from the National University of Singapore (NUS) said that the over 180 petrol stations in Singapore are “at a crossroads now”.
According to an article published last year by the Boston Consulting Group, up to one quarter of petrol station sites may become unprofitable and need to close by 2035, in places where “EVs dominate”.
And while enhanced convenience store offerings at petrol stations could draw customers who are not visiting to refuel, the consulting firm still expects total profits for the stations to decline by 30 per cent by 2035 in EV-prevalent places.
“If one day, many (petrol station sites) are given up by the (petrol) companies, there might be certain thinking about putting them to more optimal use, the same way we are looking at converting land like golf courses to better use,” said Prof Loh, who is director at the Centre for Governance and Sustainability of NUS Business School.
But petrol stations are certainly not going to be a thing of the past anytime soon.
CNA previously reported that petrol stations have been evolving over the years to offer a more diverse range of non-fuel retail services to enhance convenience and attract more customers amid Singapore’s EV push.
The next natural question would then be – could the petrol stations be converted to fast-charging stations instead?
The expectation that all of them can be converted is unrealistic, said Prof Loh.
For one, there will be a change in how people charge their vehicles.
“Slowly, we will see a decentralisation of charging (where) progressively more sites are made available in residences, including public and private housing and work places,” he said.
This would, in turn, moderate demand for centralised charging facilities, he said.
Transport economist Walter Theseira said that the fast charging “petrol station” model is unlikely to “ever make much sense in Singapore”.
This is because it is cheaper for users to have the vast majority of their charging done using slow charging, which is supplied at the EV owner’s home car park and malls, among other places.
“Thus, with widespread slow charging, fast charging ‘petrol stations’ will simply be uneconomical for most users,” said Assoc Prof Theseira, who is from the Singapore University of Social Sciences’ School of Business.
Instead, it will be more applicable to commercial operators, such as private-hire drivers, who need to charge during the day because they may drive more than their battery capacity each day.
The conversion of the petrol station sites to other uses will also be challenging, according to one environmental expert.
Conservation ecologist Rachel Oh said that the process of decommissioning a petrol station involves a site assessment and pollution survey, followed by the removal of underground tanks and pipes, excavation of contaminated soil, and the soil’s subsequent treatment.
An incomplete decontamination of the land will eventually have “significantly adverse impacts on our health and economy”, said Dr Oh, who is a research assistant professor at the NUS Department of Geography.
For instance, toxic compounds can leach onto the soil and groundwater or even into the air in vapour form, and long-term exposure can lead to increased risk of chronic health conditions, such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.
If residual fuels are not properly managed, they can also become fire or explosion hazards.
“Contaminated sites (can) become costly and time-intensive barriers to redevelopment, as complex remediation is required before land can be safely repurposed for housing, community facilities or other uses,” said Dr Oh.
Responding to queries from CNA, an Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) spokesperson said factors such as the growing adoption of EVs are taken into consideration when studying the adaptation of petrol station sites for alternative use.
“For example, many petrol station operators have proactively responded to EV trends and deployed EV chargers to provide charging services to EVs,” said the spokesperson.
URA added that relevant agencies will provide guidance on the necessary measures to ensure that petrol station sites are fit for their intended use.
CAN THE POWER GRID COPE?
With the target of 60,000 charging points deployed islandwide by 2030, Singapore is nearly halfway there, with 24,000 charging points installed as of September, according to the Land Transport Authority (LTA).
But with the 60,000 target being over two times the latest figure, how will Singapore’s energy grid hold up?
Responding to CNA’s queries, LTA and the Energy Market Authority (EMA) said that studies are currently underway to determine the impact of increased EV adoption and the installation of more chargers on Singapore’s energy infrastructure.
An “infrastructure augmentation” will be phased over the next 20 years and take into account EV charger technology improvements, and insights on charging behaviour gathered through early EV deployment.
Professor Dipti Srinivasan, who heads the Centre for Green Energy Management and Smart Grid at NUS, said that the 60,000 target will likely not be the final target, and there would be even more demand for chargers heading into 2040 as all cars become cleaner-energy variants.
“The full electrification of transportation will inevitably raise electricity demand, with the biggest challenge being the surge in peak load if many EV owners plug in simultaneously after work,” she said.
She added that addressing this issue requires more than just expanding the generation of energy.
“It calls for smart charging technologies that stagger charging rates and times through intelligent algorithms, allowing the grid to safely oversubscribe infrastructure while flattening demand peaks,” said Prof Srinivasan.
To that end, LTA and EMA stated that the possibility of smart charging is also being explored.
Possible solutions include the use of smart controllers, switches and algorithms to vary EV charging schedules, volumes and speeds, which reduces the impact on the power grid.
“Passive and active EV charger provisions” have been mandated for specified building and electrical works, to lower the cost of future retrofits associated with EV charging provision, LTA and EMA said.
Passive provisions refer to installing infrastructure, such as wiring, so chargers can be added later, while active provisions mean installing the EV charging points immediately.
And while the push to deploy more chargers is underway, EV charging companies said that they have an eye on future developments as well.
Charge+ chief executive officer Goh Chee Kiong said the firm takes a “future-ready approach” by continually evaluating new technologies and software innovations, while keeping its infrastructure flexible and scalable.
“This ensures we can integrate emerging solutions such as smart energy management without disruption,” said Mr Goh, whose firm has 4,000 charging points across Singapore.
Likewise, Mr Freddie Chew, general manager of ComfortDelGro ENGIE, said that the firm is “right-sizing” charger deployments to match the current and forecasted demand.
Doing so helps ensure charger efficiency and readiness to adopt the latest technologies as the firm, which currently has over 1,600 charging points in Singapore, scales.
“Over-deployment, on the other hand, can result in idle infrastructure that unnecessarily burdens the power grid,” said Mr Chew.
An LTA spokesperson said that it is “closely monitoring emerging clean energy solutions and remains open to facilitating other forms of charging technologies”.
“As these technologies become more commercially viable, we will work with industry and stakeholders to pilot and evaluate their potential for wider adoption.”
WHAT ABOUT CAR WORKSHOPS?
With the electrification of Singapore’s vehicle population, car workshops – most of which focus on ICE repairs – face the same uncertain future as gas stations.
Even as workshops look to pivot to EV repair, it was previously reported that there has been a shortage of skilled mechanics who understand the basics of EVs.
Associate Professor Raymond Ong said that the repairs for EVs are different from those of ICE vehicles, as each EV model requires a different set of skills to repair.
This means that EV distributors have direct partnerships with car workshops to get their technicians and engineers trained in repairing the specific vehicle models.
“This is going to render current workshop owners obsolete if they do not try to upskill or upgrade themselves or even get into a partnership with EV manufacturers,” said Assoc Prof Ong, who is the deputy head of research in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at NUS.
Echoing these concerns, Mr Joey Lim, president of the Singapore Motor Workshop Association (SMWA), said that work is underway to retrain the workforce to handle EVs.
However, the progress has been slow as there is a skills mismatch.
“Electrical engineering needs a lot more mathematics and physics calculations,” said Mr Lim.
He added that in general, EVs also have about 60 to 70 per cent fewer repair and maintenance tasks than ICE vehicles.
“So, if all the vehicles were to change to EV, then 60 to 70 per cent of the mechanical shops that handle engine, transmission and undercarriage repairs will have to close,” he said.
The upskilling of technicians to cater to the growing EV population is an important step in the technological transition, said the LTA spokesperson.
“We have been encouraging industry partners to prepare and equip a pool of technicians with the necessary skills to maintain this growing population of EVs,” the spokesperson said.
LTA said that existing automotive technicians can tap training programmes such as the National EV Specialist Safety certification that are recognised under the Singapore Workforce Skills Qualifications national credential system to “equip themselves with the fundamental knowledge on EV safety”.
“LTA will continue to work closely with our partners to grow the EV ecosystem and build a forward-looking land transport sector for Singapore.”
Not all workshop operations will be impacted, said Assoc Prof Theseira.
While the system that generates power to the car is new, he noted that mechanical repairs are largely the same between EVs and non-EVs.
“Thus, a significant part of the business, dealing with matters like suspensions, steering, brakes, lights, etc, is repairable with conventional existing skills,” he said.
Nina Kutina, 40, and her minor daughters made global headlines after they were rescued by a police team in July
A Russian woman who made global headlines after being found living in a cave in India with her two young daughters has flown back to her country, an official told the BBC.
Nina Kutina, 40, and her daughters – aged six and five – were rescued on 9 July by policemen on a routine patrol in a forest in the southern state of Karnataka.
The woman, who did not have valid documents to stay in India, had been sent to a foreigners’ detention centre along with her daughters.
Last week, the Karnataka high court asked the federal government to issue documents to Ms Kutina and her daughters to return home.
They left for Russia on 28 September, an official at the Foreigners’ Regional Registration Office (FRRO), who wanted to stay anonymous, told BBC Hindi. Ms Kutina’s minor son from another relationship, who was later found living in Goa state, also went with them.
The high court had been hearing a petition filed by Dror Shlomo Goldstein, an Israeli businessman living in Goa, who said he was the father of the two minor girls. He had asked the court to stop the children from being sent back to Russia and appealed for their custody.
Mr Goldstein hasn’t commented on the court order yet. He has the option to appeal against it, but it’s not clear whether a judgment in his favour could compel the children to be sent back to India.
Mr Goldstein had earlier told a TV channel that Ms Kutina had left Goa without informing him and that he had filed a police complaint. He also said that he had been “providing for their [the woman and the two minor girls] well-being for a long time”.
In the order, the court however said that despite Mr Goldstein’s claims, the mum and the children had “rather inexplicably” been “found in an isolated cave”.
The court also said that Mr Goldstein could not explain why they had been living in the cave “until they were found there and the authorities began [taking] action for their rehabilitation”.
The police team that found the three had earlier said they were on a routine patrol near Ramteertha hills in the Gokarna forest, which borders the tourist paradise of Goa, when they spotted brightly coloured clothes hung near a cave.
When they got closer – the entrance to the cave had been curtained off with brightly coloured saris – they saw a “little blonde girl” running out. When the shocked policemen followed her inside, they found Ms Kutina and the other child.
The three of them had meagre possessions – plastic mats, clothes, packets of instant noodles and some other grocery items – and the cave was leaking.
The police told the BBC in July that they had a tough time convincing the mother that it was dangerous to stay in the isolated location with snakes and wild animals in the forest. The police quoted her as saying: “Animals and snakes are our friends. Humans are dangerous.”
Police said she told them that they had been living in the cave for a week when they were found. She also told the police that she came to Karnataka from Goa where she also claimed to have lived in a cave. She said that her youngest daughter was born in a Goa cave.
Ms Kutina had defended her lifestyle in video interviews to Indian news agency ANI, saying she and her children were happy living like that and that “nature gives good health”.
The police, however, said that they could not take any chances as the area was prone to landslides during the monsoon season.
Ms Kutina and her daughters were taken for a medical examination and then shifted to a detention centre.
Mr Goldstein’s lawyer, Beena PK, argued in court that deportation would not be in the interests of the children, citing India being a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and provisions of the Goa Children Act, 2003.
A sunscreen scandal in Australia is continuing to grow, with 18 products now pulled from shelves in the skin cancer hotspot over safety concerns.
Analysis by a consumer advocacy group in June found several popular and expensive sunscreens did not provide the protection claimed by their makers.
One product, Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen Skinscreen, is supposed to offer a skin protection factor (SPF) of 50+ but instead returned a result of SPF 4 and was voluntarily recalled in August.
An investigation by the medicines regulator has now warned about 20 more sunscreens from other brands, which share the same base formula, and raised “significant concerns” about a testing laboratory.
“The preliminary testing indicates that this base formulation is unlikely to have an SPF greater than 21,” the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) said in an update, adding that for some of the goods the SPF rating may be as low as four.
Of the 21 products it named, eight have been recalled or manufacture stopped completely. The sale of another 10 products have been paused, and two more are being reviewed. One product named by the TGA is made in Australia but is not sold in the country.
Australia has the highest rate of skin cancers in the world – it is estimated that two out of three Australians will have at least one cut out in their lifetime – and it has some of the strictest sunscreen regulations globally.
The scandal has caused a massive backlash from customers in the nation, but experts have warned it may also have global implications. Problems have been identified with both the manufacture of some sunscreens and the integrity of lab testing relied upon to prove their SPF claims.
The manufacturer of the base formula in question, Wild Child Laboratories Pty Ltd, has stopped making it as a result, the TGA said.
In a statement, Wild Child Laboratories boss Tom Curnow said the TGA had found no manufacturing issues at its facility.
“The discrepancies reported in recent testing are part of a broader, industry-wide issue,” he said.
The TGA has previously said it is looking into “reviewing existing SPF testing requirements” which can be “highly subjective”, but in the update on Tuesday said it had significant concerns about testing undertaken by Princeton Consumer Research Corp (PCR Corp), a US lab.
The national Black Lives Matter movement claims $33.4 million of its cash is being withheld by one of its progressive partner organizations, The Post has learned.
In a scathing lawsuit, Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation accuse the Tides foundation — backed by George Soros — of alleged “deceptive business practices” as well as “egregious mismanagement” of its money, while demanding its return.
The lawsuit was filed last year, but the stakes were raised on Monday when the BLMGNF — which oversees its other regional operations — asked the California Attorney General to step in and investigate Tides.
The national chapter of Black Lives Matter says that Tides Foundation has used millions of its contributions to fund their legal defense in the suit brought against them by the civil rights group. Getty Images
Even during the course of the lawsuit, BLMGNF accuses Tides of spending $6 million of their donations, despite promising to freeze any cash belonging to the group during the litigation, according to one of their lawyers.
“My client now has to pay money just to get their own money back, after my client raised 100% of it,” said Lawrence Segal, representing BLMGNF.
Segal claimed the BLM money may even have been used by Tides to fund their defense against them.
“More than $1 million has been spent by Tides out of my client’s money just on attorney’s fees —possibly to pay their own lawyers,” said Segal. “It appears that they are paying themselves from charitable donations in order to pay the legal fees that resulted from this case.”
BLMGNF began its relationship with Tides soon after it set up its movement in 2013.
Because the fledgling group was not a tax exempt charity at the time, it needed a fiscal sponsor to distribute the money it received from anonymous donors to other organizations, and selected Tides to do so.
Things got complicated after huge amounts of money poured in following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020, with BLM taking in some $90 million in donations between 2020 and 2022.
However, that was a drop in the ocean to Tides, which oversees more than $1.4 billion in cash from myriad nonprofits, but commingles all funds, the lawsuit claims. That makes it difficult for groups like BLMGNF to monitor where their cash is going, legal papers say.
“TIDES does not segregate monies,” Segal told The Post. “All of my client’s money is apparently commingled in one giant account. Tides’ fiscal sponsorships are very loosely regulated, at best.”
Tides did not return a request for comment from The Post. The group has previously called the lawsuit “completely false” and defended their actions, saying: “BLMGNF’s lawsuit seeks to circumvent the intent of the Fund’s donors and deprive grassroots Black Lives Matter chapters critical resources, for its own benefit.”
BLMGNF have also been criticized for how they have handled donations. Out of the $90 million windfall in donations following Floyds’ death, it only gave out about $30 million for charitable purposes in the next two years.
Another $22 million went on expenses including salaries and investments.
Patrisse Cullors, a cofounder of the group, went on a real estate spending spree, The Post revealed in April, 2021.
Cullors, who maintained she did not use BLMGNF donations to make the real estate purchases, resigned a month after that story.
One of her brothers, Paul Cullors, is still associated with BLMGNF, taking in more than $200,000 a year as “head of security,” federal filings show.
In addition to the lawsuit, Tides has been under fire by the Congressional Ways and Means Committee for acting as a conduit for contributions for nonprofits that organized anti-Israel protests on Ivy League campuses following the Oct. 7th Hamas terror attacks on Israel.
Last year, Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), chair of the committee, demanded that the IRS revoke Tides’ nonprofit status. The group acted as a conduit for donations from groups such as the People’s Forum, Students for Justice in Palestine and the Adalah Justice Project, he said.
A striking element of the settlement is the allocation of $22 million to the Trust for the National Mall.
US President Donald Trump. (AFP photo)
Google-owned YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump over the suspension of his account in 2021. The ban was imposed in the aftermath of the Capitol riots, when major social media platforms, citing the risk of incitement, removed Trump from their services. The settlement closes a years-long legal battle that tested the boundaries of political speech, platform accountability, and the rights of private companies to moderate content.
John Coale, Trump’s lawyer in the social media cases, as quoted by Bloomberg, said, “I’m happy, the President is happy to get this resolved.” Google, YouTube’s parent company, declined to comment.
$22 million for White House ballroom project
A particularly striking element of the agreement is that $22 million of the payout will be directed to the Trust for the National Mall. The funds are earmarked for the construction of a new ballroom at the White House, designed in the style of the grand reception halls at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.
This echoes earlier settlements where Trump channelled large portions of compensation into legacy projects. In January, Meta Platforms agreed to pay $25 million, of which $22 million went towards a Trump presidential library.
Trump’s past settlements with other social media platforms
Since regaining the presidency last November, Trump has secured favourable outcomes with several major technology and media companies he accused of mistreating him. In February, he ended his legal fight with Twitter, now known as X, with reports suggesting a settlement worth around $10 million.
Trump had originally sued Google, Facebook, and Twitter jointly, seeking damages not only for himself but also to establish legal limits on platforms’ ability to ban or flag users. Though courts consistently ruled that social media companies retain broad First Amendment rights to regulate content, Trump continued to press his claims until settlements were reached.
Google’s legal landscape
The settlement comes at a sensitive moment for Google, which is fighting a series of antitrust cases brought by the US Department of Justice. Regulators have accused the company of monopolising key areas of online advertising and search. Earlier this month, however, a Washington federal judge declined to order Google to divest its Chrome browser, handing the company a significant victory.
One student died and dozens were injured in the building collapse of the school, located in Indonesia’s main island of Java.
Rescue personnel inspect the site after a building collapsed at an Islamic boarding school in Sidoarjo, East Java province on September 29, 2025.(AFP)
At least 65 students were presumed to be buried under rubble after the under-construction building of an Islamic school in Indonesia collapsed. the Associated Press reported.
One student died and dozens were injured in the building collapse of the school, located in Indonesia’s main island of Java, AFP quoted a police official as saying.
The multi-storeyed building of the Al Khoziny Islamic boarding school in the town of Sidoarjo collapsed when more than 100 students had assembled for afternoon prayers, state news agency Antara reported citing a witness.
Following the incident, more than 79 students were evacuated by rescuers, AFP quoted East Java police spokesman Jules Abraham Abast as saying.
The spokesman said that one victim had died, while citing information from the hospital. However, Jules did not disclose further details, saying the authorities were trying to determine how many victims were at the spot of the incident, according to AFP.
Jules said that the police was “actively communicating with relevant parties”, including the school authorities, to establish the exact number of victims “who are still or may still be trapped in the rubble.”
The school, which was under construction, already had three floors. “The plan was to have four floors with a flat roof,” Abdus Salam Mujib, one of the heads of the school, said.
He said that the building had collapsed after workers poured concrete for the third floor. Mujib added that while the upper levels of the school was being used for classrooms and student activities, the lower floor was the prayer room.
The notification is another positive step forward in repairing India-Canada ties after an all-out diplomatic war in the final months of Justin Trudeau’s prime ministership.
Mob boss Lawrence Bishnoi and his gang – linked to murder, extortion, and arms and drugs trafficking in India and abroad – has been declared a ‘terrorist entity’ by Canada under its Criminal Code, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree said Monday evening.
This means any Bishnoi gang asset in that country, from cash to vehicles and property, can be frozen or seized, giving Canadian law enforcement more (and sharper) teeth to prosecute gang members for various offences, including those related to financing of terrorist activities.
It also means immigration officials can deny suspected gang members entry into Canada.
“Acts of violence and terror have no place in Canada, especially those that target specific communities to create a climate of fear and intimidation,” a government statement said.
Under Canadian law, it is now a criminal offence for a Canadian citizen, and those abroad, to knowingly deal with property owned or controlled by the Bishnoi gang. It is also a criminal offence to directly or indirectly provide property knowing it will be used by or benefit the gang.
The notification – another step forward in repairing India-Canada ties after an all-out diplomatic war in the final months of Justin Trudeau’s prime ministership – comes a month after a Canadian MP, Frank Caputo, urged Anandasangaree to slap the ‘terrorist’ tag on Bishnoi.
Caputo, the shadow Public Safety Minister, wrote to Anandasangaree to highlight Bishnoi’s vast criminal empire and said it was guilty of assassinations and the extortion of Canadian citizens, and engaged in such illegal activities for “political, religious, and ideological reasons”.
“The Bishnoi gang’s activities lay the groundwork for listing it as a terrorist entity. As you know, they have taken credit for vast violence in Canada and abroad,” he said in the letter shared on X.
He also pointed to appeals by four other Canadian politicians, including Patrick Brown, the Mayor of Brampton, which is home to about 20 per cent of Canada’s Sikh population.
British Columbia Premier David Eby and his Alberta counterpart, Danielle Smith, as well as Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke, have also called for the Lawrence Bishnoi gang to be taken down.
The Canadian government has frequently named the Bishnoi gang as one of the more nefarious criminal syndicates in that country, and has also linked it to arms and drugs trafficking.
Lawrence Bishnoi – who split from Goldy Brar, an associate who ran his Canada ops, in June – and his gang of criminals and assassins have been linked to various murders since the headline-grabbing killing of Punjabi singer Sidhu Moose Wala in May 2022.
That list includes the December 2023 murder of Rajput leader Sukhdev Gogamedi and the October 2024 killing of Maharashtra politician Baba Siddique, as well as firing outside the home of Bollywood star Salman Khan – targeted over the 1999 blackbuck case – in April 2025.
But it was the killing of Hardeep Nijjar, a pro-Khalistani figure, in June 2023 that cemented the gang’s international ‘credentials’. Nijjar was a Canadian citizen, and his killing sparked a diplomatic row; Trudeau had claimed – without proof – the Indian government was involved.
The U.S. Capitol is seen as a looming partial government shutdown is a week away if Congress fails to fund the government, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 24, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard Purchase Licensing Rights
President Donald Trump’s administration started detailing its plans on Monday for which services it will pause if the federal government shuts down this week, with the U.S. health department slated to furlough 41% of its workforce.
The impending shutdown will be different from past government closures because the administration has threatened mass firings, of federal staff, adding that it could use the lapse in funding to downsize the federal government.
The Office of Personnel Management in a Monday memo said while training and onboarding of new federal employees is not allowed under the law dictating the parameters of a shutdown, the employees who oversee any firings are to continue their work. Unlike in past shutdowns, furloughed federal employees will also be allowed to use their government-issued computers to check for layoff notices in their email, according to OPM.
“This outrageous plan threatens to cause lasting damage to the country and the safety of the American people by mass firing nonpartisan, expert civil servants and potentially even eliminating government agencies,” Senator Gary Peters of Michigan, the top Democrat on the Senate committee that oversees shutdown operations, said in a letter to the administration.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it will not admit new patients to its clinical research studies and limit health-related communications to the public if the government shuts down. The U.S. Labor Department said, it would suspend economic data releases in a shutdown, including the closely watched monthly employment report for September.
Republicans, who control both chambers of Congress, and the minority Democrats have not reached an agreement on a stopgap funding bill to avert a Wednesday shutdown. Congressional leaders are set to meet with Trump on Monday.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
FIRING ALLOWED, TRAINING PROHIBITED
Shutdown operations are dictated by a 19th-century law that prohibits federal government operations in areas of the government where there is not approved federal funding from Congress. There are certain exceptions, as is the case for national security purposes and to protect life and property.
Crucial government benefits paid for by mandatory spending, like Social Security payments for senior citizens and healthcare access through Medicare and Medicaid, are not hit. Federal student loans and Pell grants for students in financial need also continue.
In previous years, the plans for how federal agencies would respond to a shutdown were made available to the public and to Congress weeks before a lapse of government funding, but many departments this year released their plans within the last 24 hours.
The Department of Labor said in its plan the Bureau of Labor Statistics “will suspend all operations” and that economic data scheduled during a funding lapse will not be released.
Some of the other publicly available plans are similar to previous shutdown plans from other administrations, however, the staffing data included shows the impact of the Trump administration’s layoffs, firings, and early retirement offerings. There are about 12,000 fewer full-time employees at the Health and Human Services Department compared with last year and about 1,700 fewer employees at the Education Department than in 2024, according to the plans.
Mobile internet and satellite TV have been severely disrupted across Afghanistan
The Taliban government in Afghanistan has imposed a nationwide shutdown of telecommunications, weeks after it began severing fibre-optic internet connections.
The country is currently experiencing a “total internet blackout”, internet watchdog Netblocks reports.
International news agencies say they have lost contact with offices in the capital Kabul. Mobile internet and satellite TV have also been severely disrupted across Afghanistan.
The Taliban have yet to give an official reason for the shutdown. Since seizing power in 2021, the Taliban have imposed numerous restrictions in accordance with their interpretation of Islamic Sharia law.
A Taliban official said the telecom shutdown would last until further notice.
Tolo News, a privately owned Afghan news channel, told people to follow its social media pages for updates as it expected disruptions to its television and radio networks.
Flights from Kabul airport have also been disrupted, local media reported.
According to Flight tracking service Flightradar24, at least eight flights scheduled to depart from or arrive at Kabul International Airport on Tuesday have been cancelled.
Diplomatic officials have told the BBC that the internet cuts could affect banking and e-commerce systems nationwide.
Several people in Kabul have told the BBC that their fibre-optic internet stopped working towards the end of the working day, around 17:00 local time (12:30 GMT)
Because of this, it is understood many people will not notice the impact until Tuesday morning, when banking services and other businesses are due to resume.
Fibre-optic cables transfer data super fast, and are used for much of the world’s internet.
The BBC understands that a committee in Kabul has been tasked to examine potentially “filtering” fibre-optic internet in order to “prevent immoralities”. The committee would also determine whether the fibre-optic ban would be enforced across the country, they said.
In a post on social network Mastodon.social, Netblocks said:
“Afghanistan is now in the midst of a total internet blackout as Taliban authorities move to implement morality measures, with multiple networks disconnected through the morning in a stepwise manner; telephone services are currently also impacted”.
For weeks internet users in several Afghan provinces have been complaining about either slow internet access or no connectivity.
Several residents, who requested anonymity, previously told the BBC that their businesses and lives had been seriously affected by the internet cuts.
A man who works as a money changer in Takhar province said that his daughters’ online English classes were disrupted. “Their last opportunity to study and stay engaged is now gone,” he said.
Another woman previously told the BBC that she could not attend online classes since her home internet was cut off. “I had hoped to finish my studies and find an online job, but that dream has also been destroyed,” she said. “Without internet access, I don’t know what will happen next.”
Hamid Haidari, former editor-in-chief of Afghan news channel 1TV, said on Monday that “loneliness enveloped the entire country” after the shutdown.
“Afghanistan has now officially taken first place in the competition with North Korea for [internet] disconnection” he said on X.
“The silence online without Afghan voices from inside Afghanistan is deafening,” Mariam Solaimankhil, a former member of Afghanistan’s parliament now based in the US, wrote in a post tagging X owner Elon Musk.
A spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Balkh wrote on X earlier this month that the ban on fibre-optic internet was meant to curb “evils”. He added that authorities would explore alternatives.
The blackout is the latest in a series of restrictions which the Taliban have enforced since returning to power.
Earlier this month they removed books written by women from the country’s university teaching system as part of a new ban which has also outlawed the teaching of human rights and sexual harassment.
Zhimin Qian, also known as Yadi Zhang, was convicted on Monday
A Chinese national has been convicted following an international fraud investigation which resulted in what’s believed to be the single largest cryptocurrency seizure in the world.
The Metropolitan Police says it recovered 61,000 bitcoin worth more than £5bn ($6.7bn) in current prices.
Zhimin Qian, also known as Yadi Zhang, pleaded guilty on Monday at Southwark Crown Court of illegally acquiring and possessing the cryptocurrency.
Between 2014 and 2017 she led a large-scale scam in China which involved cheating more than 128,000 victims and storing the stolen funds in bitcoin assets, the Met said in a statement.
It said the 47-year-old’s guilty plea followed a seven-year probe into a global money laundering web which began when it got a tipoff about the transfer of criminal assets.
Qian had been “evading justice” for five years up to her arrest, which required a complex investigation involving multiple jurisdictions, said Detective Sergeant Isabella Grotto, who led the Met’s investigation.
She fled China using false documents and entered the UK, where she attempted to launder the stolen money by buying property, said the Met.
“By pleading guilty today, Ms Zhang hopes to bring some comfort to investors who have waited since 2017 for compensation, and to reassure them that the significant rise in cryptocurrency values means there are more than sufficient funds available to repay their losses,” said Qian’s solicitor Roger Sahota, of Berkeley Square Solicitors.
But some reports have suggested the UK government will seek to retain the seized funds.
The BBC has approached the Treasury and the Home Office for a response.
Reforms to crime legislation under the previous Conservative government aimed to make it easier for the UK authorities to seize, freeze and recover crypto assets.
The changes would also allow some victims to apply for the release of their assets held in accounts.
‘The goddess of wealth’
Qian had help from a Chinese takeaway worker named Jian Wen, who was jailed for six years and eight months last year for her part in the criminal operation.
Wen, 44, laundered the proceeds from the scam and moved from living above a restaurant to a “multi-million pound rented house” in north London, said the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) earlier this year.
She also bought two properties in Dubai worth more than £500,000, the CPS said.
The Met said it seized more than £300m worth of bitcoin from Wen.
Chinese media outlet Lifeweek reported in 2024 that investors, mostly between 50 and 75 years old, had poured “hundreds of thousands to tens of millions” of yuan into investments promoted by Qian.
Some of the victims – including business people, bank employees and members of the judiciary – were reportedly urged to invest with Qian’s scheme by friends and family.
The investors reportedly knew little about Qian, who was described as “the goddess of wealth”.
“Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are increasingly being used by organised criminals to disguise and transfer assets, so that fraudsters may enjoy the benefits of their criminal conduct,” said deputy chief Crown prosecutor, Robin Weyell.
Vijay, one of the most bankable stars in Tamil cinema, launched his political party last year
An Indian superstar-turned-politician is at the centre of a massive row after 40 people died in a crush at his party’s rally on Saturday.
Tens of thousands of people turned up at the campaign event held by Vijay in Karur district in Tamil Nadu state. The actor was in the middle of his speech when the crowd surged suddenly.
The tragedy has sparked a blame game, with the opposition accusing government officials of not deploying enough police personnel to control crowds.
Police officials have said that the rally’s organisers, who are from Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) party, underestimated the anticipated crowd size and did not take enough precautions.
Who is Vijay?
With an acting career spanning decades, 51-year-old Vijay is one of the most popular actors in Tamil Nadu.
Over the years, he has worked his way up to becoming one of the most bankable stars, with even films panned by critics becoming massive box-office hits.
Born Joseph Vijay Chandrasekhar to a film director father and singer mother, he acted in several films as a child.
Vijay first played the hero in 1992’s Naalaiya Theerpu, directed by his father. The film, about a group of college students taking on a corrupt businessman, was a flop but as the news website Scroll put it, it sowed the “seeds of Vijay’s carefully crafted screen persona as the man with the solution to Tamil Nadu’s problems”.
He then appeared in several romances and comedies – many of them box-office hits – and became a familiar face for audiences. His smooth dance moves in particular won him many fans.
Over the years, he starred in many superhit action thrillers, including Ghilli (2004), Pokkiri (2007), Thuppakki (2012) and Kaththi (2014) where he displayed easy chemistry with his heroines and cool action mannerisms.
His fans called him Ilaya Thalapathy, or Young Commander – most huge Tamil stars have fan-approved monikers like these.
Whenever a new Vijay film would release, fans would turn out at cinema halls in droves to celebrate and support him.
Over the past few years, even films which got bad critical reviews, such as Beast (2022) and The Greatest of All Time (2024), have become box-office hits.
After the success of Beast, the Indian Express wrote that Vijay’s “stardom has reached a point, where even his most unimaginative, unoriginal and unamusing movie could bring in global box office receipts of upwards of 2bn rupees ($22.5m; £16.7m)”.
Why did he join politics?
There had been speculation around Vijay’s political entry for years – a fan club he launched gave a creditable performance in the 2021 local elections. He had also made several statements over the years that were interpreted as having political undertones.
But his decision to quit acting to enter full-time politics still took fans by surprise. He has said that Jana Nayagan, set to release early next year, will be his last film.
It’s common for film stars in India’s southern states to join politics, as they bank on their popularity and mass appeal to translate into electoral dividends.
The biggest example in Tamil Nadu is MG Ramachandran, popularly known as MGR, who joined the state’s ruling party Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) in 1953 at the peak of his stardom.
In 1972, he had a fallout with the DMK and founded his own party, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), and went on to serve as the chief minister from 1977 until his death in 1987.
The late J Jayalalithaa – one of MGR’s most successful co-stars – followed in his footsteps – joining and eventually leading the AIADMK after his death.
She served as the chief minister of Tamil Nadu for six terms.
But not all forays into politics by film stars have translated into electoral success.
Kamal Haasan, a legendary Tamil actor who has done more than 200 films across Indian film industries, launched his party Makkal Needhi Maiam in 2018, declaring his intent to challenge the dominance of the DMK and AIADMK in the state. But his party is yet to win a parliamentary or assembly seat.
Rajinikanth, one of Tamil cinema’s biggest icons, long flirted with the idea of joining politics before finally announcing in 2020 that he wouldn’t do so.
Critics argue that despite their massive popularity, celebrity-led parties often lack grassroots experience, limiting their success.
Since Vijay launched his party last year, his rallies have drawn massive crowds, with tens of thousands of people jostling to see the star and get a selfie with him.
“It’s rare to see thousands of people waiting for more than 10 hours under the scorching sun to get one glimpse of an actor-turned-politician,” says Anbarasan Ethirajan, the BBC’s Global Affairs reporter who follows Tamil Nadu’s politics closely. He adds that the massive crowds at Vijay’s rallies are reminiscent of the MGR years, when fans would jostle to see the superstar.
But Vijay’s rivals have also questioned his lack of political experience and criticised some of his statements as vague.
What will happen now?
Crushes at political rallies are common in India, often leading to blame games between the organisers and authorities.
In Vijay’s case, his fans allege that his party was denied permission to hold the event at a safer venue.
State officials deny this and claim the venue was approved by the party, BBC Tamil reports.
There have been some calls even to arrest Vijay, but given his immense popularity, the DMK-led Tamil Nadu government is treading cautiously.
A one-member commission of inquiry has been set up to investigate the cause of the crush. The state’s Chief Minister MK Stalin has promised action on the commission’s report within two months.
Meanwhile, TVK has approached the Madras High Court, seeking a federal investigation into the incident. The court is scheduled to hear the case on Monday.
Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban may have dropped hints that they were headed toward splitsville before their bombshell separation news broke.
Insiders told Page Six on Monday that the actress attempted to save her and the country singer’s 19-year marriage and didn’t want to separate.
The source shared that the relationship ran its course, while another insider told TMZ that they’ve been living in different homes in Nashville, Tenn., “since the beginning of summer.”
Nicole Kidman and her estranged husband, Keith Urban, may have dropped hints that they were separated before Page Six confirmed the news. Penske Media via Getty Images
Per the outlet, Kidman, 58, has been “holding the family together” by looking after her and Urban’s daughters, Sunday Rose, 17, and Faith Margaret, 14.
Leading up to the shocking news, the exes may have subtly revealed there was trouble in paradise with recent interviews and social media snubs.
No recent public appearances
Kidman and Urban, 57, were last photographed together at a Los Angeles Football Club match in Nashville on June 20.
The “Moulin Rouge” star and the “Let It Roll” singer appeared in good spirits while chatting in a secluded section at GEODIS Park.
Before then, they stepped out at the 2025 Country Music Awards in Frisco, Texas, on May 8.
At the time, Kidman and Urban appeared head-over-heels for each other while giggling and holding hands in the audience.
Social media snubs
Kidman shared an inside look at her summer with her kids via Instagram in August, though Urban was noticeably missing.
Several photos showed the “Babygirl” star vacationing, taking a dive in the ocean and walking around a carnival.
“Summer memories ❤️ Now back to school ✨,” she captioned the snap.
The last time Kidman shared a photo with Urban on social media was for their 19th wedding anniversary in June.
They were seen cozied up together in the black and white snap while the “Fighter” singer’s guitar hung from his neck strap.
“Happy Anniversary Baby ❤️,” the actress captioned the photo.
Urban, meanwhile, hasn’t featured his estranged wife on social media since the Country Music Awards in May.
Urban ends interview over question about Kidman’s sex scenes
In July, Urban abruptly ended a Zoom interview with “Hayley & Max in the Morning” when he was asked about Kidman and Zac Efron’s steamy scene in the 2024 Netflix film “A Family Affair.”
“What does Keith Urban think when he sees his beautiful wife with beautiful younger men like Zac Efron having these beautiful love scenes on TV?” co-host Max Burford asked.
The “We Were” singer, however, didn’t respond, and a producer shared that he had “disconnected from Zoom.”
“I think his team hung up on us because they didn’t want us to ask that question,” the producer said.
“He doesn’t like talking about his wife,” co-host Hayley Peterson chimed in.
Kidman is focusing on new projects
Earlier this month, Kidman shared that she and her bestie Reese Witherspoon have big plans to bring Hollywood to Nashville.
During a Q&A at Nashville’s Film Festival, the “Hours” star said, “There is so much room here for production.”
“The crews are fantastic and the actors, and the people, all of … I feel that it’s taking off and will continue to take off, so off we go,” she added, per People.
Kidman also wrapped up filming “Practical Magic 2” this month.
Kidman speaks about “resilience”
During an interview with Forbes published Monday, Kidman got candid about how succeeding in the movie industry taught her to be resilient.
“I think having a career that has lasted this long is what has taught me about resilience,” she said.
“I’ve been told ‘no’ so many times in my career. It’s very much about being brave, trying things, being willing to be criticized and being willing to not be stopped by that criticism.”
Kidman shared that “anything that hasn’t worked out for [her] has actually led [her] to something else that [she’s] far more grateful [she] got to experience.”
“That is also [a part of] resilience. It’s not setting your sights on what you think you’re meant to have; it’s being willing to explore and [staying] open—particularly as you get older,” the “Big Little Lies” star added.
No interview shoutouts
Kidman notably didn’t mention Urban when she talked to Forbes about her personal life.
The “Dogville” star, however, mentioned how she uses reading as an “escape” and the wellness tradition of “Forest Bathing,” which is the practice of immersing yourself in nature.
She also briefly touched on going to hot yoga classes with her daughters.
Kidman has gushed over the hitmaker in the past and mentioned in her January 2025 W Magazine cover story that the secret to their successful marriage was “a double shower.”
Mel Gibson, Donald Trump’s Hollywood ambassador, will have trouble with his latest movie.
Trump has announced a 100% tariff on all movies made outside the United States.
Gibson is shooting his two part “Passion of the Christ” sequel, and it’s not in Altoona, trust me.
Shooting is set for Rome, other locations in Italy, Morocco, and Israel.
It’s a two part movie that is costing Gibson, a Hollywood pariah, hundreds of millions of dollars.
Trump knows nothing about the movie business, but he likes to make random declarations which have to be walked back later.
I can’t wait to hear how “Passion of the Christ 2” will get some exemption from Trump, who’s obviously forgotten that cronies like Jon Voight and Sylvester Stallone also make movies abroad.
Another movie this will likely affect: Christopher Nolan’s “Odyssey,” shooting in Greece, Morocco, Sicily, and the United Kingdom.
There are plenty more, too. And who will pay for it? Moviegoers. Just like people who like to eat are paying for higher grocery bills!
Donald Trump’s latest insane rant on Truth Social:
“Our movie making business has been stolen from the United States of America, by other Countries, just like stealing “candy from a baby.” California, with its weak and incompetent Governor, has been particularly hard hit! Therefore, in order to solve this long time, never ending problem, I will be imposing a 100% Tariff on any and all movies that are made outside of the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! President DJT”
A Tomahawk land attack missile (TLAM) is launched from the U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer USS Gravely against what the U.S. military describe as Houthi military targets in Yemen, February 3, 2024. U.S. Central Command/Handout via REUTERS Purchase Licensing Rights
Russia said on Monday that its military was analysing whether or not the United States would supply Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine for strikes deep into Russia, a step that Russian officials say could trigger a steep escalation.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance said on Sunday that Washington was considering a Ukrainian request to obtain Tomahawks.
President Donald Trump has not made a final decision, and he has been wary of escalating the Ukraine war into a direct confrontation with Russia. But the fact he is now weighing such a move shows the extent of his frustration with President Vladimir Putin’s refusal to agree a ceasefire since he hosted the Russian leader at a summit in Alaska last month.
Tomahawks have a range of 2,500 km (1,550 miles) – easily far enough to hit Moscow and most of European Russia if fired from Ukraine. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy cautioned Kremlin officials last week that they should “know where the bomb shelters are”.
RUSSIA CONDUCTING ‘IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS’ OF SCENARIOS
It was unclear how or through which countries the Tomahawks could be supplied. Zelenskiy has asked Washington to sell them to European nations that would send them to Ukraine.
For the Kremlin, the escalatory risks of U.S. involvement in firing such missiles deep into Russia are clear.
“The question… is this: who can launch these missiles…? Can only Ukrainians launch them, or do American soldiers have to do that?” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters when asked about Vance’s remarks.
“Who is determining the targeting of these missiles? The American side or the Ukrainians themselves?” Peskov added, saying “a very in-depth analysis” was required.
Putin has previously warned that Russia reserves the right to strike at military installations in countries that let Ukraine use their missiles to hit Russia.
Andrei Kartapolov, head of the Russian parliament’s defence committee, told the Mayak news outlet that any U.S. military specialists who helped Ukraine to launch Tomahawks against Russia would become targets for Moscow.
“And no one will protect them. Not Trump, not Kellogg, nor anyone else,” he said.
Keith Kellogg, the U.S. special envoy to Ukraine, said on Sunday that Trump had indicated that Kyiv should now be able to conduct long-range strikes on Russia.
“Use the ability to hit deep. There are no such things as sanctuaries,” Kellogg told Fox News.
Pakistan’s rising star at the White House comes as ties between the US and India continue to nosedive. However, experts agree that India maintains its long-term value as a strategic partner to Washington.
Pakistan’s prime minister and army chief met with Trump while visiting the US for the UN General : White House
Ties between Pakistan and the US continue to build momentum under President Donald Trump as Pakistani Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and army chief Asim Munir visited the White House last week, bearing praise for Trump along with plans for more economic and strategic cooperation.
In a statement, Sharif thanked Trump for helping broker a deal in July promising a lower tariff rate for Pakistan in return for US investment in Pakistan’s energy, mining and agriculture sectors.
The White House share photos from the Oval Office meeting, where Munir is seen presenting Trump with a box full of rare earth minerals. This is Munir’s second visit to the US this year.
It remains doubtful whether Pakistan really possesses “massive” oil reserves, as Trump has put it. But Trump notably took a jab at New Delhi when announcing the deal in July, quipping that India may “one day buy Pakistani oil.”
Sharif’ also called Trump a “man of peace” last week and credited the president for helping facilitate a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a short-lived conflict in May, which was sparked by a deadly militant attack on Indian tourists in India-administered Kashmir.
Munir has said Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize, while India denies Trump played any role in the ceasefire.
Pakistan’s rising star at the White House comes as ties between the US and India continue to nosedive. The hopes of Trump continuing the close relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi have faded, as the distance between the two men feels far greater that during Trump’s first term.
On a geopolitical level, the US and India have been building strategic ties for many years, for example, vis a vis China, while maintaining a cooperative trade relationship.
Now, India continues to face a 50% tariff from the US over its continued imports of Russian oil amid the war in Ukraine.
India’s long-term strategy
Closer US–Pakistan ties are now prompting doubts in Indian policy circles about the reliability of the US as a strategic partner.
Harsh Pant, head of the Strategic Studies Programme at Observer Research Foundation (ORF), a New Dehli think tank, told DW that the calculus of Indian foreign policy could change if Pakistan grows to become central to US strategy.
“If India doubts Washington’s commitment as a long-term partner, it will fundamentally alter how India addresses challenges in the Indo-Pacific,” said Pant, who is also a professor of international relations at King’s College in London.
“This would not only reshape India’s approach to the region but also impact America’s broader Indo-Pacific strategy, the Quad partnership, and the many collaborative efforts between India and the US to balance rising Chinese influence,” Pant added. The Quad is a joint forum of four Indo-Pacific powers: India, the US, Australia, and Japan, which Washington hopes will curb China’s influence in the region.
Pakistan plays the field with Saudi Arabia
Further complicating the geopolitical picture is Pakistan’s recent defense pact with Saudi Arabia, an important US ally in the Middle East. The pact includes a mutual defense clause, stating “any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both.”
For India, having its archrival aligned with a major Middle Eastern power is a strategic concern. However, Ajay Bisaria, a former Indian envoy to Pakistan, told DW that Indian policymakers are not yet alarmed.
“Given Pakistan’s economic troubles, it is compelled to adapt its foreign policy to stay relevant to its three main international backers: the US, China, and Saudi Arabia. It tries to monetize its location by leveraging shifting geopolitical circumstances and pushing transactional relationships. India views Pakistan’s actions as part of its ongoing effort to remain globally relevant, ” Bisaria said.
Bisaria added that India’s leadership is confident that time will eventually run out on the US and Pakistan’s current rapprochement.
“India is alert to these maneuvers but not overly concerned given the sustainability of Pakistan’s balancing act and the inevitability of disappointment in US-Pakistan ties in the long run,” he added.
The bronze statue, sculpted by artist Fredda Brilliant, was unveiled in 1968 at the square as a nod to Mahatma Gandhi’s days as a law student at the nearby University College London.
Mahatma Gandhi’s statue in Tavistock Square, London, was defaced on Monday, just days before the annual Gandhi Jayanti celebrations are scheduled to take place at the site on October 2. The High Commission of India has strongly condemned the incident, calling it a “shameful act” and an assault on the legacy of nonviolence.
In a post on X, the Indian mission said the desecration was reported to the local authorities, even as its officials were on site to coordinate the restoration of the monument to its original state.
The plinth of the iconic statue, which depicts the Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, in a seated meditative pose, was discovered daubed with disturbing anti-India graffiti.
“The High Commission of India in London is deeply saddened and strongly condemns the shameful act of vandalism of the statue of Mahatma Gandhi at Tavistock Square in London,” the High Commission said in a statement.
@HCI_London is deeply saddened and strongly condemns the shameful act of vandalism of the statue of Mahatma Gandhi at Tavistock Square in London. This is not just vandalism, but a violent attack on the idea of nonviolence, three days before the international day of nonviolence,…
“This is not just vandalism, but a violent attack on the idea of non-violence, three days before the International Day of Non-Violence, and on the legacy of the Mahatma. We have taken this up strongly with local authorities for immediate action, and our team is already on site, coordinating with authorities to restore the statue to its original dignity,” it added.
The Metropolitan Police and the local Camden Council authorities stated that they are investigating reports of vandalism.
Gandhi Jayanti, designated as International Day of Non-Violence by the United Nations, is commemorated with floral tributes and the Father of the Nation’s favourite bhajans at the monument in London annually on October 2.
About The Statue
The bronze statue, sculpted by artist Fredda Brilliant and created with the backing of the India League, was unveiled in 1968 at the square as a nod to Mahatma Gandhi’s days as a law student at the nearby University College London. The inscription on the plinth reads: “Mahatma Gandhi, 1869-1948”.
President Donald Trump secured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s backing on Monday for a U.S.-sponsored peace proposal to end a nearly two-year-old war in Gaza, but questions loomed over whether Hamas would accept the plan.
Speaking at a joint White House press conference following a meeting with Netanyahu, Trump said they were “beyond very close” to an elusive peace deal for the Palestinian enclave. But he warned the Islamist group Hamas that Israel would have full U.S. support to take whatever action it deemed necessary if the militants reject what he has offered.
The White House released a 20-point document that called for an immediate ceasefire, an exchange of hostages held by Hamas for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, a staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, Hamas disarmament and a transitional government led by an international body.
Trump went into Monday’s meeting seeking to overcome Netanyahu’s misgivings over parts of the plan. It was not immediately clear whether the Trump administration and Israel had resolved all their differences, including over the possibility of a future Palestinian State, which Netanyahu has forcefully rejected, and any role for the Palestinian Authority in post-war governance of the enclave.
Trump thanked Netanyahu “for agreeing to the plan and for trusting that if we work together, we can bring an end to the death and destruction that we’ve seen for so many years, decades, even centuries.”
NETANYAHU SAYS PLAN MEETS ISRAEL’S WAR AIMS
Standing next to Trump, Netanyahu responded: “I support your plan to end the war in Gaza, which achieves our war aims.
“It will bring back to Israel all our hostages, dismantle Hamas’ military capabilities, end its political rule, and ensure that Gaza never again poses a threat to Israel,” he said.
It was clear, however, that Hamas remained the key to whether Trump’s peace proposals get off the ground.
The group’s absence from negotiations and its previous repeated refusals to disarm raised doubts about the plan’s viability.
Hamas, which triggered the war with its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, still holds 48 hostages, 20 of them still alive, Israel says.
“Hamas hasn’t yet received the plan officially, nothing beyond media publication,” a Hamas official told Reuters.
But an official briefed on the talks later said Qatar and Egypt shared the document with Hamas, which told mediators they will review it “in good faith” and then respond.
In Netanyahu’s fourth White House visit since Trump returned to office in January, the right-wing Israeli leader was looking to bolster his country’s most important relationship after a slew of Western leaders formally embraced Palestinian statehood at the United Nations last week in defiance of the U.S. and Israel.
Trump sharply criticized the recognition of statehood as a prize for Hamas.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reach to shake hands at a joint press conference in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 29, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst Purchase Licensing Rights
Monday’s meeting marked a stepped-up diplomatic effort from the president, who vowed during the 2024 presidential campaign to quickly bring the conflict to a close and has since repeatedly claimed that a peace deal was near, only for it to fail to materialize.
Washington outlined its peace plan to Arab and Muslim states on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly last week.
Trump presented his set of proposals in effusive terms on Monday but ended what was billed as a press conference without taking questions.
He has previously hailed international deals that delivered less than promised. He headed into an August summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin seeking a ceasefire in the Ukraine war and emerged with no such deal. Nonetheless, he called the meeting “a 10” on a scale of one to 10.
Netanyahu, while praising Trump as a friend of Israel, put some distance between himself and some items in Trump’s plan, including the reforms being demanded of the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority and the prospects for eventual Palestinian statehood.
The Palestinian Authority welcomed Trump’s efforts on Monday and reiterated its commitment to work with the U.S. and partners to reach a comprehensive deal, news agency WAFA reported.
Netanyahu is under mounting pressure from the hostages’ families and, according to public opinion polls, a war-weary Israeli public. But he also risks the collapse of his governing coalition if far-right ministers believe he has made too many concessions for a peace deal.
A woman wearing a raincoat collects a plastic bag near a beach as Typhoon Bualoi nears, in Nghe An province, Vietnam, September 28, 2025. REUTERS/Thinh Nguyen Purchase Licensing Rights
Vietnam closed airports and evacuated thousands of people in areas under storm threat on Sunday, as intensifying Typhoon Bualoi barrelled towards the country, days after causing at least 10 deaths and widespread flooding in the Philippines.
The typhoon was generating winds of up to 133 km/h (83 mph) as of 1000 GMT and is forecast to make landfall in central Vietnam around 0100 on Monday, slowing as it nears the coast, state-run Thanh Nien newspaper reported.
“This is a rapidly moving storm – nearly twice the average speed – with strong intensity and a broad area of impact,” the national weather forecast agency said.
“It is capable of triggering multiple natural disasters simultaneously, including powerful winds, heavy rainfall, flooding, flash floods, landslides, and coastal inundation.”
Northern and central provinces may see up to 600 mm of rain through October 1, with rivers rising by 9 meters and risks of flooding and landslides, it said.
Authorities in the central province of Ha Tinh have started to evacuate more than 15,000 people, the government said, adding thousands of troops were standing ready.
Residents in Vinh, capital of Nghe An province where the typhoon is expected to make landfall, were rushing to secure homes, tie down boats, and stack sandbags or water-filled sacks on rooftops.
“We already suffered from losses from recent Typhoon Kajiki this year and haven’t recovered yet,” said Bui Thi Tuyet, a 41-year-old resident. “Over the last 20 years living here, I have not felt this terrified because of storms.”
Vietnam suspended operations at four coastal airports from Sunday, including Da Nang International Airport, and adjusted the departure time of several flights, the Civil Aviation Authority said.
Schools in the typhoon-affected area will be closed on Monday, with closures potentially extended if necessary, according to news site VnExpress.
U.S. President Donald Trump hopes to finalize a Gaza peace plan proposal in a meeting on Monday with Israel’s Prime Minister, Trump told Reuters on Sunday, as Israeli tanks pushed deeper into Gaza City and the military wing of Hamas said it had lost contact with two hostages held there.
The fate of the two hostages, which has strong domestic resonance in Israel, could cast a shadow over a meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump on Monday.
The Hamas military wing, Al-Qassam Brigades, called on Israel on Sunday to pull troops back and suspend air strikes on Gaza City for 24 hours so fighters could retrieve the captives.
Trump told Reuters in a phone interview he had received a “very good response” from Israel and Arab leaders to the Gaza peace plan proposal and that “everybody wants to make a deal.”
Hamas said the group had not yet received any proposal from Trump nor from mediators.
Israel has launched a massive ground assault on Gaza City, flattening whole districts and ordering hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to flee to tented camps, in what Netanyahu says is a bid to destroy Hamas.
Nevertheless, the past few days have seen increasing talk of a diplomatic resolution to the nearly two-year-old Gaza war.
Trump’s 21-point Middle East peace plan to end the Gaza war calls for the return of all Israeli hostages, living and dead, no further Israeli attacks on Qatar and a new dialogue between Israel and Palestinians for “peaceful coexistence.”
HAMAS URGES ISRAELI MILITARY TO PULL BACK
Netanyahu has repeatedly said Hamas must lay down its arms or be defeated. He told Fox News earlier on Sunday it is possible to have amnesty for Hamas leaders under a ceasefire agreement that would include them being escorted out of Gaza.
Hamas has so far said it will never give up its weapons as long as Palestinians are struggling for a state. It refuses any expulsion of its leaders from Gaza.
Al-Qassam Brigades called on the Israeli military to pull troops back from the Sabra and Tel Al-Hawa districts southeast of Gaza City’s centre, and suspend flights over the area for 24 hours from 1500 GMT so it could reach the two trapped hostages.
Smoke rises during an Israeli military operation in Gaza City, as seen from the central Gaza Strip, September 28, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas Purchase Licensing Rights
The Israeli military did not directly comment on the request but made clear it had no plans to halt its advances, issuing a statement ordering all residents of parts of Gaza City including the Sabra district to leave. It said it was about to attack Hamas targets and raze buildings in the area.
Gaza residents and medics said Israeli tanks pushed deeper into Sabra, Tel Al-Hawa and nearby Sheikh Radwan and Al-Naser neighbourhoods, closing in on the heart of the city and western areas where hundreds of thousands of people are sheltering.
RESCUERS UNABLE TO REACH TRAPPED RESIDENTS
The Gaza health ministry said in a statement that at least 77 people had been killed by Israeli fire in the past 24 hours.
Local health authorities said they had been unable to respond to dozens of desperate calls from trapped residents.
Gaza’s Civil Emergency Service said late on Saturday that Israel had denied 73 requests, sent via international organisations, to let it rescue injured Palestinians in Gaza City. The Israeli military had no immediate comment.
The families of the two hostages identified by Hamas have requested that their names not be published by the media.
The war began after Hamas-led militants attacked Israeli territory in October 2023, killing around 1,200 people and capturing 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Forty-eight hostages are still in Gaza, 20 of whom Netanyahu says are still alive.
Israel’s assault has killed more than 66,000 Palestinians, according to medical authorities in the territory. Most homes have been damaged or destroyed and 2.3 million residents are living under a severe humanitarian crisis.
The Israeli military says Hamas, which ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, no longer has governing capacity and that its military force has been reduced to a guerrilla movement.
The military launched its long-threatened ground offensive on Gaza City on September 16 after weeks of intensifying strikes on the urban centre.
Over the past 24 hours, the air force had struck 140 military targets across Gaza, including militants and what it described as military infrastructure, the military said.
Three years ago, a fashion editor friend returned from Milan Fashion Week bursting with a story to tell.
Most fashion editors stayed at the same hotel, she explained, and each bedroom had its own mini fridge. After checking out, en route to the airport, a stylist in her party cried out that he’d left “an important package” in his fridge and telephoned the hotel, pleading with them not to throw it away.
“Turns out he’d forgotten his Ozempic,” my editor friend whispered. We were baffled. Ozempic?
Back then, Ozempic was not part of the common lexicon. But quietly, in certain circles, this injectable drug, which is licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, was being prescribed privately and off-label for weight loss.
Flash forward to today and the picture is vastly different. “So many fashion people are on it,” she tells me today. “And now they’re very vocal.”
Serena Williams, Elon Musk and Whoopi Goldberg have all spoken about using weight-loss injections. Some are now prescribed by the NHS, including Wegovy and Mounjaro, generating scores of headlines.
Really, this should have made it a great leveller. In theory, anyone struggling with obesity can – without the expense of a private doctor – get help to manage their weight.
Only that’s not the full picture.
Thousands of NHS patients are believed to be missing out. And with the NHS tightly restricting access, some working in the field warn a two-tier system around weight-loss drugs is developing – one that’s benefitting the most well-off.
Martin Fidock, who is UK managing director of Oviva, which provides Wegovy and lifestyle support to NHS patients, claims that thanks to varying thresholds of eligibility in different regions, NHS prescriptions are a “postcode lottery”.
An estimated 1.5 million people in the UK use these drugs – but more than nine in 10 are believed to pay privately. Prices vary but it generally costs between £100 and £350 a month, depending on the dose and lifestyle support.
Then, last month, it was reported that pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly was expected to increase the list price of Mounjaro by as much as 170%.
They have since done a deal for UK distributors, meaning rises are likely to be less, and the rises don’t affect the cost to the NHS – but it has still caused concern in some quarters.
“It’s scary,” says Brad, a tech company worker in his 40s. He has been taking Mounjaro for a year and worries he may not be able to afford to continue.
“I’ve lost 20kg and want to keep using it, but it’s a lot of money. It’s unfair.”
Nutritionists and GPs I spoke to have also expressed concerns about the broader system, and in particular whether existing health inequalities could worsen.
“We cannot allow good health to become a luxury for the wealthiest by limiting access to weight-loss drugs to those who can pay privately,” argues Katharine Jenner, executive director of Obesity Health Alliance.
So could it really be that weight-loss injections – for all of their benefits – are turning obesity into a wealth issue?
The NHS ‘postcode lottery’
Weight-loss drugs have been available on the NHS for some time, but the landscape changed significantly with the introduction of some newer medications – among them, semaglutide, marketed under the brand name Wegovy, and tirzepatide, sold as Mounjaro.
Wegovy was first prescribed for obesity by the NHS in 2023, while Mounjaro followed earlier this year. They work in part as an appetite suppressant by mimicking a hormone, which makes people feel fuller.
Studies have suggested patients can lose as much as a fifth of their body weight.
They are licensed for people with a BMI of 27 or more for those with a health condition or above 30 for those without (adjusted for certain ethnic groups). But tougher NHS criteria are being applied, and in England and Wales the drugs are mostly restricted to those with a BMI of over 35.
Plus there are more restrictions too.
For Wegovy, local areas are making their own decisions on access.
Martin Fidock claims that in recent months a third of regional health boards have increased the BMI threshold, which he says has resulted in fewer people being able to get it. (The BBC has been unable to verify this data.)
A spokesperson for Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceutical giant that makes Wegovy, told the BBC it is “concerned about the growing disparity” in access to NHS specialist weight management services.
“This has led to a large proportion of people needing to pay out of pocket, an option which is out of reach in areas of deprivation where obesity rates are significantly higher.”
NHS England has said the differences could be related to different levels of need and other providers being more active in certain regions, but confirmed it was up to local areas to decide how much to spend.
For Mounjaro, NHS England has started it for people with a BMI above 40 who also have certain health conditions. The NHS roll-out officially began in June, but a report published earlier this month suggests that not all general practices had started offering it.
Just 18 out of 42 NHS boards across England confirmed that they’d begun prescribing it in line with the roll-out plan, according to data obtained by freedom of information requests published in the BMJ.
The NHS has previously said it is supporting the phased rollout for eligible patients and that “these represent brand-new services in primary care that are being established and scaled up over time”.
But Mr Fidock believes we are seeing a “postcode lottery”.
“We have got an obesity epidemic and these drugs provide us with an opportunity to tackle it in a way we have never been able to do before. But your ability to benefit is dependent largely on whether you have the means to pay.”
Adding to the challenge is the fact that more people from deprived areas struggle with obesity in the first place: more than a third of people in the most deprived areas are obese – twice that of more affluent neighbourhoods.
Beyond the physical health risks – and there are many, including higher risks of cancer and heart disease, plus mental health problems – there may be social consequences too.
One US study found that obese men with a bachelor’s degree earn 5% less than their thinner colleagues, while those with a graduate degree earn 14% less. For obese women it is worse still, earning 12% and 19% less respectively, based on data concerning 23,000 US workers, published in The Economist in 2023.
NHS GP Matthew Calcasola, who is also involved in a service Get a Drip, which offers weight-loss drugs privately, has his own concerns.
“We’re concerned health inequality will build,” he says. “GPs worry about this.”
Private patients priced out
Meanwhile, a booming private market has emerged. Sara de Souza, a business analyst from Nottingham, is among those delighted that it has.
Following the birth of her son Vito in 2023, she put on 30kg. “I got to 96kg,” she recalls. “Me and my husband both got into bad habits. We were so busy, we were eating junk food and having chocolates.
“I was always tired and struggled to pick up my baby. But I just couldn’t lose the weight.”
Sara tried dieting and went to see her GP who referred her to a lifestyle diet and activity programme. But still the pounds stuck.
At her heaviest her BMI was 37.5, but she wasn’t eligible for NHS access and paid £200 a month for the drug through an app called Juniper, which also gave her diet and lifestyle advice. Within a year she had lost the full 30kg.
“It completely changed my life. I felt like a new person, alive again. It’s not just how I look, it’s how I feel and being able to keep up with my son.”
Sara says the cost didn’t impact her. “Even if it had, I’d have carried on, because of the benefits.”
Not everyone feels the same. Some 18% of overweight Britons would be willing to pay for weight-loss drugs – but if they were available on the NHS, 59% said they would be keen on using them, according to new polling by communications agency Strand Partners.
And some of those willing to pay privately fear they could find themselves being priced out following the proposed price spike.
“If I’d had to pay £300 or even more, I would have really struggled to afford it,” says Pete Beech, 57, from Southampton.
He weighed 18 stone and paid £160 a month for a prescription of Mounjaro to help him lose weight to qualify for an ultrasound treatment as part of his treatment for prostate cancer.
“The way the NHS is rationing these drugs has consequences beyond just obesity.”
James O’Loan, head of online pharmacy Chemist4U, has already observed some people stretching themselves financially to get hold of weight-loss drugs – some have asked for payment plans, which they cannot offer.
“Some people can’t move on to the higher doses because of cost,” he explains.
Then there are concerns about a weight-loss drug black market, or unscrupulous dispensing.
“Some services are desperate to dispense the stuff and don’t care what happens,” claims Professor Richard Donnelly, editor of medical journal Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. “People are just asked to fill in a quick questionnaire. There’s no proper medical assessment or follow up.”
He also stresses that they should not be seen as a quick fix. “They’re not there to lose a bit of fat around the tummy.”
Whilst generally well tolerated, there are risks of certain side effects — including nausea, constipation and diarrhoea. A study into potential serious side effects of weight loss jabs has also been launched after hundreds of people reported problems with their pancreas.
The NHS advises people never take a medicine for weight management if it has not been prescribed for them.
‘Not a magic bullet’
Some argue that the answer is, simply, to widen NHS access. The issue, of course, comes in part down to cost.
Michael Shah, senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, believes that this could start to resolve itself in time.
“There are more than 160 weight-loss drugs in clinical development,” he says. Once available, he predicts that the competition could push costs down across the board.
“NHS bargaining power should improve as additional players and treatments enter the space.”
Earlier this year the Tony Blair Institute suggested that the drugs should be offered to everyone with BMIs over 27, arguing that it costs even more to deal with the consequences of obesity.
Obesity is estimated to cost the economy £98bn a year, according to research commissioned by the think tank, once you take into account lost productivity as well as the NHS treatment costs and the impact on the individual.
The Institute suggests a means-tested system with those entitled to free prescriptions getting it free and others self-funding or encouraging employers to share the cost.
NHS England has said it is looking at an option to “accelerate roll out to even more people in the future”.
But it also pointed out that weight loss drugs should not be seen as a “magic bullet”.
Are we medicalising a social issue?
All of this begs a broader question – that is, in medicalising debates around tackling obesity, do we risk overlooking the wider social issue?
“By thinking we have a treatment for obesity we lose focus and stop thinking about the more difficult issues around the food industry and regulation, which are the root cause of this,” warns Greg Fell, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health.
“I do have concerns about equity of access,” he adds. “But I think the NHS has carefully thought about this and probably is, more or less, in the right place.”
The madman who killed at least four people and wounded eight others at a Michigan Latter-day Saints church is a 40-year-old Iraq War veteran who served in the US Marines, The Post can confirm.
Thomas Jacob Sanford rammed his Chevy Silverado truck into the building before opening fire on worshipers at a Sunday service at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Grand Blanc Township, Michigan.
The vehicle had two large American flags behind the cab and a set of deer antlers attached to the bumper.
Thomas Jacbob Sanford, a Marine and Iraq War veteran. Facebook/Jake Sanford
He also set the church ablaze, causing the entire structure to burn down. Authorities fear there may be more victims in the fire.
A Facebook post by Sanford’s mother says the gunman — who died at the scene in a shootout with cops — served in Iraq from 2004 to 2008.
He was killed minutes after the first 911 call came in. A Department of Natural Resources officer and a local township cop responded in about 30 seconds, authorities said.
Authorities later confirmed that Sanford, from nearby Burton, Michigan, is the lone suspect.
The source of the blaze was not immediately known, but sources told The Post that authorities found improvised explosive devices on church property, which a bomb squad was investigating.
A bomb squad was also searching Sanford’s house.
Cops said there were hundreds of worshippers inside the church when the attack began, with aerial footage showing an enormous plume of choking black smoke rising from the structure as it burned.
Social media accounts believed to be connected to Sanford show he was a family man, with a wife and young son.
A dormant GoFundMe page from 2015 raised more than $3,000 for the couple’s now-10-year-old son, who was born with congenital hyperinsulinism, or CHI, a rare genetic condition in which the pancreas releases too much insulin.
Pictures from the Sanfords’ Facebook page show the family smiling, posing in the beds of pickup trucks or in a field of tall sunflowers.
An unnamed witness told Fox 2 Detroit that the attack started just after the congregational hymn, when hundreds of people were inside the building for the 10 a.m. service.
Churchgoers reportedly heard a loud bang as the attacker crashed his truck into the building.
“We at first thought someone had accidentally crashed into the church, so we went out to help him,” the man told the local TV station.
Paul Kirby, 38, who also ran outside to render assistance, believing it to be an accident, told the New York Times he saw the man getting out of the truck from about 10 to 20 yards away before he realized what was happening.
“He started shooting at me,” Kirby said, adding that a bullet whizzed through a nearby glass door, clipping his leg with a piece of shrapnel.
He rushed inside the church to find his wife and two sons before they fled through the back and loaded as many people into their car as they could before speeding away.
Grand Blanc resident Tony Deck told USA Today that he drove by the church after hearing sirens and saw “at least four yellow canvases over dead bodies.”
Southeast Asia’s delivery and ride-hailing drivers have become a political and economic force that governments and companies can no longer ignore, experts say. Can they convert street power to lasting political leverage?
Hundreds of ride-hailing drivers staged a protest around the National Monument (Monas) complex in Central Jakarta on May 20, 2025. (Photo: CNA/Ridhwan Siregar)
When delivery rider Affan Kurniawan was killed by a police vehicle during a demonstration in Jakarta on Aug 28, his colleagues did not grieve quietly.
Within hours, WhatsApp groups lit up and around 1,000 riders in green and yellow jackets halted work to join a motorcade procession to his final resting place.
Indonesian politicians quickly took notice. Former presidential candidate and long-time opposition figure Anies Baswedan attended Affan’s funeral in the morning of Aug 29. That same evening, President Prabowo Subianto visited Affan’s home to offer support to the 21-year-old’s family.
Also on Aug 29, demonstrations involving delivery riders and app-based drivers against police brutality and other issues erupted in multiple cities in Indonesia, some of which turned violent.
Experts said the impromptu motorcade and the near-simultaneous protests underscored the riders’ solidarity and the speed with which their networks could mobilise.
“Through WhatsApp, Telegram, and social media, information spreads quickly and actions can be coordinated within hours,” said Indonesia-based transportation observer Muhammad Akbar.
“For small matters, such as collecting donations for a colleague in distress, they can mobilise instantly. When it comes to bigger issues, simultaneous protests can easily erupt across multiple cities.”
The gestures by Prabowo and Anies, two of Indonesia’s most powerful political figures, signalled something else: Gig workers are no longer invisible service providers, but a political force to be reckoned with.
“Politicians see delivery and motorcycle taxi riders as a strategic voter segment,” Akbar told CNA.
“Their numbers are huge, spread across cities, and considered influential over their families and communities. They are often positioned as important urban swing voters. A single visit to (riders’) basecamp can give a politician wide media coverage and a strong image of closeness to the people.”
What unfolded in Jakarta is emblematic of a wider trend across Southeast Asia, where app-based gig workers have staged at least 20 protests since 2020 over unfair wages, lack of social protections and lack of transparency, according to checks by CNA.
Some analysts believe they are emerging as a political constituency in their own right.
“The growing numbers of riders in urban spaces, coupled with the essential nature of their services, makes their collective action difficult for both governments and companies to ignore,” said Siwage Dharma Negara, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore.
GIG WORKERS NOW A “PILLAR” OF LABOUR MARKET
Ride-hailing apps began scaling up over 10 years ago, and millions of people across Southeast Asia have since become app-based drivers and delivery workers.
In the early years, the platforms offered attractive bonuses and gig work was seen as an appealing alternative to traditional employment.
For young people, it offered freedom from the nine-to-five office routine while others saw it as a way to supplement household income, tide over periods between jobs or stay active in retirement. College students welcomed the flexibility, balancing classes with quick delivery runs.
But when COVID-19 struck, gig work shifted from being a convenient side hustle to the only option for many as businesses slashed their workforces, imposed wage cuts or shuttered altogether.
“The rise of gig workers is not a passing trend. It is a transformation of Malaysia’s labour landscape,” said Masrizal Mahidin, president of the Malaysia E-Hailing and Delivery Organisation (MEDO).
The Malaysian government estimates there are now 1.2 million active platform-based workers in the country, compared to 466,000 before the pandemic.
“These are not abstract numbers,” Masrizal said. “They represent young graduates, single parents, and everyday Malaysians who have turned to gig work for survival and opportunity. Their growth has transformed gig work from a side hustle into a pillar of the national labour market.”
A similar story unfolded in Thailand.
“I estimate that back then (2019 to 2020), it was somewhere around 300,000 to 400,000 (app-based gig workers). That was the peak,” Akkanut Wantanasombut, head of the Research Group in Innovation for Social Solidarity and Inclusive Economy at Chulalongkorn University told CNA.
“It was the only industry that could grow during COVID-19. The service sector was dying, so people left those jobs and worked with the platforms instead.”
Getting a true picture of today’s numbers in Thailand is difficult, as figures often overlap between platforms. But Akkanut noted that participation has declined since the pandemic.
“Nowadays, the numbers have reduced a lot because working conditions have become worse and worse,” he said. “Pay has become lower and lower. And those who are still working for the platform are those who really have no other choice.”
In Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s largest economy, workers have even fewer alternatives.
A shrinking middle class has pushed domestic consumption down, forcing factories to close. As a result, the number of ride-hailing and delivery riders has soared from 4 million in 2020 to 7 million in 2025, according to government data.
“If I had to choose, I would rather work in a company,” said Dede Supriatna, 57, who lost his job at a tour and travel agency last year. “We have no social security, no insurance. If we get into an accident or find ourselves trapped in the middle of a riot like Affan, we are on our own.”
“The platform doesn’t care if an order comes from a dodgy neighbourhood, or if the road is flooded, or if there is a riot like the ones we keep seeing in the last few weeks,” he added.
“If we don’t take the order, we don’t get paid. And we get bad reviews and are punished by the platform.”
In recent years, rising living costs, sluggish economic growth, the scaling back of benefits and limited employment opportunities in parts of the region have pushed gig workers to be more vocal about their grievances and demands.
According to Adrian Pereira of the North South Initiative (NSI), a group that advocates for labour rights, Southeast Asia’s labour movements have traditionally been non-confrontational and diplomatic. But the recent wave of protests in Indonesia shows that patience has limits.
“There will always be a tipping point where workers will say enough is enough,” he said.
In some Southeast Asian cities, platform workers have staged protests outside company offices or government buildings. Others have sought audiences with lawmakers and ministers, urging them to fight for their rights.
In Indonesia, gig workers have even begun running for local council or regional representative seats and a number of them have won, paving the way to carry their grievances directly into the political arena.
Among them was Erwin Siahaan who became a city council member in Medan, North Sumatra from 2019 to 2024, and Mukti Junianto, who is now an active city council member in Solo, Central Java.
Another former ride-hailing driver was former deputy minister for manpower-turned-corruption suspect Immanuel Ebenezer. Immanuel was a gig worker from 2016 to 2019. His political career took off after founding Jokowi Mania, a group supporting former president Joko Widodo’s re-election bid in 2019.
LAWS PASSED IN SOME COUNTRIES; OTHERS CATCHING UP
Governments and companies across the region are beginning to respond, albeit unevenly.
In September last year, Singapore became the first Southeast Asian nation to pass a law protecting gig workers’ rights. Under the Platform Workers Act, delivery riders and ride-hailing drivers will see higher Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions to support housing and retirement adequacy, coverage under work injury compensation, and the right to representation in union-like associations.
Malaysia followed suit on Aug 28 with its Gig Workers Act. The law requires all platforms and companies engaging gig workers to provide contracts that spell out minimum standards for payment terms, working arrangements, insurance coverage, and termination procedures. It also created a Gig Workers Tribunal to resolve disputes.
Elsewhere, governments are still catching up.
In Indonesia, attempts to amend its labour laws to include gig workers have dragged on for years while attempts to formulate a new bill on app-based transportation have yet to materialise.
The only formal safeguard so far is a 2022 transport ministry regulation that caps platform commissions at 20 per cent. Critics say it remains toothless, allowing companies to set prices arbitrarily while the government fails to monitor compliance.
Transportation expert Akbar argued that Jakarta is reluctant to act more aggressively because ride-hailing platforms are plugging holes left by the state in terms of job creation and providing reliable public transportation. “They fill a gap that should have been the state’s responsibility,” Akbar said.
Since last year, gig workers in Indonesia have been calling for the platform commissions cap to be lowered to 10 per cent and for platforms to standardise prices instead of changing them arbitrarily.
These demands have largely fallen on deaf ears, with both the government and companies insisting the 2022 regulation is already fair.
However, there was one demand made during a Feb 17 protest that was met by the Prabowo administration: For platforms to provide Idul Fitri bonuses to gig workers which amount to 20 per cent of their average monthly income.
Drivers reported receiving anywhere from 50,000 to 1 million rupiah (US$3 to US$59.70) ahead of this year’s Idul Fitri holiday in March. The government promised that the bonuses would not be one-off but has yet to formalise the requirement in the form of a government regulation.
Meanwhile, Thailand is drafting a bill aimed at providing gig workers social security, insurance, protection against arbitrary termination and the ability to conduct collective bargaining.
But the process has been beset by disagreements and a lack of clarity over the definition of this new type of worker.
Isriya Paireepairit, vice-president for public affairs at tech company Line Man Wongnai, which has more than 140,000 drivers, welcomed the idea of an independent worker social security fund but raised concerns over implementation.
“For instance, how would benefits work for occasional riders who contribute less compared to regular riders who contribute more? Would insurance cover only jobs accepted through the platform? And how would the government verify riders’ working hours, earnings and activity data to ensure fair eligibility and accurate benefit distribution?” Isriya told CNA.
“Gig workers often work across multiple platforms … It’s still unclear how responsibilities for gig worker’s benefits are shared among different platforms.”
Worker groups representing riders have also opposed elements of the proposed bill at various stages, while academics remain sceptical.
“I don’t have any hope,” said Akkanut of Chulalongkorn University. “The regulators are very weak. They don’t really understand the new type of employment. And our labour laws are very old.”
LIMITED BARGAINING POWER?
Despite their numbers and the ability to disrupt daily mobility and routines, riders often struggle to convert street power to lasting political leverage, observers said.
Indonesia’s gig economy drivers have, for instance, protested repeatedly over the last few years for better wages and policies such as a lower cap on platform commissions.
“Unlike student groups, whose activism is often tied to broader ideological or political agendas, riders’ protests are rooted in immediate livelihood concerns, which makes their demands very pragmatic,” said Siwage of ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Their communication networks also differ. Riders rely heavily on digital platforms, messaging apps and social media channels that are already integral to their daily work. This network allows them to coordinate quickly.
“This gives their protests a spontaneous and decentralised character, which is very different from the more structured networks of student organisations. Nonetheless, their fragmented nature and lack of formal representation often limit long-term bargaining power,” Siwage said.
Mathew Mathews, principal research fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) at the National University of Singapore, said gig workers in the city state used to be just as fragmented and disorganised.
“While highly visible, their voices are not the strongest,” he told CNA. “For one, they are not seen as a unified group of workers. Many see them as part-timers, who may not be doing platform work as a dedicated career.”
Their voices began to be heard after research institutes and established groups like the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) became involved, as the Advisory Committee on Platform Workers was formed in 2021 following then-Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s speech at the National Day Rally which called for better protections for platform workers.
This, Mathews said, “worked to surface some of the concerns of this group and their needs which finally resulted in the government moving to ensure that such workers had proper work injury protection and CPF adequacy”.
Since the enactment of the Platform Workers Act last year, the National Delivery Champions Association (NDCA), which represents delivery platform workers in Singapore, told CNA that they have gained formal recognition from major platform operators like Grab, Lalamove and GogoX.
Andy Ang, NDCA’s executive secretary, said this recognition provides the association with the “legal backing” to negotiate improved conditions for platform workers.
In January this year, under the Platform Workers Act, NDCA and two other NTUC-affiliated associations were officially registered by Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower as Platform Work Associations.
“We’ve had to adapt how we engage with delivery riders as compared to salaried workers,” said Ang, whose association is affiliated with NTUC.
“Instead of meeting at fixed workplaces, we reach them through social media channels and at delivery hubs and hold regular outreach sessions at locations where riders naturally gather,” he added.
Meanwhile in Malaysia, the Gig Workers Act came after years of protests and lobbying.
“This development is not an act of benevolence. It is the product of sustained organising, vocal advocacy, and the undeniable reality that gig workers have become central to Malaysia’s transport, delivery, and digital economy,” said Masrizal of MEDO.
MEDO was among the 63 non-governmental organisations that took part in a peaceful Labour Day rally in Kuala Lumpur on May 1 this year, calling for improved workers’ rights, reported news outlet Astro Awani.
“When ministers directly address riders and drivers, when Parliament enacts laws in our name, it signals that gig workers have emerged as a political force to reckon with,” he said.
Malaysia’s Human Resources Minister Steven Sim, who championed the proposed law in parliament, described its passage as a “bold step forward” in securing social security and fairness for all gig workers in the country.
The government is “sending a strong signal that every worker matters, whether in formal sectors or informal sectors, on digital platforms or outside them”, Sim told CNA.
“The reason (for the Act) is simple – if the law does not define, it cannot defend.”
The parliamentary vote in Moldova could be crucial for the future of the former Soviet republic, which is striving to become an EU memberImage: STR/NurPhoto/IMAGO
Pro-Russia Dodon calls protest over election defeat
Moldovan authorities are braced for protests on Monday after former President Igor Dodon, one of the leaders of the pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc that lost the parliamentary election, accused the pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) of stealing the vote.
“If during the night there are falsifications, tomorrow we won’t recognize (the result of) the parliamentary elections […] and we will ask for elections to be repeated,” he said late on Sunday outside the electoral commission.
President Maia Sandu and the EU have accused Moscow of trying to sway the vote through widespread disinformation and vote-buying.
President Sandu’s pro-EU party wins more than 50% of vote
Moldova’s ruling party, the pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), has won Sunday’s parliamentary elections.
PAS took more than 50% of the vote, official results showed on Monday.
With over 99.5% of ballots counted, the PAS, led by President Maia Sandu, received 50.03% of the vote, compared to 24.26% for the pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc, according to results published on the election commission’s website.
How has the ruling PAS reacted to preliminary results?
With Moldova’s ruling pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) on track to top polls in the closely-watched parliamentary election, PAS lawmaker Radu Marian said it was a victory for all of Europe.
“There should be relief in all Europe because peace, progress, democracy is won,” Marian told DW.
“And I think we did a great job in fighting the mighty Russian dictatorship. We fought with them and not necessarily the opposition.”
Daniel Voda, Moldovan government spokesperson, echoed a similar sentiment.
“Basically, what we see now is a celebration of democracy. Moldovan people in the country and abroad have spoken,” he said.
“Moldovan people want peace, development under the European Union family,” he added.
Ruling PAS wins pivotal parliamentary election
With 98% of votes counted, the results showed that around half of Moldovans favored staying on the EU course.
The ruling pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), which has held a strong parliamentary majority since 2021, secured 49.6% of ballots, according to preliminary results.
The pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc came second, winning 24.6%.
More than 1.59 million, or about 51.9% of eligible voters, had voted in the election, the Central Electoral Commission reported.
Some 276,000 Moldovans have cast their ballots in polling stations abroad, which will remain open until 7 p.m. in their respective countries.
PAS maintains lead with more than 90% of the votes counted
The vote-counting continues apace in Moldova.
With more than 90% of votes counted, the ruling pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) has won 46% of ballots versus 27% for the pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc, according to the country’s Central Electoral Commission.
Optimism at PAS headquarters as pro-EU party takes lead
We’re back in Chisinau at the election night headquarters of the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), which came to power in Moldova in 2021 on a staunchly pro-EU and pro-Western ticket.
Every now and then, we hear cheers from a room full of party members upstairs. For now, they have good reason to be optimistic: Early results show the party is out in front in the polls, with the pro-Russian opposition in second.
Pre-election polls showed PAS was projected to lose its majority and the final outcome of the vote is still far from clear.
PAS may find itself in need of coalition partners — something which could complicate the reform process needed for Moldova to become eligible to join the EU.
The pro-Russian opposition has already called for protests on Monday.
There is a heavy police presence on the streets of Chisinau, with law enforcement announcing they detained several people late on Sunday over suspected plans to stir up unrest.
Party of Action and Solidarity maintains lead with 70% of votes counted
Moldova’s Central Election Commission said the pro-EU Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) had 44% of the vote after 70% of ballots had been counted.
Meanwhile, the pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc had won 28% of the vote.
The vote count is still underway in most parts of the country.
Party of Action and Solidarity winning most votes in early counting — Electoral Commission
Moldova’s ruling pro-European Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) has won 40% of the ballots counted so far in the parliamentary election, with 31.5% of the votes going to the pro-Russian Patriotic Bloc, according to the country’s Central Electoral Commission.
These figures come with 28% of votes counted.
Polling stations close in Moldova
Polling stations have closed for Moldova’s high-stakes parliamentary elections, which are crucial for the country’s political future.
Although exit polls were not conducted, preliminary results are expected later today.
The Central Electoral Commission reported that more than 1.59 million people had cast their ballots by 9 p.m. local time (18:00 GMT), accounting for approximately 51.9% of eligible voters.
This figure includes the 264,000 Moldovans who voted at polling stations set up abroad. These stations will remain open until 7 p.m. local time.
The leaders of the US and North Korea have expressed willingness to meet for a fourth time, but neither side has budged on the crucial question of containing North Korea’s nuclear program.
After meeting Kim in 2018, Trump quipped the two leaders ‘fell in love’Image: Ministry of Communications/ZUMA/IMAGO
During his visit to Washington in August, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung told President Donald Trump that he looked forward to the time when Trump could play a round of golf with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un.
“Someday I’ll see him … He was very good with me,” Trump responded.
On Monday, North Korean state-run media quoted Kim as saying he was open to a new round of discussions with Trump, adding that Kim enjoyed a personal bond with the US president during his first administration.
“I still have good memories of President Trump,” Kim told a session of the Supreme People’s Assembly in Pyongyang.
The two leaders met in Singapore in June 2018 for an unprecedented summit that followed months of heated rhetoric during which Trump called Kim “a rocket man on a suicide mission” while threatening to “totally destroy” North Korea.
‘We fell in love’
After the meeting, which yielded an unbinding statement agreeing on the “complete denuclearization” of the Korean Peninsula, Trump quipped that Kim had written him “beautiful letters” and “we fell in love.”
The two leaders would end up exchanging some 27 letters during Trump’s first term. In many of them, Kim addressed Trump as “your excellency” while using flowery prose praising their friendship.
However, the euphoria after the Singapore summit was short lived. A follow-up meeting in Hanoi in February 2019 was cut short when it was clear there would be no agreement on getting North Korea to drop its nuclear weapons program.
The leaders met again briefly again in June 2019 for a photo op at Panmunjom village marking the demilitarized zone between North and South.
Now in his second term as president, Trump is facing a more emboldened North Korea, which has continued to develop advanced weapons while frequently carrying out provocative missile tests. Pyongyang has also built stronger ties with China and, notably, Russia since Trump’s first term.
On Thursday, South Korean President Lee warned the UN General Assembly that North Korea is getting very close to developing an intercontinental ballistic missile that could carry a nuclear warhead to the US.
North Korea’s non-negotiable nuclear program
Despite Trump himself signaling his willingness to meet Kim, there are no signals from the Trump administration that a fourth summit is in the works. It also appears that neither side has budged on the crucial question of North Korea’s nuclear program.
On Monday, Kim said North Korea’s nuclear program would not be a bargaining chip, and reiterated his insistence that any meeting with Trump is contingent on Washington abandoning its “obsession with denuclearization.”
“Denuclearization is absolutely impossible,” Kim emphasized.
Responding to Kim’s statements, the US State Department this week reiterated that the Trump administration remains committed to the “compete denuclearization” of North Korea.
The Kim regime sees its nuclear program as existential to its survival and legitimacy. Analysts say that Kim would put US recognition of North Korea as a nuclear power on the table in any talks with Trump.
The meetings during Trump’s first term were also criticized for awarding the isolated Kim regime legitimacy and a place on the international stage while getting nothing in return. North Korea remains under international sanctions over its weapons program.
What does Kim want?
In late October, Trump is due to attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders’ forum in the South Korean city of Gyeongju.
Mason Richey, professor of politics and international relations at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul, said that as Trump is meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping at APEC, Beijing could provide an opening for a Trump-Kim meeting.
“I think Kim is happy to send up a trial balloon to see if he can get a second bite of the apple with Trump and to get the US to finally recognize North Korea as a nuclear power,” said Richey.
Richey said the second Trump administration may be willing to provide more wiggle room in the near term for North Korea on the nuclear dispute, in order to come out with the appearance of a win.
“The US under Trump has indicated that it is willing to move past denuclearization as an immediate objective and instead have it as ‘one for the future’,” he told DW.
Richey added that in any negotiations with the US, Kim is likely to seek sanctions relief and more diplomatic recognition while attempting to drive a wedge between the US and South Korea.
“The question, of course, is what is Trump going to get out of the deal,” he said. “Trump is not going to be giving anything away for free and I do not know what else North Korea can bring to the table,” he added.
Park Jung-won, a professor of law at Dankook University, told DW that Kim is aiming to seize the opportunity of his new-found diplomatic boost, as demonstrated when he appeared as an equal alongside Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin at a military parade in Beijing in early September.
“Kim wants to make the most of this opportunity to consolidate North Korea’s position and win recognition of his nation as a nuclear state,” he said.
A MAN has claimed that his father made a chilling deathbed confession in 2023 that he was responsible for the Tylenol murders – one of America’s most notorious unsolved cases.
Joseph Cibelli, a former hairdresser and law school student in Sacramento, California, said his father, Daniel Raymond Drozd, admitted to lacing the Tylenol capsules with cyanide.
A man has claimed that his father, Daniel Raymond Drozd (pictured), made a chilling deathbed confession that he was responsible for the 1982 Tylenol murdersCredit: SWNS
The dark moment in American history occurred between September and October 1982 when poisoned capsules of the over-the-counter pills killed seven people in the Chicago area.
Drozd, who died at age 73 in 2023, was 32 years old at the time, Cibelli said.
The Chicago Tylenol murders sparked fear across the nation, leading to widespread changes in pharmaceutical packaging.
However, more than four decades since the killings, the case remains unsolved.
Cibelli, 54, who is working on a memoir about his experiences, said he found evidence to support his claim that his father was allegedly responsible for the killings.
The list is long, including his father’s proximity to purchase sites, access to cyanide through work, a capsule-filling device, and extremist how-to books.
“On his deathbed, he came right out and said it,” Cibelli said.
“He told a hospice worker that he had planted cyanide pills, and then he told my brother that he had put out cyanide pills.”
After his father’s death in October 2023, Cibelli researched the locations where the poisoned bottles were purchased.
“When I started researching where all the bottles were placed, I had been to all of those locations with my father right before the murders happened,” Cibelli said.
The family lived in Lyons, Illinois, at the time – a town that “butts right up to the city” placing them in the heart of the affected area.
Cibelli’s father served in the Army from 1969 to 1971 and worked multiple jobs, including as a police officer for the Lyons Police Department and at Electromotive, performing steel plating on engine parts.
“One of the key things they use in that kind of electroplating is cyanide,” Cibelli said.
“He used to always bring stuff home from there.”
‘BROKEN HOME’
As a child, Cibelli carefully monitored his volatile father’s behavior.
He recalls a mysterious pink cup his father brought home from work and hid.
“That pink cup is massive in this whole thing because there was cyanide in that cup,” Cibelli said.
Cibelli’s 75-year-old mother, Mary, was allegedly abused by his father throughout their marriage.
“My father used to beat her constantly, and as a child, I was calling the police a lot,” he said.
“Because he was a cop, the police would show up and be like, ‘Okay, just knock it off.'”
Cibelli said his sister died at age 31 from a pulmonary embolism, while his brother, a lifelong addict, heard their father’s deathbed confession.
Cibelli claimed that his father “said to my brother, ‘I put those suicide pills out there.'”
The most haunting evidence came during news of the victims’ funeral, Cibelli claimed.
ENGRAVED MOMENTS
On October 5, 1982, the family watched a funeral for three Janus family members who died after taking poisoned Tylenol.
Three members of the Janus family — Adam, his brother, Stanley, and his sister-in-law, Theresa — died from the cyanide-laced Tylenol.
“They showed three caskets in the church, and [Catholic prelate] Joseph Bernardin was sprinkling holy water onto those caskets,” Cibelli said.
“Behind me, my dad said, ‘Great, three holy f**king Catholic martyrs.'”
When a young Cibelli asked what it meant, his father allegedly responded, “If you’re so f**king smart, you’ll figure it out someday.”
“Those six words are burned into my being,” Cibelli added.
“It’s not even a memory — it’s like eyewitness testimony.”
The poisoned bottles had been placed back on store shelves at multiple retailers in the Chicago area.
Besides seven confirmed deaths, several others were seriously injured, accelerating the recall of over 31 million bottles nationwide.
Cibelli believes his father thought he could commit the perfect crime, never expecting authorities to identify Tylenol as the cause.
“He did not expect they would even figure out it was Tylenol,” Cibelli said.
“Within two days, they figured out it was the Tylenol. That’s when he started panicking.”
‘PERFECT CRIME’
Cibelli claimed his father destroyed evidence by burning everything in a barrel, including the pink cup that allegedly contained cyanide residue.
In his father’s workshop, Cibelli found disturbing reading material, including The Anarchist Cookbook and The Poor Man’s James Bond, publications with instructions for bombs and poisons.
“This whole plan is laid out in The Poor Man’s James Bond,” Cibelli said.
“It says if you want to try using poison, put it in people’s capsules.”
Cibelli also found what he believes was his father’s cyanide dispensing device — a small container with holes sized for filling capsules.
“Each one of those holes, if you put cyanide in each one, it’s more than a lethal dose,” he said.
The ministry said in its daily report the death toll has climbed to 66,005, with a further 168,162 wounded since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack. (AP video by Alon Bernstein)
On the eve of meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that Israel is working on a new ceasefire plan with the White House, but details are still being sorted out.
Netanyahu has come under heavy international pressure to end the war, especially during the ongoing offensive in Gaza City. The death toll in the Israel-Hamas war has topped 66,000 Palestinians, Gaza’s Health Ministry said Sunday.
In Monday’s White House meeting, Trump is expected to share a new proposal for ending the conflict.
“We’re working on it,” Netanyahu told Fox News Sunday’s “The Sunday Briefing.” “It’s not been finalized yet, but we’re working with President Trump’s team, actually as we speak, and I hope we can — we can make it a go.”
Arab officials briefed on the plan say the 21-point proposal calls for an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages held by Hamas within 48 hours and a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the proposal has not been formally announced.
Netanyahu has vowed to continue fighting until Hamas, whose Oct. 7, 2023, attack triggered the war, is destroyed. But he repeated an offer to allow Hamas operatives to leave Gaza as part of a deal ending the conflict.
“If they finish the war, release all the hostages, we let them out,” he said.
Growing international pressure on Israel
Trump has so far stood behind Israel. But the U.S. leader has shown signs of impatience lately, particularly after Israel struck the headquarters of Hamas’ political leadership in Doha, Qatar, earlier this month. Ceasefire talks have stalled since, despite growing international and domestic protests.
Key Western allies have joined a list of countries recognizing a Palestinian state over Israeli objections. The European Union is considering sanctions and there are growing moves for a sports and cultural boycott against Israel.
A defiant Netanyahu told fellow world leaders Friday at the U.N. General Assembly that his nation “must finish the job” against Hamas in Gaza, where 48 hostages are still held captive, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive.
Trump’s 21-point ceasefire plan
Trump’s ceasefire proposal would include the release of all hostages within 48 hours and a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Palestinian enclave, according to three Arab officials briefed on the plan. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the ongoing talks, said the proposal is not final and changes are highly likely.
Trump discussed the proposal with Arab leaders in New York on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.
A Hamas official said the group was briefed on the plan but has yet to receive an official offer from Egyptian and Qatari mediators. Hamas has said it is ready to “study any proposals positively and responsibly.”
The official said the group had previously said it was willing to release all hostages in return for an end to the war and a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from the strip.
Nonstop explosions reported in Gaza
Local hospitals in central Gaza said at least 10 people were killed when at least two strikes hit homes in the Nuseirat refugee camp.
Gaza’s Health Ministry said in its daily report the death toll has climbed to 66,005, with a further 168,162 wounded since the war started.
The ministry, part of the Hamas-run administration, does not differentiate between civilians and militants in its toll, but has said women and children make up around half the dead. Its figures are seen as a reliable estimate by the U.N. and many independent experts.
Residents reported hearing sounds of explosions overnight across the city, likely coming from the demolition of buildings through the detonation of explosive-laden vehicles and robots. “They were nonstop,” Sayed Baker, a Palestinian who shelters close to a Shifa hospital, said of the explosions.
The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the strikes, but said it struck 140 Hamas military targets over the past 24 hours, including militants, observation equipment and infrastructure.
On Sunday, the military said it had struck a high-rise building in Gaza City after warning residents to evacuate. The strike leveled the 16-story Macca tower. No casualties were reported.
The United Nations reimposed sanctions on Iran early Sunday over its nuclear program, further squeezing the Islamic Republic as its people increasingly find themselves priced out of the food they need to survive and worried about their futures.
Iran’s theocracy prepared Sunday for a possible confrontation with the West after the United Nations reimposed sanctions over its nuclear program, even as some pushed for continued negotiations to ease the economic pain squeezing the country.
The sanctions imposed before dawn Sunday again freeze Iranian assets abroad, halt arms deals with Tehran and penalize any development of Iran’s ballistic missile program, among other measures. It came via a mechanism known as “snapback,” included in Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.
Iran’s Parliament briefly denounced the sanctions before going into a closed-door session likely to discuss the country’s response, which could include abandoning the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rushing for the bomb. People worry about a new round of fighting between Iran and Israel, as well as potentially the United States, as missile sites struck during the 12-day war in June now appear to be being rebuilt.
Meanwhile, Iran’s rial currency fell to a new record low of 1.1 million to $1, sending food prices even higher and making daily life that much more challenging.
“The government must negotiate. This is a world of business,” said Mohsen Rahaei, a 49-year-old Tehran resident. “One must get along with everyone, with all countries. Until when we want to fight? We won’t gain anything.”
Iran considers withdrawing from treaty
Iran tried a last-ditch diplomatic push at the U.N. General Assembly in New York this week, but efforts by its officials, as well as China and Russia, failed to stop the sanctions.
Speaking to the Young Journalists Club, which is affiliated with Iranian state television, lawmaker Ismail Kowsari said Parliament would discuss withdrawing from the nuclear treaty. Nonproliferation experts fear such a move could see Iran follow a path first laid down by North Korea, which said it abandoned the treaty before obtaining nuclear weapons.
Kowsari however said it wouldn’t mean Iran would go for the bomb. Such a move would need the approval of Iran’s 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iranian diplomats have long pointed to Khamenei’s preachings as a binding fatwa, or religious edict, that Iran won’t build an atomic bomb.
Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf issued his own warning to those who would honor the U.N. sanctions as the chamber began meeting Sunday.
“We announce that if any country wants to take action against Iran based on these illegal resolutions, it will face serious reciprocal action from Iran, and the three European countries that are the initiators of this illegal action will also face our reaction,” Qalibaf said without elaborating, according to a report by the state-run IRNA news agency.
Parliament soon after entered a closed session, without any formal announcement on what, if anything, was decided.
Iran warns against any military attack
Leaders in both Iran’s regular military and its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard both issued statements Sunday, warning that their forces were ready for any possible attack. Concerns have grown among the public that Israel could launch a new attack in the wake of the sanctions.
Israel’s Foreign Ministry applauded the sanctions being reimposed.
“The goal is clear: prevent a nuclear-armed Iran,” the ministry said. “The world must use every tool to achieve this goal.”
France, Germany and the United Kingdom triggered “snapback” over Iran 30 days ago, citing Tehran’s restrictions of monitoring its nuclear program and the deadlock over its negotiations with the U.S.
Iran further withdrew from the International Atomic Energy Agency monitoring after Israel’s war in June, which also saw the U.S. strike nuclear sites in the Islamic Republic.
Meanwhile, Iran still maintains a stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% — that is largely enough to make several atomic bombs, should Tehran choose to rush toward weaponization.
Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, though the West and IAEA say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003.
The three European nations on Sunday said they “continuously made every effort to avoid triggering snapback.” But Iran “has not authorized IAEA inspectors to regain access to Iran’s nuclear sites, nor has it produced and transmitted to the IAEA a report accounting for its stockpile of high-enriched uranium.”
The nations also noted Iran enriches uranium at a level that no other peaceful program does.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised the three European nations for “an act of decisive global leadership” for imposing the sanctions on Iran and said “diplomacy is still an option.”
“For that to happen, Iran must accept direct talks,” Rubio said.
An ex-Marine smashed a pickup into a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints church in Michigan, opened fire and set the building ablaze during a crowded Sunday service and then was fatally shot by police. At least four people were killed and eight wounded, and authorities were searching the building ruins for more victims.
An ex-Marine smashed a pickup into a Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints church in Michigan, opened fire and set the building ablaze during a crowded Sunday service and then was fatally shot by police. At least four people were killed and eight wounded, and authorities were searching the building ruins for more victims.
The attack occurred about 10:25 a.m. while hundreds of people were in the building in Grand Blanc Township, outside Flint.
The man got out of the pickup with two American flags raised in the truck bed and started shooting, Police Chief William Renye told reporters. The attacker apparently used gas to start the fire and also had explosive devices but it wasn’t clear if he used them, said James Dier of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
Authorities identified the shooter as Thomas Jacob Sanford, 40, of the neighboring small town of Burton. The FBI is leading the investigation and considered it an “act of targeted violence,” said Ruben Coleman, a special agent in charge for the bureau.
Officers responding to a 911 call were at the church within 30 seconds, Renye said. After the suspect left the church, two officers pursued him and “engaged in gunfire,” killing him about eight minutes later, the chief said.
People inside the church shielded children and moved them to safety during the attack, Renye said.
Flames and smoke poured from the large church for hours before the blaze was extinguished.
Two bodies were found during a search of the debris, and Renye said more victims could be found as searchers made their way though the entire church. One of the wounded people was in critical condition Sunday evening and the seven others were stable.
Renye said “some” people were unaccounted for, but he didn’t have an exact number.
Michigan State Police Lt. Kim Vetter said bomb threats were made at other churches in the area after officers shot and killed Sanford. No bombs were found and police were investigating the threats.
The motive not yet clear
Investigators were searching Sanford’s residence but authorities did not say what they found or provide any additional details about him, including whether he was a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, widely known as the Mormon church.
Sanford served in the Marines from June 2004 through June 2008, working as an automotive mechanic and vehicle recovery operator, according to military records obtained by The Detroit News. He was deployed to Iraq from August 2007 through March 2008 and had the rank of sergeant.
It was the latest of many shooting attacks on houses of worship in the U.S. over the past 20 years, including one in August that killed two children during Mass at the Church of the Annunciation in Minneapolis.
It also was the second mass shooting in the U.S. in less than 24 hours. On Saturday night, a man in a boat opened fire on a crowd in Southport, North Carolina, killing three and injuring five,
President Donald Trump applauded the FBI for its response to the Michigan shooting in a social media post. Local authorities said the FBI was sending 100 agents to Grand Blanc Township, a community of roughly 40,000 people.
“PRAY for the victims, and their families. THIS EPIDEMIC OF VIOLENCE IN OUR COUNTRY MUST END, IMMEDIATELY!” Trump wrote.
The church building, circled by a parking lot and a large lawn, is near residential areas and a Jehovah’s Witness church.
Brad Schneemann, whose home is about 400 yards (365 meters) from the church, told The Associated Press that he and his daughter heard “two rounds of four to five shots” around 10:30 a.m. “Then, we really didn’t hear anything for a while” before they left their home to see what was happening.
Tight-knit church community
Timothy Jones, 48, said his family is part of another Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints congregation, or ward, about 15 minutes away, but that his children were at the Grand Blanc Township ward Saturday night for a youth fall festival. He and his family moved to Flint two years ago in large part because of how strong the faith’s community is in the area, he said.
As people in his congregation got word of the shooting from texts and phone calls during their Sunday service, his ward went into lockdown and police came as a precaution, he said. His children were “frantically, just trying to get word that people were OK.”
Sundays are “supposed to be a time of peace and a time of reflection and worship,” Jones said. Yet in the wake of violence at other houses of worship, a shooting “feels inevitable, and all the more tragic because of that,” he added.
The shooting occurred the morning after Russell M. Nelson, the oldest-ever president of the Utah-based faith, died at 101. The next president is expected to be Dallin H. Oaks, per church protocol.
“The church is in communication with local law enforcement as the investigation continues and as we receive updates on the condition of those affected,” spokesperson Doug Anderson said.
“Places of worship are meant to be sanctuaries of peacemaking, prayer and connection. We pray for peace and healing for all involved.”
The impact of the shooting spread throughout the area
When striking nurses at nearby Henry Ford Genesys Hospital heard about the shooting, some left the picket line and ran the short distance to the church to help first responders, Teamsters Local 332 President Dan Glass said.
“Human lives matter more than our labor dispute,” Glass said.
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said in a statement that her heart was breaking for the community. “Violence anywhere, especially in a place of worship, is unacceptable,” she said.
Denmark banned the use of civilian drones for five days next week as it steps up security ahead of a European Union summit in Copenhagen.
Denmark Bans Civilian Drones Ahead of EU Leaders Visit
Denmark banned the use of civilian drones for five days next week as it steps up security ahead of a European Union summit in Copenhagen.
The move is intended to eliminate the risk of confusing civilian-operated aircraft with hostile drones during the congregation of EU government leaders, the transport ministry said in a statement on Sunday.
The ban follows a surge of drone incursions across the country in the past week. Military authorities reported new sightings near several defense facilities overnight, marking the seventh day of such incidents. “Various capacities were deployed,” the Danish Armed Forces said in an update on Sunday, without offering details.
Police have been inundated with false alarms as public concern mounts, forcing them to raise the alert level. Authorities logged 500 reports in a single day last week.
Security will be visibly tighter in the capital during the summit, where leaders are expected to discuss defense and security, including responses to hybrid threats and Russian violations of European airspace.
Although investigators have yet to identify the source of the drone activity, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has linked it to Russia’s efforts to destabilize Europe, an accusation Russia denies.
Last week, sightings of large, professional-grade drones forced the temporary closure of several airports in Denmark, including Copenhagen’s commercial hub, sparking a large-scale police investigation. In recent days, the activity has centered around military facilities, including Karup, Denmark’s biggest air force base, which detected drones in its vicinity late on Friday.
Now main challenger to a rising Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo has blasted his candidacy as “abhorrent”, called election “battle for the soul” of Democratic party
As Eric Adams (L) drops out, Zohran Mamdani (right) is leading by a wide margin in the opinion polls, and remains a key face against the policies of President Donald Trump.(AFP)
Incumbent New York City mayor Eric Adams has dropped out of election scheduled for November, setting up a direct fight between Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani and former mayor Andrew Cuomo.
A formal Republican candidate, Curtis Sliwa is in the race too, but former governor Andrew Cuomo — contesting as an independent after losing the Democratic ticket race to Mamdani — is now the main challenger to the young leader of Indian-Ugandan origin. Eric Adams was also planning to file an independent nomination.
Leading the opinion polls, Zohran Mamdani, 33, has invited President Donald Trump’s wrath as the Republican strongman sees him as a problematic “communist”.
While some analysed Eric Adams’ expected dropout as a possible consolidation of Democratic votes for Mamdani, the NY Post report said this could be to clear the field to stop Mamdani by putting all of Trump’s strength behind Cuomo or, less likely, Curtis Sliwa.
What Eric Adams said while dropping out
“It’s been an honor to be your mayor,” Adams said in a video announcement, as per NY Post. “I know I cannot continue my campaign… I strongly encourage who ever takes over City Hall to continue what we’ve done.”
He did not endorse any of the other candidates, and even took subtle swipes at both Mamdani and Cuomo, all of them essentially on the same, Democrat side of the political binary in the US.
“I want to be clear, although this is the end of my campaign, this will not be the end of my public service,” he said, “I will keep fighting for our city no matter what because I am a New Yorker.”
Cuomo vs Mamdani
Andrew Cuomo earlier blasted Zohran Mamdani’s candidacy as “abhorrent” and termed the contest a “battle for the soul” of the Democratic party. “This is a civil war within the Democratic party where the extreme left is pulling the Democratic party and the moderates are afraid,” Cuomo said on Thursday in an interview with Bloomberg TV.
“The Democratic Party is not anti-business, it’s not anti-police. That’s not who we are,” he said, implying Mamdani is all of those things, something Mamdani has consistently denied.
Bad Bunny will be headlining Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show, set to kick off Feb. 8, 2026, at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, Calif., he announced via Instagram Sunday.
The Reggaeton superstar, 31, shared the exciting news with a video — set to his hit song “Callaita” — of him sitting on top of a goal post in a football end zone. He captioned the social media post, “Super Bowl LX. Bay Area. February 2026. #AppleMusicHalftime.”
Bad Bunny said in a press release obtained by Page Six following the announcement, “What I’m feeling goes beyond myself. It’s for those who came before me and ran countless yards so I could come in and score a touchdown… this is for my people, my culture, and our history.”
He added in Spanish, “Ve y dile a tu abuela, que seremos el HALFTIME SHOW DEL SUPER BOWL,” which translates to, “Go and tell your grandmother, that we are the halftime show of the super bowl.”
Bad Bunny has been named the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show performer. Getty Images
Bad Bunny is fresh off concluding his sold-out residency in Puerto Rico, which recently made history as the most-watched Amazon Music livestream ever, per Rolling Stone.
The Grammy winner is also no stranger to the Super Bowl stage. He was a special guest when Shakira and Jennifer Lopez co-headlined the 2020 halftime show in Miami’s Hard Rock Stadium.
He performed at the time his chart-topping track “I Like It” and a mashup of “Chantaje” with “Callaita” with Shakira, 48. J Balvin also made a guest appearance during the sizzling performance.
Jay-Z, who plays a crucial role in selecting the Super Bowl performer via his company Roc Nation, said of Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, “What Benito has done and continues to do for Puerto Rico is truly inspiring. We are honored to have him on the world’s biggest stage.”
Jon Barker, SVP of Global Event Production for the NFL, further praised the Latin musical artist for his “global energy and cultural vibrancy that define today’s music scene.”
“As one of the most influential and streamed artists in the world, his unique ability to bridge genres, languages, and audiences makes him an exciting and natural choice to take the Super Bowl halftime stage,” Barker added.
“We know his dynamic performances, creative vision, and deep connection with fans will deliver the kind of unforgettable experience we’ve come to expect from this iconic cultural moment.”
The NFL and Apple Music cryptically teased earlier on Sunday afternoon via Instagram, “Tune into Sunday Night Football halftime for a big announcement” with a football, apple and shushing face emoji.
Leading up to the announcement, fans speculated that Taylor Swift would hit the stage for Super Bowl LX — especially after the singer bought back her masters in May and since her fiancé is Travis Kelce.
The tight end’s team, the Kansas City Chiefs, have made it to the championship game for the past three years in a row and many Swifties have been hoping for a storybook end to the current NFL season.
However, the pop superstar has been keeping a lower profile at Chiefs games recently amid rumblings that she has had serious threats made to her life and therefore has security concerns, per the Daily Mail.
Other names in the running have been Miley Cyrus and Adele, the latter of which sources exclusively confirmed to Page Six had been “in talks” for the halftime show.
The Grammy winner’s fiancé is Rich Paul, one of sports’ biggest agents, and Adele has attended the Super Bowl before as a fan, which further fueled the speculation.
Fans also speculated that Metallica would be considered given the rock band’s roots in San Francisco.
Drummer Lars Ulrich recently told Howard Stern, “I would f–king love to do it.”
Sunday’s general election will be the most crucial since Moldova gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. Russia is doing all it can to divert the country from its European course.
Campaigners on the streets of Chisinau, the capital of MoldovaImage: Tobias Zuttmann/DW
If a flood of videos on TikTok is to be believed, the people of Moldova are currently living through a reign of terror.
These short videos claim that the country is being governed by a “dictatorship” of its pro-European President, Maia Sandu, and the ruling liberal-conservative Action and Solidarity Party (PAS).
They also allege that this “puppet regime” has sold itself to the European Union, NATO and US billionaire George Soros with a view to destroying Moldova’s agriculture, “introducing LGBTQ ideology” and leading the country into a war against the Russian Federation.
Former president’s TikTok campaign
One of the people who posts such things on TikTok almost daily is former President Igor Dodon, a devoted follower of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Dodon is leader of the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) and head of the Patriotic Electoral Bloc alliance. The logo of the alliance features a red-and-white star surrounding a heart with the Soviet hammer and sickle at its center.
Dodon describes himself as right-wing and committed to “traditional values,” closing his videos with the Orthodox Christian salutation “God help us!”
This blend of hatred of Europe and the West, Soviet nostalgia, loyalty to the Kremlin, Orthodox Christian piety and right-wing populism appeals to a large part of Moldovan society, particularly in view of the precarious economic situation of many people in the country, especially pensioners.
Almost half of voters still undecided
This has been noticeable since late last year, when Maia Sandu was only narrowly re-elected president.
The country’s goal of joining the European Union was also confirmed by a razor-thin majority of just a few thousand votes in a referendum held on the same day.
Now, however, things could very well go the other way.
On Sunday, Moldovans go to the polls to elect a new parliament. This will be the first scheduled general election since Moldova and Ukraine were granted candidate status by the EU in 2022.
Moldova at a crossroads
For months now, the poll has been seen as a pivotal election and one that could take the country either further along the road to the EU or back to Russia.
Opinion polls in the country are considered notoriously unreliable. The unpredictability of the vote is further compounded by the fact that almost half of all voters have still not made up their mind who they are going to vote for.
Even though Sandu’s liberal-conservative, pro-European, anti-corruption civil rights party PAS is expected to remain the strongest party, it might lose the absolute majority it got in 2021.
Pro-Russian parties in the running
Two other electoral alliances that opinion polls indicate will be represented in the new parliament are both clearly pro-Russian.
These are the Patriotic Electoral Bloc and the political alliance known as Alternative, which was founded by Mayor of Chisinau, Ion Ceban.
Our Party (PN) is another party that could enter parliament. It was founded by businessman Renato Usatii, a political adventurer and populist who made his fortune in Russia and is hard to pin down politically.
Usatii could end up holding the balance of power and determining whether the country keeps its pro-European government or gets a pro-Russian one.
The Russian ambassador’s cynical threat
All this explains why President Sandu has declared the election the most important poll since the country gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. She is warning of a potential “defeat for democracy.”
She has said that if this comes to pass, “Russia will destabilize us and rip us out of Europe.”
The pro-Russian camp is making little effort to deny this.
Dodon and his Patriotic Electoral Bloc are openly calling for an end to the country’s pro-European course and a return to the Russian structures of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).
Russia’s ambassador to Moldova, Oleg Ozerov, recently made a cynical, thinly veiled threat to the country, saying that Russia is in favor of preserving Moldova’s territorial integrity and neutrality and that Ukraine is an example of what happens when a country gives up its neutral status.
Humiliations for Russia
In economic terms, the Kremlin doesn’t need Moldova, a small, largely agrarian country with a population of about 2.8 million.
Nevertheless, Russia’s imperial mentality led it to start its first post-Soviet war in what is now the separatist region of Transnistria in eastern Moldova in 1992. About 1,500 Russian soldiers are currently stationed there, and it has a massive stockpile of weapons.
But Moldova’s strategic value has increased since Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022 because capturing this largely defenseless country would allow Russia to wage a war on two fronts against Ukraine.
Furthermore, it should not be underestimated that Russia’s attitude toward Moldova has much to do with the humiliations it has experienced there — such as the fact that Maia Sandu has succeeded in liberating her country from the Russian embrace and set it on a path toward Europe.
Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco are officially husband and wife after tying the knot in a romantic ceremony.
Gomez revealed the news via Instagram Saturday evening, as she shared a carousel of images from their big day, taken by photographer Petra Collins.
The photos and videos showed the newlyweds embracing, holding hands and enjoying the moment. A few close-up shots showed Gomez’s bouquet of lily of the valley and her wedding rings.
The bride and groom both rocked Ralph Lauren. Gomez wore a custom hand-draped halter-neck satin dress with embroidery, while Blanco wore a classic black tuxedo and bowtie.
Selena Gomez married Benny Blanco on Saturday. Petra Collins, courtesy of Selena Gomez
In the comments thread of the singer’s announcement, Blanco wrote, “my wife in real life.”
The couple exchanged vows at the lush Sea Crest Nursery in Santa Barbara, Calif., while surrounded by around 170 of their family and friends, according to Vogue.
Guests included Gomez’s BFF Taylor Swift, her “Only Murders in the Building” co-stars Martin Short, Steve Martin and Paul Rudd. Other attendees included Paris Hilton, Ed Sheeran, Ashley Park, and Gomez’s “Wizards of Waverly Place” co-star David Henrie.
Throughout the weekend, guests stayed at the $3,500-a-night El Encanto hotel, where Martin and Short were photographed on Friday, ahead of the couple’s rehearsal dinner. The dinner itself was held at a mansion in the private community of Hope Ranch in Santa Barbara County.
Guests were beckoned to the lavish soirée with gold-embossed invitations, asking them to join the couple “together with their families” for the seaside ceremony at 3:00 p.m.
The elegant invitations featured romantic interlocking “S” and “B” monograms and a sprig of what appeared to be dried baby’s breath flowers — tiny blossoms said to symbolize love, purity, and commitment.
After the pair’s initial wedding plans were leaked on July 14 — including the guest list, date and location — security became a high priority in planning the special day, especially ensuring the safety of the couple’s A-lists guests.
“Security for Selena’s wedding will be of the utmost importance because not only is she a public figure, many of the guests will be too,” an insider told the Daily Mail later that month.
“She is going back and forth on whether or not to allow people to have their phones as an extra measure of security and privacy, along with the fact that she wants everyone to be present,” the insider added.
Leading up to the highly anticipated nuptials, Gomez and Blanco both had their respective bachelorette and bachelor parties in August.
Gomez hosted her bachelorette party in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, and was surrounded by her close girlfriends — including longtime pals Racquelle Stevens, Ashley Cook and Courtney Lopez.
Pictures showed the bride-to-be and her besties soaking up the sun on a yacht.
Blanco, for his part, had a bachelor party at a $25,000-a-night villa in Las Vegas, according to TMZ.
The record producer first teased the wedding timeline on July 10, but said he and Gomez were both very busy and had not started planning yet.
“We’re both working on so many things that we hadn’t even had time to get into it, but we’re so excited,” the music producer told Jake Shane on the “Therapuss” podcast. He also insisted their nuptials would be “chill” but “amazing.”
Fans began speculating that Gomez and Blanco were dating when he attended her 31st birthday party in July 2023. They had been acquainted for years thanks to their similar circles in the music industry.
In December 2023, the former Disney Channel star confirmed on Instagram that she had been secretly dating the songwriter for six months.
Responding to a fan account’s Instagram post that stated, “Selena Gomez Seemingly Confirms That She Is in a Relationship,” she commented, “facts.”
Gomez then went on to elaborate on their very serious love in a string of comments, writing that Blanco is “absolutely everything” and “the best thing that’s ever happened” to her.
Once their relationship was made public, the pair could not help but pack on the PDA.
In December 2023, the couple canoodled at Swift’s 34th birthday celebration. A month later, they were all over each other while sitting courtside at a Los Angeles Lakers game.
The couple revealed that Gomez’s mom originally set them up over a decade before they became engaged.
“It’s actually very difficult to figure out. I was around 16, 17,” Gomez told Interview Magazine in February of how old she was when she first met Blanco.
“And we first had music come out in 2013 or something,” he chimed in before adding, “Her mom set up a meeting between the two of us. This is right when I became big and she wasn’t a singer yet.”
The Rare Beauty founder initially sparked engagement rumors in August 2024 when she posted a mirror selfie with a heart emoji strategically placed over her left ring finger.
However, the pop star confirmed their engagement on Dec. 11, 2024, with a sweet Instagram post.
“forever begins now,” the “Emilia Pérez” star captioned a carousel of photos showing off her diamond sparkler.
Blanco also commented on her post, “hey wait… that’s my wife.”
The “Good for You” singer’s bestie Taylor Swift also chimed in, adding, “yes I will be the flower girl.”
Blanco popped the question with a marquise engagement ring he designed with “special symbols” of their love.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s wild swing of a movie connects with the moment we’re in like nothing you’ve seen.
Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection
There’s no one way to measure when a movie enters the cultural bloodstream — I mean, when it does so as powerfully as a shot of heroin. But when it happens, you can feel it. It used to happen a lot, but it’s rarer in the world we live in today, which is swimming in a universe of content, most of it splintered into separate silos. The phrase “mass culture” used to be synonymous with “hit television” or “blockbuster movie,” but even those things aren’t the dominating, all-eyes-on-this, collective-attention-grabbing forces they once were. All of which makes Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” a grand throwback, the all-too-rare movie that has the chance to dominate the cultural conversation.
Let’s be clear about why that could happen. “One Battle After Another” is a movie that connects with the moment we’re in like nothing you’ve seen — and the moment we’re in is like nothing you’ve seen. As the United States gets pushed, day by day, closer and closer to autocracy, that’s a situation that ought to be setting everyone in the country on edge. Yet it’s part of the nature of autocracy to narcotize people into numbness, delusion, fear, and a kind of self-perpetuating apathy. And that’s what seems to be happening in America right now. Gavin Newsom shouldn’t be the only one saying that we’re in danger of not having real elections in 2028; tons of people (leaders, citizens, journalists) should be saying it. But too many of us are caught in a zone halfway between resistance and despair, and that’s the mood that “One Battle After Another” taps into.
It’s set in a police-state America that looks and feels like the one America could be turning into in a few years. And what’s uncanny about the film isn’t just the prophetic quality of its authoritarian setting. (No, this is not “The Hunger Games.”) It’s the way that “One Battle After Another” asks us, for two hours and 41 minutes, to live inside the cave of our anxiety and outrage, our passivity and rebellion; it’s the way the film provokes shocks of recognition and a kind of suck-in-your-breath catharsis. It’s a movie that works as a heightened mirror.
Based on its ecstatic reviews, the out-of-the-gate intensity of its awards buzz, the fact that the film’s solid box-office performance this weekend indicates that people chose to listen to the critics (something that doesn’t exactly happen every day), and the general vibe of excitement over the film that’s been coursing through social media, I think “One Battle After Another” has the potential to be a sensation — not just the rare drama for adults that becomes a hit, but a movie that provokes a thousand conversations and creates its own energy field. Even hit movies hardly do that anymore, and a lot of the films that critics champion tend to provoke a conversation-in-a-bubble. I think that’s what happened last year with “Anora” and “The Brutalist,” and maybe this year with “Materialists,” a good rom-com that set the chattering classes on both coasts talking about the place where romance meets the price of real estate.
“One Battle After Another,” on the other hand, is a wildly entertaining, awesomely unpredictable screwball political thriller that on some level forces you to confront…the fate of our fucking country. It gets you to ask: What’s happening to America? Where is this all going? Will it turn out to be as threatening as the movie makes it look? That, in a way, is a question as scary as anything in “Jaws,” and “One Battle After Another” could be the rare film that electrifies audiences because it connects directly with what’s happening in their lives.
To think of a movie that hit the zeitgeist jackpot the way this one does, you might have to go back to “Wall Street,” the Oliver Stone finance drama that had the good fortune to open just seven weeks after the 1987 stock-market crash. It’s as if that movie had been designed as headline-channeling hangover therapy for the Greed Decade. Before that, “All the President’s Men,” though it came out two years after Richard Nixon resigned the presidency, was close enough in time to the Watergate scandal to act as a national referendum on what the country had been through, how it shocked our values and in some ways reshaped them.
On that score, “One Battle After Another” almost seems to be opening in the exact right week. The Jimmy Kimmel saga, which proved to be a major victory for freedom of speech, was an inflection point. So, it seems, is the indictment of James Comey. (We can only hope that one ends as triumphantly as Kimmel.) These seismic events just fuel the movie’s urgency. On the scale of sheer relevance, “One Battle After Another” is a 10 out of 10, but as staged by Anderson, working at the peak of his powers, it’s also the kind of galvanic and enveloping movie that imprints its themes onto your headspace. You want to think about it, talk about it, debate it.
Here’s a prediction that sounds counterintuitive, but I’ll stand by it: I think a solid segment of the audience for this movie is going to come from the right. The red-state demo has tended to shun films like “Civil War,” which it views as liberal-left agit-prop, but I suspect that there’s something about the big vision of “One Battle After Another” that could prove uniquely inviting. (It doesn’t hurt to have Leonardo DiCaprio giving his most inspired and relatable performance in years.) The film depicts an underground band of revolutionary guerrillas, but instead of holding them up as shining heroes, it portrays them in shades of gray, spotlighting their naïveté and selfishness. And Sean Penn’s portrayal of the Army despot Col. Lockjaw is a satire of control-freak military manners flecked with humanity. I think people on the right will go to see “One Battle After Another” for the best reason: They’ll be curious about it. And just maybe, in ways they will or will not acknowledge, it could wind up speaking to them. In a world where Ted Cruz could take a stand against President Trump during the Jimmy Kimmel saga, I think the message is: Many things are not set in stone.
Tehran residents said they were deeply worried about the return of United Nations sanctions and a nosediving local currency. (AP video/Saeed Sarmadi)
The United Nations reimposed sanctions on Iran early Sunday over its nuclear program, further squeezing the Islamic Republic as its people increasingly find themselves priced out of the food they need to survive and worried about their futures.
The sanctions will again freeze Iranian assets abroad, halt arms deals with Tehran, and penalize any development of Iran’s ballistic missile program, among other measures. It came via a mechanism known as “snapback,” included in Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, and comes as Iran’s economy already is reeling.
Iran’s rial currency sits at a record low, increasing pressure on food prices and making daily life that much more challenging. That includes meat, rice and other staples of the Iranian dinner table.
Meanwhile, people worry about a new round of fighting between Iran and Israel — as well as potentially the United States — as missile sites struck during the 12-day war in June now appear to be being rebuilt.
Activists fear a rising wave of repression within the Islamic Republic, which already has reportedly executed more people this year than over the past three decades.
Sina, the father of a 12-year-old boy who spoke on condition that only his first name be used for fear of repercussions, said the country has never faced such a challenging time, even during the deprivations of the 1980s Iran-Iraq war and the decades of sanctions that came later.
“For as long as I can remember, we’ve been struggling with economic hardship, and every year it’s worse than the last,” Sina told The Associated Press. “For my generation, it’s always either too late or too early — our dreams are slipping away.”
Iran sanctions set to ‘snapback’
Snapback was designed to be veto-proof at the U.N. Security Council, meaning China and Russia could not stop it alone, as they have other proposed actions against Tehran in the past. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called them a “trap” for Iran on Saturday.
France, Germany and the United Kingdom triggered snapback over Iran 30 days ago for its further restricting monitoring of its nuclear program and the deadlock over its negotiations with the U.S.
Iran further withdrew from the International Atomic Energy Agency monitoring after Israel’s war with the country in June, which also saw the U.S. strike nuclear sites in the Islamic Republic. Meanwhile, the country still maintains a stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90% — that is largely enough to make several atomic bombs, should Tehran choose to rush toward weaponization.
Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, though the West and IAEA say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003.
The three European nations on Sunday said they “continuously made every effort to avoid triggering snapback.” But Iran “has not authorized IAEA inspectors to regain access to Iran’s nuclear sites, nor has it produced and transmitted to the IAEA a report accounting for its stockpile of high-enriched uranium.”
Tehran has further argued that the three European nations shouldn’t be allowed to implement snapback, pointing in part to America’s unilateral withdrawal from the accord in 2018, during the first term of President Donald Trump’s administration.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised the three European nations for “an act of decisive global leadership” for imposing the sanctions on Iran and said “diplomacy is still an option.”
“For that to happen, Iran must accept direct talks,” Rubio said.
However, it remains unclear how Tehran will respond Sunday.
“The Trump administration appears to think it has a stronger hand post-strikes, and it can wait for Iran to come back to the table,” said Kelsey Davenport, a nuclear expert at the Washington-based Arms Control Association. “Given the knowledge Iran has, given the materials that remain in Iran, that’s a very dangerous assumption.”
Risks also remain for Iran as well, she added: “In the short term, kicking out the IAEA increases the risk of miscalculation. The U.S. or Israel could use the lack of inspections as a pretext for further strikes.”
Hunger and anxiety grow in Iran
The aftermath of the June war drove up food prices in Iran, putting already expensive meat out of reach for poorer families.
Iran’s government put overall annual inflation at 34.5% in June, and its Statistical Center reported that the cost of essential food items rose over 50% over the same period. But even that doesn’t reflect what people see at shops. Pinto beans tripled in price in a year, while butter nearly doubled. Rice, a staple, rose more than 80% on average, hitting 100% for premium varieties. Whole chicken is up 26%, while beer and lamb are up 9%.
“Every day I see new higher prices for cheese, milk and butter,” said Sima Taghavi, a mother of two, at a Tehran grocery. “I cannot omit them like fruits and meat from my grocery list because my kids are too young to be deprived.”
The pressure over food and fears about the war resuming have seen more patients heading to psychologists since June, local media in Iran have reported.
“The psychological pressure from the 12-day war on the one hand, and runaway inflation and price hikes on the other, has left society exhausted and unmotivated,” Dr. Sima Ferdowsi, a clinical psychologist and professor at Shahid Beheshti University, told the Hamshahri newspaper in an interview published in July.
Ukraine’s Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant entered its fifth day running on emergency generators Saturday, prompting mounting safety concerns.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, meanwhile, announced a $90 billion arms agreement with the United States and criticized Hungary for carrying out “dangerous” intelligence-gathering drone activities over Ukraine.
External power to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe’s largest, has been cut for more than four days in a record outage at the six-reactor facility on the front line of the war, Greenpeace Ukraine warned Saturday.
Emergency diesel generators are being used to power cooling and safety systems after the final power line was severed on Tuesday, according to the U.N. nuclear watchdog. Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, met with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, but the external power supply was not restored.
The reactor core and used nuclear fuel must be cooled to prevent them overheating and triggering dangerous meltdowns like the ones that occurred in 2011, when an earthquake and tsunami hit the Fukushima plant in Japan. The U.N. atomic watchdog has repeatedly warned of the possibility of a radiation catastrophe like the one at Chernobyl, about 480 kilometers (300 miles) to the northwest, where a reactor exploded in 1986.
Ukrainian officials confirmed the severity of the situation. Minister of Energy Svitlana Hrynchuk told The Associated Press that “the plant remains in blackout mode, which is a significant violation of the conditions for its normal operation,” marking the 10th such incident since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022. The cause, she said, was another shelling by the Russians, which damaged the only power transmission line supplying the plant from the Ukrainian energy system.
The Russian-controlled Telegram channel for the plant said Saturday that “sufficient diesel fuel reserves are available on-site to ensure long-term autonomous operation of the generators.”
A radiation and nuclear energy specialist at Greenpeace Ukraine, Jan Vande Putte, said “emergency diesel generators are considered the last line of defense, used only in extreme circumstances.”
“These are undoubtedly the most serious and important events since the beginning of the occupation of the ZNPP by Russia in March 2022,” he said.
Images suggest Russia may be trying to restart one reactor
Putte said that it was Russia’s “deliberate actions” that led to the plant’s disconnection from the external power grid of Ukraine. He warned that the development advanced Russia’s state-owned nuclear energy company Rosatom’s “long-standing goal” to “connect to the illegally occupied power grid in Zaporizhia and Donetsk regions and restart the nuclear reactor.”
New satellite analysis by Greenpeace Ukraine suggests that Russia may be positioning to restart at least one reactor despite high-risk wartime conditions. The environmental group said Russian engineers are building 125 miles (201 kilometers) of power lines connecting substations in the occupied cities of Melitopol and Mariupol, with construction beginning in December 2024.
According to Greenpeace’s analysis, Russia has also completed construction of a new water supply system for the plant’s cooling pond and deliberately damaged a 750-kilovolt power line that had connected the facility to Ukraine’s electrical grid.
The Associated Press could not independently verify Greenpeace Ukraine’s analysis.
The plant has been held by Russia since Moscow’s invasion in 2022. Its six reactors remain fueled with uranium though they are in a so-called cold shutdown — meaning nuclear reactions have stopped. However, the plant relies on external electricity to keep its reactor cool and power other safety systems. That external power has been cut multiple times in the war, forcing the plant to rely on diesel generators on site.
The city of Zaporizhzhia, about 440 kilometers (275 miles) southeast of Kyiv, is held by Ukraine and attacks have occurred around the plant as the front line is close. The IAEA rotates staff through the facility to check the plant’s safety and offer its expertise.
Zelenskyy addresses arms deal and regional tensions
Zelenskyy detailed Saturday at a press briefing in Kyiv what he called a “mega deal” for weapons purchases from the United States, with technical meetings beginning in late September. The $90 billion package includes both the major arms agreement and a separate “drone deal” for Ukrainian-made drones that the U.S. will purchase directly.
“We discussed and agreed on the main points with the President (Trump). Now we are moving on to practical implementation,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Ukraine had provided detailed specifications of its military needs to the U.S., including requests for long-range weapons systems.
Zelenskyy also criticized Hungarian drone activity over Ukraine, saying Ukrainian intelligence tracked of at least one drone. “I believe they are doing very dangerous things — very dangerous things, first and foremost for themselves,” Zelenskyy said.
Grieving widow Erika Kirk made a rare appearance on her late husband’s podcast, sharing how his legacy and voice would live on in his absence — vowing that “The Charlie Kirk Show” is here to stay.
Kirk hosted Friday’s episode and reassured listeners that the Turning Point USA founder’s political movement and popular show will continue with a new format and a rotation of emcees, just two weeks after the 31-year-old conservative activist was viciously assassinated during a speaking event in Utah.
“‘The Charlie Kirk Show’ is not going anywhere,” the mom of two stressed.
Erika Kirk hosted “The Charlie Kirk Show” on Friday and vowed that her slain husband’s podcast will continue on. Charlie Kirk / YouTube
“My husband’s voice will live on. The show will go on. We will have rotating hosts, rotating casts, rotating people coming on. It is going to be continually the north star of the conservative movement, of the voice of the youth, of the voice of the base, and that will not end.”
Kirk, who laughed and smiled throughout the episode, recalled her mother once telling the slain right-wing influencer that he was his generation’s Rush Limbaugh — a compliment that drove him to take his show, which launched in 2019, to new heights.
She also reaffirmed her pledge to continue her sweetheart’s “American Comeback Tour” on college campuses nationwide, adding that Turning Point USA, where she was recently named CEO, is moving “full steam ahead” with even more work than she “could ever dream of.”
“We’ll never be silenced,” Kirk said.
“That’s why continuing his platform in a beautiful, honorable way will reinforce that he will never be silenced. My husband’s voice will go on.”
Her appearance comes five days after Charlie’s memorial service, where she publicly forgave Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused of gunning him down at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10.
“We need a more representative and a more inclusive UN that reflects current realities,” says Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.
Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly at the UN headquarters in New York City on Sep 28, 2025. (Photo: Reuters/Eduardo Munoz)
Singapore has called on the United Nations to rein in the rising use of veto powers by the five permanent members of the Security Council and pressed for reforms to make the organisation more inclusive.
Delivering the country’s national statement at the UN General Assembly in New York on Sunday (Sep 28), Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said the veto is being deployed with growing frequency at a time of widening conflicts.
“The increasing, and if I may add, cynical use of vetoes by the P5 must be constrained,” said Dr Balakrishnan, adding that the wider UN membership must reach an agreement on how this veto is exercised in the future.
“Just as the world has changed dramatically in the last 80 years, it is also clear that the UN needs to reform to be fit for purpose for the next stretch,” he said. “We need a more representative and a more inclusive UN that reflects current realities.”
The five permanent members of the Security Council – China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States – hold veto power, which allows any one of them to block the adoption of any substantive resolution, regardless of how much support it has among the rest of the council.
Earlier this month, the US vetoed for the sixth time a draft resolution that would have demanded a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages, saying that it fails to condemn Hamas or recognise Israel’s right to defend itself. All 14 other members of the council voted in favour of the resolution.
Dr Balakrishnan acknowledged the role of the council’s elected members, saying their presence “gives the wider membership of the UN greater agency in addressing the pressing issues of the day”. But he also called for a stronger relationship between the Security Council and the General Assembly.
In a statement at the UN Security Council open debate last year, Singapore also called for the reform of the council, including constraining the use of veto powers.
Dr Balakrishnan’s remarks on Sunday came as the UN marks 80 years since the end of World War II. The multilateral system, grounded in international law, enabled small states like Singapore to flourish, he said.
This post-war world order “has come to an end”, Dr Balakrishnan said. The current distribution of economic weight, technological sophistication and military strength is “very different from the world of 1945”.
“It is obvious that the UN and the other international organisations have not evolved to keep up with the times,” he said.
Dr Balakrishnan pointed out that the world today has become “more turbulent, more uncertain, and in some places, more violent”.
“The erosion of respect for the principles of the UN Charter, the egregious violations of international law and of international humanitarian law, have unfortunately become common, as have violations of sovereignty and territorial integrity.”
The wars in the Middle East, Ukraine and parts of Africa reflect this tragedy, Dr Balakrishnan said. He reiterated that Singapore will reconsider its position on recognising the Palestinian state if Israel “takes further steps to extinguish a two-state solution”.
The geopolitical shifts have also disrupted the multilateral and economic trading system, he said.
“Decades of progressive trade liberalisation and investments expanded opportunities and prosperity all over the globe. But today those are at risk. The tariffs, the export controls, are being used as levers to secure unilateral advantage, including sometimes to address non-trade related issues.”
“DOUBLE DOWN ON MULTILATERALISM”
Despite the prevailing pessimism, Dr Balakrishnan said small states like Singapore cannot afford to be passive.
The multilateral system, underpinned by the UN, remains the best way to uphold global peace and prosperity in a “fair and inclusive way”, he said.
“We’re here to call on all of us to double down on multilateralism founded on international law,” he said. “Even small states and middle powers have agency and we have strategic autonomy to collectively protect our long-term national interests and the global commons.”
He cited “success stories” such as the ratification of the BBNJ Agreement, a legally binding treaty to conserve and sustainably use marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction, which show that the multilateral system still works.
Dr Balakrishnan also said Singapore has nominated ambassador Rena Lee to serve as a judge on the International Court of Justice next year, noting that if elected, she would be the first woman and only the second person from Southeast Asia to serve on the ICJ.
He ended his address by quoting Singapore’s first Foreign Minister S Rajaratnam: “Despite cynics who focus attention on its many shortcomings, Singapore has faith in the future of the United Nations simply because without it there is no worthwhile future for humanity.”
“These words still ring true today,” Dr Balakrishnan said. “So together, let us ensure that this institution continues to serve as humanity’s best hope for peace and prosperity for all of us.”
In an interview with Singapore journalists after his speech, he said that despite being a small state, Singapore has played a constructive role at the UN.
On social media, tourists are complaining about the “expectations vs reality” of Bali – How did we get here?
Bali, Indonesia’s famed tropical paradise, has charmed plenty of tourists over the years.
But it’s also leaving a growing number disillusioned – recently among them Zoe Rae.
“Since landing in Bali, something for us has just not felt quite right,” she said in a YouTube video in July, filmed in her hotel room.
“We came to Bali with high expectations because we’d seen on social media everyone having such a lovely time.”
She added: “If you took a picture of the coffee shop and zoomed out, you would see what the reality was.”
Ms Rae did not describe the reality she saw – nor reply to the BBC’s questions. But it was unsettling enough to make her book an impromptu flight to Dubai to continue celebrating her wedding anniversary there instead.
One does not need to look far for clues.
Social media posts about “expectations vs reality” in Bali abound.
Diners enjoying the sunset at a beach-side restaurant – and the piles of rubbish along the rickety stairs to get there.
The bikini-clad pose in front of a waterfall, while a snaking line of tourists await their turn on slippery rocks.
The alfresco smoothies with bamboo straws, right beside soot-puffing motorcycles stuck on jammed roads.
Millions flock to Bali every year in search of the spiritual Shangri-La promised in the noughties memoir and film Eat, Pray, Love.
What they’re greeted by instead are crowds, traffic and the cacophony of construction, which has ramped up alongside a post-pandemic boom in tourism.
The growing strain on the island had produced plenty of eye-rolls and grumbles, but this month events took a sombre turn.
More than a dozen people died in rare floods on the island. Poor waste management and unchecked urban development had worsened the situation, officials said.
The local government has since announced it will restrict new construction. But many see such interventions as too little, too late.
How did Bali, celebrated for decades as the “last paradise”, get to this point?
#Bali on Instagram
Western adventurers have been turning up in Bali since the early 20th Century, when it was seen as an exotic backwater, home to Hindu temples and rice fields.
Spirituality and a reverence for nature run deep: monkeys, cows and birds carry sacred import, large ancient trees are thought to house spirits, and the popular trekking volcano Mount Batur is believed to be protected by a goddess.
Bali was “one of the first places that there was all this talk of utopia and great beauty and culture,” says Gisela Williams, a Berlin-based travel writer who has been visiting the island since the ’90s.
“It’s the Balinese Hindu culture that has created this myth of the place.”
Over the past decade, tourism to the island has skyrocketed, from 3.8 million visitors in 2014 to to 6.3 million last year.
This year looks set to be a record-breaker: the island appears on track to welcome more than seven million foreign tourists.
Rather than unique traditions or idyll, Bali today is better known for its beach clubs and surf houses.
Alcohol is easily available and scanty clothing is more acceptable compared to the rest of Indonesia. And most visitors also want to immerse themselves in Bali’s luxe hotels, villas and spas.
“You have a lot of Westerners who are really taking advantage of the affordability of a luxury lifestyle,” Ms Williams says. “Since social media has taken over, it’s a very superficial way of understanding a place… You just see a picture, and then you go.”
Zoe Rae’s disillusionment with the reality she encountered in Bali exposes the idealised image held by many casual travellers.
Responding to Mr Rae’s post, Hollie Marie, a British content creator living in Bali, warned in a TikTok video that “only looking up Bali on Instagram will give you a distorted reality of the island itself”.
“The problem with Bali is people come here and only stay in certain areas because they want to see cute cafes, visit Instagrammable places. And they miss out on the fact that Bali is a very culturally rich island,” Ms Marie tells the BBC.
Those who live there, or have explored beyond the obvious haunts, will tell you Bali’s natural beauty is alive and well, from dolphin-watching and dive explorations, to the lush landscape in the quieter north.
The island is “much, much more” than the “party places” that tourists tend to visit, says Canny Claudya, who moved to Bali from Indonesia’s capital, Jakarta.
“If you think that Bali is overcrowded, then you’re just not in the right places.”
‘Eroded day by day’
Still, locals say their island has certainly changed under the demands of tourism.
And when they hear of complaints that this is not the paradise travellers signed up for, some point out that such comments are dripping with irony.
“When tourists said they are disappointed with Bali being more crowded, they are also part of the crowd,” says I Made Vikannanda, a Balinese researcher who advocates for the protection of the island’s nature and people.
“It’s like when we’re in traffic, we’re like ‘Why is there so much traffic?’ But we’re in a car. We’re the ones driving the car, we’re the ones making the traffic,” he said.
Twenty-two-year-old Ni Kadek Sintya recalls a time when she used to ride her scooter through the quiet roads of Canggu, past paddy fields where she would take a lunch break.
Five years on, Canggu has some of the worst traffic on the island. And Ms Sintya’s journey to her job in a wellness resort is lined with villas and cafes, and impatient honks follow her all the way.
“I wouldn’t bother stopping, let alone rest there,” she said. “Now every time I ride past that spot I used to sit [at], there’s this feeling of sadness. I feel that Bali is being eroded day by day.”
As tourism rises, hotels, cafes and bars have been fanning out from the island’s congested south.
The latest hipster destination is Canggu, a once sleepy fishing village that has become a magnet for surfers from around the world.
Canggu follows in the footsteps of other neighbourhoods, from Uluwatu to Seminyak, quiet backwaters that have transformed as tourists search for new “hidden gems”.
This migration has seen trendy cafes, gyms and co-working spaces pop up along narrow rural roads.
Pererenan, to the north, is now being hailed as a more laid-back Canggu.
Further north, in the forests of Ubud, resorts are marketing themselves as a sanctuary to escape the bustle of the south.
“There’s a real catch-22,” Ms Marie says. “On one hand, it’s always a good thing to encourage people to visit different areas… But I think there’s a danger to that as well, because that will encourage people to build everywhere and anywhere.”
Plus, she adds, “people treat Bali a bit like a playground”.
Barely a month goes by without misbehaving tourists making headlines: they have been in serious accidents after riding scooters intoxicated or without helmets; foreigners were deported for getting naked at sacred sites; others got in trouble for drunken brawls.
Adding to recent tensions are thousands of Russians and Ukrainians who have been settling down in Bali after fleeing the war.
The head of Indonesia’s National Narcotics Agency recently warned of a growing problem with Russians and Ukrainians engaging in criminal activities in Bali.
Cleaning up
Local resentment is rising, with social media vigilantes putting misbehaving tourists on blast – even as the Balinese maintain their world-famous hospitality.
“A lot of tourists think because they’re the ones with money to spend on our island, we locals should be OK with whatever they do,” says Ms Sintya, who like many of her generation have come to rely on the stability of a career in tourism.
“It can feel like I’m being trapped,” she says, “because we live on tourism. So if we stop tourism, what will we survive on?”
Despite the “uncontrolled growth” of tourism, Mr Vikannanda, the researcher, thinks the “development of Bali and the harmony of nature can still be maintained”.
“I’m still optimistic. Especially with the participation of young people.”
Indeed, businesses and activists have launched ground-up efforts to encourage sustainable development, from waste management education to beach clean-ups.
Authorities, who have been criticised for not regulating tourism enough, are also trying to clean up the island.
Earlier this year, Bali banned single-use plastics and issued behaviour guidelines for visitors to “ensure that Bali’s tourism remains respectful, sustainable, and in harmony with our local values”.
Police have been deployed to popular areas to make sure visitors follow rules.
Pictures online showed shoes and water bottles strewn across the road where the crush happened
At least 39 people have died, including children, in a crush at a political rally in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, officials say.
Tens of thousands of people had gathered on Saturday at a campaign event for actor-turned-politician Vijay, in the southern Karur district.
It was delayed by several hours, local media reported. Images broadcast on television showed people fainting in the packed crowds.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin told reporters in Karur that the death toll included at least 17 women, 13 men and nine children. A further 51 people were receiving treatment, he said.
Compensation of one million rupees ($11,300; £8,400) will be provided to the families of the deceased, Stalin added, and there will be an inquiry into the incident.
One man told Indian news agency ANI from outside a hospital that his brother’s two sons had been at the event.
“The elder one passed away, the younger one is missing. My relatives, my sister-in-law, is in the ICU. What should I do?” he said.
Vijay wrote in an online statement that his heart was “broken” and that he was in “unbearable, indescribable pain and sorrow”.
He sent his “deepest sympathies and condolences” to the families of those who had died, and prayers for a “speedy recovery” to those in hospital.
UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper issued the statement on Iran alongside her French and German counterparts
Sweeping UN economic and military sanctions have been reimposed on Iran – 10 years after they were lifted in a landmark international deal over its nuclear programme.
The new measures took effect as the three European partners to the deal – the UK, France and Germany – activated the so-called “snapback” mechanism, accusing Iran of “continued nuclear escalation” and lack of co-operation.
Iran suspended inspections of its nuclear facilities – a legal obligation under the terms of the 2015 deal – after Israel and the US bombed several of its nuclear sites and military bases in June.
Its President Masoud Pezeshkian insisted last week that the country had no intention of developing nuclear weapons.
The reintroduction of sanctions – which Pezeshkian described as “unfair, unjust, and illegal” – is the latest blow to a deal that was heralded as a turning point in Western relations with the long-ostracised Islamist nation when it was first struck.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) places limits on Iran’s nuclear installations, its stockpiles of enriched uranium, and the amount of research and development it can undertake.
It aims to allow Iran to develop its nuclear power infrastructure without straying into making nuclear weaponry.
Iran stepped up its banned nuclear activity after Donald Trump pulled the US out of the agreement during his first term as president in 2016.
He has persistently criticised the deal, negotiated under his predecessor Barack Obama, as flawed, vowing to negotiate better terms.
The US and Israeli bombing of nuclear facilities in June was intended to reverse some of Iran’s nuclear progress, as well as punish it for arming regional proxies that have repeatedly attacked Israel.
While Trump said these had caused “monumental damage”, others cast doubt on the extent to which they had hindered Iran’s nuclear programme.
European allies that remain party to the deal still hope negotiations will yield a cooling of tensions.
“We urge Iran to refrain from any escalatory action,” they said in a joint statement, adding: “The reimposition of UN sanctions is not the end of diplomacy.”
Talks between the three countries and Iran on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly earlier this week failed to produce a deal which would have delayed the sanctions being reimposed.
The foreign ministers of the so-called E3 said they had “no choice” but to trigger the snapback procedure, as Iran had “repeatedly breached” its commitments.
They cited Iran’s failure to “take the necessary actions to address our concerns, nor to meet our asks on extension, despite extensive dialogue”.
Specifically, they mentioned Tehran’s refusal to co-operate with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
“Iran has not authorised IAEA inspectors to regain access to Iran’s nuclear sites, nor has it produced and transmitted to the IAEA a report accounting for its stockpile of high-enriched uranium,” the statement read.
The suspension of IAEA inspections began following the US/Israeli bombings, but the agency confirmed on Friday that they had resumed.
Pezeshkian has softened earlier threats of Iran quitting the Non-Proliferation Treaty altogether – but has warned that a return of sanctions would put negotiations in jeopardy.
Residents of Gaza City are still evacuating as the fighting intensifies
More than 35 people have been killed in Israeli strikes and gunfire since the early hours of Saturday morning, hospital sources in Gaza say.
A strike on a house in central Gaza left at least 11 people dead – more that half of them women and children – according to officials at al-Ahli Arab hospital in Gaza City.
Health workers said nine members of the same family were among those killed in an Israeli strike on the Nuseirat refugee camp, and at least six people are reported to have been killed while seeking aid in central and southern Gaza.
It comes a day after Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu told the United Nations that Israel “must finish the job” against Hamas.
The Israeli air force says it has hit approximately 120 targets across the Strip since Friday – including, the military says, “buildings used by terror groups, terror operatives and other infrastructure”.
It is clear there has been no let up in Israel’s recent expanded ground offensive against Hamas, which is now mainly focused on Gaza City, where Israel says is the last stronghold of the armed group.
Hundreds of thousands of residents have fled the territory’s biggest urban centre, where a famine was confirmed last month by a UN-backed body. But hundreds of thousands more remain there in dire humanitarian conditions, with health and other essential services collapsing.
“They tell us go there, then come back here… People are in the streets, in the south scattered everywhere. Where should we go?” said Salwa Subhi Bakr, as quoted by AFP.
“What does the world want from us? What does Netanyahu want? What does Hamas want?” she said.
Several members of the Bakr family were killed during a strike on Al-Shati refugee camp in Gaza City, the news agency reported, citing the Hamas-run civil defence agency.
While international calls for a ceasefire have redoubled – bolstered by multiple new recognitions of Palestinian statehood at the UN this week – Israel remains intent on maintaining maximum pressure on Hamas to try to force it into surrender.
That was the message once again from Prime Minister Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly in New York on Friday, where many delegates walked out in protest as he took to the stage.
Donald Trump has once again expressed optimism about negotiating a deal that would see the hostages released and a new ceasefire in Gaza.
The US president said his team was close to achieving this goal, as what he called “very inspired and productive discussions” were being held with countries across the region.
Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, says that the US has come up with a new 21-point peace plan for the Middle East and Gaza.
It has not been formally presented, but various media reports have laid out what is said to be its key provisions.
These reportedly go beyond the release of all hostages, large numbers of Palestinian prisoners and an immediate ceasefire, to include what The Times of Israel says would be a pathway to a future Palestinian state.
But that is something Netanyahu strongly rejected in his address to the UN.
It has also been reported that the plan would enable Palestinians to remain in the Gaza Strip, rather than encourage many to leave.
Such provisions – if they are confirmed – are certain to be talking points when Trump meets Netanyahu on Monday. The US leader’s optimism may receive a reality check at that meeting.
The Times of Israel – which says it had seen a copy of the US proposal – says that it also includes a commitment for Hamas to disarm, as well as the full demilitarisation of Gaza and the establishment of a process to de-radicalise the population.
It is clear that both Hamas and the Israeli government would have to make greater concessions than they have so far committed themselves to, if the plan as it has been reported so far is to have any chance of success.
The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
Dr Jaishankar did not mince words, linking Pakistan to the recent barbarity of the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025
Jaishankar’s intervention followed India’s earlier robust response to the Pahalgam tragedy, which included retaliatory strikes against terror infrastructure in Pakistan under Operation Sindoor. File pic/PTI
India’s External Affairs Minister, Dr S Jaishankar, delivered a scathing attack on Pakistan during his address to the 80th UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York, labelling the neighbouring nation an “epicentre of terrorism”. The minister’s powerful remarks centred on the systemic and state-supported nature of terror, which he asserted remains the single largest threat to regional stability.
Dr Jaishankar did not mince words, linking Pakistan to the recent barbarity of the Pahalgam terror attack in April 2025, where 26 innocent tourists, primarily Hindu civilians, were massacred. He stressed that this act was a brutal reminder that terror hubs across the border “operate in industrial scale”, thriving due to governmental patronage. Furthermore, he condemned the disturbing normalisation of violence, highlighting that “terrorists are publicly glorified” by the state apparatus.
The EAM presented a clear demand to the international community: what is required is “relentless pressure” on the entire ecosystem that supports extremism. He outlined the immediate policy imperative to “choke the financing of terror”, calling for concerted global action to cut off the financial lifelines of terrorist organisations. India’s stance, he affirmed, is one of zero tolerance, making it clear that there will be no distinction between the terrorists and their sponsors, both of whom will be held accountable.
Musician Roger Waters, addresses pro-Palestinian demonstrators alongside Colombian President Gustavo Petro, at Dag Hammarskjold Plaza outside U.N. headquarters during the 80th United Nations General Assembly in New York City, U.S., September 26, 2025. REUTERS/Bing Guan Purchase Licensing Rights
Colombian President Gustavo Petro on Saturday dismissed the U.S. decision to revoke his visa and accused Washington of violating international law over his criticism of Israel’s war in Gaza.
The U.S. said on Friday it would revoke Petro’s visa after he took to New York’s streets on Friday to join a pro-Palestinian demonstration and urged U.S. soldiers to disobey President Donald Trump’s orders.
“I no longer have a visa to travel to the United States. I don’t care. I don’t need a visa … because I’m not only a Colombian citizen but a European citizen, and I truly consider myself a free person in the world,” Petro said on social media.
“Revoking it for denouncing genocide shows the U.S. no longer respects international law,” he added on a post on X.
Israel has repeatedly denied genocide charges over its actions in Gaza and says it is acting in self-defense.
Images of starving Palestinians, including children, have sparked global outrage against Israel’s assault on Gaza, which has killed 65,000 people, according to Gazan authorities, and internally displaced the entire population of the enclave. Multiple rights experts, scholars and a U.N. inquiry say this amounts to genocide.
Israel calls its actions self-defense after the October 2023 attack by Hamas that killed 1,200 people and in which over 250 were taken hostage.
Petro, addressing a crowd of pro-Palestinian protesters outside U.N. headquarters in Manhattan, called for a global armed force with the priority to liberate Palestinians and urged U.S. soldiers “not to point their guns at people. Disobey the orders of Trump. Obey the orders of humanity.”
The State Department posted on X that it would “revoke Petro’s visa due to his reckless and incendiary actions.”
Colombia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that using visa revocation as a diplomatic weapon goes against the spirit of the U.N., which protects freedom of expression and guarantees the independence of member states at U.N. events.
“The U.N. should find a completely neutral host country … that would allow the Organization itself to issue authorization to enter the territory of that new host State,” the ministry said.
Petro is not the first Colombian president to have his U.S. visa revoked. In 1996, then-President Ernesto Samper’s visa was canceled over a political scandal involving allegations that the Cali drug cartel had funded his presidential campaign.
Nuclear symbol and Iran flag are seen in this illustration, July 21, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration REFILE – CORRECTING YEAR Purchase Licensing Rights
Iran’s clerical rulers face one of their gravest crises since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, caught between growing discontent at home and a stalled nuclear deal that together have left the country more isolated and divided.
The United Nations reimposed sanctions on Iran on Saturday after last-ditch talks between Tehran and European powers Britain, France and Germany failed to resolve the latest of decades of standoffs over Iran’s nuclear program.
Without a breakthrough in talks with the West, four Iranian officials and two insiders predicted Iran’s economic isolation would further intensify, stoking public fury.
Yet accepting the West’s demands risks fracturing the ruling elite and sidelining the Islamic Republic’s revolutionary beliefs in “not succumbing to Western pressure” that define Tehran’s unbowed stance, they said.
CONCERNS MOUNT IN TEHRAN OVER POTENTIAL ISRAELI STRIKES
“The clerical establishment is trapped between a rock and a hard place. The existence of the Islamic Republic is in peril,” one official said, adding that “Our people cannot handle more economic pressure or another war.”
Adding to these strains are mounting concerns in Tehran over potential renewed Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites if nuclear diplomacy with the West fails, a second official said.
A 12-day war in June that began with Israeli airstrikes, followed by U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear installations, shocked Tehran, kicking off just a day before a planned sixth round of talks with Washington over Tehran’s nuclear program.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have warned they will not hesitate to hit Iran again if it resumes enrichment of uranium, a possible pathway to developing nuclear weapons.
“I think the chances of war breaking out are significant, given Israel’s aggressive posture and the strong support it currently receives from the United States,” former lawmaker Gholamali Jafarzade Imenabadi told Iranian media on Thursday.
Britain, France and Germany triggered the snapback of U.N. sanctions on August 28, accusing Iran of violating its 2015 nuclear pact with world powers. The measures took effect on Saturday after failed negotiating efforts to delay it this week during the U.N. General Assembly.
The United States, its European allies and Israel accuse Tehran of using its nuclear program as a veil for efforts to try to develop the capability to produce weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
TEHRAN SAYS RENEWED SANCTIONS WILL FORCE HARDER NUCLEAR LINE
Iranian authorities have said renewed sanctions will push them toward a tougher nuclear stance, but the threat of Israeli attacks has left them with scant room to manoeuvre.
A former moderate senior Iranian official doubted Tehran would take drastic steps as the leadership understands the risks amid its weakened regional position, mounting domestic pressures and the potential cost of further escalation.
Rifts are widening within Iran’s ruling elite over how to navigate the crisis — some push for a tougher line while others resist, fearing it could trigger the Islamic Republic’s collapse.
With Trump’s speedy revival of a “maximum pressure” campaign on Tehran since February with new sanctions and threats of further military action, a second official said some decision-makers in Tehran believe “maintaining the status quo — no war, no deal and continued talks — is the best option without offering further concessions.”
The new measures could significantly increase pressure on Iran’s economy, further restricting its trade with countries that have previously disregarded unilateral U.S. sanctions.
The U.N. sanctions include limitations on Iran’s oil, banking and finance sectors, an arms embargo, a ban on uranium enrichment and reprocessing, a ban on activities with ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons, a global asset freeze and travel bans on Iranian individuals and entities.
POPULAR ANGER MOUNTS OVER DEEPENING ECONOMIC WOES
Compounding Tehran’s challenges, Iran’s clerical establishment is grappling with mounting popular anger over deepening economic woes.
Many Iranians, like primary school teacher Shima, fear that revival of U.N. sanctions will further cripple the economy, already under worsening strain because of years of sanctions and mismanagement.
“We already struggle to make ends meet. More sanctions means more economic pressure. How are we going to survive?,” Shima, 36, a mother of two, told Reuters from Tehran by telephone.
The clerical leadership is increasingly concerned that mounting public anger over economic hardships could erupt into mass protests that would “further harm its position on the international stage,” the second official said.
ICE agents charge towards protesters during a protest against the U.S. President Donald Trump administration’s immigration policies, outside an ICE detention facility in Portland, Oregon, U.S., September 1, 2025. REUTERS/John Rudoff/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
U.S. PresidentDonald Trump on Saturday said he was directing the U.S. military to deploy to Portland, Oregon and to protect federal immigration facilities against “domestic terrorists”, saying he was authorizing them to use “full force, if necessary.”
Ordering the latest crackdown on a Democrat-led city, Trump said in a social media post that he was directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland, and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists.”
Portland Mayor Keith Wilson, who like other Oregon officials learned of Trump’s order from social media, said: “The number of necessary troops is zero, in Portland and any other American city. The president will not find lawlessness or violence here unless he plans to perpetrate it.”
Violent crime in Portland has dropped in the first six months of 2025, data show. Homicides fell by 51% compared to the same period a year earlier, according to preliminary data released by the Major Cities Chiefs Association in its Midyear Violent Crime Report. That report showed Portland had 17 homicides in the period compared with 56 in Louisville, Kentucky, and 124 in Memphis, Tennessee, which have comparable population sizes.
In a press conference on Saturday, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, a Democrat, rejected the need for troops and said she spoke with Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
“There is no insurrection, there is no threat to national security, and there is no need for military troops in our major city,” Kotek said.
“I’m going to continue communicating that to the president, and I hope he will be open to reconsidering the deployment.”
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, wrote on X that Trump “may be replaying the 2020 playbook and surging into Portland with the goal of provoking conflict and violence.”
In 2020, protests erupted in downtown Portland, the Pacific Northwest enclave with a reputation as a liberal city, following the killing in Minneapolis of George Floyd. The protests dragged on for months and some civic leaders at the time said they were spurred rather than quelled by Trump’s deployment of federal troops.
GROWING TENSIONS IN MAJOR CITIES
It was unclear whether Trump’s warning that U.S. troops could use “full force” on the streets of Portland meant he was somehow authorizing lethal force and, if so, under what conditions. U.S. troops are able to use force in self-defense on domestic U.S. deployments.
The Pentagon did not offer any clarification about whether Trump was deploying National Guard, active-duty troops or perhaps a mix of the two, as was the case in Los Angeles earlier this year.
“We stand ready to mobilize U.S. military personnel in support of DHS operations in Portland at the President’s direction. The Department will provide information and updates as they become available,” said Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesperson.
Asked about the Portland decision on Saturday, Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said ICE agents needed to be protected amid protests against immigration raids.
“We’re not going to put up with it. This administration is not playing games,” she said in an interview on Fox News.
Portland Police Chief Bob Day said there had already been an increase in federal law enforcement in recent days to bolster security at the ICE facility in the city’s southwest.
There have been growing tensions in major U.S. cities over Trump’s aggressive immigration crackdown days after a shooting targeting an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Dallas left one detainee dead and two others seriously wounded.
TRUMP FOCUS ON CRIME, ‘ANTIFA’
On Thursday, Trump told reporters that “crazy people” were trying to burn buildings in Portland. “They’re professional agitators and anarchists,” he said, without providing evidence.
Trump last week signed an executive order that declares the anti-fascist antifa, movement a domestic “terrorist organization” as part of a crackdown on what he claims is left-wing-sponsored political violence.
According to U.S. law enforcement, there has never been a terrorist incident in the United States connected to antifa. Trump first sought to designate the movement as a domestic terror organization during the nationwide George Floyd protests.
The most notorious episode involving the movement occurred in Portland in August 2020, when Michael Reinoehl, a self-identified antifa supporter, shot and killed Aaron “Jay” Danielson, a member of the far-right group Patriot Prayer.
Reinoehl was killed by federal and local law enforcement officers during an attempt to arrest him.
Trump has made crime a major focus of his administration even as violent crime rates have fallen in many U.S. cities. His crackdown on municipalities led by Democrats including Los Angeles and Washington has spurred legal challenges and protests.
A man holds a laptop computer as cyber code is projected on him in this illustration picture taken on May 13, 2017. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/Illustration/ File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
Cybercriminals have stolen data on over 8,000 children attending nurseries in London operated by childcare provider Kido International, the hackers said on their dark web portal.
The gang, which calls itself Radiant, evidenced its claim by publishing the names, photos, home addresses, and family contact information of 10 children it said attended one of Kido’s 18 nurseries in Greater London.
The hack, which raises serious concerns about child safeguarding and data privacy, was the latest in a string of serious ransomware incidents in Britain that have rocked businesses in Britain this year.
“Next steps for us will be to release 30 more ‘profiles’ of each child and 100 employees,” the post on Radiant’s leak website said.
Kido International did not respond to an emailed request from Reuters for comment. In a statement, London’s Metropolitan Police said they had made no arrests. “Enquiries are ongoing and remain in the early stages within the Met’s Cyber Crime Unit,” the statement said.
Speaking over an encrypted messaging service, the nursery hackers said they had been inside Kido’s networks for weeks.
Asked where they were based, the hackers said they were in Russia, though they did not provide evidence to support that statement.
Ransomware is malicious software used by cybercriminals to encrypt a company’s data and demand payment for its release. The hackers declined to say how much money they were asking Kido International to pay.
“Cybercriminals will target anyone if they think there is money to be made, and going after those who look after children is a particularly egregious act,” Jonathon Ellison of the National Cyber Security Centre, part of Britain’s GCHQ spy agency, said in a statement.
A government source said on Thursday that the British government was considering providing financial support for carmaker Jaguar Land Rover’s suppliers after a shutdown caused by a cyberattack was extended until October.
A day earlier, police said they had arrested a man as part of an investigation into a ransomware attack against Collins Aerospace, owned by RTX (RTX.N). The attack crippled automated check-in systems at London Heathrow, Britain’s busiest airport, and caused travel chaos at other airports across Europe.
People stand next to a destroyed tank turret, following deadly clashes between Druze fighters, Sunni Bedouin tribes and government forces, in Syria’s predominantly Druze city of Sweida, Syria July 25, 2025. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi Purchase Licensing Rights
Efforts to reach a security pact between Syria and Israel have hit a last-minute snag over Israel’s demand that it be allowed to open a “humanitarian corridor” to Syria’s southern province of Sweida, four sources familiar with the talks said.
Syria and Israel had come close in recent weeks to agreeing the broad outlines of a pact after months of U.S.-brokered talks in Baku, Paris and London that accelerated in the lead-up to the United Nations General Assembly in New York this week.
The pact was intended to create a demilitarized zone that would include the province of Sweida, where sectarian violence in July killed hundreds of people from the Druze, an offshoot of Islam.
ISRAEL SAYS IT WILL PROTECT SYRIA’S DRUZE
Israel, which has a 120,000-strong Druze minority whose men serve in the Israeli military, has said it will protect the sect and carried out military strikes in Syria under the banner of defending it.
In earlier talks in Paris, Israel asked to open a land corridor to Sweida for aid, but Syria rejected the request as a breach of its sovereignty.
Israel reintroduced the demand at a late stage in the talks, according to two Israeli officials, a Syrian source and a source in Washington briefed on the talks.
The Syrian source and the source in Washington said the renewed Israeli demand had derailed plans to announce a deal this week. The new sticking point has not been previously reported.
The State Department, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Syria’s foreign ministry did not respond to questions on the contours of the deal or the sticking points.
NO TALKS SINCE LAST WEEK
U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, who has been brokering the talks between Syria and Israel, said on Tuesday the longtime foes were close to striking a “de-escalation agreement” in which Israel would stop its attacks and Syria would agree not to move any machinery or heavy equipment near the border with Israel.
He said it would serve as the first step towards the security deal that the two countries have been negotiating. One diplomat familiar with the matter said it appeared that the U.S. was “scaling down from a security deal to a de-escalation deal.”
Speaking shortly before Barrack at an event in New York, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, a former al Qaeda leader who led rebel forces that seized Damascus last year, expressed concern that Israel may be stalling the talks.
“We are scared of Israel. We are worried about Israel. It’s not the other way around,” he said.
A Syrian official told Reuters that conversations before the U.N. General Assembly began were “positive,” but there had been no further conversations with Israeli officials this week.
Addressing the U.N. General Assembly on Friday, Netanyahu said he believed an agreement could be reached with Syria that would respect its sovereignty and protect both Israel and the security of minorities in the region.
His office said on Wednesday that concluding ongoing negotiations was “contingent on ensuring the interests of Israel, which include, inter alia, the demilitarization of south-western Syria and preserving the safety and security of the Druze in Syria.”
Syria and Israel have been foes since Israel’s founding in 1948. A disengagement agreement in 1974 created a narrow demilitarized zone monitored by the United Nations.
But since rebels toppled Syria’s then-leader Bashar al-Assad last December 8, Israel has carried out unprecedented strikes on Syria’s military assets across the country and sent troops into the country’s south.
In the artwork for her Target-exclusive “The Life of a Showgirl: The Crowd Is Your King” vinyl, Taylor Swift wears a bodysuit by The Blonds, crystal-covered Christian Louboutin heels and a show-stopping Kallati ring. Mert Alas, Marcus Piggott and TAS Rights Management
She polishes up real nice.
Taylor Swift announced her Target-exclusive “The Life of a Showgirl: The Crowd Is Your King” vinyl on Instagram Wednesday — and in the accompanying album artwork, she sports a ring that shines even brighter than the Las Vegas lights.
Designed by family-owned fine jewelry house Kallati and priced at $27,120, the superstar’s 14-karat rose-gold sparkler is set with a show-stopping 35-carat pink sapphire framed by smaller diamonds totaling 1 carat.
The dazzling piece matches Swift’s blush velvet bodysuit — plucked from The Blonds’ Elizabeth Taylor-themed fall 2023 collection, as exclusively reported by Page Six Style — and complements the supersized 3D jewel motif on the front of the corseted design.
The late “Butterfield 8” actress and jewelry collector, after whom Swift named one of her “Showgirl” tracks, would surely adore the songstress’ gobstopper-sized pink gem.
Of course, this isn’t the only headline-making ring Swift’s shown off lately. Last month, Travis Kelce popped the question with a stunning old mine brilliant-cut engagement ring crafted by jeweler Kindred Lubeck of Artifex Fine in collaboration with the Chiefs tight end himself, as we exclusively reported.
Other standout styles seen in Swift’s “Life of a Showgirl” album artwork include several other looks from The Blonds — including a playful pink feathered corset and a crystal-encrusted maroon bodysuit paired with matching flame-inspired opera gloves — along with a number of archival Bob Mackie and Pete Menefee designs from the iconic, long-running Las Vegas show “Jubilee!”
Prince William admits that wife Kate Middleton’s cancer battle took a toll on him.
“I’d say 2024 was the hardest year I’ve ever had,” the royal shares on an upcoming episode of AppleTV+’s “The Reluctant Traveler” with Eugene Levy.
He further reflects, “You know, life is sent to test us as well and being able to overcome that is what makes us who we are.”
William also notes in the segment, which will air in full on Oct. 3, how much he prioritizes sleep, as it’s an “important part of [his] life” because he’s got three small children.
Prince William made a candid admission about how he felt during his wife’s cancer journey. Apple TV
The candid look at the future king’s life comes after Middleton — who revealed her cancer diagnosis in March 2024 — shared that she has gone into remission.
“My heartfelt thanks goes to all those who have quietly walked alongside [Prince] William and me as we have navigated everything,” the Princess of Wales wrote via Instagram in January.
Middleton underwent chemotherapy treatment that she once admitted was “incredibly tough,” as she fought the deadly disease.
However, even after she was cancer-free, the princess spoke about the lasting effects of her health woes.
“You put on a sort of brave face, stoicism through treatment. Treatment’s done, then it’s like, ‘I can crack on, get back to normal,’ but actually [that’s not the case],” she said at a Colchester Hospital visit in July.
“It’s a roller coaster, it’s not smooth, like you expect it to be. But the reality is you go through hard times.”
Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco’s upcoming wedding will reportedly be missing a major A-list guest.
Meryl Streep — who appeared alongside Gomez in “Only Murders in the Building” and is dating her co-star Martin Short — was invited to the highly anticipated nuptials, but pulled out, a source told the Daily Mail.
The insider explained to the outlet that the Oscar winner was “planning to attend but told Selena she now won’t be able to.” An exact reason for her absence from the lavish affair was not provided.
However, it’s likely Streep, 76, has been tied up with work, as she’s been filming the sequel for “The Devil Wears Prada” in New York City in recent months.
Page Six has reached out to reps for Gomez and Streep but did not immediately hear back.
Gomez and Blanco will reportedly have other stars watch them say “I do” on their big day, however.
Short, 75, and Steve Martin — who also stars on the bride-to-be’s hit Hulu show — will be in attendance, and Paris Hilton and Gomez’s BFF Taylor Swift are on the guest list, as well, per the Daily Mail.
“Taylor is planning to attend but she’ll probably be going solo as [her fiancé] Travis Kelce has a game in Kansas the next day,” the insider added. “That’s all still under discussion.”
Gomez’s other co-stars Steve Martin and Martin Short will reportedly make it to the nuptials. Penske Media via Getty Images
Gomez, 33, and Blanco, 37, are expected to walk down the aisle this Saturday.
Sources revealed to the Sun last week that the pop star and songwriter’s star-studded wedding will take place at a private estate in Santa Barbara, Calif.
Guests will stay nearby at the El Encanto hotel, where rooms go for $3,500-a-night.
Taylor Swift was seen hiding under umbrellas as she arrived for Selena Gomez’s star-studded wedding celebration.
The “Blank Space” singer was pictured stepping off an aircraft at Santa Barbara airport on Friday afternoon in a dark shirt — as several people rushed out to cover her with a cluster of black umbrellas. Only the hitmaker’s elbow could be seen in snapshots from her big arrival.
A bystander could be seen carrying some luggage and a white box — potentially a wedding gift for Gomez and her groom Benny Blanco.
Once Swift descended the plane’s steps, she hopped into a waiting black SUV.
A group rushed out to meet her with the black umbrellas as she descended the aircraft’s steps. B-TEAM / BACKGRID
A rep for Swift did not immediately return Page Six’s request for comment.
A source told Page Six earlier Friday that Swift, 35, will be lodging in a private rental home during the weekend soirée for security reasons — despite the Sun’s previous report that guests would stay at El the high-profile Encanto hotel for the wedding weekend.
“She will be renting a house near the wedding venue, which is a secret to the public,” our insider said of the decision. “Her security team feels it’s better than a hotel.”
Gomez, 33, and Blanco, 37, are reportedly expected to tie the knot at a private Santa Barbara estate on Saturday, amid a romantic two-day celebration.
“All the guests will be picked up and driven to the location without knowing their destination ahead of time,” a source told the Sun earlier this month. “Everyone is so excited despite the mystery, they know it will be an amazing time.”
As for Swift, 35, it’s unclear if the hitmaker — who became engaged to Travis Kelce in August — will bring along her fiancé, as the Kansas City Chiefs tight end is set to face the Baltimore Ravens in Missouri on Sunday.
The “Only Murders in the Building” actress announced her engagement to Blanco in December 2024 via social media, with BFF Swift taking to the comments thread to react. “Yes I will be the flower girl,” she quipped.
In August, the Disney Channel alum returned the favor with a sweet comment on Swift’s engagement to the NFL star. “When besties gets engaged,” she wrote atop an Instagram Stories repost of the power couple’s engagement announcement.
FILE PHOTO: A Microsoft logo is seen on an office building in New York City in this July 28, 2015 file photo. REUTERS/Mike Segar/Files/File Photo
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that Microsoft should fire Lisa Monaco, who had served in the administrations of two Democratic presidents and is now Microsoft’s global affairs president.
The move appears to be the latest effort by Trump to exact retribution on those he sees on political enemies and comes one day after the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey.
Monaco had helped coordinate the Justice Department’s response to the January 6, 2021, attacks by Trump supporters on the U.S. Capitol.
She served as a security aide in the administration of President Barack Obama and was the deputy attorney general in President Joe Biden’s administration. Monaco started working for Microsoft in July to lead the firm’s engagements with governments globally, according to her LinkedIn profile.
Trump on Truth Social said Monaco was “a menace to U.S. National Security, especially given the major contracts that Microsoft has with the United States Government.
“It is my opinion that Microsoft should immediately terminate the employment of Lisa Monaco,” he posted.
Monaco’s security clearances were revoked in February. On Friday, Trump said the U.S. government has also banned her from all federal properties because of “Monaco’s many wrongful acts.”
Microsoft declined to comment on Trump’s post. Monaco also did not immediately respond.
On Thursday, Comey, who led the FBI when it began an investigation into ties between Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russian government, was indicted on charges of false statements and obstruction of a congressional proceeding.
Trump on Friday said he expects more indictments against perceived enemies, saying to reporters: “I think there will be others” but said he did not have a list.
Since Trump returned to office in January, he has used his powers as president to hamstring law firms that represented causes he dislikes, leveraged federal funding to force changes at universities and fired prosecutors who took part in investigations against him.
He has also pushed for charges against former national security adviser John Bolton, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff.
The Trump administration also has been involved in corporate America on an unprecedented scale, demanding that Intel’s CEO step down, before praising him and agreeing for the government to take a stake in Intel. Disney’s ABC suspended comedian Jimmy Kimmel’s show for several days under pressure from Trump and his administration.
The US$4 billion in aid spending at issue was intended by Congress for foreign aid, United Nations peacekeeping operations and democracy-promotion efforts overseas.
US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump ride an escalator as they arrive to attend the 80th United Nations General Assembly, in New York City, New York, US, September 23, 2025. (Photo: Reuters/Kylie Cooper/File Photo)
The US Supreme Court sided again on Friday (Sep 26) with Donald Trump, allowing his administration to withhold about US$4 billion in foreign aid authorised by Congress for the current fiscal year as the Republican president pursues his “America First” agenda.
The justices for now blocked an order by Washington-based US District Judge Amir Ali that had directed the administration to promptly take steps to spend the aid at issue in the dispute. Ali’s decision came in a lawsuit by aid groups challenging the administration’s action.
The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority, and the court’s three liberal justices dissented.
COURT QUESTIONS LEGAL CHALLENGE
The court said in its unsigned order that the aid groups that sued the administration likely lacked the legal authority to bring their challenge. It also expressed concerns that ruling against Trump threatened to impair his power to conduct foreign affairs.
The case raised questions about the degree to which a president has the authority to rescind funds Congress has appropriated for programs that do not align with his policies.
The administration said in court papers that the money it targeted was “contrary to US foreign policy”, reflecting Trump’s effort to scale back assistance abroad as part of an “America First” agenda. Trump has also moved to dismantle the US Agency for International Development, the main foreign aid agency.
FOREIGN AID AT STAKE
The US government’s 2025 fiscal year ends on Sep 30. The US$4 billion in aid spending at issue was intended by Congress for foreign aid, United Nations peacekeeping operations and democracy-promotion efforts overseas.
Congress budgeted billions of dollars in foreign aid last year, about US$11 billion of which was set to expire at the end of the fiscal year.
The administration sought to block the US$4 billion through a “pocket rescission”, an unusual move aimed at avoiding spending funds appropriated by Congress. The US Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse.
DISSENT WARNS OF SEPARATION OF POWERS BREACH
The liberal justices, in a dissent written by Justice Elena Kagan, said Friday’s ruling was an affront to the principle that power is separated between the three branches of government. They noted that the Constitution “gives Congress the power to make spending decisions through the enactment of appropriations laws.”
“If those laws require obligation of the money, and if Congress has not by rescission or other action relieved the Executive of that duty, then the Executive must comply,” Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Ali ruled on Sep 3 that the administration cannot simply choose to withhold the money, and that it must comply with appropriations laws passed by Congress unless lawmakers change them.
SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH TRUMP
Justice Department lawyers told the Supreme Court that Ali’s injunction raised “a grave and urgent threat to the separation of powers”.
“It would be self-defeating and senseless for the executive branch to obligate the very funds that it is asking Congress to rescind,” they wrote.
Trump budget director Russell Vought has argued that the president can withhold funds for 45 days after requesting a rescission, which would run out the clock until the end of the fiscal year. The White House said the tactic was last used in 1977.
Some legal experts have said Trump’s attempted clawback of billions of dollars in congressionally appropriated funds in this manner had no historical parallel.
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a 2-1 ruling on Sep 5 declined to halt Ali’s order, prompting the administration’s request to the Supreme Court.
In the foreign aid case, the Supreme Court on Sep 9 paused Ali’s order while it considered how to proceed.
Palestinians inspect the site of Israeli strikes on houses at Shati (Beach) refugee camp, amid an Israeli military operation, in Gaza City, Sep 26, 2025. (Photo: Reuters/Ebrahim Hajjaj)
US President Donald Trump said on Friday (Sep 26) talks on Gaza with Middle Eastern nations were intense and that Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants were aware of the discussions, which he said would continue as long as required.
Trump met leaders and officials from multiple Muslim-majority countries this week to discuss the situation in Gaza, which has been under a mounting assault from Washington’s ally Israel.
US special envoy Steve Witkoff said Trump presented proposals to those leaders that included a 21-point Middle East peace plan.
“Intense negotiations have been going on for four days, and will continue for as long as necessary in order to get a successfully completed agreement. All of the Countries within the region are involved,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Trump had promised a quick end to the war, but a resolution remains elusive eight months into his term. Trump’s term began with a two-month ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, which ended when Israeli strikes killed 400 Palestinians on Mar 18.
“Hamas is very much aware of these discussions, and Israel has been informed at all levels,” Trump wrote. His post did not mention any further details but called the discussions “inspired and productive”.
Trump officials said this week a Gaza breakthrough was likely soon despite Israeli bombardments in the coastal territory.
Experts say China’s recent commitment marks a major step forward in global climate action, standing in stark contrast to the US’s retreat from international climate goals.
In recent days, US President Donald Trump has called climate change a “con job” and doubled down on fossil fuels, while Chinese President Xi Jinping announced new climate goals and called on nations to take action.
China has made a landmark climate pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 7 to 10 per cent below peak levels by 2035.
Beijing’s reduction target marks the first time the world’s biggest emitter has committed to an actual decrease in emissions, rather than merely slowing their growth.
Chinese President Xi Jinping made the announcement at a climate leaders’ summit on Wednesday (Sep 24), where the United States was notably absent.
Analysts say China’s commitment is a pivotal moment in global climate action, with the potential to substantially improve the health of the planet.
“China is such a big emitter that it’s the only country that, if it changes its emissions significantly, it changes the (carbon footprint) of the whole of planet Earth,” said Benjamin Horton, dean of the City University of Hong Kong’s School of Energy and Environment.
Beijing’s vow is backed by promises to expand wind and solar power capacity sixfold from 2020 levels, drastically increase forest coverage and accelerate electric vehicle production.
Yao Zhe, a global policy advisor at environmental organisation Greenpeace East Asia, said Xi’s reduction target is a modest baseline.
With strong momentum in its clean energy developments, China could surpass its current pledge, she added.
“China is the world’s largest carbon emitter … but it is also the biggest clean technology provider. So, what China has to offer matters a lot,” Yao told CNA’s East Asia Tonight programme.
“I’m hopeful that the actual progress will, in fact, outpace the target on paper.”
AMERICA MISSING ON CLIMATE ACTION
Experts said China’s commitment speaks volumes at a time when the US is moving away from global climate goals.
The US is the world’s biggest historical greenhouse gas emitter and second biggest current emitter behind China.
Washington once promised major emission cuts under previous President Joe Biden – up to 66 per cent by 2035.
But those pledges are now off the table after President Donald Trump in January pulled the US out of the Paris Agreement.
“The Paris Agreement was put in place because scientists know the dangers for civilisation if we start to cross planetary boundaries … (when) global mean temperature (rises) 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial (levels),” said Horton.
The global average atmospheric carbon dioxide was 422.8 parts per million in 2024 – a record high, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), an American scientific and regulatory agency.
“The safety net for planet Earth is at around 280 parts per million. So, we’re far in excess of that. Every single year we increase our carbon dioxide … we increase our temperatures,” said Horton.
Last year was the warmest year on record.
Scientists have linked rising temperatures to more extreme weather events such as drought, wildfires, heatwaves and storms.
Horton, who is based in Hong Kong, pointed to Super Typhoon Ragasa, which in recent days wreaked havoc in the territory and nearby countries and regions.
“We need to see action and ultimately, we need to see results. We need to see our carbon dioxide volumes starting to stabilise, and as we move into the future, to decrease,” he said.
CHINA IN CONTRAST TO US’ STANCE
On Tuesday, Trump called climate change the “greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world” during his United Nations General Assembly speech. He added that climate predictions are made by “stupid people” and that countries will “fail” if they continue with the “green scam”.
In contrast, Xi urged stronger climate action from developed countries and delivered a veiled critique of the US president’s anti-climate rhetoric.
Horton said China’s pledges appear genuine, stemming from concern for environmental health and long-term economic prosperity, rather than over rivalry with the US.
“This is not about geopolitics. (The pledge) shows that the Chinese government is listening to science and is developing regulations and policies,” he said.
“It’s about an understanding of scientific information and (climate) threats posed to the population (and) the economy. If we don’t control our carbon dioxide emissions, extreme (weather) events are going to impact lives and livelihoods.”
Still, many observers said Xi’s pledge fell short of expectations.
Yao said the biggest challenge to China’s clean energy transition lies in the limited capacity of its power grid to handle increased renewable energy input.
“China has no problem producing and manufacturing such equipment, but the problem is whether the grid can absorb all this (additional) renewable energy being produced,” she said.
She added that Chinese policymakers are also trying to find a balance between decarbonisation and maintaining flexibility for future economic stimulus.
CLIMATE HEALTH LINKED TO ECONOMY
The UN has hailed Beijing’s commitments but said the world must aim higher as the clock ticks down on rising temperatures.
Alongside China, the UN said about 100 nations have signalled new climate targets ahead of the COP30 climate summit in Brazil in November.
However, there were also setbacks. The European Union is struggling to find unity on climate action, missing the September deadline to present its climate plan.
Environmental advocates warned that climate health is closely connected to that of the economy, and that environmental degradation can lead to serious financial consequences.
In an unprecedented incursion, about 20 suspected Russian drones entered Polish airspace earlier in September [FILE: September 10, 2025]Image: Dariusz Stefaniuk/REUTERS
Ukraine and Hungary spar over drone incursion
Ukraine accused Hungary of trying to spy on its border areas, saying several reconnaissance drones that had violated its airspace were “likely” of Hungarian origin.
“Ukrainian forces recorded violations of our airspace by reconnaissance drones, which are likely Hungarian,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on X.
Zelenskyy referred to “very strange incidents” on the Hungarian border, speaking in his nightly video address.
He said he had called for “thorough checks” and “if such drones appear again, to respond appropriately for the defence of our state.”
Hungary rejected the accusation and mocked Zelenskyy.
“President Zelenskyy is losing his mind to his anti-Hungarian obsession. He’s now starting to see things that aren’t there,” Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said in a post on X.
Relations between Ukraine and Hungary have soured since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has been skeptical about Western military aid for Ukraine and maintained more cordial relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin than other NATO and EU member states.
EU’s eastern members agree on ‘drone wall’ after Russian incursions
Countries along the European Union’s eastern border agreed Friday to prioritize a so-called “drone wall” that can help defend the bloc from future airspace incursions.
Defense ministers from 10 EU members met via videoconference to discuss the measures in the wake of repeated airspace violations in recent days affecting Poland, Romania, Estonia and Denmark.
Russia is believed to be behind the incursions, although Moscow has denied the allegations.
“Russia is testing the EU and NATO, and our response must be firm, united, and immediate,” European Commissioner for Defense Andrius Kubilius, who convened the talks, told a press conference after the meeting.
The defense ministers agreed to work toward establishing a “drone wall” that would be included in an Eastern Flank Watch, which would include defenses on the ground and at sea, Kubilius said.
“We shall look (at) how to build a comprehensive European Union industrial policy and financial toolbox to make the shield a reality,” he said.
Representatives from Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and Denmark, as well as representatives from Ukraine and NATO, took part in Friday’s meeting.
In an interview with AFP news agency, Kubilius urged the bloc “to move fast” and to learn “lessons from Ukraine,” which has faced regular barrages of Russian drones and missiles.
Ukraine’s Defense Minister Denys Shmygal, who participated in the meeting, said on X that the drone wall “will create a fundamentally new defense ecosystem in Europe, of which Ukraine is ready to be a part.”
Ukraine’s military commander says Russia’s offensives in 2025 failed
Ukraine’s military chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, has said that Russia’s offensives in Ukraine this year have not achieved their objectives.
“The Russians’ spring and summer campaign has effectively been disrupted,” he told reporters at a meeting.
The commander said the active front line was now 1,250 km (777 miles) long and that an estimated 712,000 Russian troops were engaged in combat in Ukraine.
According to Syrskyi, since the beginning of summer, the Russians had been using a tactic he termed “a thousand cuts” and described as a large number of small-scale infantry assaults.
However, he said that Russian plans to create a “buffer zone” in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions in the north and north-east, to capture the city of Pokrovsk, and to take control of the entire Donetsk region had failed.
Syrskyi added that Ukraine had hit 85 military or military-industrial facilities in Russia over the past two months, including air bases, depots, and factories.
Germany says Russia is showing lack of interest in peace process
Germany said Russia’s top diplomat’s accusations at the UN General Assembly that NATO was seeking war against his country underscored Moscow’s lack of interest in peace in Ukraine.
“That’s part of a known pattern … it shows that there is obviously no interest on the Russian side in de-escalating this conflict or to seek a solution or peace,” the government spokesperson said during a press conference.
On Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused NATO and the European Union of using Ukraine to declare a “real war” against Russia in a speech at the United Nations.
EU to discuss €140 billion Ukraine loan using Russian assets
European Union countries were due on Friday to begin discussions on a potential new €140 billion ($163 billion) loan for Ukraine, which would be funded by frozen Russian central bank assets.
This month, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen floated the idea of using the assets for a “reparations loan,” which Kyiv would only repay when Russia compensates Ukraine for the damage inflicted by Moscow’s invasion.
On Thursday, this initiative gained the influential support of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a key EU decision-maker who had previously been reluctant to do more to access the Russian assets.
“That loan would only be repaid once Russia has compensated Ukraine for the damage it has caused during this war,” Merz wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times.
The vast majority of Russian central bank assets in the EU are held by Euroclear, an international deposit organisation based in Belgium. However, the country has firmly rejected calls to seize the assets outright and hand them to Ukraine.
What is the proposal about?
The proposal, which is currently being debated by EU ambassadors at a meeting in Brussels on Friday, would see the EU borrow funds from Euroclear that have matured into cash.
This money would then be loaned to Ukraine on the understanding that any post-war reparations paid by Russia would be used to reimburse the EU.
The scheme would be backed by the EU’s 27 member states, which would be responsible for repaying Euroclear if Russia were to reclaim the assets without paying reparations.
This proposal will be on the table for discussion when EU leaders gather for a summit in Copenhagen next week.
Belarus says nuclear power plant could provide electricity to Ukrainian regions controlled by Russia
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko told his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, that Minsk is ready to build a new nuclear power plant in eastern Belarus and supply energy to parts of Ukraine that Russia has illegally annexed.
Belarusian state media quoted Lukashenko as saying, “If a decision is made, we will immediately begin building a new power unit or a new station if there is a need in western Russia” and the Russia-controlled Ukrainian regions.
Lukashenko and Putin are meeting in Moscow as part of World Atomic Week.
Belarus is a key Russian ally, and Russia used Belarusian territory to launch its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
The first nuclear power plant in Belarus was built by the Russian state-owned company Rosatom and financed by the Russian government. Its first unit launched in 2020.
However, the Astravets power plant, located in the western Grodno region, has come under scrutiny due to safety concerns, prompting neighboring countries and international organizations to voice their concerns.
Russia only understands military power, Finnish foreign minister tells DW
“When dealing with an imperialist power like Russia, diplomacy hardly helps,” Finnish Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen said in an interview with DW on the sidelines of theUN General Assembly.
“We have tried it for so many years… Nothing worked, they just kept advancing,” she added, remembering Russia’s war against Georgia in 2008 and its aggression toward Ukraine since 2014.
“Unfortunately, it seems to be the case that Russia understands only military power,” the Finnish minister warned. “Diplomacy is good, but we also need credible deterrence and defense so that we can force Russia to negotiate and engage in diplomacy.”
In response to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s claim that NATO and the EU have declared war on Russia, she said, “That is utterly false, of course, because Russia has been waging war against Ukraine since 2014. The full-scale invasion started three and a half years ago.
“The world knows that President Zelenskyy and Ukraine have been ready for a ceasefire and negotiations,” Valtonen said, adding that, on the contrary, Russia continues to fight on the battlefield and has specifically targeted civilians with drone and missile attacks.
‘Russia seems to wage hybrid war around the world’
Valtonen stressed that Finland has never had any illusions about Russia and has invested in defense and deterrence because it is aware of the possibility that Russia might be a threat.
“What we see now is that Russia not only has the capability but also the will to threaten basically every country in the world that is dedicated to offering democracy and freedom to their people,” she said.
Valtonen noted that Russia appears to be waging a hybrid war not only in Europe but also globally, “Everybody is worried about Russia’s actions in the Sahel, in Western Africa, where they are not only supporting military coups, but also spreading misinformation and disinformation to destabilize societies.”
EU states, Ukraine to hold talks on ‘drone wall’
Following air incursions from Russia that alarmed European Union members, the bloc will hold its first talks on proposals to build an anti-drone defense system.
On Friday, European Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius will discuss the proposals with officials from approximately 10 of the EU’s 27 countries via video conference.
Most participants are located along the EU’s eastern border with Russia and Ukraine. However, Denmark was added to the list following recent drone incidents.
Ukraine, which has developed the ability to cheaply detect and shoot down Russian drone swarms, will also participate.
Earlier this month, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for a “drone wall” in a keynote speech hours after NATO pilots shot down Russian drones in Poland.
MOURNERS at a funeral were left reeling when the “dead man” they’d gathered to bury suddenly walked in and announced: “I’m alive!”
The 22-year-old stunned friends and relatives as he crashed his own wake in Argentina – leaving everyone wondering who was in the coffin.
The mix-up began when a young man was mown down by a sugarcane truck last week.
Police suspected suicide, but prosecutors called it negligent homicide and ordered an autopsy.
The very next day, a woman turned up at a police station claiming the victim was her son.
She identified the body by his clothes and some features – and officers handed it over for burial.
But as mourners wept over the coffin at the weekend, her real son suddenly staggered in – alive, well, and apparently fresh off a several-day bender in Alderetes, north of Córdoba.
His shock return caused uproar at the service.
The man, who hasn’t been named, admitted he had “no idea” what was going on at home.
Police later confirmed the true victim was Maximiliano Enrique Acosta, 28, from nearby Delfín Gallo.
His body was eventually returned to his family, who finally laid him to rest on Tuesday.
But even that was bungled. His furious brother Hernán said: “Everything was wrong from the beginning.
“First, they handed over the body without proper identification. Then they made me go to the morgue twice. We shouldn’t have to go through this after everything we suffered.”
The Public Prosecutor’s Office has now launched an investigation into how the catalogue of blunders unfolded.
It comes after a man in India appeared to “come back from the dead” – after being declared deceased by doctors and sent for cremation.
Rohitash Kumar, 25, had been pronounced dead at a Rajasthan hospital, placed in a mortuary freezer for more than two hours, and taken to a temple pyre for his last rites when he suddenly began breathing again.
The deaf and mute man, who lived in a shelter in Jhunjhunu, had been rushed to Rajkiya Bhagwan Das Khetan (BDK) District Hospital with a fever last Thursday.
Doctors declared him dead and, without carrying out a postmortem, signed off paperwork before sending his body for cremation.
But as the funeral ritual began at Panch Dev temple, horrified mourners watched Kumar’s body twitch and his chest heave.
Eyewitness Subhash Poonia said: “He started moving his body. We were shocked and started running away.”
Kumar was rushed back to BDK Hospital and admitted to intensive care, where medics now say his condition is stable.
FITNESS expert Jillian Michaels dramatically stormed off her own podcast after clashing with panelists over Charlie Kirk.
Michaels was left incensed during a debate about conspiracy theories that have swirled in light of the conservative activist’s assassination.
Jillian Michaels abruptly stormed off her podcast during a debate about Charlie KirkCredit: Her Take/YouTube
She was so furious that she dramatically picked up her laptop and marched off set.
And, Michaels’ chair was left empty following the rest of the show.
Michaels, 51, was left particularly irritated when the rest of the panel discussed whether Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu had offered $150 million to Turning Point USA – the organization Kirk co-founded – to be more pro-Israel.
There’s no evidence to support the theory.
“There’s no proof of that, in fact the opposite is true,” Michaels snapped.
She reiterated her view that there was “no proof” of this.
Michaels and then fellow panellist, Lindy Li, appeared to spar and Li urged the host not to get angry at her.
The podcaster got more irritated as the discussion about the theory carried on before she left the set.
She appeared to clash with the firebrand commentator Ana Kasparian.
“This is not for me,” the exacerbated host said.
“I’m not interested in this. I love you guys. I’m sorry.
“I have zero interest in doing this.”
Michaels later addressed her dramatic podcast exit on The Today-Ish show.
She revealed that she didn’t want another show that was overtly critical about Israel.
Michaels paid a glowing tribute to Kirk after he was assassinated.
“Charlie was irreplaceable. He championed free speech and genuine dialogue,” she wrote on Instagram.
“He gave young men a vision of leadership rooted in responsibility, and he inspired young women to value themselves more deeply.
“While his absence calls on us all to step up, the truth is no one person can fill his shoes.
“But maybe—if the millions mourning him across the world each improve just a little—we can collectively carry forward an impact as profound as his.”
Tyler Robinson has been charged with the murder of Kirk.
The assassination at Utah Valley University on September 10, sparked a manhunt that lasted 33 hours.
Robinson admitted that he would turn himself into the authorities, according to text messages he sent his roommate.
Robinson was in a relationship with his roommate, according to prosecutors.
A $3-MILLION lawsuit against Jimmy Kimmel and Jackass star Johnny Knoxville’s production company is hitting the next stage after a writer claimed he was tased on the set of a prank show.
Daniel Curry, 49, alleges Knoxville tased him on the set of The Prank Panel in September 2022 – an incident caught on video that left him with a broken fibula and torn ankle ligament, according to court records.
Daniel Curry filed a lawsuit against Johnny Knoxville, ABC Signature Studios, and Kimmel’s Kimmelot Banner, and others connected to the series The Prank PanelCredit: SWNS:South West News Service
Curry, a veteran writer and producer, was serving as a consulting producer on the short-lived ABC series when the tasering happened on September 22, 2022, he claims.
The writer launched a negligence and battery lawsuit in 2024 against Knoxville, ABC Signature Studios, Kimmel’s Kimmelot banner, ITV America and others connected to the series.
Now, Curry’s lawsuit is heading to arbitration, a private process where a neutral third party decides the dispute outside of court, he said.
He claimed the incident permanently damaged his leg and is seeking $3 million in damages.
Curry said he’s ready to go public with information he’s kept private for years.
He accused comedian Eric André – who was also on set – of trying to downplay the incident as typical Jackass behavior.
“I’m not a public person,” Curry said.
“I’m trying to just write and work and do good work. I’m an artist, not an attention seeker.”
According to Curry’s account, the taser was on set WHY.
The incident began when André attempted to taser Knoxville, who took the weapon off him, Curry claimed.
Curry, who was on set writing jokes for André, heard what sounded like lightning – the electrical discharge of a police taser.
“Johnny Knoxville entered the studio from outside with what I now know is a police taser,” he said.
“There was a mass of people trying to avoid him. […] He just came into the room angry with a taser.
Despite Knoxville telling him he was “safe,” Curry says the Jackass star then “charged at me with a taser.
“When I got hit with the taser, I tried to run away,” he added.
“It seized my body and I went completely rigid and I collapsed into my leg.”
‘PERMANENT LIMITATIONS’
The impact broke Curry’s fibula and damaged two tendons in his ankle, requiring months of physical therapy and leaving him with permanent limitations, he claimed in court documents.
“I function pretty well, I do my PT exercises, but I don’t have a hundred percent functionality,” Curry added.
Curry claimed nobody from the show checked on him while he was unwell.
Five days after the attack, Curry claimed he received a text message sent from Knoxville.
The message, allegedly sent to both Curry and André, contained what he claimed were threats about what would happen if they pranked Knoxville’s girlfriend, then a costume designer on The Eric André Show.
The text, according to Curry, read, “Directly or indirectly no harm, embarrassment etc should come her way. She is a not combatant.
“And I wrote and deleted what would happen to someone should a person (may the god of your choice help him) make that fatal mistake but I decided not to include it here.”
Curry says André began acting differently towards him after the incident and told him “Don’t make a big deal out of it – Jackass guys hurt each other all the time.”
Now facing arbitration instead of a jury trial, Curry is working with Congressional representatives to expand workplace assault protections.
Curry, a dad-of-two, added, “What am I teaching my kids if I’m getting assaulted and then just playing along with it? That’s not a good look for anybody.”
Reps for Knoxville, Kimmelot, ITV America, ABC Signature Studios, Upper Ground Enterprises, Saticoy Studios and GEP Talent Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
KIMMEL’S DILEMMA
Meanwhile, Kimmel returned to the air on Tuesday evening after his show was temporarily suspended by ABC due to the comments he made in response to the killing of political activist Charlie Kirk.
During his evening monologue on September 15, Kimmel appeared to falsely claim that Kirk’s suspected assassin, Tyler Robinson, was a conservative, sparking a firestorm online and irking his TV bosses.
Kimmel’s show was sidelined for four days but was eventually reinstated to his usual evening slot on Tuesday.
At the time, The U.S. Sun exclusively revealed that the decision to pull Kimmel’s show was made minutes before the crew started taping on the afternoon of September 17.
His suspension came at the time when a US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan dismissed a lawsuit filed by former Congressman George Santos against Kimmel, accusing him of copyright infringement.
Pakistan has vaccinated about 9 million adolescent girls against the virus that causes cervical cancer, as part of a continuing national campaign that has overcome early setbacks fueled by skeptics online, the health minister said Friday.
Health Minister Mustafa Kamal said the campaign that began Sept. 15 is aiming to vaccinate 13 million girls aged 9 to 14 against the human papillomavirus, or HPV, which causes most cervical cancers. He said the program so far achieved 70% of its goal.
The program has overcome what Kamal said were baseless rumors spread by some parents that the vaccine could cause infertility. He gave the vaccine to his own daughter live on stage at an event in Karachi this week to build confidence.
“By the grace of God, administering the vaccine to my daughter publicly had a huge impact,” Kamal told The Associated Press. “From the fifth day of the campaign, refusal rates began dropping and acceptance climbed to 70–80% in some districts.”
However, many parents are still reluctant.
“I have heard that the vaccination is being used to make women infertile and reduce the population of Muslims,” said Ali Sheikh, a mother of two in Karachi, the capital of Sindh province.
She said that “social media is full of such claims,” and that she was advised by relatives not to allow health workers to vaccinate her daughters.
Health worker Shamim Anwar, 52, said the job of administering the vaccines has been exhausting.
“It is very difficult work. Many parents refuse because of rumors and hesitate to let us vaccinate their daughters,” she said.
“Sometimes we even face humiliation, but we tolerate it because we have to complete the vaccination target,” she said, as she went door-to-door for the campaign in Karachi.
Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among Pakistani women after breast and ovarian cancers. Globally, it is the fourth most common. Each year, between 18,000 and 20,000 women in Pakistan die of the disease, according to health authorities.
Experts promoted the campaign under the slogan “one jab will do the job.” Authorities set up vaccination centers and deployed teams to schools nationwide to reach as many girls as possible.
A disturbing Halloween display in Houston appears to show effigies of federal immigration agents wearing red MAGA-like hats hanging from gallows — drawing backlash just days after surging anti-ICE rhetoric led to a deadly shooting at an agency facility in Dallas.
The shocking front-yard display in the majority-Hispanic Second Ward neighborhood in Harris County showed the red hat-wearing mannequins strung up on a noose from homemade gallows that featured a small Mexican flag, Fox News reported.
The figures’ attire — black shirts, tan pants and face masks with zip ties in their pockets — drew comparisons to Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
Two coffins flanked the gallows, and a hangman mannequin wearing a straw hat and colorful poncho stood over a fourth dummy that appeared to have its hands tied.
A Halloween display in Houston, Texas, has drawn outrage after a video circulated on social media showing mannequins wearing red hats staged in what appears to be an execution scene. FNTV
The sick display is cordoned off with barbed wire fencing, video showed.
Tens of thousands of social media users expressed their outrage at the jarring exhibit, with one extremely agitated X user writing in a viral post, “This hateful display will likely be inciting violence. It goes past free speech. Arrest who did this.”
The twisted decorations are drawing ire as conservatives continue to push back on targeted violence and an increase in incendiary political rhetoric from the left, which has resulted in real-world shootings.
Anti-ICE gunman Joshua Jahn fired on a van at the Dallas ICE facility on Wednesday, killing one detainee and injuring two others before turning the Nazi battle rifle on himself, according to law enforcement officials. He had scrawled “ANTI ICE” on the bullets.
The night before the shooting, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom vilified ICE on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.”
“These are not just authoritarian tendencies — these are authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government,” he told the CBS host.
“That’s happening in the United States of America. Masked men jumping out of unmarked cars, people disappearing, no due process, no oversight, zero accountability,” Newsom continued.
Amazon will pay a historic $2.5 billion settlement to customers after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accused the e-commerce giant of enrolling site users in the Prime subscription service without their consent — and making it difficult to cancel.
Amazon will pay a historic $2.5 billion settlement — an estimated 35 million customers during the time period. REUTERS
“Today, we are putting billions of dollars back into Americans’ pockets, and making sure Amazon never does this again,” FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson said in a statement.
The settlement includes a $1 billion civil penalty and $1.5 billion in refunds to affected customers — making it the FTC’s largest-ever settlement and the second-highest refund award in history.
If you meet the following criteria, you could be eligible:
Signed up for Amazon Prime between June 23, 2019, and June 23, 2025.
Or attempted to cancel your Prime subscription but were unsuccessful during that period.
You are a customer in the United States.
Refunds are capped at $51 per eligible customer, and payments will be made in two waves, CNN reported.
Automatic payouts will be made to customers who signed up for Prime via a “challenged enrollment flow” — such as the Universal Prime page, shipping option select page, Prime Video, or Amazon’s single page checkout — and used no more than 3 Prime benefits within any 12-month period of their enrollment.
People who fit the bill will receive an automatic refund within 90 days of the FTC order.
Customers who signed up through a challenged enrollment flow, or tried to cancel Prime unsuccessfully during the period, and used no more than 10 Prime benefits in any 12-month period, will need to submit a claim form after the automatic payouts are completed.
Amazon will send notification emails and letters within 30 days after automatic payments end. After you submit your claim, Amazon has 30 days to review it and issue refunds.
The FTC and Amazon have not yet published the official claims website or process details. Once available, information and links will appear on the website and app. Eligible customers will receive claim forms via email and mail after the automatic payout period.
You will have up to 180 days from receiving your claim form to submit it via email, prepaid mail, or the claims website.
Elon Musk has not publicly commented on the latest development
Billionaire Elon Musk and Prince Andrew are named in new files released by Congressional Democrats that relate to the late convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The files turned over to the House Oversight Committee by the Jeffrey Epstein Estate appear to show that Musk had been invited to Epstein’s island in December 2014.
Separately a manifest for a flight from New Jersey to Florida in May 2000 names Prince Andrew among the passengers.
Musk and Prince Andrew have been approached for comment.
Prince Andrew has previously strenuously denied any wrongdoing. Musk has previously been quoted as saying that Epstein had invited him to the island but he had declined.
The partial records are from the third batch of documents produced by the Jeffrey Epstein Estate. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee say they include phone message logs, copies of flight logs and manifests for aircrafts, copies of financial ledgers and Epstein’s daily schedule.
In addition to Musk and Prince Andrew, the files released publicly also contain the names of other prominent figures including internet entrepreneur Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon, a former advisor to Donald Trump
One line in the records dated 6 December 2014 reads: “Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)”
A flight manifest records that Prince Andrew was on a flight with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell from Teterboro, New Jersey, to West Palm Beach, Florida, on 12 May 2000. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of conspiring with Epstein to traffic girls for sex.
On 11 May 2000, Buckingham Palace said on its website that Prince Andrew had flown to New York to attend a reception in New York for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Andrew returned to the UK on 15 May, a later entry said.
In the files, there is also an entry referring to a planned lunch with Peter Thiel in November 2017.
There is also an entry referring to a planned breakfast with Steve Bannon 17 February 2019.
The files also mention tentative plans for a breakfast party with Microsoft founder Bill Gates in December 2014. In 2022 Gates told the BBC that meeting Jeffrey Epstein had been a “mistake”.
It is not suggested that those mentioned in the files were aware of the alleged criminal activity for which Epstein was later arrested.
Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
In 2008, he reached a plea deal with prosecutors after the parents of a 14-year-old girl told police in Florida that Epstein had molested their daughter at his Palm Beach home.
He was arrested again in July 2019 on sex trafficking charges.
Sara Guerrero, a spokesperson for the Democrats on the committee, urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to release more files related to Epstein.
Will social media embrace these novices? Or will algorithms, online scrutiny and the race to be seen swallow them up?
Social media is a minefield. It’s a place where people battle for likes, fight to be noticed, risk being cancelled and dream of going viral overnight.
For a lucky few, it’s a lucrative career path – the creator economy is expected to be worth almost $500bn (£372bn) by 2027 – but for most, it’s a confusing and unforgiving space where the algorithm decides who gets seen and who stays invisible.
So how hard is it really to break through? Three passionate people with no social media accounts took on the challenge of turning their talent into social media traction in the space of just three months.
Emily, a potter and stroke survivor, Alun, a historian, and Danyah, a theatre performer, tracked their journey on the ups and downs of trying to find an audience and surviving the emotional rollercoaster that comes with chasing online fame.
‘Engaging with comments is overwhelming’
Before she became a potter, Emily dreamt of performing on the stage but a stroke at the age of 26 changed everything, and her cognitive understanding is not what it used to be.
Pottery gave her a new purpose and expressing herself creatively felt like a form of therapy.
Emily rarely uses social media but decided to create a TikTok account in order to “reach, inspire and support people who have been in similar positions to me”.
Her first video has just two views and subsequent content about pottery and her cat also don’t perform well.
After weeks of silence and doubt, Emily’s video about how pottery saved her life reaches thousands and other stroke survivors message her to praise her content.
She is proud of the impact she makes. “That comment meant more than a thousand likes as I actually resonated with someone and that’s more valuable.”
The success of her video comes with an unexpected burden: she is overwhelmed with the responsibility of engaging with comments.
Emily also struggles to make her content feel authentic – every time she speaks to the camera she feels as if she’s putting on a performance.
“I don’t feel like I’m doing myself justice and I’m disappointed in what I’m making,” she says. “I feel like a bit of a fraud.”
Addressing sensitive topics such as recovery from a stroke means the stakes are higher for Emily.
“There is less room for error and you don’t want to say anything that could be misconstrued and that can be hard to think about constantly,” she says.
Near the end of the experiment, Emily is dealing with issues in her personal life and finds it a challenge to keep creating content. She decides to take a break from social media but may return in the future.
‘Chasing views can impact your self-worth’
Alun is a senior lecturer in history who specialises in early modern medicine and has devoted years to researching the cultural history of beards – a niche that he realised was lacking on social media.
He agreed to be part of the experiment as he felt he had a duty as an academic to educate people.
His first video on why he loves history has a couple of hundred views and that spurs him on to start posting every few days.
His videos do well but none have more than 1,000 views, something that becomes increasingly frustrating for him, and chasing the numbers takes an emotional toll.
“It starts impacting your self worth,” he admits. “If you don’t get the views, you start thinking you’re doing something wrong and people don’t like you.”
Finally, a video gets more than 10,000 views but Alun doesn’t feel the elation he thought he would.
“I was actively looking for more views and I lost my academic integrity. I crossed a boundary and oversimplified some information and I feel a bit dirty now.”
At the two-month mark, Alun is posting on TikTok every other day but has recently found himself on the receiving end of cruel and spiteful comments about his lack of hair and eyebrows due to alopecia.
“I’m finding it harder to deal with those comments than I might have thought,” he admits. “It’s made me more conscious of my appearance.”
He decides to confront the trolls and makes a video explaining his condition.
At the same time, the university, where he lectures, starts sharing his videos as promotional material to prospective students which turbo-charges his reach.
“I’ve had 350,000 views in total and in comparison, my academic articles are read a couple of hundred times a year,” he says.
Creating content won’t replace his career but it certainly amplifies it and Alun is sure he will continue posting online.
‘It’s taking up a massive amount of time – it feels like an addiction’
For theatre performer and producer Danyah, the challenge is almost the opposite – she’s used to performing but in front of a live audience, not an online one.
She joins the experiment as she wants to bring people together. She worries people are losing in-person connection as they’re chronically online.
Danyah downloads YouTube and compared to Emily and Alun, her content is slower and longer. Her first video is eight minutes long.
She’s posting regularly – from meditation guides to leaving poems across London – but the views aren’t pouring in.
Despite this, she’s having a blast.
“It’s so much fun and I keep thinking about what I’m going to share next,” she says.
Her enthusiasm doesn’t last long and soon, she finds herself down a rabbithole of trying to understand the technical side of social media. She even buys a book on how to get a million followers.
The Department of Homeland Security has placed an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer on leave after he was filmed shoving a woman to the ground at a New York immigration court.
He has been relieved of his current duties while DHS conducts a full investigation into the incident, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement on Friday.
“The officer’s conduct in this video is unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE,” McLaughlin added. “Our ICE law enforcement are held to the highest professional standards.”
Video of the incident, which was widely shared on social media on Thursday, shows a crying woman approach the ICE officer in a hallway. He says “adios” to her several times before he grabs her, pushes her backwards and then knocks her to the ground.
Another video taken from a different angle showed the woman confronting the ICE officer at the centre of the investigation.
In the video, the woman can be heard shouting “take me, take me!” in Spanish.
The officer then grabs the woman and forces her several feet down the hallway and into a wall. He continues shoving the woman and pushes her to the ground.
The officer stands over the woman and says “leave!” in Spanish, before asking nearby officers to remove her from the building.
Another video shared on social media showed the woman being escorted from the courthouse.
The incident happened after federal agents tried taking the woman’s husband into custody as she and her daughter clung on to him, CBS News, the BBC’s US partner, reported.
She told reporters on Thursday that she is from Ecuador.
As part of US President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, ICE officers have been entering federal courthouses and detaining immigrants awaiting hearings.
In New York City courthouses alone, hundreds of immigrants have reportedly been arrested.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has attacked the recognition of a Palestinian state by multiple Western countries during a combative speech at the UN General Assembly.
Netanyahu labelled the recognition moves a “mark of shame” that sent the message “murdering Jews pays off”.
Dozens of officials and diplomats staged a walk-out as he took to the podium, leaving large parts of the conference hall empty. Outside, protesters against Israel’s war in Gaza gathered in Times Square.
Israel has come under huge international pressure over its military action in Gaza, culminating in the UK, France, Canada, Australia and other countries recognising the State of Palestine this week.
In his opening remarks, Netanyahu displayed a map labelled “The Curse” that he said showed Iranian proxy groups across the Middle East. He then highlighted Israeli military operations across the past year against Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, Hamas in Gaza, and Iran.
He thanked US President Donald Trump for American involvement in bombing Iran’s Fordo nuclear site in June, and drew parallels between Hamas’s 7 October 2023 attack on Israel and the 9/11 attack on the US. He said the two countries were fighting the same enemies, pointing to chants of “death to America” by groups linked to Iran.
The Israeli prime minister repeated that Israel would not allow a Palestinian state to exist and said this position was supported by the vast majority of Israelis.
He went on to refute the conclusion of a UN commission of inquiry that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, claiming the charge was “baseless”.
He also rejected statements by multiple UN agencies that Israel is deliberately restricting the amount of aid entering Gaza. In August, a UN-backed body confirmed that famine was taking place in Gaza City.
Ahead of his speech, Netanyahu’s office ordered that the Israeli military mount loudspeakers on trucks near the Gaza perimeter fence in order to broadcast his words live across the territory.
Netanyahu also claimed that Israeli intelligence had hacked the smartphones of people in Gaza and would stream his speech to them directly. BBC sources in Gaza said their phones had not been affected.
He said the intention of this was for a message to reach Israeli hostages there.
“Our brave heroes,” he read on the podium. “This is Prime Minister Netanyahu speaking to you live from the United Nations. We have not forgotten you, not even for a second. The people of Israel are with you. We will not falter, and we will not rest until we bring all of you home.”
There are 48 hostages remaining in Gaza, 20 of whom are thought to be alive.
Gaza resident Fadi told the BBC World Service’s OS programme: “What does he gain by broadcasting his speech forcibly to the besieged civilians inside the tents, except to further humiliate them?”
Netanyahu devoted the latter section of his address to Israel’s regional neighbours, saying it was close to a de-escalation agreement with Syria and calling on the Lebanese government to step-up its efforts to disarm Hezbollah.
He immediately came under fire within Israel, with opposition leader Yair Lapid writing: “Today saw a weary and whining Israeli prime minister, in a speech overloaded with overused gimmicks”
“Instead of stopping the diplomatic tsunami – Netanyahu today worsened the state of the State of Israel,” he wrote on X.
Yair Golan, leader of Israel’s Democrats party said the speech showed “only victimhood, sanctimoniousness, and complete blindness to the suffering of the hostages and the sacrifice of the fighters”.
He labelled the loudspeaker stunt “invalid, childish, and insane”, saying it was “propaganda show”.
A day earlier, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas said in his speech to the General Assembly that he is ready to work with world leaders to implement a peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians.
Shortly after Netanyahu finished speaking, Donald Trump separately told journalists: “I think we have a deal on Gaza”. He did not provide further details, though speculation has been mounting that a ceasefire deal could be close.
Pakistan has repeatedly made unverified claims of shooting down five Indian Air Force jets, assertions that India has consistently dismissed as “baseless,” citing the lack of any supporting evidence from Pakistan. Now, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has come forward with yet another unsubstantiated claim, this time alleging the downing of seven jets.
Shehbaz Sharif | X/@sidhant
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, while addressing the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Friday, made baseless claims of downing seven Indian jets during the military confrontation with India in May.
“Our falcons took flight and turned 7 Indian jets into scrap,” Sharif said at the UNGCA.”
“We’ve turned 7 Indian fighter jets into scrap and dust” says Pakistan’s PM at the UN. pic.twitter.com/ejP9AshRoy
Pakistan has repeatedly made unverified claims of shooting down five Indian Air Force jets, assertions that India has consistently dismissed as “baseless,” citing the lack of any supporting evidence from Pakistan. Now, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has come forward with yet another unsubstantiated claim, this time alleging the downing of seven jets.
India To Reply Tomorrow
Reportedly, tomorrow morning, India will exercise its right of reply, fielding its youngest diplomat to answer the Pakistani PM’s remarks.
Credits Donald Trump For Ceasefire
Crediting U.S. President Donald Trump for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif described Trump as a “man of peace.”
“Had he (Donald Trump) not intervened in a timely and decisive manner, the consequences of a full-fledged war could have been catastrophic,” he said.
“Pakistan nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize, this is the least we could do for his love for peace.” he added.
Notably, India has repeatedly denied claims of any foreign intervention in brokering the ceasefire that followed Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror and military infrastructure in Pakistan. India’s stance has been that Pakistan’s DGMO contacted the Indian DGMO after which an agreement over ceasefire was reached.
The operation came in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, which killed 26 civilians.
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif raised strong objections to India’s decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance while addressing the United Nations General Debate on Friday. He accused India of violating both the provisions of the treaty and international law.
Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif (File Photo)
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif raised strong objections to India’s decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance while addressing the United Nations General Debate on Friday. He accused India of violating both the provisions of the treaty and international law. However, Sharif did not acknowledge any steps taken by Islamabad to address terrorism originating from its own territory, a central concern cited by India for its decision.
DISPUTE OVER INDUS WATER TREATY ABEYANCE
During his speech at the UN, Shehbaz Sharif asserted Pakistan’s position on the Indus Waters Treaty. He stated, “India’s unilateral and illegal attempt to hold the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance defies the provisions of the treaty itself as well as the norms of international law. Pakistan has made it abundantly clear that we will defend the inseparable right of our people on these waters. To us, any violation of the treaty represents an act of war,” Sharif said.
Despite these claims, he did not mention Pakistan’s efforts to counter cross-border terrorism—a demand India has repeatedly raised as a precondition for reinstating the treaty’s provisions. Indian officials have described Pakistan’s approach to the treaty as a “desperate attempt” to avoid accountability for terrorism.
KASHMIR ISSUE RAISED AT UN
In addition to the water dispute, Prime Minister Sharif reiterated Pakistan’s stance on Kashmir during his UN address. He said, “I wish to assure Kashmiri people that I stand with them, Pakistan stands with them, and one day soon India’s tyranny in Kashmir will come to a halt,” directly addressing the people of Kashmir. This statement further underscores the complexity of India-Pakistan relations, as the Kashmir dispute and cross-border terrorism remain key points of contention alongside the water-sharing arrangements under the Indus Waters Treaty.
INDIA’S POSITION AND RESPONSE
India placed the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance as a countermeasure following the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, in which 26 civilians were killed. The Indian government linked the abeyance directly to Pakistan’s continued support of cross-border terrorism. India has accused Pakistan of manipulating the treaty process to shift attention away from terrorism concerns.
Iran has begun rebuilding missile-production sites targeted by Israel during its 12-day war in June, satellite images analyzed by The Associated Press show, but a key component is likely still missing — the large mixers needed to produce solid fuel for the weapons.
Iran has likely carried out an undeclared missile test at its Imam Khomeini Spaceport, satellite photos analyzed by The Associated Press showed Thursday, underlining Tehran’s effort to maintain its weapons program despite the 12-day war with Israel in June.
Iran has not formally acknowledged last week’s test at a circular pad that has hosted other major launches by the country’s civilian space program. A single lawmaker in Iran’s parliament, however, claimed, without offering evidence, that Tehran tested a possible intercontinental ballistic missile.
The test and the claim raise concerns that Iran may be trying to expand the reach of its missiles as tensions remain high ahead of United Nations sanctions, which are likely to be reimposed this weekend over Tehran’s nuclear program — as it also repairs missile sites that were struck by the Israelis.
“Israel’s successes in the 12-day war against Iran’s missile attacks reinforced for Tehran the importance of developing more ballistic missiles and qualitatively better versions of them,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, an analyst at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies. The think tank has long been critical of Iran and has been sanctioned by Tehran.
“Consider this part of Tehran’s efforts to build back better, and as quickly as possible,” he added.
Scorch marks seen on the launch pad
On Sept. 18, Iranian social media users posted images of the sky over Semnan province, showing what appeared to be a rocket’s contrail at sunset. Iranian officials did not acknowledge what caused the contrail, nor did Iranian state media report on the incident.
Satellite photos taken prior to that by Planet Labs PBC show the circular pad at Imam Khomeini Spaceport — about 230 kilometers (145 miles) southeast of Iran’s capital, Tehran, in Semnan — painted blue ringed with red, white and green lines — the colors of the Iranian flag.
But in satellite images since Sept. 18, the pad appeared discolored, though it wasn’t fully clear until a more-detailed Planet image requested by the AP taken this Wednesday. That image shows significant scorch marks, the pattern of which resembled scorching seen at the pad following past launches. When rockets launch, the flames from their engines pour down onto pads.
Fabian Hinz, a research fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, who studies missiles, said the scale of the scorching suggested Iran launched a solid-fuel missile, as burning aluminum oxide particles cause such marks.
The north-south marks suggest a blast deflector being used as well to channel the flames, he said.
The claim of an intercontinental ballistic missile
Iranian parliament member Mohsen Zanganeh, appearing on Iranian state television on Saturday, claimed that the Islamic Republic had launched an intercontinental ballistic missile on Thursday. He portrayed it as a sign of Iran’s strength as it faces challenges from Israel and the West.
“We have neither abandoned (nuclear) enrichment, nor handed uranium over to the enemy, nor backed down from our missile positions,” said Zanganeh, a member of parliament’s budget committee from Iran’s Khorasan Razavi province.
“The night before last we tested one of the country’s most advanced missiles, which until now had not, so to speak, been trialed — and that test was successful,” he said.
“In other words,” he added. “I mean to say that even under these conditions we are conducting a security test of an intercontinental-range missile.”
Zanganeh did not elaborate on where he got his information, nor did he provide any evidence to support his assertion. Iranian parliament members have made exaggerated claims in the past.
Intercontinental ballistic missiles typically have ranges greater than 5,500 kilometers (3,415 miles). That would extend far beyond the range reportedly allowed by Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which is 2,000 kilometers (1,240 miles).
The range of 2,000 kilometers encompasses much of the Middle East, including Israel and American military bases in the region. An intercontinental missile would at least put all of Europe in range. The U.S. military’s Central Command, which oversees its Mideast operations, did not respond to a request for comment.
Questions remain over the launch
Despite the lawmaker’s claims, there are still many questions surrounding the launch — including just what Iran sent into the sky.
Iran has in the past used the pad to launch solid-fueled missiles called Zuljanah, named after a horse of Imam Hussein, a grandson of the Prophet Muhammad and a key figure in the Shiite faith who was massacred with his fighters at Karbala in the 7th century.
The Zuljanah can launch satellites in space. However, the fact that it uses solid fuel and is capable of reaching space has raised concerns by the U.S. government that Iran could potentially build an intercontinental ballistic missile.
“If, as is increasingly being alleged, the test was of a space-launch vehicle, it represents a desire by Tehran to potentially threaten targets outside the Middle East, like the European continent and even the American homeland,” Taleblu said.
Such missiles can deliver nuclear weapons, but Iran long has maintained its nuclear program is peaceful. U.S. intelligence agencies also assess that Iran is not actively pursuing an atomic bomb, though it had been enriching uranium to up to 60% purity — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. Iran also would need to miniaturize any possible nuclear bomb to put it atop a ballistic missile.
The “Terminator” movies may be more prescient than people thought.
With AI becoming omnipresent and advanced — techsperts worry that the human race will be wiped off the map by synthetic viruses and other means if we don’t hit the kill switch.
Computer scientists Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares made this apocalyptic prediction in their dystopian new book “If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All.”
“If any company or group, anywhere on the planet, builds an artificial superintelligence using anything remotely like current techniques, based on anything remotely like the present understanding of AI, then everyone, everywhere on Earth, will die,” the AI gurus, who work at Berkeley’s Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIR) warned in the intro to the none-so-subtle tome.
Many techsperts see AI as offensive — which has made it ubiquitous in every sector from academia to dating — as a natural evolution and boon to humanity.
Much like in every sci-fi flick from “Ex-Machina” to “Terminator,” AI could even evolve to the point where it calculates that humans are no longer necessary, the experts say.
“Humanity needs to back off,” warned Yudkowsky, who has been warning about tech-istential risks posed by AI for years on the website he helped to create, LessWrong.com.
“If any company or group, anywhere on the planet, builds an artificial superintelligence, then everyone, everywhere on Earth, will die.”
The team of experts is taking this seriously, believing that “only one of them needs to work for humanity to go extinct.”
Experts fear that eventually power plants and factories will be run by robots instead of humans — after which they’d deem us disposable and bring about our techstinction, Vox reported.
To make matters worse, humans’ comparatively small brains might not even be able to comprehend the angle of attack in time.
Even if there was a tell, this chameleonic tech could potentially keep its malevolent intentions concealed until it’s presumably too late to pull the plug. “A superintelligent adversary will not reveal its full capabilities and telegraph its intentions,” warned the duo, the Daily Star reported.
The anti-ICE gunman who killed one migrant and wounded two others at a Dallas ICE facility on Wednesday was once a pot-obsessed slacker who hustled marijuana from Washington back to his home state of Texas, according to his ex-boss.
Joshua Jahn, 29 — who fired from a rooftop at a busload of migrants escorted by federal agents into the immigration facility before turning the gun on himself — worked a short-lived job on a legal cannabis farm in Benton City in 2017, where his ex-employer remembered him as a weed-loving drifter with little direction or drive.
Joshua Jahn, 29, worked a short-lived job on a legal cannabis farm in Benton City, WA in 2017. via REUTERS
“He was all about the weed. He wanted to be part of the scene. He lived in his car while he helped,” Ryan Sanderson, 49, who runs Golden Leaf farm, told The Post.
“He was just a young kid. When the job was over, he drove back to Texas.”
Sanderson, who supervised Jahn during a three-week harvest season, said the shooter had little interest in politics or anything beyond pot.
“He would come to work. He didn’t say a whole lot. He wasn’t an exceptional worker by any stretch,” Sanderson said.
“We never talked about politics or any of that kind of stuff. Nobody did.”
Jahn was part of a 15-person crew, “taking leaves off and listening to music” during the harvest.
“There are people who work, and there are people who go through the motions. He was one of those guys. He didn’t work that hard, probably because he was too high,” the boss recalled.
“What I believe happened is he was selling weed and then he came up here to work in the weed industry because he was all about it and that fizzled out,” he said.
“Then he had to go home. It wasn’t legal in Texas. I understand he worked at a solar plant. That’s kinda a 180, that’s a dirty, hardworking job….He probably didn’t have any direction, any work.”
Sanderson suspects Jahn could have had another motive to venture all the way out to Washington for the temporary gig.
“I just thought it was weird that someone would drive all the way to Texas to work at a temporary job. But now knowing that he was selling cannabis down in Texas and got in trouble prior to coming up here, I have a sense that his motive was to come up here and get weed,” Sanderson said.
“The job was for a three-week harvest, and then I kinda felt bad for him because he wanted to keep working, but I didn’t have a lot of work. I kept him on for three more months, trying to find more work for him,” he recalled.
“Eventually, I couldn’t justify keeping him because he wasn’t an all-star by any stretch.”
Jahn was also busted in 2015 for marijuana possession, before he began working on the cannabis farm.
Authorities are investigating the attack on the ICE processing center in Dallas on Wednesday as a targeted attack.
The words “Anti-ICE” were scrawled on a stripper clip of ammo near his body, and his beat-up Toyota Corolla had a bizarre nuclear fallout map taped to the side.
A handwritten note recovered by investigators also said, “Hopefully this will give ICE agents real terror, to think, ‘is there a sniper with AP [armor piercing] rounds on that roof?’”
The gunman is a registered independent who voted in the Democratic primary in 2020 and last cast a ballot in 2024.
Jahn had experience with firearms, his family said.
While the killer’s political motives remain under investigation, his mother, Sharon, posted a series of anti-gun rants on Facebook, blasting Texas Republican lawmakers who supported the Second Amendment.
Following a rocky few weeks, the lovebirds are finally back together and attempting to make things work
BIG Brother star Rylie Jeffries has reunited with Katherine Woodman at his Oklahoma ranch and the two are ‘very much together’ following their controversial season, The U.S. Sun can reveal.
The reality stars were at the center of drama during season 27 when many viewers perceived the bull rider’s behavior as “creepy” and insisted it “crossed the line.”
Since both of the lovebirds were evicted from the game in the middle of the season, they had been taking time apart to process the aftermath and backlash from their time on Big Brother.
However, a source close to the pair has told The U.S. Sun that Katherine, 23, has been “in Oklahoma with Rylie all week.”
“They finally reunited after weeks of processing emotions. Katherine has been really eager to see him and wanting to make things work but Rylie needed time.
“He’s doing a lot better now and was so excited to see Katherine. I know he appreciated how she had his back in the house after he got evicted and how she had his back with the public too.
“After a bumpy few weeks, it’s safe to say they have found their stride outside of the show. I wouldn’t say they’re boyfriend/girlfriend yet but it’s heading in that direction.
“But they are very much together,” the insider spilled.
TROUBLE IN PARADISE?
Following their eviction from Big Brother, it appeared the romance between Rylie, 27, and Katherine was done as he “needed space” from her to process the tumultuous response from viewers.
All of the outside noise apparently became “overwhelming” for both Rylie and Katherine following their reentry into the outside world.
So much so, it had negatively impacted their relationship.
According to an insider, they were “barely speaking at all” in the weeks after their eviction.
At the time in early September, “They still haven’t seen each other [in person].
“They talked here and there after the show, but it was very weird, very awkward.”
They continued: “The response to everything was overwhelming for both of them, and they didn’t know how to handle it.
“It drew a wedge between them. Rylie pulled away. Katherine didn’t want to push him. And now it’s basically done.
“They’ll see each other are the finale, which they’re both extremely nervous about.
“Both for how the audience and fans will be, and seeing each other.
“Rylie is trying to get back to his normal life by bull riding and going to local rodeos and forgetting all of this Hollywood drama.”
Despite some fans’ hopes that Rylie would skip or not be invited back to the live finale, The U.S. Sun previously reported that the polarizing star will indeed return.
“The plan for now is for Rylie to attend the finale. He has been asked back, and he plans to go. Katherine plans on going too.
“They will address Rylie’s comments and behavior at the finale and get his response to the backlash,” the source claimed.
‘PRODUCTION STEP IN!’
Rylie and Katherine became the most buzzed-about contestants of the season when they got into a hot and heavy showmance just days after moving into the house.
While their in-house relationship was celebrated by their fellow contestants, the reaction from the general public was much more negative.
The Oklahoma native was accused of being “creepy,” “aggressive,” and even “crossing the line” with his behavior toward Katherine.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto look on during a signing ceremony for the Indonesia-Canada Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada, on Sep 24, 2025. (Photo: AFP/Dave Chan)
Canada has signed a bilateral free trade agreement with Indonesia, which aims to eliminate or reduce tariffs on over 95 per cent of Ottawa’s exports to its largest market in Southeast Asia.
Several experts told AFP the strategic agreement is being made in the context of global economic turmoil, exacerbated by the protectionist policies of the United States.
“This is the right deal at the right time with the right partner,” Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney said, adding that Indonesia is Canada’s largest export market in Southeast Asia.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto called the agreement a “historic moment” during an official visit to Ottawa on Wednesday (Sep 24), as it is the first of its kind with an Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member country.
“I’m very lucky to be the Indonesian president who brings this back to Indonesia,” Prabowo said.
Canada’s exports include wheat, potash, timber and soybeans.
The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) agreement allows Canada to strengthen its presence in the Indo-Pacific region, in line with the strategy that was unveiled by the previous administration under Justin Trudeau.
The agreement also provides for the elimination of more than 90 per cent of tariffs on Indonesian imports, a boon to the export of garments and leather goods to the North American market.
Donald Trump has said he will not allow Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to annex the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
The US president told White House reporters ahead of Netanyahu’s address to the UN General Assembly on Friday: “I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank… It’s not going to happen.”
Trump, who will meet Netanyahu on Monday, also said a ceasefire deal over the war in Gaza was “pretty close”.
Israel is facing increasing global pressure to end the conflict and occupation of the West Bank, as a wave of Western states formally recognise an independent Palestinian state. Far-right Israelis view annexation as a means of preventing a Palestinian state being created.
Ultranationalists in Netanyahu’s governing coalition have repeated calls for Israel to annex the West Bank – part of the Palestinian territories – outright.
The UK and Germany say they have warned Israel against annexation, while UN Secretary General António Guterres said such a move would be “morally, legally and politically intolerable”.
Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday that he had spoken to Netanyahu as well as other Middle Eastern leaders.
“We’re getting pretty close to having a deal on Gaza, and maybe even peace,” Trump said.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas told the UN General Assembly via video link the same day that he was ready to work with world leaders to implement a peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians that was announced by France on Monday.
The 89-year-old was barred from travelling to New York, where the UN headquarters are, by the US.
Abbas thanked countries which had recently recognised a Palestinian state in a wave of declarations that began with Canada, Australia, the UK and Portugal on Sunday, and was followed by France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, San Marino, Andorra and Denmark.
The US is currently opposed to recognising Palestine, saying such a move would be a reward for Hamas.
“Hamas will not have a role to play in governance,” Abbas said in his speech. He also called for a Palestinian state to assume “full responsibilities” for the Gaza Strip following an Israeli withdrawal and connect it with the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
At the UN on Tuesday, Trump met the leaders of key Arab and Muslim nations, who warned him of consequences if Israel moved ahead with annexation.
“I think the president of the US understands very well the risks and dangers of annexation in the West Bank,” Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan told reporters afterwards.
On Wednesday morning, Israel closed the only crossing between the Israeli-occupied West Bank and neighbouring Jordan, preventing more than two million Palestinians from accessing the outside world.
The closure came days after two Israeli military personnel were shot dead near the crossing by a Jordanian gunman who was killed at the scene.
In Gaza, more than 80 Palestinians, including women and children, were killed by Israeli fire on Wednesday, most of them in Gaza City, local hospitals said.
The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.
At least 65,419 people have been killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza since then, according to the territory’s Hama-run health ministry, including more than 18,000 children.
In August, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a UN-backed body, said that more than half a million people across Gaza were facing “catastrophic” conditions characterised by “starvation, destitution and death”. Netanyahu has repeatedly denied starvation is taking place in Gaza.
A United Nations commission of inquiry found Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, in a report Israel’s foreign ministry categorically rejected as “distorted and false”.
Israel is under increasing pressure to end the war and occupation.
President Donald Trump, right, shakes the hand of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, Sept. 25, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)(AP)
United States President Donald Trump on Thursday (September 25) urged Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to stop buying oil from Russia, as Moscow’s war in Ukraine grinds on with little territorial gain. The comments came during Erdogan’s visit to the White House, where both leaders discussed bilateral ties and regional security.
“I would like him to stop buying any oil from Russia, as Russia continues its rampage in Ukraine, and they have been fighting. They have lost millions of lives already, and for what, disgraceful,” Trump told reporters.
He added that Moscow’s economy was in a “terrible” state and accused President Vladimir Putin of prolonging the war unnecessarily.
Erdogan’s neutral stance
Erdogan did not directly respond to Trump’s request on oil purchases but stressed his commitment to strengthening Turkish-American relations. Trump, however, emphasized Erdogan’s potential role in the conflict.
“They really respect Erdogan. I do, and I think he could have a big influence, if he wants to. Right now, he’s very neutral. He likes being neutral. So do I, like being neutral. But he’s somebody that, if he got involved, the best thing he could do is not buy oil and gas from Russia,” Trump said.
‘Paper Tiger’ remarks on Russia
The US President expressed frustration at Russia’s military campaign in Ukraine, noting that Moscow’s heavy bombardments had resulted in “almost no land” gained.
“With all of the heavy bombardment over the last two weeks, they’ve gained almost no land,” Trump said. “And I’m not going to ever call anybody a paper tiger, but Russia spent millions and millions of dollars in bombs, missiles, ammunition and lives, their lives, and they’ve gained virtually no land.”
Earlier this week, Trump used the term “paper tiger” on Truth Social, writing that Russia’s prolonged war effort “is very much making them look like ‘a paper tiger.’”
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov later dismissed the comment, saying: “Russia is not a tiger. Russia is more associated with a bear. Paper bears do not exist, and Russia is a real bear.”
During the G20 Foreign Ministers’ meeting, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar emphasised that terrorism poses a persistent threat to global stability and must not be tolerated.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar addresses G20 foreign ministers’ meeting on the sidelines of the UNGA.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Thursday said that terrorism remains a ‘persistent threat’ to the society adding that the world must not show any tolerance or accommodation to terrorists activities.
Speaking at the G20 Foreign Ministers’ meeting on the sidelines of the UNGA session, EAM S Jaishankar said, “A persistent threat to development is that perennial disruptor of peace, terrorism. It is imperative that the world display neither tolerance nor accommodation to terrorist activities.”
“Given the extensive networking among terrorists, those who act against them on any front actually render a larger service to the international community as a whole. As we confront conflict, economic pressures, and terrorism, the limitations of multilateralism and the United Nations in particular are visible. The need for reforming multilateralism has never been greater.” EAM said.
Adding further, the External Affairs Minister brought to the notice that the international situation is today both politically and economically volatile. “We, as members of G20, have a particular responsibility to strengthen its stability and give it a more positive direction that is best done by undertaking dialogue and diplomacy, by firmly combating terrorism, and by appreciating the need for stronger energy and economic security.”
In another statement, Jaishankar said that the focus today is on the correlation between international peace and global development.
Spoke at the G20 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting hosted by South Africa on the sidelines of #UNGA80.
Highlighted that in a politically & economically volatile international situation, G20 members have a particular responsibility to strengthen its stability and give it a more… https://t.co/1UOlg1I2v3pic.twitter.com/YQnllt0iH0
Continuing his argument, EAM said, “In recent times, that is well established, as both deteriorated in parallel. The costs, especially to the Global South, in terms of energy, food, and fertiliser security, were starkly demonstrated by ongoing conflicts, particularly in Ukraine and Gaza.”
“Apart from jeopardising supplies and logistics, access and cost themselves became pressure points on nations. Double standards are clearly in evidence. Peace can certainly enable development, but by threatening development, we cannot facilitate peace.”
Jaishankar Highlights Global Challenges On Energy Needs
Addressing on the energy challenges the world is facing, Jaishankar said, “Making energy and other essentials more uncertain in an economically fragile situation helps no one. The way out is to move the needle towards dialogue and diplomacy, not in the opposite direction towards further complications.”
Speaking on peace and global development, he said ongoing conflicts, particularly in Ukraine and Gaza, have starkly demonstrated the costs, especially to the Global South, in terms of energy, food and fertiliser security.
Goswami was reportedly part of the group that accompanied Zubeen on the yacht trip in Singapore, during which the tragic incident took place
Zubeen Garg passed away in Singapore while scuba diving.
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) of Assam Police on Thursday arrested musician Shekhar Jyoti Goswami in connection with the death of iconic Assamese singer Zubeen Garg.
Goswami was reportedly part of the group that accompanied Zubeen on the yacht trip in Singapore, during which the tragic incident took place.
Officials confirmed that Goswami was arrested after being taken into custody for questioning earlier today. However, the exact details of the allegations against him have not been disclosed.
It remains unclear whether formal charges will be filed or what the nature of Goswami’s relationship with Garg was. Several media reports have described Goswami as a close aide of the singer, with some suggesting he was the drummer in his band.
The police have yet to issue an official statement regarding this latest development.
The arrest also comes as the SIT continues its probe into the singer’s untimely death, which happened on September 19 in Singapore, where Zubeen had travelled to attend and perform at the North East India Festival. He drowned while swimming in the sea and could not be revived despite medical efforts.
Earlier today, SIT teams also carried out separate searches at the residences of two other key individuals linked to the case — Shyamkanu Mahanta, the organiser of the festival, and Siddharth Sharma, Zubeen’s manager.
A team visited Mahanta’s house in Geetanagar, where only two domestic helpers were found at home. Meanwhile, another team reached Sharma’s apartment in Dhirenpara, which was locked.
Trump has already slapped 50 per cent tariffs on Indian imports, which also includes a 25 per cent ‘penalty’ for continued purchase of Russian oil.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced tariffs of up to 100 per cent on imports of branded and patented pharmaceutical drugs, starting October 1, 2025. India’s pharmaceuticals sector, one of the most dependent domestic industries on trade with America, could be significantly impacted by the move.
“Starting October 1st, 2025, we will be imposing a 100 per cent Tariff on any branded or patented Pharmaceutical Product, unless a Company IS BUILDING their Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Plant in America,” the Republican leader said on Truth Social.
Trump’s posts showed that his devotion to tariffs did not end with the trade frameworks and import taxes that were launched in August, a reflection of the president’s confidence that taxes will help reduce the government’s budget deficit while increasing domestic manufacturing.
“”IS BUILDING” will be defined as, “breaking ground” and/or “under construction.” There will, therefore, be no Tariff on these Pharmaceutical Products if construction has started. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” he added.
In his latest tariff blitz, Trump also slapped 50 per cent duty on imports of kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities, 30 per cent on upholstered furniture, and 25 per cent on heavy trucks.
While Trump did not provide a legal justification for the tariffs, he appeared to stretch the bounds of his role as commander-in-chief by stating that the taxes were needed “for National Security and other reasons.”
US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025.
How Could India Be Impacted?
America is India’s largest export market for pharmaceutical goods. In FY 24, of India’s $27.9 billion worth of pharma exports, 31 per cent or $8.7 billion (Rs 77,138 crore) went to the US, according to the Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India, an industry body. Another $3.7 billion (Rs 32,505 crore) worth of pharma products were exported in just the first half of 2025.
Per reports, India supplies over 45 per cent of generic and 15 per cent of biosimilar drugs used in the US. Firms like Dr Reddy’s, Aurobindo Pharma, Zydus Lifesciences, Sun Pharma and Gland Pharma reportedly earn anywhere from 30-50 per cent of their total revenues from the American market.
Although the latest American tariffs appear to mainly target branded and patented drugs — a segment dominated by multinational giants — uncertainty looms over whether complex generics and speciality medicines from India would also be under the scanner. Moreover, large players already have manufacturing facilities in the US.
Ahead of his scheduled meeting with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal, US President Donald Trump addressed reporters from the Oval Office, saying, “they’re coming, and they may be in this room right now. I don’t know, because we’re late.”
“We have a great leader coming, the Prime Minister of Pakistan and the Field Marshal. Field Marshal is a very great guy, and so is the Prime Minister, both, and they’re coming, and they may be in this room right now,” Trump said.
According to the White House’s public schedule, Trump is set to engage in a closed-door session with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in the Oval Office.
On September 23, Sharif also had an informal exchange with Trump following a meeting between the US President and leaders of eight Islamic-Arab countries, which also included Pakistan.
“Informal exchange followed the dialogue between President Trump and leaders of eight Islamic-Arab countries, including Pakistan. Prime Minister Shehbaz and Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar joined President Donald Trump in the discussion,” the Pakistan Foreign Minister stated in a post on X.
After years of strained relations, US-Pakistan ties began warming when Islamabad credited US President Donald Trump for his so-called peace intervention during the military conflict with India in May.
Trump claimed he helped broker a ceasefire between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, using trade and tariff threats–a claim that India has firmly denied.
Initially, Pakistan’s military leadership stated that the ceasefire was initiated following a direct proposal from its Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) to his Indian counterpart. However, Islamabad later shifted its stance, attributing the breakthrough to Washington’s efforts, even going so far as to nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
The thaw continued in June when Trump welcomed Pakistan’s Army Chief, General Asim Munir, to the White House. The two leaders discussed a range of issues, including trade, economic development, and even cryptocurrency. Just a few weeks later, the Trump administration announced a new trade deal with Pakistan, alongside plans to help Islamabad tap into its “massive oil reserves.”
Munir again visited Washington in August, and during this visit, Pakistan secured a USD 500 million investment from the US, aimed at bolstering the country’s critical minerals sector.
Meanwhile, during the day, Trump signed an executive order approving a deal involving the popular video-sharing app TikTok, signalling a shift towards American ownership and control.
“This is interesting because I had a very good talk with President Xi, a lot of respect for him. Hopefully, he has a lot of respect for me, too. We talked about TikTok, and he gave us the go-ahead,” he said.
“You know, it’s run by American investors and American companies, great ones, great investors, the biggest. The young people really wanted this to happen,” he added.
Dakota Johnson ditched her bra for another sheer lace look at the Zurich Film Festival.
The “50 Shades of Grey” actress was pictured on the red carpet Thursday in an indigo blue party frock with a sheer lace mock turtleneck bodice and drop waist design. A voluminous ballgown style tulle skirt completed the jaw-dropping floor-length gown, which the “Materialists” star accessorized with two substantially jeweled statement rings.
She wore her brunette locks in soft waves, and applied a neutral makeup palette for the outing.
Johnson, 35, showed off various angles of the stunning look on the red carpet, and later stepped on stage to accept the Golden Eye award for career achievement.
Dakota Johnson turned heads in an indigo blue sheer lace dress at the Zurich Film Festival on Thursday. Getty Images
The “Madame Web” star’s appearance closely follows another sheer lace moment — earlier this month, she appeared in a completely sheer black lace dress at the Kering Foundation dinner in New York.
For that outing, Johnson slipped into a pair of black undies and a bra by Fleur du Mal to complement the long, revealing Gucci dress.
She accentuated the look with a cherry red manicure and lip, and opted for an event-worthy updo. In photos, Johnson showed off her partially exposed backside while modeling the see-through ensemble.
The actress previously showed Chris Martin what he was missing in a sheer black ensemble following their June split after nearly eight years together.
At the time, the radiant actress stepped out of New York’s Greenwich Hotel in a Nensi Dojaka bodysuit and matching tulle midi skirt for an eye-popping post-split appearance.
In February 2024, she again showcased her love for all things transparent in a crystal-embellished, mesh custom Gucci design for the premiere of “Madame Web.”
Should passengers lose sleep over cyber threats to aviation? (Picture: Metro)
A flurry of cyberattacks that grounded planes from Dallas to Berlin were designed to sow chaos and deter ordinary people from going about their lives, an expert has said.
Disruption swept some of the world’s biggest airports last weekend after an air traffic outage brought flights across the US to a standstill and a cyber attack crippled check-in and boarding systems at Heathrow, Brussels and Berlin.
Then, in another incident, mysterious drones were spotted flying over four airports in Denmark – Aalborg, Sonderborg and Esbjerg, as well as at the Skrydstrup airbase – last night and this morning.
This came after drones were spotted hovering above Copenhagen and Oslo’s airports earlier this week.
Dr Daniel Gardham, from the University of Surrey Centre for Cyber Security, said it is ‘unsurprising’ that the aviation industry has been hit.
‘There’s a reason the attackers are going after these very visible targets, he told Metro.
‘One is that it affects the everyday person – it brings your attention to these matters, whether you care about it or not.
‘And secondly, with airports in particular, they have different systems in place that have to work together so it runs more efficiently.’
These systems range from software managing the conveyor belt and baggage to the fuel pumps in the aircraft, which opens airports up to a larger possibility of being attacked.
‘It is unsurprising that they are able to find vulnerabilities at an airport, just because of the scale of the operation, and the fact that it comprises so many pieces that have to work together,’ he said.
He added that while the complexities are unlikely to disappear anytime soon despite advancements in AI and technology, an average traveller shouldn’t lose sleep over possible cyber-related flight disruption.
Dr Gardham said: ‘I’m sure the airports themselves are very worried, because they know that they’re being targeted.’
While passengers should be mindful about cybersecurity, there’s not much passengers themselves can do. He’s recommended that they take out travel insurance in case something happens.
So, how prepared is the UK for the likelihood of more cyber attacks targeting aviation – and how worried should you be?
Mantas Sabeckis, an ethical hacker and infosecurity researcher, said the UK aviation world is taking cyber threats seriously, and he feels they’re doing a good job of keeping on top of the changes.
He pointed to a recent UK Cyber Security Breaches Survey, which showed that around 76% of large UK businesses have plans in place for cyber incidents.
‘They push for basics like keeping systems updated, training staff on cyber risks, and having a solid plan to bounce back quickly if something goes wrong,’ he told Metro.
‘That being said, aviation is very complex, with lots of different companies and suppliers working together. This means there are still weak spots – like the recent cyberattack linked to Collins Aerospace is a good example of causing big headaches at airports.
‘So, even though the UK is doing well compared to many places, the job of protecting aviation cyber systems is never done. You have to keep learning, improving, and staying alert as hackers get smarter.’
Are digital boarding passes safer?
As airports remain on high alert, airlines are preparing to end the use of paper boarding passes. Ryanair, for example, is going 100% digital from November 12, a move that has been labelled a nightmare by passengers.
Mr Sabeckis said while online boarding passes usually speeds up check-in and boarding, they come with risks – especially in light of the recent attacks.
‘Staff have to fall back on manual processes like handwritten boarding passes, which slows everything down and can cause confusion,’ he said.
‘I think digital boarding passes are the future, and now is still a good time for airlines like Ryanair to continue adopting digital boarding passes, but they need to do it carefully. They should keep in mind that the aviation sector saw a 600% year-on-year increase in cyberattacks, and this means they must prepare for potentially more frequent and sophisticated cyber threats that could disrupt automated systems.’
What about the US? Are they safe from cyber attacks?
It is not just the UK and European travel hubs that have been targeted in recent years.
Airlines in the US fell victim to the Scattered Spider cybercrime network shortly after hackers paralysed Marks and Spencer payment systems in the UK, leading the FBI to issue an alert about the group in June.
The FBI said it has seen the Scattered Spider cybercriminal group ‘expanding its targeting to include the airline sector.’
‘These actors rely on social engineering techniques, often impersonating employees or contractors to deceive IT help desks into granting access,’ the FBI warned.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas pledged at the United Nations on Thursday to work with U.S. President Donald Trump, Saudi Arabia, France and the United Nations on a peace plan for Gaza overwhelmingly backed by the world body.
The 193-member U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly endorsed this month a seven-page declaration that aims to advance a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians and end the Gaza war between Israel and Hamas militants.
The declaration emerged from an international conference at the U.N. in July – hosted by Saudi Arabia and France – on the decades-long conflict. The United States and Israel boycotted the event and have rejected the international efforts.
TRUMP OFFERS 21-POINT PEACE PLAN
Separately, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said on Wednesday that Trump had presented a 21-point peace plan for the Middle East and Gaza during a meeting with leaders of several Muslim-majority countries on the sidelines of this week’s U.N. General Assembly.
Abbas addressed the annual gathering of world leaders on Thursday via video after the United States said it give him a visa to travel to New York.
“Despite all that our people have suffered, we reject what Hamas carried out on October 7th – acts that targeted Israeli civilians and took them as hostages — because such actions do not represent the Palestinian people nor their just struggle for freedom and independence,” Abbas said.
ABBAS RULES OUT HAMAS ROLE, BUT HAMAS BEGS TO DIFFER
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas appears on screens as he addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), at the U.N. headquarters in New York, U.S., September 25, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon Purchase Licensing Rights
“We have affirmed — and will continue to affirm — that Gaza is an integral part of the State of Palestine, and that we are ready to assume full responsibility for governance and security there. Hamas will have no role in governance, and it – along with other factions – must hand over its weapons to the Palestinian National Authority,” he said. “We reiterate that we do not want an armed state.”
The points he raised are included in the declaration endorsed by the General Assembly.
“We declare our readiness to work with President Donald Trump, with Saudi Arabia, France, the United Nations and all partners to implement the peace plan” backed by the General Assembly, Abbas said.
Hamas rejected the remarks by Abbas.
“We consider the President of the Authority’s assertion that Hamas will have no role in governance an infringement on the inherent right of our Palestinian people to decide their own destiny and to choose who governs them, and a submission —unacceptable to us — to external dictates and schemes,” Hamas said in a statement.
The group also said that its weapons “cannot be compromised so long as the occupation remains entrenched on our land and oppressing our people,” adding: “We denounce the President of the Authority’s call to surrender them.”
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar described Abbas’ speech as “nice words” to the West and accused the Palestinian leader of failing to fight terrorism.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday declaring that his plan to sell Chinese-owned TikTok’s U.S. operations to U.S. and global investors will address the national security requirements in a 2024 law.
The new U.S. company will be valued at around $14 billion, Vice President JD Vance said, putting a price tag on the popular short video app far below some analyst estimates.
Trump on Thursday delayed until January 20 enforcement of the law that bans the app unless its Chinese owners sell it amid efforts to extract TikTok’s U.S. assets from the global platform, line up American and other investors, and win approval from the Chinese government.
The publication of the executive order shows Trump is making progress on the sale of TikTok’s U.S. assets, but numerous details need to be fleshed out, including how the U.S. entity would use TikTok’s most important asset, its recommendation algorithm.
“There was some resistance on the Chinese side, but the fundamental thing that we wanted to accomplish is that we wanted to keep TikTok operating, but we also wanted to make sure that we protected Americans’ data privacy as required by law,” Vance told reporters at an Oval Office briefing.
Trump’s order says the algorithm will be retrained and monitored by the U.S. company’s security partners, and operation of the algorithm will be under the control of the new joint venture.
Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping had indicated approval of the plans. “I spoke with President Xi,” Trump said. “We had a good talk, I told him what we were doing and he said go ahead with it.”
The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. TikTok did not immediately comment on Trump’s action.
Trump has credited TikTok, which has 170 million U.S. users, with helping him win reelection last year. Trump has 15 million followers on his personal TikTok account. The White House also launched an official TikTok account last month.
“This is going to be American-operated all the way,” Trump said.
He said that Michael Dell, the founder, chairman and CEO of Dell Technologies; Rupert Murdoch, the chairman emeritus of Fox News owner Fox Corp and newspaper publisher News Corp, and “probably four or five absolutely world-class investors” would be part of the deal.
The White House did not discuss how it came up with the $14 billion valuation.
TikTok’s Chinese parent, ByteDance, currently values itself at more than $330 billion, according to its new employee share buyback plan. TikTok contributes a small percentage of the company’s total revenue.
According to Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, TikTok was estimated to be worth $30 billion to $40 billion without the algorithm as of April 2025.
Alan Rozenshtein, a professor at the University of Minnesota Law School, said the executive order left unanswered questions, including whether ByteDance would still control the algorithm.
“The problem is that the president has certified the deal, but he has not provided a lot of information on the algorithm,” he said.
U.S. President Donald Trump shows a signed executive order on a deal that would divest TikTok’s U.S. operations from ByteDance from its Chinese owner ByteDance, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 25, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque Purchase Licensing Rights
Chinese media on Friday also painted a different picture of the TikTok agreement, suggesting ByteDance would continue to play a major or operational role.
ByteDance will set up a new U.S. company as part of the restructuring of TikTok’s U.S. operations, Chinese media outlet LatePost reported, citing sources.
The new company to be set up by ByteDance will be responsible for e-commerce, branding operations and interconnection with international operations, the report said.
The report also said the joint venture, as described by the White House and valued at $14 billion, would be responsible for U.S. digital security, safeguarding content and software as well as related local businesses.
Another Chinese financial magazine, Caixin, also reported, citing people close to the deal, that ByteDance planned to set up a TikTok U.S. entity that will receive some revenue from the new TikTok joint venture.
The White House and ByteDance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
ORACLE AND OTHERS TO OWN TIKTOK IN THE U.S.
A group of three investors, including Oracle (ORCL.N) and private-equity firm Silver Lake, will take a roughly 50% stake in TikTok U.S., two sources familiar with the deal said on Thursday.
A group of existing shareholders in ByteDance will hold a roughly 30% stake, one of the sources said. Among ByteDance’s current investors are Susquehanna International Group, General Atlantic and KKR.
Given intense investor interest in TikTok, the 50% stake may still shift, the source noted.
Oracle and Silver Lake did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
CNBC reported earlier, citing sources, that Abu Dhabi-based MGX, Oracle and Silver Lake are poised to be the main investors in TikTok U.S. with a combined 45% ownership.
MGX did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the CNBC report.
Republican House of Representatives lawmakers said they wanted to see more details of the deal to ensure it represented a clean break with China. “As the details are finalized, we must ensure this deal protects American users from the influence and surveillance of CCP-aligned groups,” said U.S. Representatives Brett Guthrie, Gus Bilirakis and Richard Hudson.
The agreement on TikTok’s U.S. operations includes the appointment by ByteDance of one of seven board members for the new entity, with Americans holding the other six seats, a senior White House official said on Saturday.
The U.S. Justice Department filed criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey on Thursday, in a dramatic escalation of President Donald Trump’s retribution campaign against his political enemies.
If convicted, Comey could face up to five years in prison. He faces charges of making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation.
Comey, in a video posted on Instagram, said: “My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So, let’s have a trial and keep the faith.”
His attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, said in a statement: “Jim Comey denies the charges filed today in their entirety. We look forward to vindicating him in the courtroom.”
Trump has threatened to imprison his political rivals since he first ran for president in 2015, but Thursday’s indictment marks the first time his administration has succeeded in securing a grand jury indictment against one of them. Trump’s Justice Department is also investigating other antagonists including New York Attorney General Letitia James and John Bolton, who served as a national security official in Trump’s first term as president.
The charges breach decades-long norms that have sought to insulate U.S. law enforcement from political pressures. The federal prosecutor in Virginia who had been tasked with pursuing the case resigned last week after drawing Trump’s wrath for expressing doubts about the case, and others in the office have privately said the evidence does not merit criminal charges, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Trump, who has pressured Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute Comey and other critics, celebrated the news. “JUSTICE IN AMERICA!” he wrote on social media. “He has been so bad for our Country, for so long.”
Trump fired Comey in 2017, early in his first term in office. He has since regularly assailed Comey’s handling of the FBI investigation that detailed contacts between Russians and Trump’s 2016 campaign.
Since Trump returned to office last January, his Justice Department has been examining Comey’s 2020 testimony when he addressed Republican criticisms of the Russia investigation and denied that he had authorized disclosures of sensitive information to the news media.
The indictment alleges that Comey misled Congress by claiming he had not authorized anyone else to be an anonymous source in news reporting about an FBI investigation.
Trump’s administration has carried out a sweeping campaign to remake the Justice Department, which the president alleges was used as a political weapon when he left office in 2021. Trump faced federal charges of mishandling classified documents and trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat. Both cases have been dropped.
James Comey, former director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is seen in a frame grab from a video feed as he is sworn in remotely from his home during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing exploring the FBI’s investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign and Russian election interference in Washington, U.S., September 30, 2020. U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
“Donald Trump has ordered the criminal prosecutions of political targets, and the Department of Justice is corruptly obeying,” said Norm Eisen, a prominent former government ethics official under Democratic President Barack Obama and currently a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “This indictment has all the hallmarks of a vindictive and meritless prosecution.”
TENSIONS WITHIN JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
The effort to target Comey had been viewed with skepticism in the Eastern District of Virginia, the U.S. attorney’s office handling the case.
After the district’s top federal prosecutor, Erik Siebert, resigned last week, others in the office told his successor, Lindsey Halligan, that charges should not be filed due to a lack of evidence, according to a source. Career prosecutors in the office also previously drafted a memo urging Halligan not to seek an indictment, saying the case lacked evidence to establish probable cause that a crime was committed, Reuters previously reported.
Underscoring the weakness of the case, the grand jury on Thursday declined to indict Comey on a third proposed charge, originally listed as count one of the indictment, of making a false statement to Congress in a different part of his Senate testimony stemming from a question related to the 2016 presidential election, court records show.
Halligan most recently served as a White House adviser, and before that was one of Trump’s personal defense lawyers.
In a highly unusual move, Halligan personally presented the evidence to the grand jury on Thursday – a task typically performed by a line prosecutor and not the U.S. Attorney, according to four people briefed on the matter.
Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards, resigned from his position as a senior national security prosecutor following the news on Thursday, saying he was doing so in order to uphold his “oath to the Constitution and country,” according to a copy of his resignation letter seen by Reuters.
Comey’s eldest daughter, Maureen Comey, was fired, from her job as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan in July. She filed a lawsuit earlier this month, with her lawyers saying in the complaint that she was fired “solely or substantially because her father is former FBI Director James B. Comey.”
Trump and Comey have had an acrimonious relationship since the start of the president’s first term. Trump fired him as FBI director days after Comey publicly confirmed that the president was under investigation over his election campaign’s connections to Russia. Comey then emerged as a prominent critic of the president, calling him “morally unfit” for office.
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks, on the day he signs energy-related executive orders at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 8, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File photo Purchase Licensing Rights
The Trump administration intends to shift $1.8 billion in foreign aid funding toward “America First” initiatives such as pursuing investments in Greenland and countering “Marxist, anti-American regimes” in Latin America, according to a document sent to Congress.
“The national security interests of the United States require that the United States utilize these foreign assistance funds to meet new challenges in ways that make America safer, stronger, or more prosperous,” according to the Congressional Notification reviewed by Reuters on Wednesday.
The administration’s plan to shift the funding from programs previously authorized by Congress was first reported by The Washington Post.
A State Department spokesperson said the department looked forward to working with Congress “on America First Foreign Assistance,” saying foreign assistance programs must align with administration policies.
“The United States will prioritize trade over aid, opportunity over dependency, and investment over assistance,” the spokesperson said in an emailed statement.
President Donald Trump’s administration has been pursuing a massive overhaul of foreign assistance since the Republican began his second term in January. The strategy is a departure from the long-held assumption that food, medical and economic assistance is an important “soft power” component of U.S. global influence.
In the notification, dated September 12, the administration says the $1.8 billion would be obligated for programs to “strengthen U.S. global leadership,” to focus on several areas central to Trump administration policy.
These include diversifying critical mineral supply chains, promoting strategic infrastructure investment and development, countering China’s influence and “addressing the immigration crisis.”
The document says $400 million would support efforts involving Europe, including energy and critical minerals programming in Ukraine and economic development and conservation work in Greenland.
Trump has said he wants to take control of Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. The strategically located island is rich in oil, natural gas and many minerals needed for high-tech industries.
In the western hemisphere, the document says, $400 million would support activities to end illegal immigration to the U.S., counter China’s dominance in critical minerals and artificial intelligence and “confront the Marxist, anti-American regimes of Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua.”
USAID DISMANTLED
Since January, the administration has dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development, frozen and then slashed billions of dollars of foreign aid, saying it wants to ensure U.S. taxpayer money goes only to programs aligned with Trump’s “America First” policies.
The cutbacks effectively shut down USAID, leading to the firing of thousands of its employees and contractors. That jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and has thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos.
Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the plan outlined in the notification subverted Congress’ power, outlined in the Constitution, to control how government money is spent.
A light moves in the sky over Aalborg, amid reports of drone sightings that led to the city’s airport, used for commercial and military flights, being closed due to drones in its airspace, in Aalborg, Denmark. Morten Skov/@MSchieller69609 Purchase Licensing Rights
Denmark’s Aalborg airport, used for commercial and military flights, was closed due to drones in its airspace, police said early on Thursday, two days after the country’s main Copenhagen airport was shut over drone sightings that raised European security concerns.
Danish national police said the drones followed a similar pattern to the ones that had halted flights at Copenhagen airport for four hours a few days earlier. Local police later said the drones had left the Aalborg area after about three hours.
Denmark said on Tuesday the incident at Copenhagen airport was the most serious attack yet on its critical infrastructure and linked it to a series of suspected Russian drone incursions and other disruptions across Europe.
The closure of Aalborg airport also affected Denmark’s armed forces because it is used as a military base, police added. The Danish armed forces said they were assisting local and national police with the investigation, but declined to comment further.
Authorities in Norway also shut the airspace at Oslo airport for three hours on Monday evening after a drone was seen.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Tuesday that the drones that halted flights at Copenhagen airport were part of a “pattern of persistent contestation at our borders.”
Suspicions of Russian involvement in the Copenhagen airport incident were ungrounded, Russia’s ambassador to Denmark said on Tuesday.
Norwegian and Danish authorities are in close contact over the Copenhagen and Oslo incidents on Monday but their investigation has not yet established a connection, Norway’s foreign minister said on Wednesday.
MORE THAN ONE DRONE
Northern Jutland police told reporters “more than one drone” had been sighted near Aalborg airport and they were flying with lights on.
The drones were first seen at about 9:44 p.m. (1944 GMT) on Wednesday, according to police, and remained in the airspace until 12:54 a.m. on Thursday.
Eurocontrol, which oversees European air traffic control, had earlier said arrivals and departures at Aalborg airport would be at a “zero rate” until 0400 GMT on Thursday due to drone activity in the vicinity.
The first flight from Aalborg on Thursday is scheduled at 0420 GMT, the airport’s website showed.
Northern Jutland police said they could not specify the type of drones or whether they were the same as the ones flying over Copenhagen airport on Monday.
“It is too early to say what the goal of the drones is and who is the actor behind,” a police official said.
Northern Jutland police later said that efforts to take down the drones had been unsuccessful and the drone operators had yet to be apprehended.
Southern Jutland police said in a post on X that drones had also been observed near the airports in the Danish towns of Esbjerg, Sonderborg and Skrydstrup.
Fighter Wing Skrydstrup in Southern Jutland is the base for Denmark’s F-16 and F-35 fighter jets.
National police commissioner Thorkild Fogde said many people around the country had reported drone sightings to the police since Monday.
It only lasted a day. The U.S. Park Police removed a statue of President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein from the National Mall at approximately 5:30 a.m. on Wednesday. The protest artwork had been placed on the east side of the mall near the U.S. Capitol building Tuesday, and there was a permit for it to remain until Sunday.
The Reddit user are-you-a-vegetable posted a video of a uniformed officer supervising a team of maintenance workers loading it onto a flatbed truck before sunrise. After the sun rose, the only thing left was an outline in the sand revealing where it had been.
Dozens of people came down to see the statue on Wednesday morning and were disappointed to learn it was already gone.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
“As somebody that had served this country for 17 years to ensure the freedom of speech for our fellow countrymen, it is beyond reprehensible to me,” Navy Veteran Christopher Hooper told Straight Arrow News.
“It comes down to freedom of speech and that includes art,” Hooper continued. “So the fact that it’s gone — we’re no longer in the threat of an authoritarian government, we are in an authoritarian government.”
Everyone who Straight Arrow News spoke with on the National Mall Wednesday opposes President Trump, which is typical in heavily Democratic D.C., especially when there’s a protest.
“More and more of our rights are being eliminated or usurped by this administration,” Lynn Koiner told SAN. “You can’t protest. If you say anything, like Jimmy Kimmel, you’re taken off.”
The statue had a plaque that stated, “In honor of friendship month. We celebrate the long-standing bond between President Donald J. Trump and his closest friend Jeffrey Epstein.”
Beneath the inscription was a carving of two hands held together to form a heart and a reference to the Trump message to Epstein in the “birthday book“ — “Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything.”
The plaque is a reference to Jeffrey Epstein stating he was Trump’s “closest friend”.
“The Epstein case reminds me of the Watergate missing 18 minutes of tape,” Dan Meijer told SAN. “The truth will bubble up slowly but eventually, and so the more he panics about it, the more you realize there’s something there.”
While Trump has called the Epstein files a Democratic hoax and has so far been able to keep a bulk of them sealed, it may get harder to do that in the coming weeks. Adelita Grijalva won a special election in Arizona Tuesday night to fill a vacant seat in the House of Representatives. Once she’s sworn in, she can be the final signature needed on a discharge petition to force a vote on releasing the files.
Pessimists appear to outnumber optimists these days, with a new poll showing most Americans believe democracy “is not working,” among several other jarring findings.
The new Quinnipiac University Poll released on Tuesday found 53% of citizens believe American democracy is not working right now, compared to 41% of Americans who believe the system is going fine.
Those on the left, unsurprisingly, were much more likely to say the figurative house is burning down, with 74% of polled Democrats saying “the system of democracy in the United States is not working”; only 22% of Republicans said it is not working, and 74% of GOP voters said there is no problem at all.
A few other eye-grabbing results from Quinnipiac:
79% of American voters believe the U.S. is in a state of “political crisis”
71% of Americans believe political violence is a “very serious problem” — up from 54% who felt that way in June
53% of voters said they are “pessimistic about free speech” in the U.S.
Another 39% of respondents said they approve of how President Donald Trump is handling the economy, including 85% of Republicans. Only 5% of Democrats gave the president a thumbs up on the economy.
Quinnipiac’s poll — and the sharp jump in Americans concerned about political violence — comes two weeks after conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed at an event in Utah.
The new poll was conducted between Sept. 18-21 and is based on 1,276 self-identified registered voters nationally.
Overall, the top priority for 32% of respondents was “preserving democracy”; the next closest topic was the economy, according to 18% of respondents, and illegal immigration and crime, which both grabbed 9% of respondents.
Stassi Schroeder has turned her back on Meghan Markle after the former was left out of the latter’s recent “As Ever” PR box gifting.
“I have literally defended her when no one else did,” the “Vanderpump Rules” star shared on an episode of her “Stassi” podcast earlier this month.
“I have filmed videos about it, I’ve commented on all the things, I literally had my f–king PR reach out.”
Stassi Schroeder called out Meghan Markle after she was left out of the actress’ recent “As Ever” PR box gifting. Instagram/@stassischroeder
Schroeder, 37, claimed that Markle, 44, might not take her seriously because of her background in reality television.
“The way she moves through social media, I think that she’s stuck in 2017, and she just thinks I’m a lowly reality person,” the TV personality alleged.
“That’s what I think, and I am furious, and this is the last straw. I’m not watching her show anymore,” she added, referring to the “Suits” alum’s Netflix series, “With Love, Meghan.”
“I’m not going to talk about her anymore. I’m going to unfollow her right now … Done,” Schroeder said.
The Bravo star also called out Markle for sending PR boxes to the “Toast” podcast hosts, Claudia Oshry and Jackie Oshry, who have “questioned her.”
“When you’re sending PR boxes to people who talk s–t about you — Claudia and Jackie don’t talk s–t about her, but they literally, they’ve questioned her, and they also say, ‘I wonder what Stassi’s thinking about this.’”
“‘I wonder what Stassi’s thinking about this because Stassi’s her number one fan.’ Everyone f–king knows. No longer,” Schroeder stated. “My feelings are hurt and I’m a toxic fan … I was a toxic fan that’s now a toxic hater.”
The Bravolebrity also called out Markle for “paying attention to [her] haters” instead of her fans, alleging, “I think it’s her way of trying to control the narrative. I think she’s controlling.”
Schroeder also slammed Markle as a “control freak” and compared her to Blake Lively, though she didn’t clarify her remarks on the “Gossip Girl” alum.
Reps for Markle and Lively weren’t immediately available to Page Six for comment.
The Duchess of Sussex has lost supporters in the past, including her close friend Jessica Mulroney after the royal was allegedly left “mortified” when her pal made a “tone-deaf” comment about “white privilege” in 2020.
President Donald Trump said Tuesday NATO countries should shoot down Russian aircraft that violate their airspace. He also praised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in his nation’s war against Russia, saying it’s “putting up one hell of a fight.”
Ukrainians were cautious Wednesday in their response to a surprise pivot in U.S. President Donald Trump’s views on their prospects for defeating Russia’s invasion, after he said they could win the three-year war and retake land captured by Moscow.
Russian officials, meanwhile, said developments on the battlefield showed Ukraine is unable to reclaim the occupied territory and dismissed Trump’s description of Russia as a “paper tiger.”
“Russia isn’t a tiger, it’s more associated with a bear,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. “There are no paper bears. Russia is a real bear.”
Wary Ukrainians hope for solid U.S. support
Some Ukrainians expressed hope that Trump’s words would be backed up by concrete support for Ukraine in Washington, while others were wary about the American president’s unpredictability.
“We need such support from America, from Donald Trump, and we hope that this will continue in the future — the same rhetoric, the same attitude toward us, toward Ukraine, and toward the war in Ukraine,” Olha Voronina, a 66-year-old Kyiv resident, said.
Volodymyr Cheslavskyi, a 48-year-old soldier recovering from a war wound, said he considered Trump to be more interested in making money than helping Ukraine, and kept people guessing about his true intentions with contradictory statements.
“He can say different things each time — he supports Ukraine, or he does not support Ukraine,” Cheslavskyi told The Associated Press in St. Michael’s Square in the Ukrainian capital.
Anna Khudimova, 43, said she believed her country’s armed forces could prevail on the battlefield against Russia’s bigger army.
“But we cannot do it without the help of NATO, without the support of Europe,” she said. “If Trump influences the situation, then perhaps this can be realistic.”
Russia has occupied around 20% of Ukraine since it annexed Crimea in 2014. The all-out invasion began in February 2022.
U.S. and Ukraine eye joint weapons production
In comments Tuesday at the United Nations and on social media, Trump took a swipe at Russian President Vladimir Putin’s leadership, made cutting remarks about Russia’s military prowess and derided the Russian economy’s performance. He also said NATO countries should shoot down Russian warplanes entering their airspace, as happened recently in Estonia.
Trump’s comments were an unanticipated departure from his previous positions on the war, when he was publicly cool, even at times hostile, toward Ukraine and apparently more amenable to Putin.
After taking office in January, Trump reversed the three-year U.S. policy of isolating Russia when he called Putin. He has also ruled out the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO, has said Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy would need to negotiate swapping land in return for a peace deal with Moscow, and on social media called Zelenskyy “a dictator without elections.”
A senior Ukrainian lawmaker said Trump’s latest remarks were unexpected but important.
“What remains important to us is not only Trump’s words, but also whether he fulfills the earlier promises regarding decisive sanctions” on Russia, Oleksandr Merezhko, chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Policy and Interparliamentary Cooperation, told the AP.
The United States and Ukraine signed earlier this year a deal granting Washington access to the country’s critical minerals and other natural resources. Another agreement is in the works, with a Ukrainian delegation due in Washington next week for talks on joint weapons production, Ukraine’s Ambassador to the U.S. Olha Stefanishyna said Wednesday.
The potential deal focuses on drone manufacturing, where Ukraine is at the cutting edge of new battle-tested technology, and was discussed “in quite some detail” between Trump and Zelenskyy on Tuesday, she said.
Kremlin says it is protecting Russia’s security
Zelenskyy and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov were due to address the U.N. General Assembly later Wednesday.
Trump said on social media Tuesday: “With time, patience, and the financial support of Europe and, in particular, NATO, the original Borders from where this War started, is very much an option.”
Max Bergmann, the Director of the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank, said that when he read Trump’s post, his reaction was, “the U.S. is out” and handing off to Europe.
“I feel that it’s the president sort of signing off, like: ’We’ll keep sort of doing some stuff, but this is basically your problem,’” Bergmann said on the sidelines of a defense conference in Tallinn, Estonia.
Russia’s state television channels cast Trump’s comments as part of his efforts to shift the burden of dealing with the conflict to Europe and encourage it to buy more American weapons.
Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, challenged Trump’s comment that “Russia has been fighting aimlessly.”
A day after France led other nations in recognizing Palestinian statehood, the U.N. Security Council once again aired a deep divide between the veto-wielding United States and most of the rest of the world over how to end the war in the Gaza Strip and resolve the Mideast conflict.
At a special session to discuss the crisis, one representative after another expressed horror at Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack and Israel’s ongoing military offensive in the Gaza Strip, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed vast areas and displaced around 90% of the population, many of them starving. Most nations called for an immediate ceasefire and an influx of humanitarian aid.
“Gaza has become a graveyard for humanity as well as for the global conscience,” said Pakistan’s foreign minister, Mohammad Ishaq Dar. “The time for words has passed. The time for action is now.”
But no such action is expected from the world body, where the United States has shielded Israel from numerous calls for a ceasefire. Last week, it voted against the other 14 members of the Security Council on a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire and the release of all hostages.
The United States said the resolution did not go far enough in condemning Hamas. Washington is also opposed to the latest moves to recognize Palestinian statehood. As a permanent member of the Security Council, it could block any path to full Palestinian membership in the world body.
The context
The Security Council meeting once again reflected the deep isolation that Israel and its closest ally, the United States, face when it comes to growing international demands for accountability and an end to Israel’s war in Gaza.
Since world leaders began arriving in New York on Monday, the topic of Gaza and Palestinian statehood has towered over other diplomatic discussion, with a two-state solution conference kicking off the week of gatherings. Country after country, including most U.S. allies, used their time in the General Assembly, the Security Council and in bilateral meetings across the U.N. campus to bring attention to the growing civilian death toll and the impact the nearly two-year long war has had on Palestinian children.
During the council meeting, Israel was not present due to the Jewish new year. The Americans, who have a top-level delegation in town, sent their U.N. ambassador to represent them instead of Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
But even before heads of state and government came to Manhattan, the Security Council has held 80 meetings on the war in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023. During those sessions, both Biden and Trump administration officials have vetoed or rejected resolutions calling for an immediate ceasefire, saying that the messages of support by the 14 other members do not go far enough.
The consistent obstructions have frustrated the U.N.’s most powerful body and have called into question its relevance and efficiency if one permanent member can continue to veto efforts that have near-unanimous support.
The players’ responses
U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz said it was “regrettable” that the council convened Tuesday’s meeting on the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashana, a decision that he said had excluded Israel.
“This charade is disappointing,” Waltz said of the meeting. “It is clearly fueled by domestic politics and it has given Hamas a reward for refusing to surrender, as well as an incentive” to keep holding 48 hostages, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive.
He said the Security Council should instead focus on eliminating Hamas. He blamed international action in support of the Palestinians for the breakdown of ceasefire talks in recent weeks, and not an Israeli strike on Hamas negotiators in Qatar, a key mediator, which was condemned by several members of the council.
The establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) development bank would give 10 Eurasian countries an alternative to Western-dominated lenders like the World Bank and IMF, say analysts.
A Chinese yuan note. REUTERS/Thomas White/Illustration/File Photo
China’s push for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) to set up a development bank is its latest effort to internationalise the yuan and challenge Western-dominated financial institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), analysts say.
They add that the multilateral lender could offer a lifeline to countries facing Western sanctions, while giving emerging economies an alternative source of funding and a hedge against dollar dependence.
Speaking at the SCO summit in Tianjin earlier this month, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced plans for a development bank – calling on countries to accelerate its creation.
“It should be established as soon as possible to provide stronger support for the security and economic cooperation of member states,” Xi said.
SCO member states include Russia and Iran which face Western sanctions, as well as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, India, Pakistan, Belarus and China itself.
If successful, the SCO Bank could be more than just another lender, experts told CNA – it would join establishments like the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) as part of a growing network of Chinese-led multilateral institutions aimed at reshaping global finance by loosening the dollar’s grip.
“Chinese banks are huge,” said Charles Chang, a finance professor at Fudan University in Shanghai, noting that four of the world’s largest banks – the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), Agricultural Bank of China (ABC), China Construction Bank (CCB) and Bank of China (BOC) – were Chinese.
“There’s incredible capital accumulation there. As a result, when and how they move will necessarily have a big impact,” Chang said.
The SCO Bank comes at a critical juncture, as tariff tensions mount and the dollar’s dominance endures. As US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg in August: “We have extraterritorial power with the dollar.”
“Why do Russia, China and Iran want to come off these dollar payment rails? Because when there’s bad behaviour, we can make it very difficult for them with sanctions,” Bessent said.
At the same time, questions remain about the viability of the new bank, with few details released so far.
How will investments and debt servicing be determined?
Will the yuan dominate or will a basket of member currencies be used? And how can the SCO bank gain credibility and ensure transparency in lending?
“The structure of the internal governance is key,” Chang said.
STARTING SMALL: HOW THE SCO BANK COULD TAKE SHAPE
An official SCO statement released hours after Xi’s speech on Sep 1 said the bloc had “decided to establish a development bank and accelerate consultations on a series of issues related to the financial institution’s operation”.
“The world has entered a new period of tumultuous change and global governance has arrived at a new crossroads,” Xi said during his address, where he also pledged US$1.4 billion in loans to SCO members over the next three years.
“The shadows of Cold War mentality, bullying, are not dissipating, and there are new challenges that are increasing, not diminishing,” Xi added.
Beijing has yet to provide a timeline, outline how the bank will be structured, or explain what its lending priorities and decision-making framework will look like.
But analysts told CNA they believe an SCO Bank would likely follow a familiar Chinese trajectory: starting small before gradually evolving into a more defined institution, much like the Beijing-based AIIB.
“We don’t know much at this point, but like many Chinese-led global governance initiatives and institutions, it will likely start small and grow into itself over time, developing a more definite set of functions,” Joe Mazur, a senior analyst at the Trivium China think tank in Beijing, told CNA.
“Whatever form it ultimately ends up taking, it will likely join the ranks of the AIIB and similar (Chinese-led) organisations that seek to form an alternative to Western-dominated institutions,” Mazur said.
Kun Fan, an arbitrator and associate law professor at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), told CNA that the bank’s credibility would ultimately rest on its legal architecture.
“It should also guard against dominance (of one state) and keep smaller members on equal footing, while ensuring independent tribunals and fair procedure,” she said.
“Having clear legal provisions and dispute resolution clauses could provide legal certainty and give smaller member states more leverage when dealing with more powerful states or state-owned enterprises,” she added.
Developed with an initial focus on Asia’s infrastructure needs, the AIIB has since grown to more than 100 members, including countries like India, Singapore, South Korea, Brunei and Australia.
Since its launch, it has expanded from funding basic infrastructure to backing major projects in energy transition, urban development and digital connectivity – which include flagship projects like Indonesia’s Batam-Bintan Bridge Project as well as renewable energy investments in the Maldives.
As of end-2024, the bank announced that it had approved 303 projects with total payments of US$58.8 billion in funding and also aims to increase its annual financing to US$17 billion by 2030.
The NDB, meanwhile, was established in 2015 by BRICS countries to mobilise resources for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in emerging markets and developing countries.
Originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India and China, with South Africa joining soon after, the bloc has since expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia.
As of July 2025, the bank said it has approved US$40 billion in loans for over 120 projects, including some within China.
Experts expect the SCO Bank to focus heavily on infrastructure and development programmes for a start.
Chang of Fudan University described it as a natural extension of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), saying early emphasis would likely be on large-scale infrastructure projects.
“Infrastructure is usually the first thing people will think about,” Chang said.
He also noted discussions were emerging around “newer core technologies” such as rare-earth minerals, artificial intelligence, digital finance, and supply-chain logistics. “That might be further down the line though,” he added.
The SCO Bank could also ultimately serve purposes beyond financing, acting as a platform for regulatory cooperation or policy dialogue outside the orbit of US-led institutions like the IMF and World Bank.
“But it remains to be seen which parties will ultimately join, fund and engage,” Chang said.
LOOSENING THE DOLLAR’S GRIP
For many members, the appeal of an SCO Bank lies in its promise to ease dependence on the US dollar, experts said.
Most international loans and trade settlements remain dollar-denominated – and for now, the US dollar remains unrivalled as the backbone of the global economy.
According to IMF data, the dollar made up nearly 60 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves in 2024 – far ahead of the euro at 20 per cent, the Japanese yen at 6 per cent, the British pound at 5 per cent and the Chinese yuan at 2 per cent.
Although dollar share has slipped from its peak of 72 per cent of reserves in 2001 as foreign reserve managers diversify into other currencies, it still remains the dominant reserve currency.
Such dominance means that when the US Federal Reserve raises interest rates, the effects ripple across the world – triggering capital outflows, weakening local currencies and increasing the cost of dollar-denominated debt.
But observers have noted that the dollar’s once unshakable grip may be loosening.
In a Xinhua commentary piece published on Jul 5, Maya Majueran, BRI director of Sri Lanka, wrote that “dollar dominance was slowly eroding” amid “multiple forces driving this transition”.
China has already been pushing bilateral currency swap deals – more than 40 worldwide – to encourage the use of the yuan in trade, investment settlement and debt repayment.
Such swaps allow central banks to exchange their currencies directly, reducing reliance on the US dollar.
Majueran said “emerging markets are diversifying their reserve portfolios, bilateral trade in local currencies is gaining momentum and the weaponisation of the dollar, particularly through sanctions, is prompting the building of parallel financial systems”.
These changes are also being “further accelerated by growing geopolitical tensions and fragmenting trade relationships”, Majueran added.
The Argentine government reached an agreement with the People’s Bank of China in 2023 – securing US$1.7 billion in yuan from a currency swap to repay part of its US$2.7 billion debt to the IMF.
The remaining US$1 billion was covered by the Development Bank of Latin America.
The yuan has also become the most popular foreign currency in Russia, surpassing the US dollar in 2023, after Western sanctions severed Moscow’s access to global financial systems following its invasion of Ukraine.
At a meeting with Xi in Beijing on May 16, Russian President Vladimir Putin also revealed that “90 per cent of all payments are already made in roubles and yuan”.
WHICH COUNTRIES STAND TO GAIN?
For countries under Western sanctions or financial isolation, such as Russia and Iran, an institution operating outside the dollar system could provide a crucial lifeline.
“China, being squarely in the cross-hairs of the US, certainly stands to benefit, which is why we see its prominence in initiating and pushing forward this initiative,” said Chang.
“But I think that all critical trade partners stand to benefit, including much of the ex-Soviet Republics and Southeast Asia.”
He added: “Keeping in mind that this is not just funding, but also potentially impacts currency dependence, trade, and other geopolitics, the most-dependent nations will tend to benefit the most.”
But this appeal is not confined to SCO members. Southeast Asian countries will also be paying attention, said Chong Ja Ian, associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore. “ASEAN members would indeed look at the SCO Bank as an additional source of funding,” he told CNA.
Still, too little is known about the bank to assess whether it would strengthen ASEAN’s position or risk undermining its own initiatives, Chong said.
Indonesia, he added, might be attracted if the terms are favourable, but borrowing could also “turn into economic and political problems if badly handled”.
He cited maritime tensions where China’s “nine-dash line” claims overlap with Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone near the Natuna Islands.
“Greater dependence on China could complicate these issues for Indonesia,” said Chong, adding that elsewhere in the region, countries like Vietnam and the Philippines – both with ongoing territorial disputes with China – are likely to remain cautious.
“The Philippines has had negative experiences with the BRI,” he added.
In 2023, Manila dropped Chinese loans to finance three ambitious railway projects, valued at more than US$5 billion – these included the Mindanao railway, the Subic-Clark freight railway, as well as a proposed long-haul commuter railway.
AIIB lending rates were also said to have been “significantly higher” compared to funding from Japan or South Korean official development assistance, said Philippine Senator Sherwin Gatchalian.
“That would give (Manila) reason to remain wary of an SCO bank,” said Chong.