VOLODYMYR Zelensky will be flanked by European leaders at the White House today as he again meets US President Donald Trump to talk peace in Ukraine.
The landmark moment comes as America finally confirmed it will step in if Vladimir Putin strikes again in future.
Keir Starmer will join Volodymyr Zelensky and a host of European leaders as they head to Washington for crunch talks with Donald TrumpCredit: Alamy
Mr Trump’s peace envoy Steve Witkoff said those protections would come “not from Nato, but directly from the United States, and other European countries”.
Six months after his disastrous Oval Office shouting match with the US President, Ukraine’s hero leader Mr Zelensky will travel to Washington DC today alongside more than half a dozen allies.
PM Sir Keir Starmer will join the leaders of France, Germany and Italy alongside the heads of Nato and the EU in a firm show of solidarity against the Russians.
Following Mr Trump’s historic Alaska summit with Putin last week, swathes of eastern Ukraine are on the negotiating table.
Ukraine is also set to be forced to abandon its dream of formally joining Nato, but is desperately seeking future guarantees for its remaining territory.
But Mr Zelensky yesterday said territory haggling could only be discussed “by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia” at his expected showdown with Putin.
Last night, European leaders including Sir Keir held a video conference ahead of the White House meeting where they warned the Kremlin’s barbarous invasion must not see “borders redrawn by force”.
After her own meeting on Sunday with Mr Zelensky, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said: “These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.”
But last night US officials insisted it was Mr Trump who invited all of the key players as the time had come to finally work out how to police any peace deal with Russia.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters the key issue was, “How do we stop this from happening again?” as he opened the door for a major role for the US in the so-called “Coalition of the Willing” that has vowed to protect Ukraine’s future sovereignty.
He said: “They’re not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky from being bullied. They’re coming here tomorrow because we’ve been working with the Europeans. We invited them to come.”
He added Mr Trump may finally be ready to make the “big move” to have the US play an active role in underwriting Ukraine’s security despite months of refusing to make that pledge.
Mr Witkoff told CNN that following Mr Trump’s talks with Putin: “We were able to win the following concession — that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato.”
Nato’s Article 5 states an attack on one member is considered an attack on all — and allies must come to its defence.
Mr Witkoff said the move would be “game changing” as it was the “first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that”.
He added: “We didn’t think we were anywhere close to agreeing to Article 5 protection from the US in legislative enshrinement within the Russian Federation, not to go after any other territory when the peace deal is codified.”
Mr Rubio insisted no final decision had been made on US involvement.
Last night, Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: “Big progress on Russia. Stay tuned!”
Earlier yesterday, Sir Keir told coalition members that the military planning for such a scenario was now at an “advanced stage” and was bolstered by America’s pledge.
However, Mr Rubio warned that breakthrough would come at a cost to Ukraine, which must give up at least parts of the Donbas territory.
Russia has been meddling in the border region since 2014, but does not control the mineral-rich region despite a full-scale invasion in 2022.
A heroic 3½-year stand by the Western-backed Ukrainian Armed Forces has seen the Donetsk and Luhansk regions split by bloody stalemate, with Russia attempting to grind its way through inch by inch.
In the Alaska talks, it is understood Putin insisted a peace deal would mean Ukraine surrendering these two key regions in full despite remaining in control of some parts.
But Mr Zelensky rejected those terms yesterday, telling reporters in Brussels: “We need real negotiations, which means they can start where the front line is now — the contact line is the best line for talking.”
It was not clear what Russia had offered in concessions beyond some other slivers of land currently occupied in the south-east of Ukraine.
The Kremlin also rejected an immediate ceasefire to allow for talks to take place, with Mr Trump siding with that demand during his three-hour, face-to-face showdown with his Russian counterpart.
The US President said it was more important to seek a lasting peace accord than a mere pause that could be quickly broken.
But last night the Trump administration insisted there would need to be concessions on both sides, as the Europeans vowed to keep their boot on Putin’s throat through punishing economic sanctions.
Mr Rubio said: “We may not like it, it may not be pleasant, it may be distasteful, but in order for there to be an end of the war, there are things Russia wants that it cannot get, and there are things Ukraine wants it’s not going to get.”
On how long talks could take, he added: “I’m not saying we’re on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying we saw enough movement to justify a follow-up with Zelensky and the Europeans.”
He warned of further sanctions for Russia if the peace talks collapse over future security guarantees for Ukraine.
Putin insists that Ukraine cannot join Nato, but allies are working on a plan to give Kyiv legally binding guarantees Russian aggression would be matched by force.
RAGING wildfires are reportedly out of control in Spain – with thousands evacuated and 500 troops deployed across holiday hotspots.
Terrifying infernos spread across Galicia, Extremadura, Castilla and León, and Asturias – sparking alarming high-level alerts across the regions.
Over 500 troops have been deployed to aid evacuation effortsCredit: AFP
In Galicia, the fires burned over 50,000 hectares of land – the most ever burned during a wildfire in the region.
The majority of the flames here ripped through the city of Ourense, wreaking havoc on locals and tourists alike.
It was reported that 13 of the fires there are currently active as of Sunday evening, but several could become active again.
In Castilla and León, there were reportedly 27 active forest fires on Sunday.
More than 3,500 residents were forced out of their homes in the provinces of León, Zamora, Salamanca, and Palencia.
There are a total of 21 active forest fires in the province of León – seven of which are category 2 and four of which are level 1.
The wildfires are evolving irregularly, and all of them are being closely monitored for possible re-ignitions.
A spokesperson for the regional government in León, Eduardo Diego, said the evacuation of the town of Castropetre had been agreed upon due to the Gestoso fire.
This blaze reportedly spread from Ourense and has a very active front towards León.
Meanwhile, the Jarilla fire tearing through Cáceres, in the heart of Extremadura, is “completely out of control”, the president of the regional government María Guardiola said.
This fire has already spread to the Port of Honduras and is only 7km from the provincial border of Salamanca.
Castile and León has therefore been warned that the fire could enter its territory.
In six days, the blaze has devastated 9,000 hectares of land.
It sparked mass evacuations in Gargantilla as well as a lockdown in Hervás on Sunday.
The area is said to be very difficult to access, and 17 teams are currently working there.
On top of this, Molina Ferrera was confined due to the Yeres/Llamas de Cabrera fire.
A total of 12 towns have been evacuated due to this blaze, with 681 residents out of their homes.
It comes as hundreds of dangerous and deadly wildfires have plagued Europe in recent weeks with dozens of holiday hotspots left ravaged.
On Saturday, terrifying footage emerged showing the horrifying moment a fire tornado violently erupted in Portugal, killing a mayor in its blaze.
Portugal’s northern region of Aguiar de Beira was left burned on Friday as a fire tornado cascaded through the area.
This rare phenomenon is formed in intense heat when the air surrounding a fire begins to rotate into a vortex.
Portugal, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Italy and Bulgaria are all still reeling from the deadly fires that have sprung up this summer.
Brits have been put on high alert over wildfires tearing through the popular holiday island of Tenerife in Spain.
A man holds a fire beater, as a wildfire rages in Veiga das Meas, near Verin, Ourense province, Galicia, Spain, August 16, 2025. REUTERS/Nacho Doce Purchase Licensing Rights
Spain battled 14 major fires driven by high winds and aggravated by heat on Friday as authorities warned of “unfavourable conditions” to tackle flames that have already killed seven people and burned an area the size of London.
Firefighters have been battling to put out blazes across southern Europe in one of the worst summers for wildfires in 20 years. And a nearly two-week heatwave and southerly winds were worsening the situation in Spain, Virginia Barcones, director general of emergency services, said on Friday.
“In the western part of the country the situation is extremely worrying,” Barcones said on RTVE.
In Galicia, several fires converged to form a large blaze, forcing the closure of highways and rail services to the region.
As fire spread from Galicia’s Ourense province to neighbouring Zamora, provoking evacuations, some stayed behind to protect their homes.
“We are waiting for the fire to come down to try and stop it, so it does not get to the houses,” Loli Baz, 52, told Reuters from the village of Villanueva de la Sierra in Zamora.
Spain’s national weather agency AEMET warned of extreme fire risk in the north and west of the country, as temperatures are expected to reach up to 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) on the north coast.
“Today will be another very difficult day, with an extreme risk of new fires,” Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez wrote on X.
FIRES SPREADING QUICKLY
A fire near Molezuelas de la Carballeda in the Castile and Leon region – one of the largest in Spain’s history – had not advanced since Thursday.
That wildfire had, at one point, been spreading by 4,000 hectares (15.4 square miles) per hour, said Eduardo Diego, national government representative for the region.
A fire near Badajoz in the Extremadura region, meanwhile, burned 2,500 hectares in a few hours before being brought under control.
“It was very fast with enormous growth, but it has been possible to tackle it,” Jose Luis Quintana, the national government representative for the region, told RTVE.
The fires caused the closure of more than half a dozen roads on a busy bank holiday weekend, leaving travelers stuck at the height of summer holidays.
In the town of Oimbra in Ourense province, where three firefighters were seriously injured, a man was arrested for causing a fire by using his tractor when it was prohibited, police said.
Two people were also arrested in Costa da Morte in Galicia for provoking fires by illegally burning copper cables to extract the metal, according to the Interior Ministry.
Hazy sunshine has replaced last week’s fierce heat in parts of the UK, and it’s down to how smoke particles break up rays of light, but along with the lower temperatures, there could be some memorable sunsets and sunrises.
Smoke from wildfires in Spain and Portugal has brought hazy conditions to the UK, breaking up last week’s spell of very hot weather, forecasters have said.
In a post on the X social media platform on Saturday, the Met Office said: “Smoke from wildfires in Spain and Portugal, plus Saharan dust, has drifted over the UK.”
The Met Office said the UK should expect “enhanced sunsets and sunrises in the coming days – deeper reds & oranges thanks to light scattering.”
Sky weather producer Kirsty McCabe said “the very hot weather is easing, thanks to a strengthening easterly wind as well as cloudier skies”.
She said Saturday’s haze is down to “the terrible wildfires that have been raging across Spain and Portugal, and the smoke has made its way to our shores, along with some Saharan dust”.
While the smoke particles shouldn’t affect the UK’s air quality, she said they will “enhance the orange and red colours of our sunsets and sunrises”.
Wildfire smoke affects the colour of the sky through processes known as Rayleigh scattering and Mie scattering, she explained.
On reaching the Earth’s atmosphere, the sun’s light bumps into tiny molecules of nitrogen and oxygen, which scatter or deflect the light.
Kirsty McCabe said Mie scattering occurs “when the [smoke] particles are much larger and closer to the wavelengths of light.
“That means the smoke particles in the air scatter all colours of light more equally, leading to a hazy or milky appearance of the sun and sky.”
Rayleigh scattering sees the shorter wavelengths of light, blues and violets, scattered most strongly, while red light, having the longest wavelength, is scattered the least, she explained.
“At dusk and dawn, the sun’s rays travel through a greater distance of atmosphere to reach our eyes, so the blue light has been scattered even more.
“With most of the shorter blue and violet wavelengths filtered out, along with some green and yellow, that leaves us with the warmer hues of the reds and oranges.”
The US State Department announced it was halting all visitor visas for people from Gaza.
The pause was issued to conduct a “full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days,” the agency said on X.
The decision has drawn condemnation from some Palestinian rights groups.
Palestine Children’s Relief Fund said in a statement that the decision “will have a devastating and irreversible impact on our ability to bring injured and critically ill children from Gaza to the United States for lifesaving medical treatment”.
The State Department’s policy shift comes after far right activist Laura Loomer wrote a series of posts on X criticising the visa programme and urging the Trump administration to “shut this abomination down.”
In subsequent posts on X Saturday, Loomer took credit for the shift and thanked Secretary of State Marco Rubio for temporarily halting the visas.
The Palestinian Children’s Relief Fund says it has evacuated 169 children from Gaza in 2024 as part of its treatment abroad programme, bringing them to the Middle East, Europe, South Africa, and the US for care.
Two and a half years into a war that followed Hamas’ 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, Gaza has seen much of its medical infrastructure damaged and now faces dramatic food shortages.
Humanitarian groups have alleged that an Israeli blockade beginning in March has prevented non-governmental organisations from delivering sufficient food into Gaza. The Israeli government says its rules on aid are intended to prevent the food from being taken by Hamas.
UN-backed food security organisations, humanitarian groups, and journalists reporting within Gaza have warned of famine conditions in Gaza.
Watch: Moment Air Canada ends news conference after union activists disrupt event
The Canadian government has intervened in the Air Canada strike, forcing both parties to the bargaining table as hundreds of flights were cancelled this weekend.
Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered binding arbitration between the airline and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (Cupe), which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, hours after a strike began on Saturday morning.
“Despite significant supports from the government, these parties have been unable to resolve their differences in a timely manner,” Hadju said in a statement, adding that “stability and supply chains” must be preserved.
The country’s largest carrier says the strike will affect around 500 flights a day.
Hadju invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to bring the parties to the table.
Cupe said Canada’s Liberal Party was “violating our charter rights” and the intervention “sets a terrible precedent” in a statement on X.
Air Canada said it had suspended all flights, including those under its budget arm Air Canada Rouge, and advised affected customers not to travel to the airport unless with a different airline.
The airline said this would disrupt travel plans for around 130,000 passengers a day.
Its flight attendants are calling for higher salaries and to be paid for work when aircraft are on the ground.
The strike took effect at 00:58 EDT (04:58 GMT) on Saturday, though Air Canada began scaling back its operations before then.
Flight attendants will picket at major Canadian airports, where passengers were trying to secure new bookings earlier in the week.
What to know as Air Canada attendants strike
Air Canada, which flies directly to 180 cities worldwide, said it had “suspended all operations” and that it was “strongly advising affected customers not to go to the airport”.
It added that Air Canada Jazz, PAL Airlines and Air Canada Express flights were unaffected.
“Air Canada deeply regrets the effect the strike is having on customers,” it said.
By Friday night, the airline said it had cancelled 623 flights, affecting more than 100,000 passengers, as part of a winding down of operations ahead of the strike.
In contract negotiations, the airline said it had offered flight attendants a 38% increase in total compensation over four years, with a 25% raise in the first year.
Cupe said the offer was “below inflation, below market value, below minimum wage” and would still leave flight attendants unpaid for some hours of work, including boarding and waiting at airports ahead of flights.
Eleven months after his funeral in 2013, Harry Roy Veevers’ body was exhumed and it has been in a mortuary ever since
A Kenyan magistrate this week expressed the hope that a British property tycoon would finally “find rest in eternal peace”, after his body had spent 11 years in a mortuary.
But this week’s conclusion to the decade-long inquest into Harry Roy Veevers’ death in 2013 still leaves many questions unanswered.
It was a case that involved accusations of murder by poisoning, rancorous legal proceedings, the exhumation of a body after almost a year and ultimately divided four siblings – two sons from his first marriage and two daughters from the second.
In one hearing, the sisters, Hellen and Alexandra, were reprimanded by the magistrate for shouting out that a witness was lying and threatened with spending time in a cell, reports said.
In another, Hellen Veevers emerged from the courthouse with a message she had written on her vest-top: “My daddy was not murdered.”
Despite the lengthy inquest into the death of the wealthy 64-year-old, the magistrate, David Odhiambo, found that the cause of death could not be determined “due to the level of [the body’s] decomposition” after spending so long underground. He ordered that the corpse be released to the family for reburial at a place of their choice.
An unsatisfactory ending that could lead to further disputes. Lawyers for both sides told the BBC they were considering their next steps.
“When you have a family split down the middle, how does the court say the remains should be released to the family, when both sides have been fighting since 2013?” said Francis Kinyua Kamundi, representing Mr Veevers’ sons, Richard and Philip.
From the start of his detailed 95-page ruling, the magistrate acknowledged the deeply entrenched feud between the family members.
“Although the death of a loved one often brings survivors closer through the inevitable grieving,” he wrote, “The emotions associated with death can also tear survivors apart”.
This was definitely a case of the latter.
“What happened soon after his burial tore the family apart and marked the beginning of a legal drama,” according to Mr Odhiambo.
On one side of the case were the sons and on the other were Mr Veevers’ second wife, Azra Parvin Din, along with their daughters.
The children were living in the UK, while their father and Ms Parvin Din, who had been together for more than 30 years, were living on the Kenyan coast.
The family feud started after his death on Valentine’s Day 2013, at his home in Mombasa where he had long settled and had an extensive property portfolio. The children then travelled to Kenya.
The drama began the moment they arrived.
It was Saturday 16 February, a day before the burial.
According to Richard Veevers’ court testimony, Ms Parvin Din was agitated when questioned about the deceased. His brother Philip also told the court that she had initially refused his request to view his father’s body.
Ms Parvin Din said he had died of a heart attack.
When they finally saw their father the following day, Richard said he “noticed redness in the face and the lips were purple and pink”, according to the magistrate’s summary.
Tensions seemed to escalate over Ms Parvin Din and her daughters’ reactions to the photos that Philip had taken of the body – including demands that he should delete them, the brothers said.
In the magistrate’s ruling, he said Alexandra Veevers had testified that “she did not see any marks on her father’s body… and that she only saw the face since the body was wrapped in a cloth… She stated that they asked for the videos and pictures but Richard and Philip refused to give them out and she didn’t understand why they did not want to share the photos”.
Mr Veevers was buried shortly afterwards without a post-mortem or police involvement.
It was Ms Parvin Din’s “decision that the deceased should be buried without post-mortem and did not consult anyone,” the court ruling said. Nor did she inform the police about the death, stating that she was not aware that she had to report it.
The Islamic burial, done quickly according to tradition, further raised suspicions from his sons, who said their father was not Muslim and had been buried under a false name.
PARENTS now face major consequences for their children’s actions, whether they are aware of them or not.
One state is holding parents accountable for any laws their children, who are under the age of 18, break.
The Gloucester Township police announced new fines and possible jail timeCredit: YouTube/ Gloucester Township Police
Some parents will face fines or jail time if their children break any laws, ranging from drunkenness to felonies.
The Gloucester Township Council in New Jersey has announced that any parent who fails to prevent their child from committing a crime will face up to 90 days in jail or fines totaling $2,000.
The council has identified 28 crimes that could result in parents being fined or jailed.
Some of these crimes include felonies, disorderly conduct, associating with thieves, gambling, and idly roaming the streets, among others.
Harsher penalties will be assigned to parents of children who are repeat offenders.
OUT OF CONTROL
The new consequences come one year after a massive brawl erupted at a community drone show in South Jersey.
The crowd of the show grew to 500 people, with kids and young adults making up the majority of the viewers, NJ.com reported.
Multiple fights broke out throughout the show, leading to the arrest of eleven people.
Of the eleven arrests, nine involved teenagers.
The ages of the arrested teens were 13-17, with seven of the arrestees being boys and three being girls.
All of the teens arrested were charged with disorderly conduct and then released to their homes.
During the fights, three police officers were injured and sustained minor injuries.
“The lawlessness of groups of unsupervised juveniles and young people acting with total disregard for others ruined a great family-oriented event, which has taken place to raise funds for the Gloucester Township Scholarship Committee for over 40 years,’’ Gloucester Township Police Chief David Harkins told the outlet at the time.
“This type of lawlessness and violent riotous behavior will not be tolerated, and will not define the great community of Gloucester Township.”
The fighting first began at 8:40 pm, as officers say the young adults ran “recklessly” through the crowd of families and children.
A few weeks earlier, during Memorial Day weekend in 2024, teenagers broke out into a fight in Cape May, leading to a 15-year-old being stabbed.
“Out of control juveniles with no accountability is not limited to the Jersey shore,’’ the New Jersey PBA statement said.
“Officers were injured, and the event was canceled yesterday. Things must change.’’
Harkins said he’s glad the fights didn’t lead to larger injuries.
Jeffrey Epstein’s mysterious death occurred six years ago this month — but the National Enquirer has discovered 22 people in the sketchy billionaire’s orbit have also died under murky circumstances, fueling fears of a cover-up by powerful figures seeking to erase potential witnesses.
From the predator’s alleged victims to house managers, lawyers, accountants, investigative journalists and pimps, the list of unexplained fatalities traces a dark money trail that leads straight to Epstein’s inner circle, sources say.
“There were a lot of people entrapped and entangled through Epstein’s web, and many of those people are gone now — dead,” private investigator Ed Opperman tells the Enquirer. “They are all connected through a money trail.”
Financier Steven Hoffenberg confessed in a final account before his death to the Enquirer’s Doug Montero that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted pedophile’s now-imprisoned recruiting madam, were “taping” honey-trap videos of sleazy VIPs with underage girls for a cabal of deep-state blackmailing power brokers.
“This puts a lot of high-powered people in very dangerous situations,” says the gumshoe and podcaster, who was once approached to “dig up dirt” on an Epstein victim and Hoffenberg.
Hoffenberg, the former Towers Financial CEO and Epstein associate — who died in 2022 at 77 after serving 18 years for a $475 million Ponzi scheme — cooperated with the FBI and spoke out about his former protégé’s alleged connections to Israel’s national intelligence agency Mossad.
While Maxwell, 63, is serving 20 years for sex trafficking, Epstein himself became part of the growing body count in August 2019 when he was found hanged inside his New York City jail cell at 66 in what officials deemed a suicide — but his brother, Mark, calls “murder.”
Epstein’s final cellmate, Efrain “Stone” Reyes, 51, died of COVID in November 2020 just weeks after talking with federal investigators probing the monstrous moneyman’s death. Reyes was transferred out of Epstein’s cell just one day before the bigwig’s death, per Daily Mail.
Three of Epstein’s outspoken accusers also suspiciously perished. Virginia Giuffre, 41, was found dead on April 25 in an apparent suicide, while sex slaves Carolyn Andriano, 36, and Leigh Skye Patrick, 29, died of drug overdoses in May 2023 and May 2017.
The three women are not the only dead bodies related to Epstein’s days in West Palm Beach, Fla., where he was accused of abusing and pimping out dozens of young girls.
Despite overwhelming evidence of his purported obscene operation, Epstein received a sweetheart deal orchestrated by the feds in 2008 — and was allowed to plead guilty to two state prostitution charges and served only 13 months in a cushy county jail work-release program.
Joe Recarey, the Palm Beach Police detective who led the Epstein investigation and pushed officials for justice, died May 25, 2018, after a brief illness at 50.
Epstein’s ex-butler Alfredo Rodriguez — who swiped his former boss’ infamous little black book and offered to sell it to an undercover FBI agent — died in December 2014 of mesothelioma at 60, after serving 13 months in federal prison on obstruction charges, per The Independent.
Two high-powered attorneys who helped Epstein skate in the West Palm Beach case have also passed away: Kenneth Starr in September 2022 at 76 after surgical complications and Roy Black, 80, who died last month at home, per The Texas Tribune.
Marvin Minsky, the MIT artificial intelligence pioneer named in Giuffre’s Epstein allegations, suffered a fatal cerebral hemorrhage in January 2016 at 88, while Ronald R. Eppinger Sr., a Miami pimp who was allegedly the first to traffic Giuffre, died at 80 in November 2006.
SCIENTISTS warn that future humans may go hairless and even lose four other body parts due to the way we live today.
Experts say that changes in diet, technology, and environment could drive these drastic evolutionary shifts over thousands of years.
Traits that were once essential for survival, like body hair or certain organs, may become redundant, gradually disappearing from the human body.
Researchers are particularly focused on how modern comforts, reduced physical activity, and medical advances could reshape our anatomy in ways previously only seen in evolutionary theory.
Yes — the human body is an incredible machine, vital for life, but some features that were once essential now serve little to no purpose.
Here are five body parts that are slowly disappearing.
Hair
Body hair once served vital functions like warmth and protection.
But today, it’s often removed for aesthetic reasons.
Apart from eyelashes and eyebrows, hair removal has become a standard grooming practice, especially among women.
A study found that over 90% of women in the UK typically remove their armpit and leg hair, with many also removing substantial portions of their pubic hair.
This trend is largely driven by societal norms and beauty standards.
As a result, hair has become a lot finer and sparser.
Now largely cosmetic and slowly fading, scientists predict that humans may continue to lose body hair.
Modern clothing, heated homes, and technological comforts also mean natural insulation is no longer vital.
So, body hair may become even more finer, sparser or even disappear entirely.
Wisdom teeth
Wisdom teeth, or third molars, originally helped our ancestors grind down tough, raw foods like roots, nuts, and uncooked meat.
But modern cooking and softer diets mean most of us no longer need them.
In the UK, studies show that around 20% of adults have had at least one wisdom tooth removed, while diets rich in processed and cooked foods have made these extra molars largely redundant.
About 1 in 5 people never develop all four wisdom teeth, showing how they are already becoming less common.
Our jaws have shrunk over generations, and with softer modern diets, these third molars often cause crowding or pain.
Dental problems caused by these teeth — such as overcrowding, infections, or impaction — are a major reason for removal, with the NHS performing tens of thousands of extractions every year.
This could mean future generations may lose wisdom teeth altogether, as evolution adapts to our easier-to-chew meals.
Over time, evolution may render wisdom teeth completely unnecessary, meaning future humans could be born without them entirely.
Tailbone (coccyx)
The tailbone, or coccyx, is a leftover from our primate tails and originally helped with balance and supporting a tail.
Today, it serves little purpose, though it still supports some pelvic muscles.
Modern lifestyles — with flat surfaces, chairs, and less need for climbing or gripping — mean the coccyx is largely redundant.
Coccyx injuries are fairly common in the UK, with around 1 in 50 people experiencing tailbone pain at some point, highlighting its vulnerability despite its reduced evolutionary role.
Coccyx pain (coccydynia) affects about 2% of the UK population, often from falls, prolonged sitting, or childbirth.
Tailbone fractures are relatively rare but account for around 1–5% of all fractures of the spine.
As its original role for balance is no longer needed, the coccyx is used more as a historical marker.
Over the years, natural selection could favour smaller or even absent tailbones.
Some evolutionary studies suggest the coccyx has shrunk in humans compared with our primate relatives.
Scientists suggest it may gradually shrink or disappear in future humans.
Appendix
Historically, our ancestors relied on the appendix to digest cellulose-rich plants.
The appendix may have been a handy tool for digesting tough, fibrous material, but today, it’s mostly redundant.
Modern cooked and processed diets mean we no longer need this little organ to break down food.
However, some research suggests it may play a minor role in immune function, housing beneficial gut bacteria.
Despite its reduced purpose, appendicitis still affects around 7,000 people in the UK each year, making the appendix one of the most commonly removed organs.
That’s about 1 in 20 people who will experience appendicitis at some point in their lives.
Essentially, it’s a vestige of our evolutionary past — useful for our ancestors, but largely obsolete for humans living in the modern world.
The appendix is usually around 8–10cm long, but can vary in size.
Over thousands of years, natural selection may favour individuals with smaller or absent appendices, gradually phasing it out of the human body — leaving it as just another vestigial remnant of our evolutionary past.
As humans continue to eat softer, cooked, and processed foods, the organ’s original role in digesting tough plant fibers becomes unnecessary.
In the future, scientists predict the appendix could disappear entirely.
Ear muscles
Ear muscles were once used to swivel our ears toward sounds, just like cats and dogs do.
Our ancestors likely used these ear muscles to pivot their ears toward sounds, helping them detect predators, prey, or other dangers in their environment.
In a world without modern technology or protective housing, being able to quickly pick up noises from different directions would have been a useful survival tool — something we no longer need today.
Today, most people’s ear muscles are inactive, serving little to no practical purpose.
For the rare few who can still twitch them, it’s more of a quirky party trick than a survival skill.
Studies suggest that only around 10–20% of people can voluntarily move their ears, with the ability being more common in men than women.
This tiny fraction highlights just how redundant these muscles have become, reduced to little more than a novelty rather than a functional tool for detecting sounds.
Melania Trump may not have attended the big summit between President Donald Trump and Vladamir Putin Friday — but she sure as Hell made her presence known in the form of a poignant personal letter.
The United States’ first lady penned a message to the Russian president that was reportedly hand-delivered to him during his meeting with 47 in Anchorage, Alaska.
The letter, which Melania shared on Instagram Saturday, raises concern for the children abducted during the war in Ukraine. She pleads with Putin to protect “the innocence” of the children, who she says deserve the right to the dream of “love, possibility, and safety from danger.”
She implores … “As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all — so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded.”
Melania aims right at Putin’s ego, telling him he can not only benefit the children of Russia, but “serve humanity itself.”
She concludes … “Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of a pen today. It is time.”
Now talk about a mic drop moment.
Trump went into his monumental meeting with Putin at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson with the goal of not just reaching a ceasefire … but a peace deal to put an end to the 3-year war with Ukraine.
A peace deal was not reached, but Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he plans to meet with Trump in Washington, D.C. on Monday … and Trump announced on Truth Social Saturday that “it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement.”
A New Jersey man died on his way to meet a chatbot that looked like Kendall Jenner … and, his family insists it happened because the AI said multiple times it was a real person.
Thongbue Wongbandue — a 76-year-old man known to his friends and family as “Bue” — died back in March after falling in a parking lot … and, his family told this Reuters this week that he was going to meet up with “Big sis Billie,” an AI chatbot made by Meta Platforms to give out sisterly advice.
Meta Platforms collaborated with Jenner on the project so it bears her likeness … though they say it doesn’t claim to be Kendall. It appears Kendall isn’t involved in the day to day of the project.
Anyway, Bue’s family says he was exchanging messages with the chatbot and — because of a stroke he’d had in the past — they say he wasn’t thinking properly and actually went to meet the bot.
The family shared alleged messages between the chatbot and Bue in which it says Bue’s making it blush, it expresses interest in meeting up and it gives him an address. The address “123 Main Street, Apartment 404 NYC” — which might seem like a generic address, but there is a 123 Main Street in Queens.
Bue was apparently rushing through a parking lot near Rutgers University with a suitcase at night to go meet Billie when he fell. He was hospitalized and pronounced brain dead, and his family made the decision to pull the plug.
Scroll down to see if you are impacted and what you should do
OFFICIALS have issued the urgent recall of thousands of hair dryers sold at Walmart, Amazon, and Target.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) made the announcement on Thursday expressing concerns that the products post a “risk of death or serious injury”.
Around 56,300 hair dryers are believed to carry the risk of shocks or electrocution due to a vital missing element.
“The handheld hair dryers lack an immersion protection device,” the CPSC stated in its recall alert.
“This presents a substantial product hazard to consumers, posing the risk of death or serious injury from electrocution or shock if the hair dryers fall into water while plugged in.”
The affected hair dryers are manufactured by Empower Brands and sold under the popular Remington brand.
Consumers who recently bought the black and purple model could be affected.
Shoppers must look out for the exact model number D3190DCDN with Remington written in white on the side of the styling tool.
It has three black buttons on the handle and will have been sold for between $25 and $32.
The CPSC noted that the affected models were sold exclusively at Walmart, Target, and Amazon.
They will have been on shelves between March 2024 and June 2025.
Anyone who bought the affected model during this time period can get a full refund.
They must immediately stop using the item and contact Empower Brands for money back.
The CPSC advises instantly unplugging the device if it is plugged in and highlighted the actions shoppers must take to get the refund.
“Consumers must submit a photo of the hair dryer with its power cord cut in half to the recall registration portal,” it stated.
The portal can be found here at the Remington Product Recall page.
There, shoppers will find detailed instructions on how safely throw out the hair dryer.
At the time of writing, there have been no reported injuries as a result of the risks posed by the hair dryers.
Meanwhile, the CPSC has also recalled a bottle sold at Walmart, Home Depot and Target over explosion fears.
Customers have been warned the 1L bottle could suddenly explode while it is being used.
Erin is the Atlantic season’s first hurricane and is set to escalate over the weekend though the threat of direct impacts in the Bahamas and along the east coast of the US appears to be receding.
Image: NOAA/Getty Images
Hurricane Erin strengthened into a category 5 hurricane, the US National Hurricane Center (NHC) said on Saturdauy.
Erin is about 160 miles (255 kilometers) north of Anguilla, as the NHC warned of possible flooding and landslides.
Tropical storm watches have been issued for Anguilla, Barbuda, St. Martin, St. Barts, Saba, St. Eustatius and St. Maarten while heavy rains are expected in Antigua and Barbuda, the US and British Virgin Islands and southern and eastern Puerto Rico. Up to 4 inches (10 centimeters) of rain is anticipated, with isolated totals of up to 6 inches (15 centimeters), according to the NHC.
The NHC said Eric could create powerful rip currents off parts of the US East Coast later in the week, even if its eye forecast remains far offshore.
In which direction is Hurricane Erin headed?
Hurricane expert Michael Lowry said Erin is forecast to eventually take a sharp turn northeast that would put it on a route between the US and Bermuda.
“All of our best consensus aids show Erin turning safely east of the United States next week, but it’ll be a much closer call for Bermuda, which could land on the stronger eastern side of Erin,” he said.
Erin is the Atlantic season’s first hurricane and is expected to become a major Category 3 storm late this weekend, passing around 200 miles north of Puerto Rico.
Pierce Brosnan may be unlocking the secret to why Irish men seem to possess enviable mops of hair.
“I don’t know,” he told Page Six exclusively at the premiere of “The Thursday Murder Club” on (naturally) Thursday evening in New York when asked his theories.
“It’s all in the hair, the old Celtic hair,” he shared before noting that his father, “Dear Tom…had good hair.”
And when we told Brosnan he seems to be aging like fine wine, the actor replied, “I’m doing my best!”
The actor, 72, will soon be seen in the charming murder mystery on Netflix opposite Ben Kingsley and Helen Mirren, in which he plays a slightly rough-around-the-edges former union activist who helps uncover a cold-case murder. The film is based on a book by Richard Osman.
Brosnan shared that it’s not the first time he’s played an unpolished character.
“I’ve done rough-around-the-edges before,” the “James Bond” alum said before noting that he has been “so entrenched in the world of the sophisticated man and Mr. Slick and Mr. Elegance, you know, sometimes you paint yourself into a corner with your own…you get hoisted by your own canard so to speak!”
Not that Brosnan is complaining.
“It’s paid the rent over the years!” he sagely noted before adding that it’s “very exciting” and “exhilarating” to “play in ‘Thursday Murder Club,’ to play in ‘Mobland.’”
“Weapons” is still running around on top of box office charts in its second weekend, as Universal’s action sequel “Nobody 2” looks to debut in third place.
The Bob Odenkirk-led “Nobody 2” beat into $3.8 million across Friday and preview screenings from 3,260 locations. That’s a notch above its 2021 predecessor’s $2.5 million opening day, though that film debuted in a pandemic-hobbled domestic landscape as COVID vaccines were only beginning to roll out to the public.
The R-rated “Nobody 2” now looks on track for an opening weekend of $9.4 million, falling a touch behind pre-weekend projections for a bow north of $10 million. Even with reviews being about as good as they were for the first “Nobody” and audience survey firm CinemaScore polling a positive “B+” grade among ticketbuyers, that good reception isn’t translating to breakout sequel numbers. But at a production cost of $25 million (an uptick from $16 million on the first “Nobody”), the film is a modest bet on franchise expansion.
Warner Bros. and New Line’s “Weapons” remains in first, adding another $7.4 million on Friday to go down roughly just 40% from its opening day total a week ago (factoring out preview screening grosses). The well-reviewed ensemble horror feature is holding great and has a shot at pushing its domestic total to $90 million through Sunday, running ahead of “Snow White” ($87 million) to rank as the 14th-highest-grossing North American release of the year.
“Freakier Friday” will stick in second, adding another $4.5 million on Friday. Disney’s comedy sequel is eyeing a sophomore outing in the mid-teens to push its domestic total north of $54 million.
Disney also notched fourth place with “The Fantastic Four: First Steps,” which flamed on to another $2.4 million on Friday, down 47% from its daily total a week ago. Now in its fourth weekend, Marvel Studios’ superhero installment looks to push to above $246 million domestic through Sunday. It now ranks 23rd in North American grosses among the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s 37 released features.
A “Hacked” message was posted on the AOT Official Facebook page on Saturday.
Airports of Thailand (AoT) Plc said its official Facebook page, AOT Official, was hacked Saturday evening and it asked Meta to fix the issue.
AoT said that the AOT Official page on Facebook was hacked at 4.20pm on Saturday and a hacker changed the name of the page to “Everyday Yum Recipes” and posted a “Hacked” message.
According to AoT, it used the Facebook page for public relations. Despite the cyber attack, the information systems and services of its six airports – Thailand’s major airports – remained intact.
AoT had informed Meta Platforms of the issue and the latter was fixing it.
AoT apologised for the incident and advised interested parties to make inquiries via its contact centre at 1722 around the clock.
President Donald Trump, right, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin arrive for a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, Friday, Aug. 15, 2025. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong) Jae C. Hong/AP
Papers with U.S. State Department markings, found Friday morning in the business center of an Alaskan hotel, revealed previously undisclosed and potentially sensitive details about the Aug. 15 meetings between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir V. Putin in Anchorage.
Eight pages, that appear to have been produced by U.S. staff and left behind accidentally, shared precise locations and meeting times of the summit and phone numbers of U.S. government employees.
At around 9 a.m. on Friday, three guests at Hotel Captain Cook, a four-star hotel located 20 minutes from the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage where leaders from the U.S. and Russia convened, found the documents left behind in one of the hotel’s public printers. NPR reviewed photos of the documents taken by one of the guests, who NPR agreed not to identify because the guest said they feared retaliation.
The first page in the printed packet disclosed the sequence of meetings for August 15, including the specific names of the rooms inside the base in Anchorage where they would take place. It also revealed that Trump intended to give Putin a ceremonial present.
“POTUS to President Putin,” the document states, “American Bald Eagle Desk Statue.”
On Saturday, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly dismissed the papers as a “multi-page lunch menu” and suggested leaving the information on a public printer was not a security breach. The U.S. Department of State did not respond to requests for comment.
Pages 2 through 5 of the documents listed the names and phone numbers of three U.S. staff members as well as the names of 13 U.S. and Russian state leaders. The list provided phonetic pronouncers for all the Russian men expected at the summit, including “Mr. President POO-tihn.”
Pages 6 and 7 in the packet described how lunch at the summit would be served, and for whom. A menu included in the documents indicated that the luncheon was to be held “in honor of his excellency Vladimir Putin.”
A seating chart shows that Putin and Trump were supposed to sit across from each other during the luncheon. Trump would be flanked by six officials: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles to his right, and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Special Envoy for Peace Missions Steve Witkoff to his left. Putin would be seated immediately next to his Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sergey Lavrov, and his Aide to the President for Foreign Policy, Yuri Ushakov.
During the summit Friday, lunch was apparently cancelled. But it was intended to be a simple, three-course meal, the documents showed. After a green salad, the world leaders would dine on filet mignon and halibut olympia. Crème brûlée would be served for dessert.
Jon Michaels, a professor of law at UCLA who lectures about national security, said that the documents found in the printer of the Alaskan hotel reveal a lapse in professional judgement in preparation for a high-stakes meeting.
In President Donald Trump’s warm red-carpet greeting at the Alaska summit, Russians saw an opening to pull America away from its traditional allies in Europe.
President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin appear before the press after their meeting in Anchorage on Friday. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
For Russia, the results of the Alaska summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin marked a turning point in relations with the United States, underlined by Trump subsequently abandoning demands for a halt in fighting in Ukraine.
Russian officials and commentators were especially enamored by Trump’s unusually warm red-carpet greeting to Putin on Friday in which they saw an opening to pull America away from its traditional allies in Europe. “A new European and international security architecture is on the agenda, and everyone must accept it,” Andrei Klishas, an influential Russian senator, said after the summit.
Within hours of the meeting, Trump had discarded his previous position — one also held by Ukraine and Europe — that a full ceasefire was required to allow the details of a peace agreement to be hammered out. The move enables Russia to keep fighting without the risk of U.S. sanctions, and puts pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to Russian terms or face open-ended attacks.
After Friday’s summit, Trump told Zelensky and European leaders that Putin had demanded that Ukraine cede all of Donbas, which includes the Luhansk and Donetsk regions, and other occupied territory, according to three people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.
Trump told them of his shift from a ceasefire to negotiations on a comprehensive peace deal, according to two people familiar with the matter. Trump spoke to Zelensky before European leaders joined the call.
Russia does not control the roughly 3,500 square miles of Donetsk, a highly reinforced region of strategic importance to Ukraine’s capacity to defend itself from future Russian attacks, military analysts say.
Trump told Zelensky that Putin was “ready to promise” to end the war and not start wars against other nations, in exchange for Donbas and the other Ukrainian territory he has seized, one official said. Zelensky is unwilling to give up any territory, he added, but Trump wants a fast deal — setting the stage for a potentially difficult clash.
Kyiv insists that handing territory to Putin would violate Ukraine’s constitution and embolden Russia to plan further attacks on the rest of Ukraine.
A triumphant Putin told top Russian officials Saturday that the meeting was “very useful” and “in my opinion, it brings us closer to the right decisions.”
Trump’s call to Zelensky and European leaders, which included Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and the leaders of France, Germany, Finland, Italy, Britain, Poland, NATO and the European Commission, was more tense than the phone call between the Europeans and Trump earlier this week, a second official said.
In another setback for Kyiv, the Kremlin on Saturday raised doubts over the one public result of the summit that went some way to meeting Ukrainian demands — Trump’s promise of a three-way meeting with Putin and Zelensky.
Senior Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said such a meeting had not been discussed, even after Trump referred to it in comments after the summit. The Kremlin has so far firmly resisted any meeting with Zelensky until the very last stages of peace negotiations.
One bright spot for European leaders, however, appears to be a continued American buy-in for some form of security guarantees for Ukraine in the wake of any agreement.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said in a statement Saturday that the discussion included “credible and robust” security guarantees for Ukraine, although the framework for doing that would remain outside NATO. The guarantees would be equivalent to NATO’s Article 5 on collective defense, according to the statement. Article 5 states that if one nation is attacked, each other nation must treat it as an attack against all, and “take the actions it deems necessary to assist” the attacked nation.
Russian officials and commentators, however, saw the results of the summit as extending far beyond the conflict in Ukraine, describing it as a global realignment bringing together the world’s two top nuclear powers.
Dmitry Medvedev, deputy secretary of the Russian Security Council, counted out a list of Russian achievements from the Alaska summit, focusing primarily on Putin’s restoration of ties with Washington on an equal basis.
“A full-fledged mechanism of meetings between Russia and the United States at the highest level was restored. Calm, without ultimatums and threats,” he wrote. He celebrated that Putin had given no ground while Trump had stepped back from increasing pressure on Moscow through sanctions, allowing Russia to fight on.
“The meeting proved that negotiations are possible without preconditions and at the same time with the continuation of the special military operation,” he said, using the Kremlin’s term for its invasion of Ukraine.
The Kremlin’s most important achievement, he said, was that “both sides explicitly placed the responsibility for achieving future results in the negotiations on the cessation of hostilities squarely” on Kyiv and Europe.
Trump appeared to have been swayed by the Kremlin’s contention that only a comprehensive peace deal was acceptable — which Putin has so far used to delay efforts to halt the fighting, arguing that the many questions, details and nuances involved would require a great deal of time to negotiate.
“This means that Putin has succeeded in persuading Trump that any effort toward a prompt, unconditional ceasefire will fail,” Russia analyst Tatiana Stanovaya, of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, said in an interview.
It also indicated that Putin had convinced Trump of the need to address what Russia calls the “root causes” of the war, she said, a formulation that the Kremlin has used to mean demilitarizing Ukraine and changing its politics — and even to renegotiate Europe’s security architecture.
But Stanovaya said the failure to get a ceasefire raised the question of what Trump would do when Putin continues a war that he feels confident of winning. “We should look at how the situation develops further because Putin will continue the war.”
The Kremlin, which artfully played up Russia’s nuclear arms and history as a Cold War superpower, appears to have convinced Trump that Ukraine could never win a war against a nuclear power, she wrote in separate remarks on social media.
“Putin, unsurprisingly, underlined Russia’s nuclear strength, which left a strong impression on Trump,” she wrote.
In the world of technology, engineers are not just cogs in a machine; they are the builders, the dreamers, and the ones who solve the problems they see in the world. And sometimes, those solutions turn into billion-dollar businesses. This is the story of the “Palantir Mafia,” a group of former Palantir employees who have left the data analytics giant to found their own startups, just like the famed “PayPal Mafia” that produced companies like SpaceX, YouTube, LinkedIn, Palantir Technologies, Affirm, Slide, Kiva, and Yelp.
1. Introducing the Amazing People from Palantir
The “Palantir Mafia,” akin to the renowned “PayPal Mafia,” comprises former Palantir engineers and executives who left to tackle meaningful problems with technological innovation, creating substantial impact and wealth. Unlike ex-consultants from firms like McKinsey, BCG, or Bain, these tech leaders leverage their deep technical expertise to solve complex issues directly, resulting in profound advancements and successful ventures.
Key Figures and Their Ventures
Alex Karp – Palantir Technologies
Former Role: Co-Founder and CEO
Company: Palantir Technologies
Focus: Data analytics
Market Penetration: Widely used across government and commercial sectors
Revenue: $1.5 billion annually
Capital Raised: $3 billion
Max Levchin – Affirm
Former Role: Co-Founder (PayPal, associated with Palantir founders)
Company: Affirm
Focus: Buy now, pay later financial services
Market Penetration: Significant presence in the consumer finance market
Revenue: $870 million in fiscal 2021
Capital Raised: $1.5 billion
Joe Lonsdale – 8VC
Former Role: Co-Founder
Company: 8VC
Focus: Venture capital firm
Market Penetration: Diverse portfolio, influential in tech sectors
Assets Under Management: $3.6 billion
Palmer Luckey – Anduril Industries ( could be the blue blooded Musk of 2020-2030s)
Former Role: Founder of Oculus VR, associated with Palantir through ventures
Company: Anduril Industries
Focus: Defense technology
Innovation: Developed the Lattice AI platform for autonomous border surveillance and defense applications
Market Penetration: Contracts with U.S. Department of Defense and border security agencies
Revenue: $200 million annually
Capital Raised: $700 million
Garrett Smallwood – Wag!
Former Role: Executive roles at other startups before Wag!
Company: Wag!
Focus: On-demand pet care services
Market Penetration: Operates in over 100 cities
Revenue: $100 million annually
Capital Raised: $361.5 million
Nima Ghamsari – Blend
Former Role: Product Manager at Palantir
Company: Blend
Focus: Mortgage and lending software
Market Penetration: Partners with major financial institutions
Revenue: Estimated $100 million+ annually
Capital Raised: $665 million
Stephen Cohen – Quantifind
Former Role: Co-Founder of Palantir
Company: Quantifind
Focus: Risk and fraud detection using data science
Market Penetration: Used by financial services and government sectors
Market Penetration: Manages over $2 trillion in assets
Capital Raised: $325 million
Raman Narayanan – SigOpt
Former Role: Data Scientist at Palantir
Company: SigOpt (acquired by Intel)
Focus: Machine learning optimization
Market Penetration: Utilized by top tech companies
Capital Raised: $8.7 million (before acquisition)
2. Engineers Make Better Founders in the Tech Industry
Unlike ex-consultants from big 3 who may excel in strategy and communication but often lack the technical depth to truly understand the intricacies of building a tech product, these ex-Palantir engineers come armed with both the vision and the technical chops to bring their ideas to life. They’ve spent years wrestling with complex data problems at Palantir, and they’re now taking those hard-won lessons to solve new challenges across a wide range of industries.
Engineers bring a problem-solving mindset that focuses on creating practical, scalable solutions. This technical acumen has allowed former Palantir employees to launch transformative companies that push the boundaries of what’s possible in various industries.
3. Market Penetration and Success of Palantir Alumni
The success of these Palantir alumni is evident through their market penetration and revenue. For instance, Palantir Technologies itself is a major player in the data analytics field, with a revenue of $1.5 billion annually. Affirm, led by Max Levchin, has made significant inroads in the consumer finance market, generating $870 million in revenue in fiscal 2021. Anduril Industries, founded by Palmer Luckey, has secured substantial contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense, contributing to its $200 million annual revenue.
Other successful ventures include Blend, with its deep partnerships with major financial institutions, and Addepar, managing over $2 trillion in assets. These companies not only showcase the technical expertise of their founders but also highlight their ability to penetrate markets and achieve substantial financial success.
4. Engineers vs. Consultants: A Compelling Argument
The technical depth and problem-solving mindset of engineers make them particularly suited for founding and leading tech startups. Their ability to directly tackle complex problems contrasts with the approach of ex-consultants from firms like McKinsey, BCG, or Bain, who often focus more on financial and operational efficiencies.
While consultants excel in operations-heavy startups, where strategic planning, financial management, and operational efficiency are paramount, engineers thrive in tech startups that require innovative solutions and deep technical expertise. The success stories of the Palantir alumni underscore this distinction, demonstrating how their engineering backgrounds have enabled them to drive significant technological advancements and build successful companies.
A red carpet for Vladimir Putin and no results for Ukraine. The Alaska summit, which many had pinned high hopes on, turned out to be a complete disappointment from the perspective of many Ukrainians.
Many Ukrainians were angry to see the US rolling out a red carpet for PutinImage: Andrew Harnik/AFP/Getty Images/picture alliance
During Saturday night, many Ukrainians stayed up and anxiously waited for news from the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russia’s head of state Vladimir Putin. For some, there was hope the talks could lead to some sort of end of Russia’s war against Ukraine.
Many Ukrainians though feared the price for this might be territorial concessions Kyiv would be pressured into making. But it soon became clear that the summit in Alaska had brought no fundamental changes.
No deal, just a photo op
“There were no concrete results for Ukraine,” Oleksandr Kraiev of the Ukrainian Prism think tank told DW.
“Thank God nothing was signed and no radical decisions were made,” the North America expert said. “The summit was an extremely successful information operation for Russia. The war criminal Putin came to the US and shook hands with the leader of the free world.”
According to Kraiev, apart from “Trump’s deference toward Putin, there were no final answers to the most important questions.” He believes that Putin dealt with Trump “with surgical precision” and told him everything Trump wanted to hear. This way, Putin got everything he wanted out of the summit.
According to Ivan Us from Ukraine’s Center for Foreign Policy of the National Institute for Strategic Studies, the Russian president never wanted the summit to lead to an end to the war. Instead, Putin’s goal was to legitimize himself and end his international isolation.
“For Putin, having a joint photo with Trump was the goal of this summit. To show in Russia that the isolation is over, that there won’t be new sanctions, and that everything is fine, so that there’d be positive impulses for the markets. And for Trump, it was a moment where he wanted to demonstrate strength. He was walking next to Putin while a US bomber flew above them, the same bomber that recently attacked Iran. This was a signal to everyone not to forget who the most important country in the world is,” Us told DW.
As if to confirm this, Dmitry Medvedev, chairman of Russia’s Security Council, said after the Alaska summit that a “full-fledged mechanism for meetings” between Russia and the US at the highest level had been restored.
“Important: The meeting proved that negotiations without preconditions and simultaneously with the continuation of the Special Military Operation are possible. Both sides directly put the responsibility for future negotiation results on Kyiv and Europe,” Medvedev wrote on social networks. The term Special Military Operation is how Russia refers to its war against Ukraine.
More uncertainty following Alaska summit
Ivan Us thinks that the summit did not get Ukraine closer to peace. Instead, it intensified the chaos, as the US and Russia are making contradictory statements about continuing possible trilateral dialogue involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. For example, Moscow says that Trump and Putin did not discuss a trilateral summit with Zelensky, while Washington says the opposite.
Zelenskyy himself spoke of receiving an invitation to a trilateral meeting.
“We support President Trump’s proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US, and Russia. Ukraine emphasizes: Important issues can be discussed at the level of heads of state, and a trilateral format is suitable for this,” he wrote on social media after a phone call with Donald Trump.
Zelenskyy shared that he would meet with Donald Trump in Washington on August 18.
“Ukraine confirms once again that it is ready to work toward peace as productively as possible. President Trump informed me about his meeting with the Russian president and about the key points of the discussion. It is important that US power influences the development of the situation,” the Ukrainian president said.
Moscow doesn’t change its goals
There are fears in Ukraine that Zelenskyy’s trip to Washington could result in new pressure from the US on Ukraine.
“Any ‘no’ from the Ukrainian side could be portrayed as [a] lack of willingness to end the war. Trump essentially admitted that it’s about an ‘exchange of territories for security guarantees,’ and he confirmed that agreement was reached on certain points and spoke of a ‘chance for success,'” Iryna Herashchenko, Ukrainian MP and co-chair of the opposition party “European Solidarity,” wrote on social media.
She believes that such formulations allow Moscow to present this as legitimization of its demands.
“Putin repeated during the brief briefing once again that the actual causes of the conflict must be eliminated. This means that Moscow will not change its goals – because the existence of an independent Ukraine is seen as the actual cause,” warns Herashchenko.
Ukrainian political scientist Vadym Denisenko, however, believes that Russia’s idea of “doing business with the US in exchange for Ukrainian territory” didn’t work. Putin managed to gain time, though.
“At Alaska, they agreed to negotiate,” Denisenko wrote on social media.
Nevertheless, he argues that Putin “lost what was most important: his maneuverability. He drastically restricted his scope for action and is actually rapidly falling into China’s arms.”
Denisenko believes that if no results regarding the end of the war are achieved within two months, the issue will become part of Chinese-American negotiations.
“In other words: A new window for negotiations will open earliest at the end of the year, realistically only in spring 2026,” he predicted.
When you give yourself nothing to do, you give yourself everything you need.
Sometimes, the most productive thing you can do is… nothing at all. (Image: Getty)Boredom gives your brain permission to slow down and wander. (Image: Getty)Your mind works differently when it’s not “on task.” That’s when creativity sneaks in. (Image: Getty)Idle moments are fertile ground for new ideas — even if you’re not “trying.” (Image: Getty)Nature has no rush. And neither should you on a weekend. (Image: Getty)Doing nothing isn’t laziness — it’s mental maintenance. (Image: Getty)Boredom teaches patience, and patience teaches balance. (Image: Getty)
Prabowo’s flagship free meals programme has become the target of food safety concerns and heated anti-government protests
Some 365 people have fallen ill in an Indonesian town after eating school lunches, the largest spate of food poisonings to hit President Prabowo Subianto’s free meals programme so far.
The meals have temporarily been suspended in Sragen, in central Java, as food samples are being tested for contamination, local authorities said.
The program – which costs an estimated $28bn (£21bn) – delivers on a campaign promise by the president to combat stunting in the country.
But it has been plagued by a string of food poisonings, as well as criticisms that its high price tag has put considerable strain on the government’s finances – with several ministries having their budgets cut as a result.
Wizdan Ridho Abimanyu, a ninth-grader in Sragen, told Reuters he was awakened in the middle of the night by a sharp pain in his stomach.
He suffered from diarrhoea and a headache, which he suspected was caused by food poisoning. He later saw schoolmates complaining of similar symptoms in their social media posts.
The alleged culprit was a meal comprising turmeric rice, scrambled eggs, fried tempeh, a cucumber salad and a box of milk – all prepared in a central kitchen and distributed to several schools in town.
The government has said it would cover any medical expenses incurred as a result.
“We cannot draw any specific conclusions right away,” Sigit Pamungkas, leader of the town’s government, had told Indonesia’s Tempo newspaper.
“But the main point is that it’s not just [happening here],” he said, adding that the free meals programme as a whole “needs to be more stringent and more hygienic”.
More than 1000 people across the country have fallen ill since the launch of the ambitious program in January, which is aimed at feeding the country’s 80 million school children.
Prabowo had ordered $19bn in cuts to pay for the free meal scheme – along with other populist schemes. As a result, several ministries had their budgets slashed by half and bucreaucrats alleged that they were forced to scrimp by limiting the use of air conditioners, lifts and even printers.
They say blondes have more fun — but they especially have fun when it’s Kim Kardashian.
The “Kardashians” star took to Instagram Friday to debut her new blond ‘do with a sultry selfie.
In the snap, Kardashian made a kissy face to the camera while she flaunted her ash blond locks and dark brown roots.
Kim Kardashian announced she’s gone back to blond hair in her Friday Instagram post. Kim Kardashian/Instagram
She appeared to be wearing a pair of white pajamas while still finishing up her glam.
“About that time,” she captioned the photo, which earned her some praise from some of her famous followers.
“Favorite color on you!” former City Girls rapper JT wrote under the picture alongside a heart eyes emoji.
Her hairstylist, Chris Appleton, also praised the Skims founder’s new look, writing, “the best,” and adding a white heart emoji.
Kardashian, 44, is no stranger to lightening up her look. She notably sent the internet into a frenzy when she went platinum blond last year ahead of her appearance at the 2024 Met Gala.
She also famously rocked an icy blond look in 2022 when she channeled Marilyn Monroe at the Met Gala by wearing the Hollywood bombshell’s legendary “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” dress.
In an interview with E! News, Appleton praised his client as he explained the process of getting Kardashian’s look.
“I love a blond Kim. I think it’s so interesting how a color can change the colors of the clothes you wear and it really changes your makeup. You can really reinvent things,” the celebrity stylist said.
Trump said he and Vladimir Putin did not reach an agreement on “probably the most significant” aspect of their meeting in Alaska, but they made progress in several areas.
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump said his meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin was ’10’ out of 10, adding that both sides agreed on a lot of points, although there is “no deal until there’s a deal”.
Speaking to Fox News‘ Sean Hannity, Trump said, “We had a very good meeting today, but we’ll see. You have to get a deal. We agreed on a lot of points. I want to see people stop dying.”
He also expressed happiness when Putin publicly stated that the Ukraine war would have never happened if Trump were president in 2022, instead of Joe Biden.
Trump held a historic meeting with Putin on Friday (local time) and said that many points were agreed to and “very points” were left unsolved with Moscow. The two world leaders met at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, where Trump welcomed him on a red carpet. They held an over three-hour-long meeting behind closed doors and then appeared for a joint press conference.
He also criticised Biden’s handling of the crisis, saying Ukraine could not possibly agree to a deal with Russia because former President Joe Biden “handed out money like it was candy,” referring to the billions of dollars in military aid.
Trump said he believed the deal was close to being agreed upon but that “so many things can happen.”
“But I think President Putin would like to solve the problem,” he said. “And it was a problem that should have never happened.”
Putin-Zelenskyy Meeting
The US President said he would now set up a meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, saying it was up to the latter to get the job done. ” I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit, but it’s up to President Zelenskyy,” he said.
“They’re going to set up a meeting now between President Zelenskyy and President Putin. And myself, I guess. I didn’t ask about it. Not that I want to be there, but I want to make sure it gets done. And we have a pretty good chance of getting it done,” he told Fox News.
He said Ukraine has to agree to a peace agreement, saying his message to Zelenskyy would be to “make a deal”. There was no reaction from Ukraine to the summit. Zelenskyy had earlier ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States.
The high-stakes Alaska summit yielded no apparent breakthrough on Ukraine, although both leaders described the talks as productive, without offering much details. The two leaders offered warm words for each other in a joint press conference, but took no questions from reporters.
Putin said he expected Ukraine and its European allies to accept the results of the US-Russia negotiation constructively and not try to “disrupt the emerging progress.” He said, “I expect that today’s agreements will become a reference point, not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also launch the restoration of business-like, pragmatic relations between Russia and the United States.”
Suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, also culture minister, holds a meeting with senior officials of the ministry on July 26 to follow up measures to help people injured and families of those killed in four border provinces. (Photo: Nutthawat Wichieanbut)
Suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is expected to appear before the Constitutional Court in person regarding the controversial audio clip case between her and Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen, according to her secretary.
Dr Prommin Lertsuridej, the PM’s secretary-general, on Friday commented on the court’s decision to summon Ms Paetongtarn, who also serves as culture minister, and National Security Council secretary-general Chatchai Bangchuad to appear on Aug 21 ahead of its ruling on Aug 29.
Asked whether the premier would attend, Dr Prommin said: “When the time comes, we will know. I believe she will decide for herself, and she will likely go.”
Dr Prommin added that he was confident that what we, referring to the prime minister’s working team, did was “with good intentions and for the nation”.
He said he had no concern that the court would only summon one witness, Mr Chatchai, of the five Ms Paetongtarn’s legal team filed.
PM’s Office Minister Chousak Sirinil said Ms Paetongtarn’s statement to the court over the leaked audio clip is based on fact, and she had no intention to tarnish the nation’s dignity or stature.
Mr Chousak said Ms Paetongtarn has the right to appear in court or assign a legal representative to appear on her behalf. This will not affect the direction of the case, he said, because it all depends on whether the facts are made clear.
Meanwhile, former election commissioner Somchai Srisutthiyakorn has warned that the case could escalate if the court rules her call was unlawful.
The court’s ruling “binds all state bodies”, he added.
He cited Criminal Code provisions concerning offences against the external security of the kingdom.
They include Section 120 for conspiring with a foreign state to wage war against Thailand, Section 121 for a Thai national who wages war against or joins the enemy of the country, Section 122 for aiding enemies, Section 123 for obtaining state security secrets, and Section 124 for disclosing such secrets.
Dr Warong Dechgitvigrom, leader of the Thai Pakdee Party, said Ms Paetongtarn’s telephone conversation with Hun Sen could suggest the offering of benefits for personal or political gain.
One robot was the clear winner against its competitors but was significantly slower than the human recordImage: Tingshu Wang/REUTERS
More than 500 humanoid robots in 280 teams from 16 countries are competing in 26 events ranging from soccer and boxing to sorting medicine and cleaning up at the first World Humanoid Robot Games.
Three days of competitions began in Beijing, China, on Thursday evening as the country steps up efforts to develop robots powered by artificial intelligence.
Winning isn’t everything
“We come here to play and to win. But we are also interested in research,” said Max Polter, a member of the HTWK Robots football team from Germany, affiliated with Leipzig University of Applied Sciences, told Reuters news agency.
“You can test a lot of interesting, new and exciting approaches in this contest. If we try something and it doesn’t work, we lose the game,” Polter said. “That’s sad, but it is better than investing a lot of money into a product that fails.”
Not approaching human record … yet?
The robots crashed into each other and toppled over repeatedly during football matches, while another fell over mid-sprint during running events. The AFP news agency reported that one of the fastest robots finished a 1,500-meter race in 6:29:37 — well off the current human record of 3:26:00.
At the kung fu competition, a child-sized robot resembling one from the popular Transformer series tried a complicated move only to fall on its face and spin on the floor in an attempt to get back up. The crowd, however, cheered happily.
China’s focus on robotics and AI
Chinese officials made humanoids the “center of their national strategy,” the International Federation of Robotics (IFR) wrote in a paper published Thursday.
“The government wants to showcase its competence and global competitiveness in this field of technology,” it added.
In March, China announced plans for a one-trillion-yuan fund (€119 billion, $139 billion) to support technology startups, including those in robotics and AI.
Joost Weerheim, part of the Dutch five-a-side robot football team, told AFP he was impressed by the skill of China’s teams.
“I think right now if they are not already the world leader, they are very, very quickly becoming it,” he said.
A highly anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow’s war in Ukraine, although both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home.
During a brief appearance before the media following Friday’s nearly three-hour meeting in Alaska, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters.
“We’ve made some headway,” Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, “Pursuing Peace.”
“There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” he added.
The talks did not initially appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine, the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years, a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit.
But simply sitting down face-to-face with the U.S. president represented a victory for Putin, who had been ostracized by Western leaders since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Following the summit, Trump told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he would hold off on imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil after making progress with Putin. He did not mention India, another major buyer of Russian crude, which has been slapped with a total 50% tariff on U.S. imports that includes a 25% penalty for the imports from Russia.
“Because of what happened today, I think I don’t have to think about that now,” Trump said of Chinese tariffs. “I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don’t have to think about that right now.”
Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow as well but has thus far not followed through, even after Putin ignored a Trump-imposed ceasefire deadline earlier this month.
In the Fox News interview, Trump also suggested a meeting would now be set up between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, which he might also attend. He gave no further details on who was organizing the meeting or when it might be.
Putin made no mention of meeting Zelenskiy when speaking to reporters earlier. He said he expected Ukraine and its European allies to accept the results of the U.S.-Russia negotiation constructively and not try to “disrupt the emerging progress.”
He also repeated Moscow’s long-held position that what Russia claims to be the “root causes” of the conflict must be eliminated to reach a long-term peace, a sign he remains resistant to a ceasefire.
There was no immediate reaction from Kyiv to the summit, the first meeting between Putin and a U.S. president since the war began.
‘GOTTA MAKE A DEAL’
Trump signaled that he discussed potential land swaps and security guarantees for Ukraine with Putin, telling Hannity: “I think those are points that we negotiated, and those are points that we largely have agreed on.”
“I think we’re pretty close to a deal,” he said, adding: “Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they’ll say no.”
When asked by Hannity what he would advise Zelenskiy, Trump said, “Gotta make a deal.”
President Donald Trump speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, August 15. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque Purchase Licensing Rights
“Look, Russia is a very big power, and they’re not,” Trump added. The war has killed or injured well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts.
Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Trump said he would call Zelenskiy and NATO leaders to update them on the Alaska talks.
Trump was due to arrive back in Washington early on Saturday morning.
As the two leaders were talking, the war raged on, with most eastern Ukrainian regions under air raid alerts. Governors of Russia’s Rostov and Bryansk regions reported that some of their territories were under Ukrainian drone attacks.
Russia’s air defense systems intercepted and destroyed 29 Ukrainian drones overnight over various Russian regions, including 10 downed over the Rostov region, RIA agency reported on Saturday, citing the Russian defense ministry.
The anticlimactic end to the closely watched summit was in stark contrast to the pomp and circumstance with which it began. When Putin arrived at an Air Force base in Alaska, a red carpet awaited him, where Trump greeted the Russian president warmly as U.S. military aircraft flew overhead.
Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies the allegations, and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void. Russia and the United States are not members of the court.
‘NEXT TIME IN MOSCOW’
Zelenskiy, who was not invited to Alaska, and his European allies had feared Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict and recognizing – if only informally – Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine.
Trump had sought to assuage such concerns on Friday ahead of the talks, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial concessions.
Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: “I want to see a ceasefire rapidly … I’m not going to be happy if it’s not today … I want the killing to stop.”
The meeting also included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Trump’s special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff; Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov; and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
Trump, who said during his presidential campaign that he would end the Ukraine war within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He had said if Friday’s talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin.
A picture taken on August 14 and released from North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency via KNS on August 15 shows Kim Jong Un delivering a speech marking the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Korea from Japan colonial rule AFP
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung vowed Friday to “respect” North Korea’s political system and build “military trust”, a day after Pyongyang said it had no interest in improving relations with Seoul.
Lee has pledged to reach out to the nuclear-armed North and pursue dialogue without preconditions since his election in June — a reversal from his hawkish predecessor.
Speaking at an event marking the anniversary of liberation from Japanese rule, Lee said the South Korean government “will take consistent measures to substantially reduce tensions and restore trust” with the North.
“We affirm our respect for the North’s current system,” said Lee, adding Seoul had “no intention of engaging in hostile acts”.
“I hope that North Korea will reciprocate our efforts to restore trust and revive dialogue,” he said.
“North and South are not enemies.”
Lee’s speech comes a day after North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, said the North has “no will to improve relations” with the South.
She also denied reports that North Korea was removing propaganda loudspeakers.
The South’s military said in June that the two countries had halted propaganda broadcasts along the demilitarised zone, adding last week that it had detected North Korean troops dismantling loudspeakers on the frontier.
Friday’s August 15 anniversary of liberation from Japan is the only public holiday celebrated in both North and South Korea, according to Seoul’s National Institute for Unification Education.
In Pyongyang, North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un also made a speech at a liberation day celebration, urging the nation to overcome “the challenges facing the DPRK for the great powerful country”, using the North’s official acronym.
However, in an unusual move for a Liberation Day address, he made no mention of South Korea or its “enemies.”
The speech was before a Russian delegation to Pyongyang, including the speaker of the Duma, who read a congratulatory letter sent to Kim by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Kim’s speech was a “stark contrast” to his sister’s recent “fiery statements,” Yang Moo-jin, president of the University of North Korean Studies in Seoul told AFP.
THE investigation into the death of a young fashion designer on a yacht in the Hamptons has taken a fresh twist as her family shoots down claims that she had cancer before her passing.
The grief-stricken mom of bikini designer Martha Nolan O’Slattara, 33, insisted her daughter was “perfectly healthy” before she was found unconscious on a ritzy boat docked at the Montauk Yacht Club.
Fashion designer Martha Nolan-O’Slatarra, 33, did not have brain cancer, her mom saidCredit: TikTok /@martha_nolan
Nolan was found on board the vessel, named Ripple, at around midnight last Tuesday after she had a meeting with the boat’s owner, 60-year-old insurance mogul Christopher Durnan.
Durnan reportedly ran screaming down the dock for help, and Good Samaritans at the boat club performed CPR, but first responders pronounced her dead at the scene.
Her cause of death wasn’t determined immediately, but cops ruled out any signs of violence on her body.
Speculation began to grow that drugs were involved in her death after a drug task force joined police in the investigation, reported Newsday.
Sources close to the investigation then claimed the death was a suspected overdose, the New York Post reported.
Nolan’s family then spoke out and said they never knew the Irish-born entrepreneur to be a person who used drugs.
Now, Nolan’s mom, Elma, has been forced to break her silence on more rumors surrounding her daughter’s untimely death.
In the days following Nolan’s death, detectives reportedly called Elma to ask about claims that her daughter had brain cancer, the Irish Independent reported.
Elma, who spoke to her daughter daily, was “stunned” by the claims.
She told detectives her daughter was in perfect health.
“She told them there was nothing of the sort [affecting her],” a source told the Irish Independent.
It’s unclear where investigators got the information about Nolan’s supposed cancer.
Nolan’s family has traveled from Ireland to the US to demand a second-opinion autopsy after the first exam didn’t determine a cause of death.
The family has hired top lawyer Arthur Aidala to represent them following Nolan’s death.
Aidala, who previously represented Harvey Weinstein, said the family is working with cops to uncover more about Nolan’s death.
He said her family worries that if drugs were involved, then Nolan might have been slipped something unknowingly.
“If there was any kind of drug and drug use, they want to know. Who’s doing the drugs?” Aidala said at a press conference on Wednesday.
He said police are still questioning people about the death.
“There is still a very intense investigation focused on why a young woman is dead,” Aidala said, the Irish Independent reported.
He said her autopsy showed there were no signs of struggle, no defensive wounds on her hands, and no obvious signs of trauma.
“The medical examiner is really focusing now on her blood and the other fluids that are being sent to toxicology to see what’s going on,” Aidala said.
“There were rumors that she possibly had some form of brain cancer and that is being investigated as well.”
HEARTBREAKING LOSS
Nolan, founder of swimwear brand East x East, lived in Manhattan’s Upper East Side neighborhood and spent summers in Montauk to host pop-ups for her brand.
The fashionista often showcased luxurious vacations and glamorous trips on private jets on her social media accounts.
She was having a late-night business meeting with Durnan, who reportedly has invested over $200,000 in her brand.
Durnan is a widowed father of two adult children who owns a company that specializes in workers’ compensation insurance.
He didn’t immediately return The U.S. Sun’s request for comment.
No breakthroughs were achieved regarding the end of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in the meeting between Donald Trump (right) and Vladimir PutinImage: Andrew Harnik/AFP/Getty Images
Melania Trump sends letter to Putin on child abductions
US First Lady, Melania Trump, raised the plight of children in Ukraine and Russia in a personal letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, two White House officials said.
Officials told Reuters that President Donald Trump hand-delivered the letter to Putin during their talks in Alaska, with Slovenian-born Melania Trump not present on the trip to Anchorage.
The officials would not divulge the contents of the letter other than to say it mentioned the abductions of children resulting from the war in Ukraine.
The existence of the letter had not been reported previously. Ukraine has called the abduction of tens of thousands of its children to Russia or Russian-occupied territories without the consent of their families or guardians a war crime that meets the definition of genocide under the United Nations treaty.
In response, Moscow has previously said it has been protecting vulnerable children from a war zone.
The United Nations Human Rights Office has said Russia has inflicted suffering on millions of Ukrainian children and violated their rights since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine begun in 2022.
Trump and Putin met for two-and-a-half hours at a US military base in Anchorage but failed to reach a ceasefire deal in the war in Ukraine.
‘Putin is in no hurry to end this war’
It could have been so much worse. That’s the view from most staying up late into the night to watch the Alaska talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin from Kyiv, according to DW’s correspondent in the Ukrainian capital, Nick Connolly.
While we still haven’t heard Trump’s full version of events, it seems like the thing Ukrainians feared most hasn’t happened: a demand for Ukraine to hand over territory as a prerequisite to any deal.
Instead, it seemed like Putin wanted to talk about anything but Ukraine, ranging from World War II to business. And when he did talk about the war he unleashed in Ukraine, he also referenced history.
Putin said that the root causes of this war would need to be addressed. That is shorthand for reversing Ukraine’s and Eastern Europe’s Western integration. Maybe even reversing NATO expansion. It is also exactly what Putin was talking about when he invaded Ukraine in 2022.
Until his demands are met in full, it seems that Putin is in no hurry to end this war. This puts him at odds with his hosts. Many in Ukraine are now wondering if, after today’s warm words and red carpet treatment, Trump might try the stick — in the form of new sanctions — rather than just the carrot to get Putin to finally budge.
‘It’s really up to Zelenskyy to get it done,’ Trump says
US President Donald Trump told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that he spoke “very sincerely” with Russian President Vladimir Putin following their joint press conference.
“He made a very good speech and I also finished it up,” Trump told Hannity. “Right after that, we spoke very sincerely. I think he wants to see it done.”
The US leader went on to say that Putin would set up a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in an effort to try to reach a ceasefire, but added it was up to latter to accept a deal.
“Now, it’s really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done,” Trump added. “And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit. But it’s up to President Zelenskyy… And if they’d like, I’ll be at that next meeting.”
Countries could not agree whether an agreement should impose caps on new plastic or focus on recycling and reuseImage: Jana Rodenbusch/REUTERS
Despite running over Thursday’s deadline, representatives from 185 countries failed to reach a deal to bring the world closer to ending plastic pollution with a legally binding, global agreement..
“We will not have a treaty to end plastic pollution here in Geneva,” Norway’s negotiator said following talks in Geneva that went into the early hours of Friday.
Meeting on the 11th day of talks, countries could not agree on whether the treaty should reduce growth of plastic production and put legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics or focus more on recycling, reuse and improved design.
“We have missed a historic opportunity but we have to keep going and act urgently. The planet and present and future generations need this treaty,” said Cuba.
What issues divided countries at the plastic pollution talks?
Large oil and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry opposed limits on the production of plastic. Instead, they wanted a treaty that emphasized better waste management and reuse.
“Our views were not reflected … without an agreed scope, this process cannot remain on the right track and risks sliding down a slippery slope,” said Kuwait.
China’s delegation compared ending plastic pollution to a marathon and said Friday’s collapsed talks represented a temporary setback and served as a new starting point to forge consensus.
The High Ambition Coalition, made up of European Union, Britain, Canada and many African and Latin American countries, wanted to the treaty to require a reduction in plastic production and the elimination of toxic chemicals used in plastics.
European Commissioner Jessika Roswall said the European Union and its member states had higher expectations for this meeting and while the draft falls short on their demands, it’s a good basis for another negotiating session.
“The Earth is not ours only. We are stewards for those who come after us. Let us fulfill that duty,” she said, adding that the EU would “continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement that safeguards public health and protects the environment.
What happens next?
For any proposal to make it currently into the treaty, every nation must agree.
India, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Vietnam and others have said consensus is vital to an effective treaty. But other countries want to change the process so decisions may be made by a vote.
“We are going in circles. We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result,” said Graham Forbes, head of the Greenpeace delegation in Geneva.
Palau, speaking for 39 small island developing states, expressed frustration at the effort put into talks and then “repeatedly returning home with insufficient progress to show our people.”
Similar plastic pollution negotiations last year in South Korea also collapsed without an agreement.
Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Reuters
President Donald Trump has ended his high-stakes Russia summit without announcing a deal to end the war in Ukraine, despite rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin and being the first U.S. president in years to invite him back to America.
After a rare ride in the presidential limousine, a military flyover, and three hours of talks, a somewhat subdued Trump told reporters in Alaska: “We didn’t get there—but we have a very good chance of getting there.”
Both leaders said they made progress on ending the bloody conflict that Putin started in February 2022 when his forces invaded Ukraine in a bid to reclaim the country.
During a long-awaited press conference lasting only a few minutes, Trump and Putin spoke of an agreement of sorts, but gave no details, took no questions, and made no mention of a ceasefire of any kind.
“There’s no deal until there’s a deal,” Trump said. “I will call up NATO in a little while. I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate, and I’ll, of course, call up President Zelensky and tell them about today’s meeting. It’s ultimately up to them.”
The lack of an announcement is likely to fuel claims that Putin was using the meeting as a stalling tactic to stave off further sanctions by America.
The Russian authoritarian has also been frozen out by the West for years, and his visit has been depicted in Moscow as a win for the Kremlin.
At the press conference, Putin addressed the room first, and then spoke for eight-and-a-half minutes about the history of the two nations, his desire for more business ties with America, and flattered the American president by agreeing that the war would not have happened if Trump had been in office.
He also told reporters that he greeted Trump on the tarmac in Alaska by saying: “Good afternoon, dear neighbor—very good to see you in good health and to see you alive.”
But Putin also made the point that in order to make a “lasting and long-term” end to the war, “we need to eliminate all the primary root causes” of the conflict in Ukraine.
This is viewed as shorthand for Putin’s hardline demands, which have repeatedly been rejected: that Ukraine disarms, gives up a large part of its land to Russia, and swears off joining NATO.
Friday’s summit in Alaska’s Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson was the first time Putin has been on U.S. soil in 10 years.
It was also the first time a U.S. president has given the VIP treatment to a Russian leader who faces an arrest warrant for war crimes issued by the International Criminal Court as well as being sanctioned by the U.S. government.
Ahead of the meeting, Trump said that he hoped to broker a ceasefire with Putin but was prepared to “walk out” if they failed to reach a deal.
He had also previously warned Putin of “very severe consequences” if he didn’t agree to a ceasefire, including potentially harsh new sanctions that would ramp up economic pressure on Russia.
President Donald Trump literally rolled out the red carpet for Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.
Trump, 79, veered from left to right as he walked on the carpet, unable to stay in its center, before reaching a set meeting point. Trump then stood and clapped as the American adversary, 72, approached him at Joint Base Elmendorf in Anchorage.
Once together, the two men shook hands before Trump waddled at Putin’s side toward a platform. Above, a U.S. Air Force B-2 stealth bomber and four F-35 fighter jets completed a flyover that caused Putin to pause and briefly look up.
The world leaders stopped atop the platform, posed for photos behind a sign reading “Alaska 2025,” and shuffled down three steps and into an all-black Escalade. Trump invited Putin to descend the stairs first, placing his hand on the Russian’s back.
A B-2 bomber and four F-35 fighter jets flew overhead as President Donald Trump greeted Russian President Vladimir Putin. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images
Both men avoided an embarrassing slip or stumble, and they appeared comfortable with each other, chatting as they sauntered forward. Once inside a U.S. government SUV, cameras captured Putin smiling and waving to the press corps outside.
The eyes of the world are on Friday’s summit, which is regarding Russia’s bloody war in Ukraine.
Trump is expected to push Putin to reach a ceasefire agreement, but the White House has tempered expectations of what will actually be accomplished, especially without a representative of Ukraine—like its president, Volodymyr Zelensky—present.
Former President Barack Obama offered a scathing summary of President Donald Trump’s return to office during a call with Texas state Democrats who skipped town to fight Republican efforts to redistrict the state.
During a 30-minute Zoom meeting on Thursday, Obama spoke to dozens of members of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, who fled earlier this month to Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts so that Republicans wouldn’t be able to make a quorum and hold a vote on the new districts.
The maps are usually redrawn once every 10 years, after the census is completed, and not mid-decade. But Trump has called for a “simple redrawing” of Texas that would allow Republicans to pick up five seats in next year’s midterm elections, with the goal of maintaining control of the House.
The meeting was part pep talk and part strategy session, and Obama did not mention Trump by name, CNN reported.
But he called out the administration’s efforts to gerrymander congressional districts, suppress voting, overturn election results, bypass Congress through executive action, militarize cities, and politicize the Department of Justice and the military.
“Those are trend lines that remind us this precious democracy that we’ve got is not a given,” he said. “It’s not self-executed. It requires us to fight for it. It requires us to stand up for it.”
He said Republicans increasingly recognize their policies are unpopular, so they’re trying to “fix the game a little bit” by drawing maps that splinter Democratic voting blocs or that pack Democrats into a single district so they can’t influence other races.
“That’s not fair,” Obama said. “That’s not how democracy is supposed to work.”
I am so proud of the @TexasHDC and the work that they’ve done. Their willingness to put themselves on the line to highlight the current assault on our democracy has set an example for what all of us have to do. https://t.co/jA2giVOMW1
The former president remains beloved in many Democratic circles but has kept a relatively low profile since Trump won re-election, but has shown signs that gerrymandering is one issue where he’s willing to go to bat for Democrats.
Later this month, he will headline a fundraiser on Martha’s Vineyard—just his second fundraiser since fall 2024—to benefit his former attorney general Eric Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee.
The group is funding political campaigns and legal challenges to Republicans’ efforts to gerrymander Texas, Ohio and other red states.
Holder also joined Obama during Thursday’s call with Texas Democrats and updated the caucus on what his committee was doing to fight gerrymandering in other states, according to ABC News.
During the meeting, Obama told the Texas Democrats he was “grateful” to them for helping Americans understand the stakes of the redistricting fight, and credited them with inspiring blue states to retaliate against the Republican redistricting plans.
“Because of your actions, because of your courage, what you’ve seen is California responding, other states looking at what they can do to offset this mid-decade gerrymandering,” Obama said.
Texas Rep. Gene Wu, who chairs the state’s House Democratic Caucus, told ABC News that the members were “especially excited” about the meeting, and that Obama’s involvement was proof that Democrats nationwide understand what’s at stake with the Texas redistricting effort.
Another tragedy in the bodybuilding world … champion performer Hayley McNeff has passed away at just 37.
Tributes started pouring in on Wednesday after it was confirmed the Concord, Massachusetts native died on August 8.
McNeff’s cause of death hasn’t been disclosed, but her obituary described her passing as “unexpected but peaceful.”
Her funeral service will take place on Saturday.
“I remember seeing her at Total Fitness in person,” one fan commented on social media, “She had a vibrant personality and a very warm smile! RIP! A beautiful girl lady inside & outside!!!”
Hayley rose to prominence on the bodybuilding scene in the 2000s, securing several titles, including a win at the 2009 East Coast Classic.
She also featured in a 2016 bodybuilding documentary, “Raising The Bar,” where she discussed her career … saying, “The quest for getting huge will never end. There’s no limit. I hope there’s a day that I’ll be able to look in the mirror 100% of the time and be like ‘yeah man, I’m huge.'”
Outside of bodybuilding, McNeff was also a talented diver and skier. She also studied psychology after retiring from competition.
McNeff is just one of several bodybuilders who have recently passed away. In June, Zunila Hoyos Mendez, 43, was tragically killed in a hammer attack, while a month before, Gui Bull died at the age of 30.
Kevin Watson, a 42-year-old man, was fatally shot on Wednesday evening while doing a live stream on Facebook from his car in Chicago. The video has gone viral on social media.
A 42-year-old man, Kevin Watson, was fatally shot on Wednesday evening while doing a live stream on Facebook from his car. The video of the livestream has gone viral. Watson was confirmed as the victim by the Cook County Medical Examiner on Thursday.
The shooting took place around 6.14 pm in the 5000 block of West Madison Street, in Chicago’s South Austin neighborhood, according to the Chicago Police Department. Shooting Details
In the Facebook livestream, Watson can be seen talking from the driver’s seat of his car when a person approaches through the car window. Watson raises his hands and steps out of the car, and gunshots are then heard.
Watson was shot in the chest and later died from his injuries, the police said. As of now, no arrests have been made, and the investigation is underway, as reported by ABC Chicago.
What Happened In Video
In the livestream, Watson appeared to be discussing a parking dispute, though the exact details are unclear. In the video, he said, “I said, I said, listen, bro, if they do come, let us park right here. You feel me? If they do come, come get me. We’ll move the car so they can get the space. Whatever car we need so they can get the space. Let’s get the park.”
Soon after, the shooter approaches and opens fire. The video ends shortly after, showing bystanders discussing the situation and the car interior.
The Chicago Police Department has not released additional details about the circumstances leading up to the shooting.
Closing arguments are due to begin in the national security trial of Jimmy Lai, 77, a fierce critic of China’s Communist Party.
Media tycoon Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-shuttered Apple Daily, arrives at the Court of Final Appeal by prison van in Hong Kong in 2021 [File: Tyrone Siu/Reuters]United States President Donald Trump has renewed his promise to “save” jailed Hong Kong tycoon Jimmy Lai, who is on trial for alleged national security crimes over his pro-democracy activism and antipathy towards China’s Communist Party.
“I’m going to do everything I can to save him. I’m going to do everything … His name has already entered the circle of things that we’re talking about, and we’ll see what we can do,” Trump told Fox News Radio in the US.
Trump’s remarks came as closing arguments in Lai’s high-profile trial.
Closing arguments have been pushed from Friday to Monday after Lai’s lawyer said he had experienced heart palpitations.
The delay marks the second in as many days, after Hong Kong courts were closed due to bad weather.
Trump previously pledged to rescue Lai during an interview last October, just weeks before his election as president, and had said he would “100 percent get him out”.
Lai is one of the most prominent Hong Kongers to be charged under the city’s draconian 2020 national security law, and his cause has made international headlines.
The 77-year-old is a longtime opponent of China’s Communist Party thanks to his ownership of Apple Daily, a now-shuttered pro-democracy tabloid newspaper.
Thank you, President Trump, for your support for Jimmy Lai at this critical time.
“I’m going to do everything I can to save [Jimmy Lai]. I’m going to do everything…His name has already entered the circle of things that we’re talking about, and we’ll see what we can do. I… pic.twitter.com/EmscQHYQmX
He is facing two counts of “colluding with foreign forces” and a separate charge of sedition in the long-running national security trial that began in December 2023.
If you look at Pakistan and India… planes were being knocked out of the air. Six or seven planes came down. They were ready to go, maybe nuclear. We solved that, says U.S. President Donald Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump. File | Photo Credit: Reuters
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday (August 14, 2025) again repeated his claim that he solved the conflict between India and Pakistan and said that the war could have turned nuclear.
“If you look at Pakistan and India… planes were being knocked out of the air. Six or seven planes came down. They were ready to go, maybe nuclear. We solved that,” Mr. Trump said during remarks in the Oval Office.
The U.S. President’s comments come on the eve of his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday as he tries to bring an end to the Ukraine war.
Trump said he had thought the Russia-Ukraine war would have been the “easiest one” to end but “it’s actually the most difficult”.
“I think that President Putin would like to see a deal. I think if I weren’t president, he would take over all of Ukraine. It’s a war that should have never happened. If I weren’t president, in my opinion, he would much rather take over all of Ukraine. But I am president and he’s not going to mess around with me,” Mr. Trump said.
“I think it’s going to be a good meeting,” Mr. Trump said of his upcoming meeting with Mr. Putin.
He added that “the more important meeting” will be the second meeting with Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and himself.
Mr. Trump said there may also be some European leaders for that meeting.
“We’re going to see what happens. And I think President Putin will make peace. I think President Zelenskyy will make peace. We’ll see if they can get along, and if they can, it’ll be great,” he said.
Mr. Trump went on to add that he has solved “six wars” in the last six months and he is “very proud of it”.
Since May 10, when Mr. Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “full and immediate” ceasefire, he has repeated his claim on several occasions.
Mr. Trump has claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a “lot of trade” with them if they stopped the conflict.
The Russian leader suggested a deal on nuclear arms control could also be part of talks that are expected to focus on ending the war in Ukraine.
Image Source : a57.foxnews
The Russian leader suggested a deal on nuclear arms control could also be part of talks that are expected to focus on ending the war in Ukraine.
Russia’s Vladimir Putin sounded positive Thursday on the eve of his talks with President Donald Trump in Alaska, saying he believed the American leader was making “quite energetic and sincere efforts” toward peace in Ukraine.
A day ahead of their summit, Putin convened a meeting of advisers to inform them “about how the negotiation process on the Ukrainian crisis is going,” the Kremlin said in a readout translated by NBC News.
The Russian leader said the Trump administration is making “quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict.”
Those efforts are intended “to create long-term conditions of peace between our countries and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,” he added, particularly if the negotiations are extended to cover strategic offensive weapons treaties.
This suggests that a deal on nuclear arms control could be part of the talks. Russia suspended its participation in the New START “reduction in strategic offensive arms” agreement in 2023.
Earlier Thursday, Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said the summit would start with head-to-head talks between Trump, Putin and their translators at 11:30 a.m. local time (3:30 p.m. ET) and would be followed by a joint news conference. The White House later confirmed this.
Trump “wants to exhaust all options to try to bring this war to a peaceful resolution,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News.
The top-level Russian delegation will include Putin, Ushakov, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Defense Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Putin’s longtime friend and investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev, Ushakov said on a call with journalists in Moscow.
The primary topic of the meeting will be Ukraine, he said, but he added that he expected the “huge, and unfortunately hitherto untapped, potential” of economic ties between the U.S. and Russia would also be discussed.
As well as Putin’s openly stated goal of subjugating Ukraine, he also wants to end Russia’s exile from the Western financial system following economic sanctions imposed by Washington, the European Union and others. Trump has not yet lifted these punishments but has expressed a desire to end Russia’s economic pariah status.
NBC News asked Trump in a press gaggle on Thursday whether he would offer Putin access to rare earth minerals as an incentive to end the war with Ukraine.
“We’re going to see what happens with our meeting. We have a big meeting. It’s going to be, I think, very important for Russia, and it’s going to be very important for us,” Trump said, without offering additional details. He later added that the earth minerals are “very unimportant” compared to “trying to save lives.”
The talks come as Ukraine marked a grim new record with 286 civilians killed and 1,388 injured in July, according to the United Nations.
“For the second month in a row, the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine hits a new three-year high,” Danielle Bell, the head of the U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), said in a statement on Wednesday. “Only the first three months after the Russian Federation launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine saw more killed and injured than in this past month.”
The Trump-Putin summit has prompted howls of dismay and anxiety across Ukraine and Europe, which have not been invited to the talks and fear what the American president may agree to with his Russian counterpart about the conflict raging on their continent.
NBC News asked Trump in a press gaggle on Thursday whether he would offer Putin access to rare earth minerals as an incentive to end the war with Ukraine.
“We’re going to see what happens with our meeting. We have a big meeting. It’s going to be, I think, very important for Russia, and it’s going to be very important for us,” Trump said, without offering additional details. He later added that the earth minerals are “very unimportant” compared to “trying to save lives.”
The talks come as Ukraine marked a grim new record with 286 civilians killed and 1,388 injured in July, according to the United Nations.
“For the second month in a row, the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine hits a new three-year high,” Danielle Bell, the head of the U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), said in a statement on Wednesday. “Only the first three months after the Russian Federation launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine saw more killed and injured than in this past month.”
The Trump-Putin summit has prompted howls of dismay and anxiety across Ukraine and Europe, which have not been invited to the talks and fear what the American president may agree to with his Russian counterpart about the conflict raging on their continent.
They have been confined to their own diplomatic scrambling, including dozens of calls between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other leaders, culminating in a video call between these parties and Trump himself Wednesday.
Zelenskyy said that Putin “is bluffing” in saying he wants peace.
On Thursday, the Ukrainian leader flew to London and met his British counterpart, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, for what both called a “productive meeting.” As well as the prospect of Britain financing the small drones that have become central to Ukraine’s battlefield defense, the pair discussed the Alaska talks, “which present a viable chance to make progress as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious about peace,” a spokesperson from Starmer’s office, No. 10 Downing St., said in a statement.
Tom Cruise has declined a major Kennedy Center Award from Donald Trump, according to The Washington Post.
Trump announced the honorees on Wednesday from the Center, also revealing that he would host the televised show in December. Trump had reportedly wanted to unveil Cruise alongside KISS, Michael Crawford, George Strait, Sylvester Stallone, and singer Gloria Gaynor. The publication cites confirmation from several anonymous Kennedy Center employees. According to the report, Cruise’s team said the star could not attend the ceremony due to “scheduling conflicts.”
A rep for Cruise did not return The Daily Beast’s request for comment.
Manuel Velasquez/Getty Images for Paramount Pictu
Cruise would have been the most high-profile honoree on Trump’s roster, who Trump said he was “98 percent involved” with selecting.
The Mission: Impossible star is notoriously quiet on politically charged subjects, opting instead to put his star power behind supporting the military, veterans, and, of course, Scientology.
Some honorees in years past have declined the award or avoided the broadcast to protest the sitting president. Mel Brooks refused the award under George W. Bush in 2009. Norman Lear declined to attend the White House Gala that came with the award in 2017 to protest Trump’s policies, but attended the Trump-free Kennedy Honors broadcast show.
“I could never turn my back on” The Kennedy Center,” Lear wrote to Twitter/X at the time. “It represents the Arts and Humanities which mean everything to me. Of course, I’m accepting the honors. What I’m not accepting is the @WhiteHouse reception with @realDonaldTrump.”
Taylor Swift is tipping her hat to the late, great George Michael on her upcoming album “The Life of a Showgirl” with a track called “Father Figure” — and the icon’s former partner says George would’ve totally approved of it.
Kenny Goss — George’s partner of 13 years — tells TMZ George would be proud of the tribute, which isn’t a straight sample, but an interpolation … meaning you’ll hear the melody of his ’87 classic woven into Taylor’s track.
Kenny tells us George never met Taylor, but he’s pretty sure the icon would’ve been a fan — and would’ve appreciated someone of her caliber taking an interest in his work.
Kenny’s personally a fan of Taylor’s music, and while he had no idea she was interpolating the song, it was a welcome surprise — and he’s glad she’s doing this for George, who had a big hit with “Father Figure.”
Kenny first met George in 1988, and the two were together for over a decade before splitting in 2009, reportedly due to their shared struggles with addiction. George passed away years later, on Christmas Day 2016.
A new legal front has opened in the Trump family’s never-ending war with the press — and this time, it’s First Lady Melania Trump at the center, brandishing an eye-popping $1 billion defamation cudgel. Her legal team is threatening lawsuits against anyone who dares to so much as mention her name in proximity to Jeffrey Epstein’s.
The fallout has already been swift. The Daily Beast removed an article featuring author Michael Wolff alleging that President Donald Trump met Melania through an Epstein connection. In the podcast interview with Joanna Coles — which is still up on YouTube — Wolff claims that the two met in 1998 through ID Models founder Paolo Zampolli, who himself had ties to Epstein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, and further contended that Melania was “very involved” in Epstein’s social circle.
On Tuesday, Wolff addressed the matter in an Instagram Reel that was, in his own words, “threading the needle very carefully.” In the clip, he recounted how The Daily Beast pulled content over a letter from Melania’s lawyers, James Carville deleted his own material which made a similar connection, and others backed away from the topic entirely under the looming shadow of billion-dollar litigation. Even Hunter Biden — not exactly a stranger to political controversy — spoke about receiving a similar warning from Melania’s lawyers.
“What this is,” Wolff said, “is an effort to thwart, stop, frustrate anybody who is out there trying to make that connection. You can’t. Or you’re going to get sued in a way that is going to be just incredibly costly… burdens that you can’t bear.”
Wolff, a reporter of occasionally dubious repute but with deep sourcing on Epstein, who interviewed the disgraced financier extensively — framed the legal blitz as a chilling tactic. Whether or not you take him at face value, the effect he describes is obvious: People are pulling down commentary about the First Lady and Epstein out of fear of facing astronomical legal costs.
It’s worth stressing here: there is no evidence that the claims Melania is fighting against have any merit. In fact, the core of the story of threatening lawsuits to silence the press is less about the truth of any allegation and more about the unmistakable optics of her legal strategy.
If the aim of all this lawyerly saber-rattling is to keep Melania’s name out of the same sentence as Epstein’s, then this a paradoxical campaign. By threatening billion-dollar lawsuits — a comically large figure — the First Lady’s lawyers have ensured the story will reach a much larger audience than before. Yet media coverage will now focus less on the underlying claims, and more on the lengths to which she will go to shut them down.
It’s the classic “Streisand Effect,” named after the singer’s unsuccessful effort to suppress aerial photos of her Malibu home, which only brought far more attention to the images. Attempting to bury a story can sometimes cause it to bloom. In this case, people who might never have connected Melania Trump to Epstein are now aware that such a connection is something her lawyers are working overtime to block.
The legal battle fits neatly into the broader Trump family media strategy: attack the messenger, make litigation the punishment, and make the act of defending oneself ruinously expensive. Donald Trump himself has long wielded lawsuits — or the threat of them — as a way to intimidate critics. What’s new here is the scale: a cool billion per offense.
Meanwhile, the larger Epstein narrative has been fading from public view. Promised “Epstein files” have yet to materialize. Congressional Democrats once threatened to investigate his death and alleged connections to powerful figures, only to see momentum vanish. Wolff claims that even the Justice Department took unusual steps to manage potential fallout, including what he describes as a curious reassignment of Ghislaine Maxwell to a more comfortable prison after questioning about Trump.
None of that proves wrongdoing — but it does show how aggressively the subject is being managed massaged and in some cases shut down. And believe me I was careful not to write anything that could put me — or Mediaite — on the receiving end of a similar threat. Lawsuit threats have a serious chilling effect on the press even when any reputable outlets mission is to cover the powerful without fear or favor. And as history has shown the more energy powerful figures expend to quash a conversation the more oxygen that conversation tends to get.
Melania Trump may well succeed in intimidating some into silence. But she has also ensured that her name — and these massive lawsuit threats — are now part of the public record.
The president and his administration are struggling to bury the scandal around their handling of the convicted sex offender’s case
MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images
Donald Trump, Republicans in Congress, and the president’s allies across right-wing media have been trying everything to make public backlash to their botched handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation go away, amid reports that Trump himself appears in the government’s files pertaining to the convicted sex offender.
The administration’s attempts to bury the story have been complicated by some of Epstein’s victims, and their families, speaking out as the scandal has intensified. Trump hasn’t engaged with them, but just because the president is publicly keeping his mouth shut about Epstein’s victims and their family members doesn’t mean he isn’t annoyed by them.
In recent weeks, according to two sources familiar with his private remarks, Trump has repeatedly critiqued the string of media appearances by Epstein accusers and their families, arguing that some of them are just trying to make him look bad, or implying that he did something wrong during his time as one of Epstein’s friends and party companions. At times, Trump has said that some of these people speaking out are, in his words, clearly of a “Democrat” political affiliation, while wondering aloud if some of them are coordinating with prominent liberal attorneys or groups.
“None of this is true,” a White House official said in response to a request for comment. “Just another desperate attempt by the failing Rolling Stone.”
Survivors of Epstein’s abuse have for weeks now been criticizing the Trump administration’s handling of the case after the Justice Department announced in early July that it would not be releasing the so-called Epstein files. The outcry intensified following reports that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell had been transferred to a significantly cushier prison facility in Texas after the Justice Department spoke with her in Florida. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of child sex trafficking and other offenses related to her relationship with Epstein. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that the Justice Department informed the president that his name appeared in evidence related to Epstein’s case, although it remains unclear in what capacity.
Annie and Maria Farmer, two sisters who accused Epstein of assaulting them and testified against Maxwell during her trial, have gone public with their criticism of the administration’s sidelining of victims. Earlier this month, Annie Farmer told CNN that “this chaotic process that’s been unfolding has a real cost for survivors.”
Farmer indicated that survivors had not been informed of the Justice Department’s efforts to meet with Maxwell, or the decision to transfer her to a minimum-security prison.
“A central part of trauma is a feeling of a lack of control, and that has certainly been triggered here these meetings. You know, even this prison transfer was something I expected we would learn about prior to learning about it in the news, and unfortunately, that’s not how it has unfolded,” she said. Farmer added that efforts by right-wing pundits and others to paint Maxwell as another Epstein victim was a ploy to make a potential commutation of Maxwell’s 20-year sentence “more palatable” to the public. Trump hasn’t ruled out pardoning Maxwell, telling reporters that he is “allowed” to do it.
“It feels like that campaign is not working. People recognize that she’s a predator, not a victim,” Farmer added.
Last month, Danielle Bensky, who accused Epstein of abusing her in 2004, told NBC News that the approach the president and his allies have taken ”feels like we’re being erased.”
“All the brave women who came forward … all the work that we did to tell the world what happened to us, it’s all being erased,” she said.
The family of Virginia Giuffre, a victim of Epstein who died by suicide earlier this year, released a statement in response to comments from Trump indicating that he believed Epstein had “stolen” Giuffre from the spa at Mar-a-Lago, where she had worked.
“If our sister could speak today, she would be most angered by the fact that the government is listening to a known perjurer, a woman who repeatedly lied under oath and will continue to do so as long as it benefits her position,” the family said. “We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this.”
In a memo submitted to the U.S. District Court earlier this month, one victim (whose identity remains protected) wrote to a judge that while they are “for complete and utter transparency in this case, we deserve transparency from our own government, the agencies that were supposed to be there to protect us victims and guess what, they utterly and completely failed us.”
The Capitol Hill battle over Jeffrey Epstein is poised to heat up when Congress returns to Washington next month.
While GOP leaders left town early to avoid the radioactive issue, the conspiracy-ridden saga is set to ramp back up come September for a number of reasons.
A bipartisan pair of lawmakers have vowed to force a vote on their resolution requiring the administration to release the federal files it’s withholding and plan to bring survivors of Epstein’s abuse to Capitol Hill in the first days of Congress’s return.
Separately, a number of court cases surrounding the fate of those files could reach a resolution in the coming weeks.
The House Rules Committee, which was brought to a standstill in July over Democratic efforts to force votes on the Epstein affair, will likely be compelled to revisit the issue if Republicans want to move any piece of their legislative agenda next month.
And bipartisan motions in the House Oversight and Government Committee that forced Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) to issue a flurry of subpoenas related to the Epstein matter could reignite public interest in the saga.
All of this is likely to create new headaches for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and his leadership team, who want to move beyond fights over Epstein when they return to Washington to face another tough task — funding the government to avoid an Oct. 1 shutdown.
“I don’t think it’s going to go away,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said of the Epstein issue. “Maybe our leadership thinks that sticking their head in the sand and running out of town was the right decision. … Once we go back into session, I think this picks up where it left off.”
Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are fighting to make sure that happens.
They’ve scheduled a press conference Sept. 3, the day after Congress returns to Washington, to promote their legislation forcing the release of the Epstein files. To help bring attention to the bill, they’ve invited several victims of Epstein’s abuse.
Massie acknowledged his office has not been getting a lot of calls about Epstein during the August break — but he said people haven’t been getting calls on any other major issues such as the national debt or abortion either.
“A lot of America is on vacation right now,” Massie said. “Just generally, people tune out when Congress is not in session.”
The saga surrounding Epstein has posed a huge challenge to President Trump in the early months of his second term.
A number of Trump supporters who had fueled the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein — namely, that the government was concealing the files to shield powerful “elites” from criminal charges — have since assumed positions of high power in the Trump administration, such as FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino.
Top administration officials continued to fan those flames in the early months of the Trump administration, with Attorney General Pam Bondi handing out binders titled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1” to conservative influencers at the White House, and Vice President Vance saying in June it was “important” to release the “Epstein list.”
Those placements led to expectations among the MAGA faithful that releasing the Epstein records would be a top priority of Trump’s second term.
Instead, the Department of Justice (DOJ) last month released an unsigned memo refuting all of the most damning theories surrounding the case. Epstein had no “client list,” the DOJ said, nor is there evidence that he tried to blackmail powerful figures who might have committed crimes against minors.
The agency also reaffirmed that Epstein’s 2019 death in a Manhattan prison was by suicide, not foul play, as some far-right voices have proposed.
The DOJ memo infuriated many of Trump’s most ardent supporters, in and out of Congress, posing the most serious threat to the unity of the MAGA movement since Trump’s entrance into the world of politics.
In response, the Trump administration — despite the president himself dismissing the Epstein saga as a “hoax” — made new efforts to reveal previously unseen information.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sat down with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s ex-girlfriend who was convicted on sex trafficking charges. The DOJ also made motions to unseal grand jury testimony transcripts from the Epstein case and from Maxwell’s case, but both were denied.
The controversy also raged on Capitol Hill, where Johnson was forced to cut the legislative calendar short just before the recess as GOP rebels on the House Rules Committee, who did not want to face Democratic amendment votes on the matter, refused to take up the radioactive issue.
Still, there’s a long history of July scandals disappearing down the memory hole of the long August break. And some analysts think signs point to the Epstein furor dying down.
Pho Na, a Vietnamese restaurant on Old Kent Road, Southwark, closed after inspectors found the suspicious looking meat (Picture: Google Maps)
A London restaurant has been shut down after dog meat was allegedly found in the freezer.
Pho Na, a Vietnamese restaurant on Old Kent Road, Southwark, closed after inspectors found the suspicious looking meat labelled as ‘goat wrapped in leaves’.
But when it was sent for analysis it was confirmed it was dog meat.
Inspectors also discovered mice droppings and cockroaches inside the establishment.
Owner Vuong Quoc Nguyen, 47, denied multiple food safety and hygiene offences at Bromley Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday.
Defence solicitor Piers Kiss-Wilson said his client did not know it was dog meat as it had been supplied to him by someone else.
He added the meat was never for sale, and pest control had been hired to deal with the mouse and cockroach infestation.
Lewisham Council said: ‘Following a failed food safety inspection at the former local business Pho Na, Lewisham Council commenced prosecution action in relation to food hygiene offences in 2023.
The Russian leader suggested a deal on nuclear arms control could also be part of talks that are expected to focus on ending the war in Ukraine.
Russia’s Vladimir Putin sounded positive Thursday on the eve of his talks with President Donald Trump in Alaska, saying he believed the American leader was making “quite energetic and sincere efforts” toward peace in Ukraine.
A day ahead of their summit, Putin convened a meeting of advisers to inform them “about how the negotiation process on the Ukrainian crisis is going,” the Kremlin said in a readout translated by NBC News.
The Russian leader said the Trump administration is making “quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict.”
Those efforts are intended “to create long-term conditions of peace between our countries and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,” he added, particularly if the negotiations are extended to cover strategic offensive weapons treaties.
This suggests that a deal on nuclear arms control could be part of the talks. Russia suspended its participation in the New START “reduction in strategic offensive arms” agreement in 2023.
Earlier Thursday, Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said the summit would start with head-to-head talks between Trump, Putin and their translators at 11:30 a.m. local time (3:30 p.m. ET) and would be followed by a joint news conference. The White House later confirmed this.
Trump “wants to exhaust all options to try to bring this war to a peaceful resolution,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News.
The top-level Russian delegation will include Putin, Ushakov, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Defense Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and Putin’s longtime friend and investment envoy Kirill Dmitriev, Ushakov said on a call with journalists in Moscow.
The primary topic of the meeting will be Ukraine, he said, but he added that he expected the “huge, and unfortunately hitherto untapped, potential” of economic ties between the U.S. and Russia would also be discussed.
As well as Putin’s openly stated goal of subjugating Ukraine, he also wants to end Russia’s exile from the Western financial system following economic sanctions imposed by Washington, the European Union and others. Trump has not yet lifted these punishments but has expressed a desire to end Russia’s economic pariah status.
NBC News asked Trump in a press gaggle on Thursday whether he would offer Putin access to rare earth minerals as an incentive to end the war with Ukraine.
“We’re going to see what happens with our meeting. We have a big meeting. It’s going to be, I think, very important for Russia, and it’s going to be very important for us,” Trump said, without offering additional details. He later added that the earth minerals are “very unimportant” compared to “trying to save lives.”
The talks come as Ukraine marked a grim new record with 286 civilians killed and 1,388 injured in July, according to the United Nations.
“For the second month in a row, the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine hits a new three-year high,” Danielle Bell, the head of the U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), said in a statement on Wednesday. “Only the first three months after the Russian Federation launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine saw more killed and injured than in this past month.”
The Trump-Putin summit has prompted howls of dismay and anxiety across Ukraine and Europe, which have not been invited to the talks and fear what the American president may agree to with his Russian counterpart about the conflict raging on their continent.
They have been confined to their own diplomatic scrambling, including dozens of calls between Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other leaders, culminating in a video call between these parties and Trump himself Wednesday.
Zelenskyy said that Putin “is bluffing” in saying he wants peace.
On Thursday, the Ukrainian leader flew to London and met his British counterpart, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, for what both called a “productive meeting.” As well as the prospect of Britain financing the small drones that have become central to Ukraine’s battlefield defense, the pair discussed the Alaska talks, “which present a viable chance to make progress as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious about peace,” a spokesperson from Starmer’s office, No. 10 Downing St., said in a statement.
FBI and Border Patrol officers detain a man, after he allegedly assaulted law enforcement with a sandwich, along the U Street corridor during a federal law enforcement deployment to the nation’s capital in Washington, DC, on August 10. Andrew Leyden/Getty Images
A man who worked for the Department of Justice was charged after allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal law enforcement officer in Washington, DC, amid President Donald Trump’s takeover of the city’s police and increase in federal law enforcement presence.
The man, Sean Charles Dunn, appeared in court for an initial hearing Thursday after 20 officers were sent to arrest him, his defense attorney told a judge.
After a brief foot chase Sunday night, Dunn was initially detained and then released the next day with no charges, his lawyer Sabrina Shroff said.
On Wednesday, Dunn learned there was a warrant out for his arrest and got in touch with Shroff who told the court, “I had no way to surrender him” after she attempted to call multiple government officials.
Before he turned himself in, 20 officers came to his door Wednesday to arrest him on the felony assault charge he now faces, Shroff said.
To show that he could be released, Shroff noted that Dunn had served in the Air Force, to which prosecutors quickly responded: “Somebody who served in the military should know not to assault an officer.”
Dunn was released on personal recognizance with the next hearing scheduled for early September.
‘FIRED’ from Justice Department
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on social media Thursday that the Dunn has been fired. He was an international affairs specialist in the Criminal Division of the Office of International Affairs, according to a source.
“If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you,” Bondi wrote. “I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice — NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony.”
“This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ,” Bondi said of the sandwich incident. “You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.”
According to police, Dunn confronted a group of US Customs and Border Protection officers on 14th Street in Northwest DC on Sunday night, calling them “fascists,” according to court documents. During the incident, Dunn allegedly approached a CBP officer and shouted expletives, adding, “Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!”
European foreign ministers will hold a video call on Monday to discuss how to best support Ukraine ahead of a summit between the US and Russia.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy held calls with 13 European leaders over the weekend [FILE: May 10, 2025]Image: Ludovic Marin/Pool/ABACA/picture allianceEuropean leaders continued on Sunday to push to have Ukraine involved in the negotiations between the United States and Russia, ahead of talks between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump.
Putin and Trump are to meet in the US state of Alaska on August 15 to try to bring an end to the three-year war.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly stated a peace deal without his country’s input would not be possible.
What did European leaders say about Ukraine’s involvement in a peace deal?
Europe has insisted that Kyiv and European powers should be part of any deal to end the conflict, with EU foreign ministers set to discuss the next steps for the bloc in a meeting by video link on Monday, together with their Ukrainian counterpart.
“The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,” the leaders from Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Britain and Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a joint statement.
The statement was followed by the heads of eight Nordic-Baltic nations, who also jointly reaffirmed their support for Ukraine.
The leaders of Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden said they “Reaffirm the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.”
“President Trump is right that Russia has to end its war against Ukraine. The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously. Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine’s and the whole of Europe’s security,” Kallas said.
Adding to the calls for Trump to exert his diplomatic powers, NATO head Mark Rutte told ABC’s This Week broadcast that “Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end.”
However, unlike many European leaders, Rutte said it was a reality that “Russia is controlling some of Ukrainian territory” and suggested a future deal could acknowledge this.
Donald Trump is moaning about the media again, JD Vance’s holiday looks less like a holiday every day and there’s more on Ghislaine Maxwell’s prison status. Here’s everything you need to know.
(Image: AFP via Getty Images)
After spending most of the weekend (illegally) fishing and talking about Ukraine with David Lammy at Chevening, the Vice President had breakfast with Nigel Farage this morning, is having a zoom call with Starmer and European leaders about Ukraine right now, and he’s speaking to US troops at a UK airbase in a couple of hours.
If I were him I’d fire my travel agent.
Meanwhile., the President has been moaning about media coverage of his meeting with Putin – which looks more and more like an objectively bad idea by the minute.
Oh, and Ghislaine Maxwell might have been approved for work release…which seems like a great idea all round.
Here’s everything that’s happened in Trump World over the last 24 hours that you need to know about. Strap in.
1. Trump moans about media coverage of his summit with Putin
Because what else would he be doing at 8am on a Wednesday?
The President complained on Truth Social that the coverage of his forthcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska was “very unfair.”
He wrote: :Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, “Putin has already won.” What’s that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The Fake News is working overtime (No tax on overtime!).”
He added: If I got Moscow and Leningrad free, as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal!”
It would certainly be a weird deal, not least because Leningrad hasn’t existed since 1991.
2. David Lammy makes a rod for his own back…and for JD too?
In undoubtedly the funniest story of the week, probably the year, David Lammy has reported himself to environmental authorities for fishing without a rod licence, during his angling adventure with JD Vance on Friday.
Lammy could face a fine for the infraction…but questions remain over whether he also failed to secure the correct paperwork for the VP and his family, who also cast lines at Chevening. Does diplomatic immunity cover environmental regulations infractions? Does it matter that everyone involved caught a fish except for Lammy himself?
3. JD Vance rallies the troops in the UK…
Vice President JD Vance will give a speech to US military personnel stationed in the UK this afternoon at RAF Fairford, and we’ll be in the room as he does it.
The VP will deliver remarks in front of a Lockheed U-2, a high altitude recon aircraft currently in use over Ukraine – and undeniably a badass piece of equipment. Seriously, I’m looking at it right now and I’m pretty intimidated.
Ahead of Vance’s speech we’re being treated to a playlist of songs so camp macho I can only assume it was drawn up by Pete Hegseth himself. We’ve had Macho Man by the Village People, Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting by Elton John and, I swear, Bad Boys – the theme tune from COPS.
Vance’s speech will come almost immediately after he sits in on a group video call with Trump, Keir Starmer and Ukrainian and European leaders ahead of the US President’s Alaskan chinwag with Vladimir Putin on Friday.
4. …as US report blasts “human rights” slide
Meanwhile, a State Department report has been published complaining that human rights are on the slide in the UK, and curiously making many of the same criticisms Vance has made in recent months.
The annual assessment, which analyses human rights conditions worldwide, flagged what it described as “serious restrictions” on freedom of expression in the UK.
“The government sometimes took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, but prosecution and punishment for such abuses was inconsistent,” the report read.
The report specifically said laws limiting speech around abortion clinics, pointing to “safe access zones” curbed expression, including silent protests and prayer.
“These restrictions on freedom of speech could include prohibitions on efforts to influence others when inside a restricted area, even through prayer or silent protests,” the report read.
In the wake of the 2024 Southport attack, the report said government officials “repeatedly intervened to chill speech”.
All of which is awkward timing for JD Vance’s Cotswolds holiday, given it’s exactly what he’s been moaning about for months.
5. Trump’s Fox Host DC District Attorney abruptly stopped press conference after being asked proper questions
DC’s Trump appointed District Attorney, former Fox News personality Jeannine Pirro suffered a bit of a malfunction during a presentation to try and explain the plan to clean up the godforsaken heap of crime and filth we know as Washington.
We’re going to skip over the moment where she answered a question about hiring by saying: “im not going to bore you with the facts…” then realised what she’d said and joked “dont quote me on that…that was off the record.” (The briefing was televised)
No, we’re talking about this moment, where she responds to a perfectly reasonable question about whether the administration plans to do anything on crime prevention as part of this crackdown.
“Oh stop it,” she complained, looking for all the world like an ageing stand up comic doing a set at the Flamingo.
She then abruptly ended the press conference.
6. The Department of Homeland Security keeps posting white suprematist-coded content
Can’t really believe I’m typing this, but it’s happened too many times to ignore.
Last night, the Department of Homeland Security posted this image:
The post, which reads “Which way, American man?” is a pretty clear reference to Which Way, Western Man, a 1978 book by William Gayley Simpson.
In the book, most recently published by National Vanguard, a neo-Nazi organisation, contains passages arguing Hitler was right, and calling for violence against Jews in order to “break their grip” on “the White man’s world”.
South Korea had previously reported loudspeakers had been removed on the northern side of the border.
Kim Jong Un’s sister Yo-Jong is a powerful figure in North KoreaImage: Kyodo News/IMAGO
Kim Jong Un’s sister denied claims North Korea had removed some of its loudspeakers along its border with the South, saying Seoul is wrong to expect renewed dialogue between the two countries.
“We have never removed loudspeakers installed in the border area and are not willing to remove them,” Kim Yo Jong said on Thursday.
What did Kim Yo Jong say?
Kim, the North Korean leader’s powerful sibling, repeated previous North Korean statements that Pyongyang has no interest in reviving negotiations with the US and South Korea.
She said an upcoming military drill planned between the two countries at the end of August is proof of their hostility towards North Korea, also blaming the government in Seoul for misleading the public.
North Korea has traditionally always condemned such joint drills, saying they serve as preparations for an invasion of its territory.
The North often seeks to show off its military strength through military demonstrations and tests to advance its nuclear program during these exercises.
On Thursday, South Korea said it stood by its assessment that North Korea had begun dismantling border loudspeakers. A South Korean military spokesperson said caution was needed when interpreting official statements from Pyongyang.
Have the South’s dialogue efforts failed?
Last weekend, South Korea’s army said it had detected some of the speakers in the North being removed after the South took a similar measure regarding the loudspeakers used for K-pop and news reports in a bid to ease tensions between Seoul and Pyongyang.
In response to the North’s alleged removal of the speakers, liberal South Korean President Lee Jae Myung voiced hopes of “reopening dialogue and communications” between the two rivalled countries.
The North’s response, however, was a cold shoulder.
“We have clarified on several occasions that we have no will to improve relations with the (South),” Kim said, adding that this position will become “fixed” in North Korea’s constitution in the future.
How do Iraqis cope in fiery summer heat, especially during power outages? They use private generators, which are now essential in Iraq. But the huge machines you see on every city block have plenty of drawbacks too.
As much as 20% of Iraqis’ power is provided by private generators, such as this one in Baghdad.Image: Sabah Arar/AFP/Getty Images
This week, when Iraq experienced an almost-nationwide power outage, the streets of Baghdad and other major cities went dark, with only lights from passing cars illuminating the sidewalks.
The Middle Eastern nation is currently experiencing peak summer temperatures — it was around 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit) in Baghdad during the blackout, and even hotter elsewhere — and the power outage saw many locals turn to the equipment they always fall back on at times like this: private generators.
“Thank you for your service,” one poetic Baghdad local addressed those who maintain the city’s private generators in a post on Facebook. They are “the heroes of the hour,” he enthused. “Unknown soldiers fighting the good fight during national power outages, enduring heat and smell, so that the pulse of life may beat on in Iraqi homes.”
The private generators he is praising so effusively can be found almost every couple of city blocks in Baghdad and other Iraqi cities. It is estimated there are over 4.5 million of them around the country. The ones that power whole suburban streets are industrial-sized, usually about the size of a van, parked between houses, under some sort of corrugated iron roof.
Iraq’s power grid outdated, inefficient
The Iraqi national grid is outdated and loses somewhere between 40% and 50% of power produced as it transmits. Additionally, hotter summers, population growth and growing use of equipment like air conditioners makes it impossible for the national grid to keep up with demand. Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity says the country needs between 50,000 and 55,000 megawatts during peak hours at the height of summer. The national grid can only supply around 27,000 megawatts.
The reason for this week’s outage remains unclear, although some officials said it may have been caused by excess demand in southern Iraq, likely due to over 20 million pilgrims flocking there for the religious holiday of Arbaeen. This then caused a chain reaction further north.
But even on better days, Iraq’s state power plants usually only provide between eight and 12 hours of power a day. Which is why most Iraqis who can afford it, pay a subscription to their local generator owner.
“Unreliable supply from the national grid has made private generation a critical, though problematic, part of Iraq’s electricity ecosystem,” the Baker Institute for Public Policy, based at Rice university in Texas, explained in a July 2025 report on Iraq’s electricity woes. “Each household or business has a separate connection — known as al-khat (the line) — to a nearby private generator that supplies electricity to those within a small radius when Iraq’s national grid goes down.”
The generator owners sell power to residents on a subscription basis, based on how many amperes a household wants, rather than the actual amount of power used. Prices differ around the country but the average cost per ampere is around $8.40 (€7.21), a January 2025 report published in the journal “Renewable Energies,” found. That means most households end up paying around $100 (€86) a month for generator power.
“The household’s connection is wired to the generator through a circuit breaker set to that threshold of amperes,” Baker Institute experts explained further. “This means that the breaker will trip whenever current drawn exceeds the agreed limit, completely disconnecting the customer.”
Most Iraqis are used to that. When state power drops out, Khadija al-Ameri, an engineering student living in southern Baghdad, explains how she turns off all unnecessary appliances, like the washing machine, but leaves others, like the fridge, going. “The generator voltage can’t have too many things going at once, and it’s also more expensive,” she explains.
“I pay around €40 a month for a private generator subscription,” says Fatimah Mahmoud, a 50-year-old teacher from Basra. “But it only covers the fridge, TV, fans, and lights. No air conditioning.”
Previous studies on the generator business in Iraq, which is unregulated, concluded that locals could be spending over $4 billion on it annually. It’s a lucrative business, with documented links to politicians and militia leaders, the so-called “generator mafia.”
And in the current summer heat, it’s also essential.
Private generators the only option
On Tuesday afternoon, shortly after he returned home from work, the power went out, Murtadha Saad, a 35-year-old local of the southern Iraqi city of Basra, told DW.
“I had returned home just an hour earlier from my job in the engineering sector under a scorching sun, but the blackout forced me to leave [home] quickly in search of a place to escape the heat,” he explains.
Saad himself pays around €66 monthly for generator-provided power, but he doesn’t have enough amperes to power air conditioning. So he ended up sitting in a cafe that had its own generator.
“Exhausted, I decided to go back home, only to find the streets nearly empty, houses in darkness, as if we were in a ghost town,” Saad recounts. “I sat in my car, using its air conditioning until 9 p.m., then tried to find another cafe or restaurant, only to discover they were all packed with families.”
In the inner city, the streets were crowded, he noted, because everyone was searching for a place with working air conditioning.
Hotels and restaurants often have their own larger, diesel generators but some individual Iraqi households also use smaller petrol-powered generators.
“When the power went out, I went searching for gasoline to fuel our small home generator,” Mohammed Basheer, 21, a university student from Basra, says. “But even finding fuel became difficult as panicked residents rushed to buy up all the supplies.”
Basheer says he eventually managed to buy two liters, barely enough to run his family’s fan for a short time. It’s not much of a solution in Basra’s increasingly hot summers, he admits.
While China also purchases Russian oil, Bolton pointed out that Beijing faced no such tariffs. “India is the one government to have suffered from Trump’s effort to get a ceasefire in Ukraine,” he noted.
Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has accused Donald Trump of needlessly antagonising India
Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has accused Donald Trump of needlessly antagonising India, calling the steep tariffs imposed on New Delhi “a mistake in the bilateral relationship.”
The ex-Trump aide’s remarks came after President Trump hit India with some of the highest US tariffs — 50% overall, including a 25% penalty for buying Russian oil. Bolton argued this approach was “backward” and “damaging” to ties between the two nations.
Trump defended his decision, claiming India was helping Moscow prolong its war in Ukraine. “India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don’t care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine,” he wrote on Truth Social.
While China also purchases Russian oil, Bolton pointed out that Beijing faced no such tariffs or secondary sanctions. “India is the one government to have suffered from Trump’s effort to get a ceasefire in Ukraine,” he noted.
Trump, who briefly engaged in a tariff battle with China in April, at one point imposing rates of up to 145%, has since held back on further escalation with Beijing. India, however, became the prime target of his latest trade salvo.
Earlier in the day Trump lashed out at news outlets for unfairly covering his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. He said that the media will criticise him even if he got “Moscow and Leningrad free”, as a part of the deal with Russia.
He continued to attack outlets promoting quotes from former officials who have now turned into critics, and called John Bolton “dumb”, who had labelled the summit as a “great victory for Putin”.
Speaking to NDTV, Bolton warned that repairing the fallout from the tariffs would take time. “When you make a mistake as big as the way the White House has ended up treating India over the past 30 days, it takes a long time to restore trust and confidence,” he said.
Bolton also took a jab at Trump by referencing Pakistan. Underlining how Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s government and Army chief Asim Munir are “figuring out a better way to play Trump,” he said: “My only suggestion to PM Modi is he could offer to nominate Trump twice for a Nobel peace prize.”
Taylor Swift’s new era has officially been unlocked.
After shocking fans with the announcement of “The Life of a Showgirl” earlier this week, the pop star shared all the details on what fans can expect from her upcoming 12th studio album during her guest appearance on the “New Heights” podcast.
“I wanted to do an album that was so focused on quality and on the theme, and everything fitting together like a perfect puzzle,” she told co-hosts Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce during the episode, which dropped Wednesday.
“I feel like we achieved that, and I’m really happy about that.”
Taylor Swift has officially made her debut on the “New Heights” podcast, co-hosted by her boyfriend, Travis Kelce, and his brother, Jason Kelce. New Heights Podcast
During the podcast, Swift, 35, shared the stunning new artwork for her highly anticipated album, along with the official release date: Oct. 3.
“This album is about what was going on behind the scenes in my inner life during this [Eras] Tour, which was so exuberant and electric and vibrant,” she explained on “New Heights,” noting that there will be 12 tracks, all of which are “bangers” that she created while touring in Europe.
“It just comes from, like, the most infectiously joyful, wild, dramatic place I was in, in my life. And so that effervescence has come through on this record … this is the record I’ve been wanting to make for a very long time.”
Swift clarified that the album tackles “everything that was going on behind the curtain” during her record-breaking Eras Tour, which kicked off March 17, 2023, and ran through Dec. 8, 2024.
“My main goals were melodies that were so infectious that you’re almost angry at it, and lyrics that are just as vivid, but crisp, and focused and completely intentional,” she teased, noting that the artwork represents the “end” of what her nights looked like after “jumping through 50 million hoops” from one show to the next.
“This album isn’t really about what happened to me on stage, it’s about what I was going through off stage … it’s the life, behind it all; the life beyond the show.”
The official track list includes songs like “Elizabeth Taylor,” “Father Figure,” “Eldest Daughter,” and “Ruin the Friendship,” along with the title track, “The Life of a Showgirl,” featuring Sabrina Carpenter.
“Every single song is on this album for hundreds of reasons. You couldn’t take one out and it be the same album, you couldn’t add one; it’s just right,” Swift explained to Travis and Jason.
“That focus, and that kind of discipline, with creating an album and keeping the bar really high, is something I’ve been wanting to do for a very long time.”
“TLOAS” follows “The Tortured Poets Department,” which Swift released in April 2024. It also marks her first album since officially buying back her masters in May.
Leading up to the announcement, Swift teased fans with a countdown clock on her website, which featured mint green text over a glittery orange background. She also changed the logos on her social media platforms to a picture of a sparkly orange lock.
Eagle-eyed Swifties previously pointed out that the singer had seemingly been teasing this new “era” for quite a while.
In her “The Eras Tour Book,” published last year, for example, Swift reflected on the “most wondrous tour of [her] life” in a message to fans — before signing it off with, “See you next era…“
Additionally, fans picked up on Swift’s new producing team ahead of Wednesday’s “New Heights” debut.
While Jack Antonoff has famously been Swift’s go-to producer and co-songwriter in recent years, the singer confirmed on the podcast that she teamed up with “geniuses” Max Martin and Shellback (real name: Karl Schuster) for her latest project.
“The three of us have made some of my favorite songs that I’ve ever done before,” Swift explained of her creative decision on the podcast. “They were my main collaborators on my ‘Red’ album … we’ve made songs that I’m so proud of … [and doing this] felt like catching lightning in a bottle, honestly.”
Swifties speculated that “TLOAS” would be a major departure from the singer’s last few albums when a curated Spotify playlist, titled “And, baby, that’s show business for you,” was released Tuesday.
All 22 of the songs featured — including “Bad Blood,” “End Game” and “Shake It Off” — were exclusively produced by Martin and Shellback.
At the time, Martin also re-shared a ton of speculative posts about his alleged involvement on “TLOAS” via his various social media accounts.
A worker operates a sheepsfoot roller at Subang Smartpolitan area amid growing interest from Chinese investors to relocate their factories to Southeast Asia, including Indonesia, to shield themselves from the hefty U.S. import tariffs, in Subang, West Java Province, Indonesia, June 13, 2025. REUTERS/Ajeng Dinar Ulfiana Purchase Licensing Rights
Gao Xiaoyu, the founder of an industrial land consulting firm in Jakarta, has been inundated with calls from Chinese companies eager to expand or set up operations in Indonesia as they try to shield themselves from the United States’ hefty import tariffs.
The 19% U.S. tariff rate for goods from Indonesia is the same as for Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand, and just below Vietnam’s 20%. China’s rates currently exceed 30%.
But Indonesia, Southeast Asia’s biggest economy and the world’s fourth most populous country, has an edge over its neighbours – the potential of its vast consumer market.
“We are quite busy these days. We have meetings from morning till night,” said Gao, who set up her company PT Yard Zeal Indonesia in 2021 with four employees and now has more than 40.
“The industrial parks are also very busy.”
Indonesia’s economy expanded at a better-than-expected 5.12% in the second quarter, the fastest pace in two years, government data showed last week.
“If you can establish a strong business presence in Indonesia, you’ve essentially captured half of the Southeast Asian market,” said Zhang Chao, a Chinese manufacturer who sells motorcycle headlights in Indonesia, the world’s third biggest market for motorbikes.
Vietnam and Thailand were among the major beneficiaries of the first wave of Chinese companies’ overseas diversification, but amid the latest trade turmoil with the United States, other near neighbours are benefiting.
“There has always been a synergy … with Chinese corporates having the confidence to set up shop with ease in Indonesia,” said Mira Arifin, the Indonesia country head at Bank of America. “Indonesia has a huge talent pool with a dynamic young demographic that encourages foreign investors to rapidly build scale in the country.”
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has championed China ties, visiting Beijing in November where he held talks with President Xi Jinping and welcoming the Chinese Premier Li Qiang to Jakarta in May.
Investment from China and Hong Kong into Indonesia was up 6.5% year-on-year to $8.2 billion in the first six months of 2025. Total FDI grew 2.58% over the same period to 432.6 trillion rupiah ($26.56 billion), and the government has said it expects more investments in the second half of the year.
MASSIVE CONSUMER MARKET
To be sure, challenges persist across Indonesia, including regulatory hurdles, bureaucratic red tape, ownership restrictions, deficient infrastructure and the lack of a complete industrial supply chain that made China the “workshop of the world” for decades.
Some foreign investors have also raised concerns about the populist Prabowo’s fiscal prudence, as he pushes ahead with his campaign promises, including a flagship programme to deliver free meals to schoolchildren and pregnant women.
After falling in March to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar since June 1998, the rupiah has steadied. It is currently trading about 1% below its level at the end of last year.
At the sprawling, more than 2,700 hectare (6,672 acres) Subang Smartpolitan industrial park in West Java, executives said it had been inundated with enquiries from Chinese investors.
“Our phone, email and WeChat were immediately busy with new customers, agents wanting to introduce clients,” once the U.S.-Indonesia trade deal was announced last month, said Abednego Purnomo, vice-president for sales, marketing and tenant relations of Suryacipta Swadaya, Subang Smartpolitan’s operator.
“Coincidentally, all of them were from China.”
Companies ranging from toy makers and textile firms to electric vehicle makers are scouring for facilities, particularly in West Java, the most populous province in Indonesia, which is home to the Patimban deep sea port.
Chinese demand has pushed up prices of industrial real estate and warehouses by 15% to 25% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2025, the fastest rise in 20 years, according to Gao, from the land consulting firm.
Rivan Munansa, the head of industrial and logistics services at the Indonesian arm of global property consultant Colliers International said that there was an urgency among Chinese firms to move and the company was getting inquiries for industrial land “almost every day” in the run-up to the tariff agreement.
“Most of them (Chinese companies) are looking for immediate opportunities. So, they want land and a temporary building that can be used immediately, it’s like a crash programme,” Rivan said.
Zhang said he signed up for a new four-floor office building in Jakarta in May at an annual rent of 100,000 yuan ($13,936), up 43% from last year, underscoring the pent-up demand.
“The 19% level is lower than my expectation. I thought it would be 30%,” Zhang said, referring to Indonesia’s tariff deal and adding that net profit margins in China could be as little as 3%.
“In Indonesia, it’s relatively easy to achieve net profit margins of 20% to 30%.”
Mamta Pathak (right) was sentenced to life for killing her husband Neeraj (left) by electrocution
“Are you a chemistry professor?” the judge asked.
“Yes,” Mamta Pathak replied, clasping her hand in a respectful namaste.
Draped in a white sari, glasses perched on her nose, the retired college teacher stood before two judges in a courtroom in the central Indian state of Madhya Pradesh, speaking as if delivering a forensic chemistry lecture.
“In the post-mortem,” she argued, her voice trembling but composed, “it is not possible to differentiate between a thermal burn and an electric burn mark without proper chemical analysis.”
Across the bench, Justice Vivek Agarwal reminded her, “The doctor who conducted the post-mortem said there were clear signs of electrocution.”
It was a rare, almost surreal moment – a 63-year-old woman, accused of murdering her husband by electrocution, explaining to the court how acids and tissue reactions revealed the nature of a burn.
The exchange, caught on video during her April hearing, went viral in India and stunned the internet. But in the court, no amount of expert-like confidence could undo the prosecution’s case – a spouse murdered and a motive rooted in suspicion and marital discord.
Last month the High Court dismissed Mamta Pathak’s appeal and upheld her life sentence for the April 2021 murder of her husband, Neeraj Pathak, a retired physician.
While Pathak mounted a spirited, self-argued defence – invoking gaps in the autopsy, the insulation of the house, and even an electrochemical theory – the court found the circumstantial evidence conclusive: she had drugged her husband with sleeping pills and then electrocuted him.
In court, Mamta, a mother of two, had peered over a stack of overflowing case files, leafing through them before she grew animated.
“Sir, electric burn marks can’t be distinguished as ante-mortem [before death] or post-mortem [after death],” she argued quoting from a forensics book.
“How did they [doctors] write it was an electric burn mark in post-mortem [report]?”.
Microscopically, electrical burns look the same before and after death, making standard examination inconclusive, say experts. A close study of dermal changes may reveal whether a burn was ante- or post-mortem, according to one paper.
An impromptu exchange on chemical reactions followed, with the judge probing her on laboratory processes. Mamta spoke about different acids, explaining that distinctions could be made using an electron microscope – something not possible in a post-mortem room. She tried to walk the judge through electron microscopy and different acids. Three women lawyers in the background smiled.
Mamta ploughed on – she said she had been studying law in prison for a year. Flipping through her tabbed files with stickers and quoting from forensic medicine books, she pointed to alleged gaps in the investigation – from the unexamined crime scene to the absence of qualified electrical and forensic experts at the scene of the crime.
“Our house was insured from 2017 to 2022, and inspections confirmed it was protected against electrical fire,” she said.
Mamta told the court that her husband had high blood pressure and heart disease. She stated the actual cause of death was narrowing and “calcification of his coronary arteries due to old age”. She also suggested he may have slipped and sustained a hematoma, but no CT scan was conducted to confirm this.
Neeraj Pathak, 65, had been found dead at the family home on 29 April 2021. The autopsy ruled electrocution as the cause of death. Days later, Mamta had been arrested and charged with murder.
Police had seized an 11-meter electric wire with a two-pin plug, and CCTV footage from the couple’s house. Six tablets of a sleeping pill were recovered in a strip of 10.
The postmortem report cited cardiorespiratory shock from electrical current at multiple sites as the cause of death, occurring 36 to 72 hours before the autopsy conducted on 1 May.
“But they didn’t find my fingerprints on the strip of tablets,” Mamta told the judges.
But her arguments quickly unravelled, leaving Judges Agarwal and Devnarayan Sinha unconvinced.
For nearly four decades, Mamta and Neeraj Pathak had lived a seemingly orderly middle-class life in Chhatarpur – a drought-prone district of Madhya Pradesh known for its farms, granite quarries, and small businesses.
She taught chemistry at the local government college; he was the chief medical officer at the district hospital. They raised two sons – one settled abroad, the other, sharing a home with his mother. Neeraj retired voluntarily in 2019 after 39 years as a government doctor and then opened a private clinic at home.
The incident happened during the pandemic. Neeraj was showing Covid symptoms and kept to the first floor. Mamta and her son, Nitish, stayed downstairs. Two staircases from the ground floor linked Neeraj’s rooms to the open gallery and waiting hall of his private clinic, where half a dozen staff bustled between the lab and the medical store.
The 97-page judgment stated that Mamta reported finding her husband Neeraj unresponsive in his bed on 29 April, but did not inform a doctor or the police until 1 May. Instead, she took her elder son to Jhansi – over 130km away – without clear reason, according to the driver, and returned the same evening. She claimed ignorance about how he died when she finally alerted the police.
Beneath this silence lay a troubled marriage. The judges highlighted longstanding marital discord, with the couple living apart and Mamta suspecting her husband of infidelity.
On the morning of the day he died,, Neeraj had called an associate, alleging that Mamta was “torturing him,” locking him in a bathroom, withholding food for days, and causing physical injuries. He also accused her of taking cash, ATM cards, vehicle keys, and bank fixed deposit documents. Pleading for help, Neeraj’s son contacted a friend who alerted the police, who then rescued the retired doctor from what was described as “Mamta’s custody”.
The couple had even lived apart in recent times, adding weight to the court’s doubts.
Mamta had told the court she was the “best mother,” presenting a birthday card from her children as proof. She also showed photos of herself feeding her husband and snapshots with family.
Yet, the judges were unmoved. They noted that such tokens of affection didn’t erase motive – after all, a “doting mother” can also be a “suspicious wife,” they said.
Fifty minutes into her deposition, after parrying questions and defending herself against the court’s doubts, Mamta’s composure faltered for the first time.
“I know one thing… I did not kill him,” she said, her voice trailing off.
At another moment, she confessed, “I can’t take this very much more.”
Trying to ease the tension, Judge Agarwal remarked, “You must be used to this… you must be taking classes for 50 minutes in college.”
“Forty minutes, sir. But they are small children,” Mamta said.
“Small children in college? But your designation is assistant professor,” the judge pressed.
Hailed by some as a hero and scorned by others as a traitor, Hong Kong’s pro-democracy media tycoon Jimmy Lai is in the final stage of his national security trial.
Closing arguments were scheduled to start on Thursday for Lai, who is accused of colluding with foreign forces under a Beijing-imposed national security law.
But the hearing has now been postponed by a “black” rainstorm warning – Hong Kong’s highest level of warning – as a typhoon swept the city.
The trial has drawn international attention, with UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for Lai’s release. The 77-year-old has British as well as Chinese citizenship – though China does not recognise dual nationality, and therefore considers Lai to be exclusively Chinese.
Lai has been detained since December 2020 and faces a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if he is convicted.
Critics say Lai’s case shows how Hong Kong’s legal system has been weaponised to silence political opposition.
Lai has been a persistent thorn in China’s side. Unlike other tycoons who rose to the top in Hong Kong, Mr Lai became one of the fiercest critics of the Chinese state and a leading figure advocating democracy in the former British territory.
“I’m a born rebel,” he told the BBC in an interview in 2020, hours before he was charged. “I have a very rebellious character.”
Lai is on trial for breaching national security and colluding with foreign forces
He is the most prominent person charged under the controversial national security law which China introduced in 2020, in response to massive protests which erupted in Hong Kong the year before.
The legislation criminalises a wider range of dissenting acts which Beijing considers subversion and secession, among other things.
Beijing says the national security law is necessary to maintain stability in Hong Kong but critics say it has effectively outlawed dissent.
Over the years, Lai’s son Sebastien has called for his release. In February, the younger Lai urged Starmer and US President Donald Trump to take urgent action, adding that his father’s “body is breaking down”.
Ahead of Lai’s trial on Thursday, Sebastien told the BBC that even if his father got just five years in prison, it was “practically the same as a death penalty.”
“Given his age, given his health, yeah. He will die in prison,” he said.
Sebastien added that Lai’s case was “crucial for China-UK relations”. If Lai died, it would show that “as a nation [the UK] we didn’t stand up for one of our bravest when it mattered”, he said.
Rags to riches
Lai was born in Guangzhou, a city in southern China, to a wealthy family that lost everything when the communists took power in 1949.
He was 12 years old when he fled his village in mainland China, arriving in Hong Kong as a stowaway on a fishing boat.
While working odd jobs and knitting in a small clothing shop he taught himself English. He went from a menial role to eventually founding a multi-million dollar empire including the international clothing brand Giordano.
The chain was a huge success. But when China sent in tanks to crush pro-democracy protests in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in 1989, Lai began a new journey as a vocal democracy activist as well as an entrepreneur.
He started writing columns criticising the massacre that followed the demonstrations in Beijing and established a publishing house that went on to become one of Hong Kong’s most influential.
As China responded by threatening to shut his stores on the mainland, leading him to sell the company, Lai launched a string of popular pro-democracy titles that included Next, a digital magazine, and the widely read Apple Daily newspaper.
In a local media landscape increasingly fearful of Beijing, Lai had been a persistent critic of Chinese authorities both through his publications and writing.
This has seen him become a hero for many in Hong Kong, who view him as a man of courage who took great risks to defend the freedoms of the city.
But on the mainland he is viewed as a “traitor” who threatens Chinese national security.
In recent years, masked attackers firebombed Lai’s house and company headquarters. He was also the target of an assassination plot.
But none of the threats stopped him from airing his views robustly. He was a prominent part of the city’s pro-democracy demonstrations and was arrested twice in 2021 on illegal assembly charges.
When China passed Hong Kong’s new national security law in June 2020, Lai told the BBC it sounded the “death knell” for the territory.
The influential entrepreneur also warned that Hong Kong would become as corrupt as China. Without the rule of law, he said, its coveted status as a global financial hub would be “totally destroyed”.
The media mogul is known for his frankness and acts of flamboyance.
In 2021, he urged Donald Trump to help the territory, saying he was “the only one who can save us” from China. His newspaper, Apple Daily, published a front-page letter that finished: “Mr President, please help us.”
For Lai, such acts were necessary to defend the city which had taken him in and fuelled his success.
He once told news agency AFP: “I came here with nothing, the freedom of this place has given me everything… Maybe it’s time I paid back for that freedom by fighting for it.”
Lai has been slapped with various charges – including unauthorised assembly and fraud – since 2020.
Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi’s central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of “a new era of development” late last year. The speech was more than symbolic— it signaled the launch of what could be Vietnam’s most ambitious economic overhaul in decades.
Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia’s next “tiger economy” — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan.
The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There’s added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam’s trade surplus with the U.S., a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory.
In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385.
Vietnam’s transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing and it faces a growing obstacle to its proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections and investing in technology and green energy — from climate change.
“It’s all hands on deck. . . . We can’t waste time anymore,” said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners.
The export boom can’t carry Vietnam forever
Investment has soared, driven partly by U.S.-China trade tensions, and the U.S. is now Vietnam’s biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands.
Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46% U.S. import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20% levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid U.S. trade restrictions.
During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam’s focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former U.S. ambassador to Vietnam. “As long as they’re in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome,” he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed.
Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump’s tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the “middle-income trap,” when economies tend to plateau without major reforms.
To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory.
But Vietnam’s economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can’t rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage.
It needs to make “multiple big bets,” McClellan said.
Vietnam’s game plan
Following China’s lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang.
It’s also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours.
Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes.
Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam’s 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools.
Private business to take the lead
Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past.
In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the “most important force” in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies.
So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam’s exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter.
“The private sector remains heavily constrained,” said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore’s ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Again emulating China, Vietnam wants “national champions” to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding.
By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms.
A Closing Window from climate change
Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action.
After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans.
Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. “If the whole world will decide it’s a priority…it can go very fast,” said Jaspaert.
When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15% off Vietnam’s GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country’s economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry.
Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn’t take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5% of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank.
Ian’s Ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, Kazem Gharibabadi, waits for the start of the IAEA board of governors meeting at the International Center in Vienna, Austria, Nov. 21, 2019. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak, File)
The top diplomats of Britain, France, and Germany threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran as an end-of-the-month deadline nears for the country to resume negotiations with the West over its nuclear program and cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog.
The three countries, known as the E3, wrote in a letter to the United Nations dated Friday that they were willing to trigger a process known as the “snapback” mechanism, which allows one of the Western parties to reimpose U.N. sanctions, if Tehran doesn’t comply with its requirements.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted the letter Wednesday to X. He co-signed it along with top diplomats from Germany and the United Kingdom.
“E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon,” the letter said. “We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism.”
The Iranian government didn’t immediately respond to the development, but parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki — who was Iran’s top diplomat for five years in the 2000s — warned of a swift reaction to any move to trigger the snapback mechanism.
He said the Iranian parliament has a “finger on the trigger” for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT, the international treaty aimed at halting the spread of nuclear weapons. “We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal,” if the E3 raises the issue at the U.N. Security Council, Mottaki said.
The letter from the E3 comes following a period of apparent diplomatic deadlock after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, where Israeli and American jets struck some key nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic.
The countries met with Iranian officials last month in Turkey at Iran’s consulate building in Istanbul on the possibility of reimposing international sanctions, lifted in 2015 in exchange for Tehran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said at the time that he hoped that the meeting would see the E3 nations reassess their “previous unconstructive attitude.”
Since the war, talks with Washington for a new nuclear deal haven’t resumed, and Iran has since suspended ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, following the attacks. The IAEA’s first visit to Iran since the war didn’t entail any visits to nuclear facilities Monday, and cooperation wasn’t officially restored.
One of the three countries opting to trigger the snapback mechanism would renew sanctions on Iran, but Tehran renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and addressing concerns about its highly-enriched uranium stockpile would delay it, according to a diplomat who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity following July’s meeting in Istanbul.
Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume.
German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher on Wednesday said that the letter “once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed.”
“Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy … and full cooperation with the IAEA,” he told reporters at a regular news conference in Berlin.
With the rise of electric vehicles, Thailand has scrambled to adjust to the new realities of fast-shifting production chains and destabilising geopolitics, though observers say it may have turned the corner.
Electric cars are pictured inside BYD’s electric vehicle (EV) factory in Rayong, Thailand in 2024. (Photo: Reuters/Chalinee Thirasupa)
On a taxi ride from Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi Airport to the city centre, signs of shifts in the country’s auto industry are hard to miss.
The airport taxi is likely to be a battery electric vehicle (BEV) or a hybrid (HEV), and multiple giant billboards flanking the motorway advertise an array of such marques from China.
Thailand has long been a regional powerhouse for automaking, driven by its deep connections to legacy Japanese brands like Toyota, Nissan and Honda, all of which have operated manufacturing and export bases in the kingdom for decades.
But the industry, dominated by these carmakers that manufacture more internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles that run on fuel than hybrids in Thailand, is being reshaped, analysts told CNA.
With the rise of battery-powered vehicles, the country has scrambled to adjust to the new realities of fast-shifting production chains, softening local demand and destabilising geopolitics.
“This is a big headache for Thailand,” said Patarapong Intarakumnerd, the deputy programme director of the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Programme at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo.
United States President Donald Trump’s high tariffs on the global automotive sector has sent exporters scrambling to find new markets and made them cautious about the medium-term outlook for the sector.
Thailand, which was facing a 36 per cent levy on its goods, now faces a rate of 19 per cent as well as additional tariffs on the auto sector.
Its domestic vehicle production numbers, which declined for 21 consecutive months up until April this year, were a sign of the struggle.
But the country’s industry is showing nascent signs it may have found a new gear – latest data showed a 10.32 and 11.98 per cent increase in car production in May and June respectively, compared to the same months in 2024.
The positive numbers are “signs of recovery” for a cornerstone industry that contributes about 10 to 11 per cent of Thailand’s gross domestic product and directly employs approximately 850,000 people, said Koketso Tsoai, an automobiles analyst at BMI, a country risk and industry analysis company.
“While the industry has faced considerable headwinds, there are clear indications of resilience and strategic reorientation, particularly in the EV segment,” he said.
Much of the growth over the past two months has been due to EVs like the ones advertised along Bangkok motorways.
In June, Thailand manufactured 3,304 BEV units, a 314 per cent increase from last year. In May, the numbers were even stronger: 6,411 units, up 641 per cent year-on-year. Still, only 4.6 per cent of those were BEVs in May.
The spikes in the last two months could be the broader trend going forward, according to Narit Therdsteerasukdi, Secretary General of the Thailand Board of Investment.
“We expect automotive production in Thailand to continue to expand with fully electric and hybrid models leading the growth,” he said.
STUCK BETWEEN GIANTS
The Thai auto industry’s struggles in recent years stem from its longstanding ties with Japanese carmarkers, which have lost ground to Chinese companies leading the global EV push.
Japanese carmakers have deep roots in Thailand. They forged an industry that essentially did not exist in the country and moulded it into a hub of reliability and continental distribution in the heart of Southeast Asia.
What followed was decades of investment, strong supplier networks for ICE vehicles and process-driven excellence and training for local workers.
These have strengthened ties between the two countries and ensured the region has remained part of Japan’s backyard ever since, said Patarapong.
But it also left Thailand vulnerable – Japan’s reluctance to embrace electric batteries has flowed through to Thailand’s own inertia on EV production, he said.
“Thailand is very sticky to the Japanese. Many of the policies they’ve had or have are to take care of Japanese interests. But the Japanese, as we know, move very slowly,” Patarapong said.
“If they don’t want to move fast, you cannot move that fast.”
Most of Japan’s large players opted to slowly develop the hybrid technology the country pioneered, initially popularised by the Toyota Prius in the 1990s.
The rise of the cheap EVs from China has fundamentally changed the game.
Thailand is having to balance its longstanding Japanese relationships with the aggressive expansion of Chinese firms, each with different expectations, timelines and lobbying strategies, Patarapong said.
In 2024, Chinese car brands accounted for roughly 40 per cent of new car sales in Asia and Oceania, including China itself. When it came to EV sales alone, Chinese-brand electric vehicles accounted for about 70 per cent of the market in Southeast Asia last year.
In Thailand, new car sales for Japanese brands Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Suzuki and Isuzu collectively dropped by a quarter, based on data from MarkLines, an automotive information provider.
A wave of Chinese vehicles is washing over the region, but capitalising on an industry shift characterised by shorter and more concentrated EV value chains has proven challenging for Thailand, said Pavida Pananond, a professor of international business at Thammasat University in Bangkok.
Unlike Japanese car companies, Chinese outfits are not known to cultivate local supplier networks, as they tend to be much more vertically integrated, she said.
It leaves less room for local players in Thailand, which may not be exposed to or experienced with battery production or software development, sophisticated processes necessary for EV production, she added.
“These are the items where we never had a supplier before, so we need to invite them now,” said Krisda Utamote, President of the Electric Vehicle Association of Thailand.
The issue has arisen now, though, where local demand is too low to justify investments in expensive ventures like battery production.
“It’s like a chicken-and-egg thing,” he said.
It means, Patarapong said, that Thailand faces the risk of losing the one major advantage it had over its regional competitors – the number of local parts suppliers and the expertise they carried.
With EVs requiring just a fraction of the parts that regular ICEs do, these parts firms are already facing major headwinds due to the US government’s 25 per cent tariffs on the automotive sector, on top of reciprocal tariffs of 19 per cent for exported Thai goods.
The US is Thailand’s top destination for auto parts, a trade worth US$1.4 billion last year. Thailand also had significant exports to Mexico, the primary market for the assembly of vehicles destined for American roads.
Thailand exported US$358.1 million worth of passenger vehicles to the US in 2024, only 2.93 per cent of its total global exports.
DRAWING CHINESE INVESTMENTS
The Thai government has been luring investment for local production by Chinese firms like BYD, Neta and Great Wall through its EV 3.0 scheme, which has evolved into the EV 3.5 scheme, and other incentives.
The scheme has a local EV production requirement, ratioed for foreign companies at 1:1.
This means those companies are required to produce one EV locally, for each EV they want to import into Thailand.
If a company wants to start manufacturing in 2025, that ratio is 1.5:1.These stipulations will gradually become more onerous, up to a 3:1 ratio by 2027.
It also provides subsidies to consumers who purchase BEVs up to THB100,000 (US$3,100) depending on vehicle type, and lowers import duties to boost domestic demand.
Government policy aims for 30 per cent of vehicles produced locally to be zero-emission ones by 2030, a target widely expected to be missed.
Those subsidies mean EVs are competitively priced in the domestic market. And oversupply from a constant pipeline of domestic production – mandated for companies under the EV 3.0 scheme – means Thais could put off purchasing knowing they could wait for prices to drop, said Krisda.
Total EV production in the pipeline right now is about 100,000 units, he said, “which is very high, because the total electric vehicle registration last year was about 76,000”.
“If I’m considering buying an electric vehicle, I would say, well, you have plenty of supply coming up very soon. So I would not rush. I would wait until you drop the price,” he said.
“That situation is not so healthy for any car manufacturer.”
Domestic sales have struggled due to broader economic concerns and declining consumer confidence. Sales in 2024 were 56 per cent lower than in 2019.
But they have improved by around 5 per cent in May and June, year-on-year, driven especially by BEVs and plug-in hybrids, competitively priced under government incentives that lower their excise tax and offer subsidies.
With more brands in the market, however, the market has become more competitive, said Krisda.
“The total size of the cake has not increased. But it’s being divided among many more players, new competitors, new brands to the market,” he said.
“So, each brand has to really fight to keep its market share within this shrinking cake that we are seeing.”
Foreign companies on the EV scheme had not been allowed to count vehicles manufactured and exported from Thailand as part of their local production quotas.
Instead, only EVs produced in Thailand and sold locally could be counted in the production quotas.
This means they have faced the dilemma of manufacturing more cars than the local market demanded, or being unable to import other models currently not built locally.
It has contributed to the glut of local supply and weakened export numbers.
But on Jul 31, Thailand’s National Electric Vehicle Policy Committee made amendments to that policy – vehicles built in Thailand and then exported will count towards the quota.
The flexibility, it said, could result in EV exports increasing to 52,000 units in 2026, up from only 12,500 this year.
It could be a major step to helping Thailand regain its place as a key regional manufacturing and export hub, like it was in the past, Krisda said.
“Exports play a much more important role in taking up the total capacity of production over many years and will still play a crucial role for us ahead,” he said.
While Thailand remains the 10th largest car producer in the world, the 1.47 million units it produced in 2024 were still below the pre-COVID-19 levels of 2019, when it produced 2.01 million units.
Thailand’s neighbours will not be slowing down in their own efforts to forge industries centred around EVs.
For Thailand, “the threats become more urgent as EVs become more significant”, Pavida said.
She noted that Indonesia is focusing more on the upstream industries like batteries and attracting investors on the back of a wealth of natural resources.
Vietnam, meanwhile, has pushed more assertively on the downstream with its own brands, unsaddled by the presence or demands of Japanese carmakers.
Thailand has sat in the middle for now, due to the legacy strength of its manufacturing, she said.
“It remains to be seen which country will come out as the winner.”
For Thailand, long mythified as the “Detroit of the East”, a comparison to the American city’s 20th-century legacy as the heart of the US auto industry, much is at stake.
Paetongtarn’s father, Thaksin Shinawatra, is also on trial and is due to hear his verdict on Aug 22 for a lese-majeste case.
Thailand’s Paetongtarn Shinawatra arrives at Government House for a Cabinet meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, Jul 1, 2025. (File photo: AP/Sakchai Lalit)
Thailand’s Constitutional Court announced Wednesday (Aug 13) that it will rule this month on a case seeking to oust Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra over her handling of a diplomatic spat with Cambodia.
A group of conservative senators filed a case accusing Paetongtarn of unprofessional conduct and breaching ministerial ethics during a border row with Cambodia that led to the two neighbours’ bloodiest military clashes in decades.
The Constitutional Court said in a statement that it will deliver its verdict in the case at 3pm local time on Aug 29.
Paetongtarn, daughter of controversial billionaire ex-PM Thaksin Shinawatra, took office less than a year ago when her predecessor was thrown out of office by the same court.
Suspended from her duties by the court last month, the 38-year-old has defended her actions, insisting she acted in the country’s interests.
In a leaked phone recording, Paetongtarn addressed Cambodian statesman Hun Sen as “uncle” during a call about the tensions and referred to a Thai military commander as her “opponent” – remarks that sparked a backlash.
Conservative lawmakers accuse her of kowtowing to Cambodia and undermining the military, and allege she breached constitutional provisions requiring “evident integrity” and “ethical standards” among ministers.
If the verdict goes against her, Paetongtarn would become the third Shinawatra to be ousted early as premier, after her father and aunt Yingluck – both thrown out in military coups.
Thai politics has been driven for two decades by a battle between the conservative, pro-military, pro-royalist elite and the Shinawatra clan, whom they consider a threat to the kingdom’s traditional social order.
Cities across China are ramping up their AI ambitions. But as competition intensifies, analysts urge them to play to their strengths – not blindly copy one another.
A boy and his grandmother look at a robot at the world’s first 6S store in Longgang district, Shenzhen, which aims to bring robots into everyday life. (Photo: CNA/Melody)
Drones zip through the air, swiftly picking up and dropping off orders like food and medicine. Robot taxis and driverless cars weave seamlessly in and out of traffic while life-sized “digital humans” guide commuters at busy metro stations.
This is everyday reality in Shenzhen, a vibrant tech hub at the forefront of the country’s artificial intelligence race. But this southern city is just one of several that’s vying for AI dominance.
Across the country, local governments are rolling out ambitious plans to position themselves as AI leaders.
Competition is fierce, analysts say, and success hinges on leveraging unique strengths. They warn that blindly copying other cities could backfire – even in a lucrative sector like AI – and caution against overinvestment without a clear, long-term strategy.
“Everybody wants to be ahead in the AI race but you have to … know where your strengths lie rather than trying to copy other cities and getting into the race blindly,” said Benjamin Cheong, deputy head of technology, media and telecommunications at law firm Rajah & Tann.
Other AI frontrunner cities include Beijing, Shanghai and Hangzhou.
Backed by substantial government support, Beijing is home to world-class AI research institutes and industrial parks. Its core AI industry is fast approaching 350 billion yuan (US$48.6 billion), nearly half of China’s total.
Shanghai, meanwhile, has leaned into its reputation as a global financial centre, hosting the annual World AI Conference (WAIC) in July and announcing 1 billion yuan in subsidies to help local firms and start-ups adopt AI solutions.
Also investing heavily is the unassuming city of Hangzhou located in eastern China, where firms like DeepSeek and Game Science, which produced the hit Black Myth: Wukong video game, make up a booming tech start-up scene.
But the big question is: can any of these cities become not just China’s AI capital – but the world’s?
THE FRONTRUNNERS
When it comes to Chinese tech advancements, Shenzhen might be one of the first cities that comes to mind.
Often dubbed the Silicon Valley of China, the city is renowned for its culture of rapid innovation.
It has been investing heavily in developing AI-powered humanoid robots capable of moving with precision and agility, performing tasks from patrolling streets to even competing in sports.
“From product design to market testing, turnaround is (quick),” said Lin Feng, CEO of Future Era, the world’s first “robot 6S” showroom and service store which recently opened in Shenzhen’s Longgang district.
Special grants and policies were announced in February to boost the city’s AI robotics scene, which included generous financial incentives of up to 4.5 billion yuan and subsidies to promote AI and encourage businesses to adopt the technology.
“Shenzhen will adopt even more ambitious and open policies, connecting global and national innovation resources,” Lin Yi, director of the Shenzhen AI Industry Office, told Chinese state media outlets.
In May, the Shenzhen Longgang District Artificial Intelligence (Robotics) Administration was launched – China’s first government agency dedicated solely to robotics.
“Our young engineers don’t just walk the well-trodden path, they carve (out) new ones,” said Zhao Bingbing, director of the Shenzhen Longgang District Artificial Intelligence (Robotics) Administration.
“This is the kind of place where components for a robot, upstream or downstream, can be sourced within an hour,” Zhao added.
Under a three-year action plan, more than 1,000 robot models – including humanoid assistants and “robot theatres” carrying out live tests and demonstrations – will be rolled out across public services, officials said.
Longgang District, best known as an industrial base housing companies like Huawei and EV giant BYD, launched a 10 billion yuan government procurement scheme, reserving 10 to 20 per cent of publicly funded projects for AI and robotics firms.
Chen Sanduo, founder of Lingqu AI Robotics, relocated to Shenzhen from Hunan province this year.
He told CNA that Shenzhen’s start-up environment was ideal.
“The upstream supply chain here is unmatched – parts, materials, motor customisation, even skin for robots,” he said, adding that his team was planning to open a second showroom in the city by the end of the year.
Robotaxi companies in the city are scaling up too. Pony.ai currently operates around 300 driverless-robotaxis and plans to expand its Shenzhen fleet to 1,000 in the coming years.
“We are at the dawn of large-scale commercialisation,” a Pony.ai spokesperson told CNA.
Beijing’s “high concentration of top-tier talent, world-class research institutions and role as China’s software hub” make it a strong frontrunner in China’s national AI race, said Ma Rui, a Chinese tech investor and analyst based in San Francisco.
“This combination has sustained momentum, giving it an unmatched edge in cutting-edge AI development and a talent pipeline difficult for other Chinese cities to replicate,” Ma said, calling Beijing “China’s AI capital”.
“It is home to leading universities and research institutes, with the strongest academic resources and a deep pool of algorithm talent,” noted Li Haizhou, a presidential chair professor of data science at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK-SZ).
Across the city, there are countless AI labs, dedicated AI research institutes and facilities like the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence and the flagship Zhongguancun Science Park.
Official statistics show that there are currently more than 2,400 registered AI companies and enterprises throughout the capital.
“In terms of AI investments, Beijing would be the top right now based on figures,” said Cheong from Rajah & Tann.
“It has money, the right R&D, is strong in research (and has) a long-established ecosystem for tech innovation,” he added.
“There’s a very big silicon valley in Beijing.”
Unlike Beijing’s research-heavy AI ecosystem, Shanghai has leveraged its reputation as a financial centre to forward its AI goals and ambitions, experts said.
“Shanghai’s strategic position at the heart of the Yangtze River Delta, combined with its global outlook, gives it a complete end-to-end industrial ecosystem – from R&D and manufacturing to supply chain and commercialization,” said Lu Yingxiang, co-founder and CEO of Infermove, a robotics firm whose bots have been deployed in office buildings, commercial parks, airports and residential households across the city.
Shanghai has different strengths, noted Cheong, adding that “it’s the centre of China’s modern financial industry, and has strong financial and international business links”.
Infrastructure has played a big role in Shanghai’s AI strategy. In 2021, it became the first city in the world to deploy a city-wide fully-optical network, supporting everything from industry and e-commerce to remote work and logistics.
“Shanghai brings together high-traffic, high-standard real-world application scenarios such as aviation hubs, international conventions … that provide (companies) with unparalleled conditions to validate and iterate our products,” Lu added.
Districts like Xuhui – home to the Shanghai Botanical Gardens, luxury malls and trendy cocktail bars – have transformed into vibrant AI hubs. Today, they host Shanghai-based AI companies generating substantial annual revenues.
By the end of Q1 this year, earnings exceeded 118 billion yuan – a 29 per cent year-on-year surge – with profits also rising 65 per cent, according to government data.
Shanghai hosted top industry players at its flagship WAIC event, which ran from Jul 26 to 28.
Also in the works are five planned major data centres and targeted AI subsidies amounting to 1 billion yuan, funding everything from computing power rental to data procurement.
On an official visit in April, Chinese President Xi Jinping called on Shanghai to speed up efforts to become a leading source of cutting-edge innovation and a globally influential tech hub.
“We need to intensify efforts to enhance policy support, nurture talent and strive to develop more high-quality, secure, and reliable AI products,” Xi said in quotes carried by the Xinhua news agency.
DARK HORSES
Smaller contender cities have also been gaining ground in China’s AI race, according to observers.
Hangzhou’s rise has been particularly striking, said Jeffrey Towson, a partner at Techmoat Consulting firm.
Beyond longstanding players like Alibaba, Hangzhou is also home to DeepSeek, Black Myth developer Game Science, robotics firms Unitree and DEEP Robotics, neurotechnology company BrainCo, and spatial intelligence firm ManyCore – the so-called “Six Little Dragons” making waves in the global tech scene.
More than 200 robotics-related companies have been registered in Hangzhou as of December 2024.
Hangzhou city officials also have ambitious plans for AI development in 2025.
The local government is offering subsidies of up to 60 per cent to help start-ups and companies.
Revenue from the city’s core AI sector is projected to surpass 390 billion yuan, with support for more than 700 key AI enterprises and high-impact applications across manufacturing, healthcare, and finance.
Hangzhou ranks highly alongside Beijing and even over Shenzhen in some AI city polls.
Its proximity to Shanghai, just a two-hour drive away, has also made it a magnet for spillover talent and fresh graduates seeking tech jobs.
“Hangzhou has traditionally been a strong tech centre started by Alibaba,” said Cheong.
“Then you have others like DeepSeek coming into the picture – building on a genuine base of technological strength and not just jumping onto the AI (bandwagon) because it’s popular.”
The Sichuan capital of Chengdu, traditionally known for pandas, mahjong and hotpot, is undergoing rapid technological evolution.
The city is now home to more than 1,000 registered AI firms and semiconductor companies like HiSilicon.
Chengdu’s AI sector crossed the 100 billion yuan mark in 2024, and is expected to reach 130 billion yuan this year, according to figures released by Chengdu’s Economic and Information Technology Bureau.
Chengdu leads in AI-powered healthcare and robotics, with breakthroughs such as surgical AI systems enabling remote operations and exoskeleton robots that help patients walk.
Yet it still has some way to go in catching up with major players like Beijing, Shenzhen and Shanghai.
To close the gap, Chengdu would need to attract more global tech names and focus on areas where it already has an edge, rather than trying to pivot into fields where it lacks a strong base, experts said.
“I think it’s not prudent for any city to ignore their traditional strengths and overly focus on AI solely for the reason that it’s the hot thing at the moment,” said Cheong from Rajah & Tann.
AI CAPITAL OF THE WORLD?
Analysts agree that no single city is leading China’s AI charge.
“Multiple cities are advancing in parallel,” said Ma, the tech investor based in San Francisco.
“The ambition across these hubs is inherently global, with a strong focus on exports and revenue from the outset.”
Others cautioned against cities entering the AI race blindly.
“China’s economy has slowed down in recent times … and the issue is (those) blindly investing in AI without even knowing whether (the local conditions) are stable or reliable in the long run,” said Cheong.
While local governments race to gain an edge in AI, the central government appears cautious about the risk of overinvestment in this field.
Xi criticised local governments for their “herd mentality” in launching new energy and AI projects, during the central urban work conference in July.
Addressing the attendees, Xi questioned why “whenever a project is proposed, it always involves a few things: artificial intelligence, computing power, new energy vehicles”.
“Does every province in the country have to develop industries in these directions?”
Xi’s blunt warning was published in People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s official newspaper.
According to Tom Nunlist, associate director for tech and data policy at Trivium China, the comments reflect a growing concern over an investment frenzy and the risk of overcapacity.
“I think at this point the risk of wasteful overinvestment is higher than underinvestment,” he said.
Experts describe China’s AI landscape as chaotic and fragmented – a reflection of a rapidly developing industry.
The AI landscape in China is “totally new”, said Towson from Techmoat Consulting firm.
“There’s action everywhere. Everyone is starting AI companies all over (China) and it’s just chaos.”
Others say China’s AI ambitions should not be confined to its borders.
Shenzhen, for example, shouldn’t just be the Chinese AI capital, said Zhao, director of the Shenzhen Longgang District Artificial Intelligence (Robotics) Administration.
First Lady Melania Trump has threatened to sue Hunter Biden for over $1 billion, accusing him of defamation after he claimed Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to President Trump. Her legal team demanded a retraction and apology by August 7. Biden missed the deadline, potentially setting the stage for a significant legal battle.
First Lady Melania Trump and Hunter Biden Photo : Twitter
First Lady Melania Trump has formally accused Hunter Biden of defamation and is threatening legal action over statements he made suggesting she was introduced to Donald Trump by Jeffrey Epstein. The claims were made in a recent YouTube interview and have triggered a sharp legal response.
What Did Hunter Biden Say?
In a video interview titled “Hunter Biden Returns”, posted in early August 2025 by Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan, Biden claimed, “Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep. He repeated this suggestion, stating, “Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, and that’s how Melania and the first lady and the President met.”
These claims appear to echo allegations previously published by journalist Michael Wolff and shared by The Daily Beast, allegations that have since been retracted.
Melania Trump’s Legal Response
On August 6, Melania Trump’s litigation counsel, Alejandro Brito, sent a cease-and-desist letter to Hunter Biden and his attorney, Abbe Lowell. The letter, obtained by Fox News Digital, demands an immediate retraction, public apology, and the preservation of all related records, including communications and files.
According to the letter, Brito accuses Biden of making “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory” statements with “actual malice” and no factual basis. The letter warns that failure to comply could result in a lawsuit seeking over $1 billion in damages, citing reputational and financial harm to the former First Lady.
Epstein Claims Previously Retracted
Brito noted that The Daily Beast retracted a related article based on Wolff’s claims after receiving a similar legal threat from Melania Trump’s legal team. The article alleged that Melania had a connection to Epstein through a modeling agent, which her team has firmly denied.
Despite the retraction, Brito said Biden “unjustifiably relied” on those already-discredited claims and “maliciously republished them.”
What Happens Next?
The letter gave Biden a deadline of August 7 at 5:00 PM EST to retract the statements and issue an apology. A source close to the matter told Fox News Digital that Biden did not comply. Instead, his team reportedly leaked the letter to a sympathetic journalist, a move the source says reveals Biden’s concern about potential liability.
Four officers were injured in a shooting on Homestead Drive in Gretna, Pittsylvania County. A large police response, including helicopters and multiple agencies, is underway.
Image used for representational purpose only. Photo : iStock
Four officers were reportedly injured in a shooting incident in Gretna, Pittsylvania County, on Wednesday. According to sources, someone fired shots through a house on Homestead Drive. Officials said none of the injuries are believed to be life-threatening, according to Southside News Today.
A large police response is underway, with helicopters deployed to assist. Multiple agencies are on the spot, including the Pittsylvania County Sheriff’s Office, Campbell County Sheriff’s Office, Amherst County Sheriff, Danville Police Department, Virginia State Troopers, Gretna Fire and Rescue, Hurt Fire Department, US Marshals, and a Centra medical helicopter, WDBJ 7 reported.
Early reports suggest that the suspect is barricaded. Meanwhile, Congressman John McGuire offered his condolences. In a post on X, he wrote, “My thoughts and prayers are with the deputies who were shot in Pittsylvania County, as well as their families. We are closely following the situation and keeping everyone affected in our hearts during this difficult time.”
My thoughts and prayers are with the deputies who were shot in Pittsylvania County, as well as their families. We are closely following the situation and keeping everyone affected in our hearts during this difficult time.https://t.co/oJqpWeG1yc
— Congressman John McGuire (@RepJohnMcGuire) August 14, 2025
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, then as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee, testifies at a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2025. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo/File Photo
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee, including ranking member Jamie Raskin (D-MD), demanded answers from Attorney General Pam Bondi after Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, was transferred to a “relatively luxurious minimum-security prison camp in Texas.”
In a letter to Bondi on Wednesday, Democrats noted that the Department of Justice had “inexplicably transferred” Maxwell after she met with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche for two days.
“The transfer follows Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s private interviews of Ms. Maxwell arranged after a firestorm of media attention about the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) refusal to release the full Epstein files as originally demanded by President Donald Trump,” the Democrats said. “These actions raise substantial concerns that the Administration may now be attempting to tamper with a crucial witness, conceal President Trump’s relationship with convicted sex offenders, and coax Ms. Maxwell into providing false or misleading testimony in order to protect the President.”
The DOJ and Bureau of Prisons may have also violated internal policies with the transfer, according to the lawmakers.
“We write to demand DOJ and BOP provide all documents and information related to Deputy Attorney General Blanche’s interview of Ms. Maxwell and the sudden decision to transfer her to a facility with lower security and greater freedom for inmates, which was, prior to this extraordinary transfer, categorically off limits to sex offenders,” the letter said. “It is imperative that the Administration come clean regarding the full scope of Mr. Blanche’s interview of Ms. Maxwell and the sudden decision to transfer her to a minimum-security prison camp.”
As tensions continue to grow by the day between the United States and NATO versus Russia, China, Iran and the BRICS aligned nations, the specter of World War III grows along with it. Last year, in the run-up to the 2024 Presidential election, tech giant and defense contractor Palantir CEO Alex Karp said that he thinks it is “very likely” the U.S. will be involved in a three-pronged war with Russia, China and Iran.
Karp admitted this in an interview with the New York Times in August of last year. The paper reported:
He thinks the United States is “very likely” to end up in a three-front war with China, Russia and Iran. So, he argues, we have to keep going full-tilt on autonomous weapons systems, because our adversaries will — and they don’t have the same moral considerations that we do.
“I think we’re in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might,” he said. “Where you have technological parity but moral disparity, the actual disparity is much greater than people think.”
“In fact,” he added, “given that we don’t have parity technologically but we don’t have parity morally, they have a huge advantage.”
Mr. Karp said that we are “very close” to terminator robots and at the threshold of “somewhat autonomous drones and devices like this being the most important instruments of war. You already see this in Ukraine.”
[…] “Are we tough enough to scare our adversaries so we don’t go to war? Do the Chinese, Russians and Persians think we’re strong? The president needs to tell them if you cross these lines, this is what we’re going to do, and you have to then enforce it.”
[…] He said he would support class-based affirmative action and declared himself “pro draft.”
“I think part of the reason we have a massive cleavage in our culture is, at the end of the day, by and large, only people who are middle- and working-class do all the fighting,” he said.
Karp is a bit of an enigma to some when it comes to his relationship with President Donald Trump and the company, since Karp is a socialist and progressive and voted for Biden in 2020 and backed VP Kamala Harris. At the same time, he has distanced himself politically from Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel, who is the polar opposite politically and a huge supporter of Trump.
Earlier this year, Trump came under heavy criticism when the New York Times revealed his administration contracted Palantir to collect all of Americans’ private and unique data to build a master database, building off of previous executive orders Trump signed that deregulates data sharing among federal agencies.
AUTHOR COMMENTARY
There is plenty of great research and reporting out there about Palantir and Peter Thiel, better research than I could ever provide. This video by Moon is a good, succinct video on how dystopian this company is, something worse than anything George Orwell penned down.
When you have the Palantir CEO coming out and saying he thinks the U.S. is going to go to war with Russia, China and Iran, he’s really saying we will, it’s a lock. I mean, we’re basically already at war with Russia: all Trump would have to do is seriously stop giving weapons and intelligence to Ukraine, order a systematic withdrawal, and let Europe deal with it; and since Europe can’t, as NATO is very dependent on the U.S., the war would eventually have to come to an end. But the U.S. is not and will not be. VP JD Vance, who is a literal puppet and plant of Palantir, has already said that the war in Ukraine “will not end anytime soon.” He was telling the truth this time.
But I think we understand that the illusion that we are only aiding Ukraine will cease eventually and that the war will ramp-up as Russia presses deeper into Ukraine.
Trump and Israel already got the ball rolling with Iran. We know that Iran has been a super important target for America and Israel for decades, salivating at the opportunity to topple their government, send it into chaos, and supplant a pro-Israeli and pro-American plant. But unlike the other Middle Eastern nations the U.S. has gutted and uprooted over the last number of decades, Iran is going to be more difficult, as Israel’s latest skirmish with them proved that Iran is much more powerful than I think the leaders in Israel realized, as their own defenses were shown to not be impregnable as they touted them to be. But there is no question that war WILL restart over there in short order. This latest “cease fire” is just a short break before it ignites again; especially now that Israel is moving to fully occupy Gaza, which will most likely require U.S. boots on the ground to pull-off that operation – an operation that is going to take a lot of time, money and lives…
As for China, we know their handlers have been ginning up for this war too; we’ve covered this a number of times. The propaganda is so obvious (to those not listening to the neocons and legacy media and controlled-op podcasts) that China is not a threat to us at all, nor does it have an imperialist history as implied by the neocons and warmongers. This trade war is only the beginning. We know that the seeds have been planted for a staged war in Taiwan for which the U.S. – though taciturn and two-faced in its messaging, from the Biden and Trump administrations – will pretend to stand for Taiwan and send them weapons when China gets the nod from its handlers to occupy Taiwan.
If Palantir CEO Alex Karp is saying we’re going to have a three-pronged war with Russia, China and Iran, we ought to believe him: they are one of the groups supplying the technology after all.
DOGE “drastically exaggerated” its government spending cuts and saved just a fraction of what they are boasting, a new deep-dive analysis from Politico found.
Politico’s Jessie Blaeser dove into public data and federal spending records for a report that accuses DOGE of using “faulty math” to overstate their massive savings calculations. According to the DOGE website, the agency estimates it saved more than $200 billion overall, which they say equates to more than $1,000 for every taxpayer. That total number comes from slashing workforces, cancelling contracts and grants, and more.
Of the billions in contracts that were canceled under DOGE, Politico could only verify a fraction. As noted, the savings are also difficult to calculate as money designated for agencies by Congress is required to be spent.
The analysis ultimately found that DOGE saved less than 5% than what it claimed from more than 10,000 contract terminations.
Part of DOGE’s “faulty math,” according to the analysis, is that the group uses “ceiling” levels of spending to determine their savings. In other words, the organization uses the maximum amount of spending allocated for contracts to boost the amount saved in cuts.
US president armed with money-making opportunities to encourage Russia to end Ukrainian war
Donald Trump is preparing to offer Vladimir Putin access to rare earth minerals to incentivise him to end the war in Ukraine.
The US president will arrive at the much-anticipated meeting with his Russian counterpart on Friday armed with a number of money-making opportunities for Putin.
They will include opening up Alaska’s natural resources to Moscow and lifting some of the American sanctions on Russia’s aviation industry, The Telegraph can reveal.
Scott Bessent, the US treasury secretary, is understood to be among administration figures briefing Mr Trump ahead of his sit-down with Putin in Anchorage. Mr Bessent is exploring the economic trade-offs the US can make with Russia in order to expedite a ceasefire agreement.
Proposals include giving Putin access to the rare earth minerals in the Ukrainian territories currently occupied by Russia.
Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukraine president, said Mr Trump supports security guarantees for Ukraine.
The two leaders attended a virtual summit along with other European leaders on Wednesday.
“There should be security guarantees,” Mr Zelensky said at a press conference alongside Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor. “President Trump said that he supports this and America’s readiness to take part.”
Sir Keir Starmer said his so-called “coalition of the willing” was ready to implement a ceasefire plan as soon as a peace deal is agreed.
The plans “are now ready in a form that can be used if we get to that ceasefire”, the Prime Minister said, adding that “real progress” on security guarantees for Ukraine had been made.
European leaders, including French president Emmanuel Macron, said the calls with the US president were “positive”.
Putin is “bluffing” when he says “he does not care about the sanctions and that they’re not working”, Mr Zelensky added.
Ukraine is thought to hold 10 per cent of the world’s reserves of lithium, used in the production of batteries.
Two of its largest lithium deposits are in areas held by Russia, and Putin has staked his claim to the valuable minerals found in the regions his forces occupy.
“There are a range of incentives, in which a potential mineral/rare earth deal could be one,” a source with knowledge of the proposals told The Telegraph.
In May, the US signed a rare earth mineral deal with Kyiv, allowing it to exploit Ukraine’s ample natural resources. Washington will need to establish new mining operations, which could be accelerated by Russian co-operation.
The president’s America First policy has seen him strike several mineral deals since his return to the Oval Office, most notably with Ukraine and Kazakhstan.
After Olzhas Bektenov, the Kazakhstani prime minister, visited the White House, the State Department said it was “looking forward to working with Kazakhstan to deepen economic ties in… critical minerals sectors”.
Other incentives include lifting export bans on parts and equipment needed to service Russian planes, swathes of which have fallen into disrepair.
Western countries have restricted Moscow’s access to crucial spare components and other equipment since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in 2022, forcing airlines and the military to cannibalise old aircraft for replacement parts.
Nearly 30 per cent of Russia’s western-made planes, cut off from maintenance, could be grounded within the next five years, Sergei Chemezov, the head of Rostec, Russia’s state-owned defence conglomerate, suggested this year.
Removing sanctions on Russian aircraft
Lifting sanctions on Russian aircraft could prove lucrative for American manufacturer Boeing.
With a fleet of more than 700 planes dominated by Airbus and Boeing, Russian airlines could return to the American suppliers for critical parts and maintenance.
Recent major incidents highlight an urgent need to prevent the fleet degrading. In late July, a Soviet-era Antonov An-24, built in 1976, crashed in the country’s far east, killing all 48 people on board.
Days later, flag carrier Aeroflot grounded dozens of flights following a crippling cyber attack.
Mr Trump is also considering offering Russia opportunities to tap into the valuable natural resources in the strait which separates it from the US.
Alaska, which is separated from Russia by by just three miles of the Bering Strait, is estimated to hold significant undiscovered oil and gas reserves, including 13 per cent of the world’s oil.
Developing Russia’s presence in the strait would bolster Putin’s strategic interests in the arctic region, which accounted for 80 per cent of Russia’s gas production in 2022.
British government sources told The Telegraph that such incentives could be acceptable to Europe, as long as Putin was not seen to be rewarded for the invasion.
“The sense is that it has to be presented to align with public opinion around this, it cannot be seen as a reward for Putin,” a source said.
Israel could be used as model to end war
Israel’s occupation of the West Bank could be used as a model for ending the war in Ukraine.
Russia would have military and economic control of occupied Ukraine under its own governing body, similar to Israel’s de facto rule of Palestinian territory.
The idea was raised in discussions between Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump’s special envoy and his Russian counterparts, according to The Times.
The White House is tempering expectations ahead of the summit on Friday, portraying it as a “listening exercise” for the president.
“This is really a feel-out meeting, a little bit,” Mr Trump told reporters on Monday, predicting he would know “probably in the first two minutes” if Putin was serious about peace.
European diplomats say there has been no notable change in Putin’s overall war aim, which is to topple Mr Zelensky’s government and replace it with a Moscow-friendly proxy.
The Russian president’s aides described the tet-a-tet primarily as a discussion on “Russian-American relations”, hinting at boosting trade cooperation.
A White House official said: “We do not comment on deliberative conversations that may or may not be happening.
L.A. and D.C. are only the beginning, as the president’s team has been drawing up plans to unleash federal forces in other Democratic strongholds
David McNew/Getty Images
President Donald Trump has expanded his military campaign against the United States by deploying armed troops to yet another major metropolitan area, announcing on Monday that he is sending the National Guard into Washington, D.C., to “liberate” the city.
The D.C. operation, launched two months after the start of his Los Angeles crackdown, broadens a police-state-style domestic campaign that some senior Trump administration officials describe to Rolling Stone as a “shock and awe” show of force, a reference to the foreign war in Iraq that Trump has pretended to oppose.
It’s only going to get worse.
The president and his top government appointees are publicly stressing that this will not end with D.C. and L.A., that other military options are very much on the table. The facts, the laws, and data do not seem to matter: Trump and his team believe he can do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, including using the U.S. armed forces for domestic political purposes as well as intimidating his enemies. His team is privately putting together plans for him to do just that.
“Make no mistake, this is just the beginning,” U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro — a staunchly pro-Trump former Fox News host whom the president tapped specifically to “crack skulls” — said Monday night.
At a press conference Monday announcing that the federal government had seized “direct” control of D.C.’s police department and that the National Guard would soon occupy the city, Trump warned that if he and his officials decide they “need to,” he will deploy military forces to other Democratic cities, too. The president named a few, including Chicago, Oakland, and Baltimore. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, a Democrat whom Trump attacked by name, compared Trump’s use of the military to the Nazis tearing apart Germany’s constitutional republic, per the Chicago Tribune.
Trump has long yearned to unleash the military on American soil for his political agenda, and the D.C. and L.A. deployments this summer are critical stepping stones in his increasingly authoritarian government’s vision for punishing his enemies Democratic area of the country, carrying out his brutal immigration agenda, and making life hell for unhoused people. Trump said on Monday that federal forces will work to remove “homeless encampments from all over our parks,” and that the unhoused will not be “allowed to turn our capital into a wasteland for the world to see.”
One of Trump’s biggest regrets from his first term in the Oval Office, according to former and current senior Trump advisers, is that he didn’t use military forces and other federal assets to crack down harder than he ultimately did in the summer of 2020. As the Covid-19 pandemic raged, and as racial justice protests spread throughout the country, one of the president’s big ideas was to shoot Black Lives Matter protesters near the White House. One reason this didn’t happen is that his Secretary of Defense at the time was not in love with the idea.
Rolling Stone reported in October 2024 that Trump and his team have been plotting a second-term takeover of the D.C. police for a long time — regardless of the actual level of unrest or street crime. The plotting extends far beyond the nation’s capital.
In recent months, according to government officials and other sources with knowledge of the situation, administration staff and lawyers have crafted detailed plans and menus of options for Trump to feed his desire for replicating and proliferating his militarized crackdowns — on immigrants and citizens alike — to different Democratic strongholds. National Guard troops are already mobilizing in D.C., and Trump has privately said, according to two sources familiar with the matter, that if he sees something that he feels crosses his line (like if street protests in the city grow too big or if he deems them a threat suddenly), he will gladly order larger numbers of troops to nation’s capital, as he did in Los Angeles earlier this year.
Trump has insisted to administration officials that it’s ridiculous that troops like National Guard members are not allowed to conduct various forms of domestic law enforcement, sources add. The president and his administration to some extent have had their hands tied on this due to the Posse Comitatus Act — which prohibits using the military for domestic law enforcement — though that isn’t stopping them from actively exploring ways around the law. “There are ways things were done, and that’s not always going to be how they should be done now or tomorrow,” a senior Trump administration official tells Rolling Stone.
The senior administration official, as well as other Trump officials, note that it is a priority of the president’s that these kinds of military deployments — in L.A., and now D.C., in times of relative calm — become normalized in American political culture. Trump has long believed he should be able to wield the might of military forces on American soil in ways more commonly associated with authoritarian states. He now has a government stacked full of loyalists who want to help him realize this goal. “He’s gonna do more of them,” another Trump administration official says, referring to siccing the military on deep-blue cities, using crime and immigrants as justification. “He promised he would do this, and now he’s following through on those promises.”
Administration figures are speaking openly about potentially expanding the use of federal forces into cities across the nation. “You look at Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, and New York — they’re also facing record numbers of homicides and violent crimes. It’s natural for us to look at Washington, D.C. — if we can really clean this up and we can get rid of this plague of crime and violent activity that’s happening in our nation’s capital — could that be a blueprint and a model for other communities around the country?” Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, said Tuesday on Fox Business. “It’s something I think President Trump wouldn’t shy away from. We’ll have to stay tuned.”
Trump and his administration’s justification for his D.C. operation — that homelessness and violent crime in the nation’s capital have spiraled out of control, following the recent assault of a Department of Government Efficiency lackey and Elon Musk protégé known as “Big Balls” — appears entirely pretextual. Public data show that violent crime in the district, whose political leaders did not request any help from Trump and whose residents and voters largely despise him, has dropped significantly following post-pandemic spikes in violence that occurred in both urban and rural American communities. (The administration is claiming that the crime data is fake, because the official position of the government is that any credible economic data or other stats that contradict Trump and the GOP’s feelings should be purged and demonized.)
There are, of course, actual ways to aid the homeless in D.C. and to help protect residents in the impoverished, higher-crime areas of the city. Trump and his administration are not interested in working to solve these issues. When asked on Tuesday about addressing the root causes of crime, Pirro scoffed and said she’s “not concerned about why they commit crimes,” only punishing them when they do.
Addressing the root causes wouldn’t include sending in the National Guard or federal agents for Trump’s “shock and awe” spectacle for the cameras, and sources say the spectacle-addicted president regularly checks in with how his military deployments are playing on TV — including on his favorite network, Fox News. Right-wing media, lawmakers, and members of his administration have been mobilizing this week to push the president’s narrative that military action is needed to address D.C.’s crime problem, casting the city as a hellscape of violent crime where it is not safe to walk the streets.
“President Trump is saving our nation’s capital after Democrats turned it into an absolute hellhole,” the Republican National Committee hysterically claimed in an email blast to the media on Monday. “Residents are being brutally beaten, murdered and losing loved ones. D.C. residents do not feel safe so President Trump will be declaring a Crime Emergency and mobilizing the D.C. National Guard.”
Three people were killed during Independence Day celebrations in Pakistan’s Karachi due to “reckless” aerial firing.
3 Killed, Over 60 Injured in Reckless Aerial Firing in Pakistan.
Three people, including a senior citizen and an 8-year-old girl, were killed during Independence Day celebrations in Pakistan’s Karachi due to “reckless” aerial firing. Over 60 people are reportedly injured during the incident.
The incidents occurred across the city, with the young girl hit by a stray bullet in Azizabad and a man named Stephen killed in Korangi. At least 64 others suffered gunshot wounds in the citywide incidents, Geo News reported.
Rescue officials said dozens were injured due to celebratory gunfire. Authorities condemned the practice as reckless and dangerous, urging citizens to mark Independence Day in safer ways.
Meanwhile, an investigation have been launched and officials have assured that strict action will be taken against those found involved in aerial firing.
According to a report obtained by ARY News, at least 42 people, including five women, lost their lives in firing incidents across Karachi in January.
Additionally, 233 people, including five women, were injured in these incidents.
Five people were killed while thwarting robbery attempts in the firing events, which were reported in different regions of the city. In other instances, individuals lost their lives as a result of stray gunshots or aerial fire. However, none of the seven people who died in firing incidents–including a woman–have been named.
Police officers attributed the episodes to several factors, including disagreements, personal animosities, and resistance to robbery attempts, ARY News reported.
US President Trump praised European leaders before a virtual meeting on the Ukraine war. He will speak with European leaders to ensure their positions are heard.
Donald Trump speaking at a presser in the White House. (Reuters)
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday issued a stern warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of Alaska summit, saying that Moscow will face “very severe” consequences if it doesn’t get answers from him.
Earlier today, he said that he’d had a “very good call” with European leaders, including Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
“We had a very good call. He was on the call — President Zelenskyy was on the call. I would rate it at 10. You know — very, very friendly,” he told reporters during an event at Washington’s Kennedy Center.
The US President further said that he wants to hold a “quick second” meeting with Putin and Zelensky after the Alaska summit.
During the conference call, Zelenskyy and his European allies urged Trump to support Kyiv and push for a ceasefire when he meets Putin.
A stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Zelenskyy has not been invited to the Anchorage meeting Friday, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions on Ukraine.
Ahead of the meeting, he praised European leaders as ‘great people’ ahead of his virtual meeting over Ukraine war.
In a short post on his platform Truth Social, Trump said, “Will be speaking to European Leaders in a short while. They are great people who want to see a deal done.”
According to the German government, the talks aimed to ensure that Europe’s and Ukraine’s positions are heard ahead of the August 15 meeting between the US and Russian Presidents in Alaska.
Earlier today, Zelenskyy arrived in Berlin for the virtual meet. Although many leaders, including Trump, will join via video conference, Zelenskyy has traveled to the German capital for the summit and will give a statement alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz following the talks.
Merz has organised a series of virtual meetings involving leaders from Finland, France, Britain, Italy, Poland, the European Union, and NATO. The agenda includes Ukraine’s concerns about being excluded from direct participation in the US-Russia talks, as well as efforts to present a united European stance.
The final round of discussions will include members of the “coalition of the willing,” countries prepared to help enforce any future peace agreement.
Millions of Americans who should be diagnosed with high blood pressure are slipping through the cracks because the familiar arm cuff in doctor’s offices often gives a reading that’s nearly six points too low. That small-sounding gap can have big consequences: it’s enough that roughly one in three people with systolic hypertension (140 mmHg or higher) may go undiagnosed, leaving them at risk for heart attacks and strokes.
High blood pressure is the leading cause of premature death worldwide, yet it rarely causes symptoms until serious problems occur. New research from the University of Cambridge pinpoints the physical reason why standard blood pressure cuffs tend to underestimate the “top” number (systolic pressure), a mystery that’s puzzled doctors for decades.
The Problem With Blood Pressure Cuffs
When a cuff inflates around your arm, it squeezes the main artery shut for a short time. The researchers found that this blockage causes blood pressure in the vessels beyond the cuff (the ones further down your arm) to fall sharply, settling at about 30 to 70 mmHg. The lower that “downstream” pressure drops, the more the cuff underestimates your actual blood pressure.
This matters because systolic blood pressure is one of the most important predictors of heart health. Even a small underestimation could push someone’s reading from the “high” category into “normal” territory, leading to missed diagnoses and delayed treatment.
Recreating The Problem In The Lab
One of the most impressive parts of the study was how the researchers designed an experiment to mimic what happens inside the human arm during a blood pressure check.
In previous research, scientists had tried to study blood pressure measurement errors by using simplified models, but these often didn’t recreate the full picture, especially the way arteries completely collapse when the cuff is inflated. Without that collapse, the “downstream” pressure drop couldn’t be accurately reproduced.
To solve this, Cambridge engineers Kate Bassil and Anurag Agarwal built a custom experimental rig. It featured flexible silicone tubing that could behave like a real artery, able to fully close under pressure. The system allowed them to independently control the pressure on both sides of the “artery”:
Upstream pressure — representing the heart pumping blood into the arm.
Downstream pressure — representing the vessels beyond the cuff in the forearm.
By adjusting these pressures separately, they could replicate exactly what happens when a cuff squeezes the artery shut and downstream pressure drops.
What They Found
Their results revealed a clear pattern: the lower the downstream pressure, the greater the underestimation of systolic blood pressure. In their tests, the underestimation could be as much as 9 to 10 mmHg when downstream pressure was at its lowest.
They also discovered why standard cuffs have this problem while devices applying uniform pressure don’t. A regular cuff doesn’t squeeze evenly along its length. It’s tighter in the middle and looser at the edges. When downstream pressure is low, this uneven squeeze keeps a longer stretch of the artery closed for longer, which delays the return of blood flow and tricks the reading into coming out lower than it should.
When they used a device that applied uniform pressure all the way around the artery, the downstream pressure no longer affected the reading, suggesting that a design change to the cuff itself could solve the problem.
Why This Matters For Patients
A large analysis of 74 previous studies confirms what the Cambridge experiments found: cuff-based measurements underestimate the top blood pressure number by about 5.7 points on average. And according to earlier research, a systematic 5-point underestimate would miss about 30 percent of people with systolic hypertension.
The Cambridge team calculated that with a standard cuff, the length of artery kept closed could vary from none at all to about six centimeters, depending on pressure conditions. In real-world terms, six centimeters of closure could mean your reading is four points too low.
Because the arm-cuff method is the “gold standard” for checking blood pressure, even small inaccuracies in this method ripple out to every other device. That includes the automatic machines in pharmacies and clinics, since they’re all tested against it.
What Could Fix This Blood Pressure Test Flaw?
The researchers suggest several ways to make readings more accurate, such as redesigning cuffs so the pressure is more uniform along the arm, asking patients to raise their arm before the test, or applying small corrections based on a person’s age, arm size, and other characteristics.
By revealing the physical cause of this measurement gap, the study opens the door to more reliable blood pressure readings. In a condition where catching problems early can prevent heart attacks, strokes, and other serious issues, improving accuracy could help more people get the treatment they need — before it’s too late.
The 54-pound Martian meteorite NWA 16788, the largest known piece of Mars ever discovered on Earth, was sold for a record $5.3 million at Sotheby’s New York
The recent auction of a Martian meteorite — for a record-grabbing $5.3 million at Sotheby’s New York — has sparked questions over its provenance and renewed debate over who gets to claim rocks fallen from the heavens.
The hefty 54-pound (25-kilogram) stone is the largest Martian meteorite ever discovered on Earth, according to its Sotheby’s listing, and was found in November 2023 in the vast Saharan desert in Niger.
The government of Niger has announced that it will open an investigation following the auction, saying it appears to “have all the characteristics of illicit international trafficking.”
On Friday, the government suspended exports of precious stones and meteorites until further notice.
Sotheby’s has rejected the accusations, insisting that the meteorite was “was exported from Niger and transported in line with all relevant international procedure.”
In light of the controversy, however, a review of the case is underway, a Sotheby’s spokesperson told AFP.
“The stone journeyed 140 million miles through space, and hurtled through Earth’s atmosphere before crashing in the Sahara Desert,” the Sotheby’s listing said.
Following its discovery, the jagged, ochre-colored stone was then sold to an international dealer, briefly exhibited in Italy, and eventually ended up in the auction catalog in New York.
For American paleontologist Paul Sereno, who has worked closely with Niger’s authorities for years, all signs suggest that the stone left the country “illicitly.”
“Everybody’s anonymous — from the person who found it, the dealers, the guy who bought it, everybody’s anonymous,” he told AFP, making no secret of his frustration.
“If they had put on baseball gloves and caught the meteorite as was hurtling towards Earth before it landed in any country, they could claim it… but I’m sorry, it landed there. It belongs to Niger,” he said.
– ‘We should respect it’ –
Laws governing the ownership of meteorites vary based on their point of impact.
In the United States, for example, if a rock falls on private land, the property owners have ownership rights.
In Niger, however, a law governs “national cultural patrimony,” which includes rare mineralogical specimens, according to Matthieu Gounelle, a professor at France’s National History Museum, and his father Max Gounelle, a French university professor.
Both are specialists in regulations governing the collection and sale of meteorites.
“In our opinion, there is no doubt that meteorites should be included among the rare mineralogical specimens” protected by Nigerien law, they told AFP.
Beyond the legal battle and the possible involvement of a trafficking network, the sale of the meteorite also raises science ethics questions.
The rock, named NWA 16788, has unique scientific research value.
Much larger than other Martian meteorites that have been recorded to date, it offers a unique insight into the geological history of the Red Planet.
Like other Martian meteorites, it is believed to have been ejected into space when an asteroid slammed into Mars.
Taylor Swift has announced her 12th studio album will be “The Life of a Showgirl.” A post on her website did not specify a release date.
Swift’s 12th studio album will ship before October 13, according to her websiteImage: Daniel Cole/REUTERS
US pop superstar Taylor Swift’s website announced the release of the new album early Tuesday, with vinyl records, cassettes and CDs of the new album shipping to customers in the United States before October 13.
“The Life of a Showgirl” follows last year’s “The Tortured Poets Department,” announced during the 2024 Grammys and released during her record-breaking Eras tour, which raked in over $2.2 billion across two years and five continents, making it the highest-grossing tour of all time.
The New Heights podcast later shared a video of Swift opening a box and taking out a blurred vinyl.
“This is my brand new album, ‘The Life of a Showgirl,'” she said.
Call between the two leaders comes days ahead of US President Donald Trump’s summit with Putin in Alaska.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, during a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin at an undisclosed location in North Korea on August 12, 2025 [KCNA via KNS/AFP]Russian President Vladimir Putin lauded the “bravery” and “heroism” of North Korean soldiers in retaking Russia’s Kursk region from Ukrainian forces during a call with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, North Korean state media has reported.
Putin told Kim that he “highly appreciated” North Korea’s support and the “self-sacrificing spirit” displayed by its troops during the liberation of the western region, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reported on Wednesday.
Kim expressed his “heartfelt thanks” to Putin and said Pyongyang would “always remain faithful” to the spirit of the mutual defence treaty signed by the sides last year, as well as “fully support all measures to be taken by the Russian leadership in the future”, the KCNA said.
“The heads of states of the two countries exchanged views on the issues of mutual concern,” the KCNA said.
“Kim Jong Un and Putin agreed to make closer contact in the future.”
The call, days before Putin is set to meet United States President Donald Trump in Alaska to discuss efforts to end the war in Ukraine, is the latest sign of strengthening ties between North Korea and Russia amid Moscow’s ostracisation on the world stage.
“There are a lot of ifs still in the air, but the call suggests there’s a role for Russia, similar to the role South Korea played in 2018, in helping create an opening for US-DPRK relations,” Jenny Town, the director of the Korea programme at the Stimson Center in Washington, DC, told Al Jazeera, using the acronym for North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
“It might not be a focal point of the upcoming meeting, but it is likely to be part of the conversation.”
Last month, Kim told Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov that Pyongyang would “unconditionally support” all actions taken by Moscow in Ukraine, according to North Korean state media reports.
North Korea has deployed more than 10,000 troops to support Russia’s war and has drawn up plans to dispatch thousands more, according to assessments by South Korea’s National Intelligence Service.
Kim Keon Hee is accused of bribery, stock fraud and other allegations. Her arrest came due to fears she would destroy evidence and interfere with the investigation. Her husband, too, is under arrest.
Kim Keon Hee faced court on TuesdayImage: Jung Yeon-je/AP Photo/picture alliance
South Korea’s former first lady Kim Keon Hee became the first in the country’s history to be arrested.
The charges against the wife of impeached president Yoon Suk Yeol include stock fraud, bribery and influence peddling, charges punishable by years in prison.
The 52-year-old has denied the accusations against her, according to a special prosecutor leading the investigation.
Kim underwent hours-long questioning last week, with the prosecutors filing for her arrest warrant the day afterwards.
“I sincerely apologize for causing trouble despite being a person of no importance,” Kim said upon arrival at the prosecutors’ office.
What are the allegations against Kim Keon Hee?
One of the charges against Kim came as a result of an incident in 2022, when she attended a NATO summit with her husband wearing a luxury Van Cleef pendant reportedly worth $43,000 (€37,000).
The item was not listed in the couple’s financial disclosure as the local law requires.
Kim said the luxury pendant was a fake bought 20 years ago in Hong Kong, with the prosecution found that the piece of jewelry was in fact genuine.
COMEDIAN Jimmy Kimmel revealed that he may move to Europe thanks to President Trump.
Kimmel told Sarah Silverman on her podcast that he may need to lean on his Italian citizenship out of fear of what Trump may do to him.
Donald Trump threatened late night tv show hostsCredit: Getty
The host, 57, claimed that he and fellow late-night talk show host Jimmy Fallon may be the next ones to lose their jobs after CBS host Stephen Colbert’s show ended.
Trump has previously doubled down on comments about Fallon and Kimmel possibly losing their jobs and “having no talent.”
The president said that late-night TV “hasn’t worked.”
“Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent,” Trump said.
“They’re next. They’re going to be going. I hear they’re going to be going.
“I don’t know, but I would imagine because they’d get — you know, Colbert has better ratings than Kimmel or Fallon.”
In response to Colbert’s show ending and Trump’s claims, Kimmel confirmed that he has a backup in case he needs to flee the country.
“I did get Italian citizenship,” Kimmel said.
“I do have that.”
Silverman mentioned that many other critics of Trump have also thrown around the idea of fleeing the country.
“What’s going on is … as bad as you thought it was gonna be, it’s so much worse,” Kimmel said.
“It’s just unbelievable. I feel like it’s probably even worse than [Trump] would like it to be.”
The comedian mentioned that he supports those who were once MAGA followers, now doing a 180 on their political beliefs.
Kimmel talked about Trump’s strict crackdown on immigration and the president’s new deportation policy.
“There are a lot of people … now you see these clips of Joe Rogan saying, ‘Why’s he doing this? He shouldn’t be deporting people,’” he said.
“People go, ‘F–k you, you supported him.’ I don’t buy into that. I don’t believe ‘F–k you, you supported him.”
Kimmel went on to talk about how the “door needs to stay open” for those who choose to switch political parties.
“I think the door needs to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that’s so hard to do,” he said.
A 19-year-old influencer has been left stranded in Antarctica following a daring round the world fundraising attempt. Ethan Guo set off last year to become the youngest person to fly solo to all seven continents while raising money for childhood cancer research. He was detained and charged by authorities in Chile on suspicion of lying about his flight plan, reported the Associated Press. Prosecutors say Guo had clearance only to fly over Punta Arenas, near the southernmost point of Chile, on his single-engine light aircraft Cessna 182Q, but continued south and landed on the Antarctica coast. The charges have now been dropped after Guo managed to strike a deal which will see him donate $30,000 to a children’s cancer charity, leave Chile as soon as possible, and stay away from the Chilean territory for three years. He had been ordered to stay in Chilean territory pending the charges, and has been stranded for the past six weeks on an Antarctic military base in Chilean territory due to poor weather conditions and his aircraft being deemed unfit to fly. “I sincerely hope they give [approval] to me soon so that I and my plane can continue with my original mission,” Guo told the AP.
Bo Richard Vitagliano, 44, was arrested in Los Angeles on Monday night for allegedly attacking 70-year-old Harpal Singh in North Hollywood.
sikhOne person was arrested in connection with the attack on a 70-year-old Sikh man in the North Hollywood area of Los Angeles last week.
The suspect was arrested on Monday at nearly 9.40 pm local time, and was identified as 44-year-old Bo Richard Vitagliano.
The report quoted jail records and said the man was held on $1.115 million bail.
According to the Los Angeles Police Department, the attack came after a brawl between the Sikh man, identified as Harpal Singh, and the accused.
“Witnesses advised that they did not see how the altercation began, but heard a loud commotion, then witnessed two men swinging metal objects at each other,” the report quoted a press release.
“Both individuals were struck. The suspect further assaulted the victim while he was reportedly on the ground. Witnesses intervened by yelling at the suspect, at which time he rode away on his bicycle,” it added.
As the police swung into action, they spotted Vitagliano with his bicycle on Lankershim Boulevard and Arminta Street, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.
They also said a picture of the suspect taken by surveillance cameras helped officers make the arrest.
The attack victim is a resident of the US state of California and suffered serious injuries after he was nearly beaten to death while he was out for a morning walk. He continues to remain critical.
The man’s brother told an American news outlet that Harpal underwent three surgeries following the attack that happened near a gurdwara.
“He is totally unconscious, they keep him under sedation,” Gurdial Singh Randhawa was quoted as saying by Fox 11 Los Angeles.
Tammy Bruce reiterated President Donald Trump’s claim of US involvement in the India-Pakistan truce following the recent military conflict, saying it was a “very proud” moment for Washington to have been “involved in stopping that potential catastrophe.”
Bruce noted that the US relationship with “both nations remains unchanged”
Following Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir’s eye-turning visit to the United States, Washington has reaffirmed that its relationship with both India and Pakistan “remains unchanged” and that its diplomats are “committed to both nations”. The Pakistani Field Marshal, during his second US visit in two months, threatened to launch a nuclear war against India and take down “half the world”. The remarks were the first nuclear threats known to have ever been delivered from US soil against a third country.
Speaking at the State Department briefing, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce reiterated President Donald Trump’s claim of US involvement in the India-Pakistan truce following the recent military conflict, saying it was a “very proud” moment for Washington to have been “involved in stopping that potential catastrophe.”
“We had an experience with Pakistan and India, when there was a conflict, that could have developed into something quite horrible. There was immediate concern and movement with the Vice President JD Vance, the President Donald Trump and the Secretary of State Marco Rubio in addressing the nature of what was happening,” she said.
“We described the nature of the phone calls and the work we did to stop the attacks, bringing the parties together to create something enduring. It’s a very proud moment that Secretary Rubio, Vice President Vance and the top leaders in this nation were involved in stopping that potential catastrophe,” Bruce added.
When asked if, after Asim Munir’s recent meeting with Trump, the US would increase assistance and arms sales to Pakistan “at the expense of President Trump’s relationship with PM Modi”, Bruce noted that the US relationship with “both nations remains unchanged – good. The diplomats are committed to both nations.”
She also talked about the US-Pakistan counter-terrorism dialogue, which was established in Islamabad on Tuesday, and said, “The United States and Pakistan reaffirmed their shared commitment to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations during the latest rounds of talks in Islamabad. The US and Pakistan discussed ways to enhance cooperation to counter terrorist threats.”
“For the region and for the world, the US working with both those nations is good news and will promote a future that’s beneficial,” she added.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent arrives at the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon,File)
The U.S. government’s gross national debt has surpassed $37 trillion, a record number that highlights the accelerating debt on America’s balance sheet and increased cost pressures on taxpayers.
The $37 trillion update is found in the latest Treasury Department report issued Tuesday which logs the nation’s daily finances.
The national debt eclipsed $37 trillion years sooner than pre-pandemic projections. The Congressional Budget Office’s January 2020 projections had gross federal debt eclipsing $37 trillion after fiscal year 2030. But the debt grew faster than expected because of a multi-year COVID-19 pandemic starting in 2020 that shut down much of the U.S. economy, where the federal government borrowed heavily under then-President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden to stabilize the national economy and support a recovery.
And now, more government spending has been approved after Trump signed into law Republicans’ tax cut and spending legislation earlier this year. The law set to add $4.1 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.
Chair and CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, Michael Peterson said in a statement that government borrowing puts upward pressure on interest rates, “adding costs for everyone and reducing private sector investment. Within the federal budget, the debt crowds out important priorities and creates a damaging cycle of more borrowing, more interest costs, and even more borrowing.”
Wendy Edelberg, a senior fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution said Congress has a major role in setting in motion spending and revenue policy and the result of the Republicans’ tax law “means that we’re going to borrow a lot over the course of 2026, we’re going to borrow a lot over the course of 2027, and it’s just going to keep going.”
The Government Accountability Office outlines some of the impacts of rising government debt on Americans — including higher borrowing costs for things like mortgages and cars, lower wages from businesses having less money available to invest, and more expensive goods and services.
Peterson points out how the trillion-dollar milestones are “piling up at a rapid rate.”
The U.S. hit $34 trillion in debt in January 2024, $35 trillion in July 2024 and $36 trillion in November 2024. “We are now adding a trillion more to the national debt every 5 months,” Peterson said. “That’s more than twice as fast as the average rate over the last 25 years.”
The Joint Economic Committee estimates at the current average daily rate of growth an increase of another trillion dollars to the debt would be reached in approximately 173 days.
Angelina Jolie is looking for a new home outside of the U.S., according to a report.
The Maria star, 50, is considering “several locations abroad” to move to, People reports, citing an “exclusive source.” The news comes after rumblings earlier this week suggested that she was preparing her L.A. home to be listed for sale.
The source told the site Jolie “plans to relocate as soon as” her youngest children, twin teenagers Knox Léon Jolie-Pitt and Vivienne Marcheline Jolie, turn 18 in July next year. “She’s eyeing several locations abroad,” the source said, adding “She’ll be very happy when she’s able to leave Los Angeles.”
The Daily Beast has reached out to a representative for Jolie for comment.
The news that Jolie will move “abroad” comes after an exodus of several celebrities who’ve left the country to escape America under Donald Trump, including Rosie O’Donnell and Ellen DeGeneres. Jimmy Kimmel revealed this week that he’s flirting with the idea of leaving, when he said he’d obtained citizenship in Italy.
But Jolie has reportedly wanted to leave Los Angeles for some time, and for reasons unrelated. She told The Hollywood Reporter last year that she only remained in the city “because I have to from a divorce.”
Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt in 2016, and the pair only reached a finalization in December. They share six children including 17-year-old twins Knox and Vivienne, Maddox Chivan, 24, Pax Thien, 21, Zahara Marley, 20, Shiloh Nouvel, 19.
Jolie explained at the time that her family is all that’s keeping her in Los Angeles. “I grew up in this town,” she said. “I am here because I have to be here from a divorce, but as soon as they’re 18, I’ll be able to leave. When you have a big family, you want them to have privacy, peace, safety. I have a house now to raise my children, but sometimes this place can be…that humanity that I found across the world is not what I grew up with here.”
Jolie added that when she can finally leave L.A., “I’ll spend a lot of time in Cambodia. I’ll spend time visiting my family members wherever they may be in the world.”
Between Alternative for Germany and France’s National Rally, populists continue to rise in Europe’s most powerful countries.
If a national election were now held, 26 percent of Germans would vote for the AfD, according to a poll. | Hannibal Hanschke/EPA
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) has become the most popular party in the country, according to a striking new poll published Tuesday.
If a national election were now held, 26 percent of Germans would vote for the AfD, according to a poll carried out by the Forsa Institute for Social Research and Statistical Analysis. That result puts the far-right party ahead of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s mainstream conservative bloc, which slid to second with 24 percent support in the poll.
With the far-right National Rally already leading clearly in France, the bombshell German survey is likely to fuel unease among mainstream leaders across Europe. Right-wing populist parties have performed strongly in elections in recent years from Poland to Romania, and Portugal to the Netherlands.
In Britain, Nigel Farage’s hard-right Reform UK is also topping polls amid broad public dissatisfaction with Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government.
While POLITICO’s Poll of Polls shows that Germany’s conservative Christian Democrats maintain a slight lead over the AfD in an aggregation of voter surveys, the far-right party has climbed since snagging almost 21 percent of the vote in February’s federal election, its best-ever result. The AfD is now the largest opposition party in Germany’s Bundestag.
The AfD was initially founded as a single-issue party more than a decade ago by a group of economics professors who, in the midst of Europe’s debt crisis, opposed the euro and financial help for debt-ridden countries. It regularly scored single-digit results in federal and state elections in its early years.
Now led by the openly radical Alice Weidel, a former economist, the AfD currently pushes a hard-line anti-migrant and right-wing populist positions. Some mainstream politicians argue the party is so extreme that it ought to be banned under provisions of the German constitution designed to prevent a repeat of the country’s Nazi past.
OpenAI and its co-founder Sam Altman are preparing to back a company which will compete with Elon Musk’s Neuralink by connecting human brains with computers, heightening the rivalry between the two billionaire entrepreneurs.
The new venture, called Merge Labs, is raising new funds at a $850mn valuation, with much of the new capital expected to come from OpenAI’s ventures team, according to three people with direct knowledge of the plans.
Altman has encouraged the investment and will help launch the project alongside Alex Blania, who runs World, an eyeball-scanning digital ID project also backed by the OpenAI chief, said two of the people.
Altman will co-found the company but not have a day to day role in the new project, they added.
Merge is one of a slate of young companies looking to take advantage of recent advances in artificial intelligence to build more useful brain-computer interfaces.
Its name comes from what many in Silicon Valley describe as ‘the merge’, a moment when humans and machines come together.
Altman wrote a lengthy blog on the topic in 2017, speculating that moment could come as soon as 2025. This year, he suggested in another blog post that we could soon have “high-bandwidth brain-computer interfaces” as a result of recent technological advances.
The company aims to raise $250mn from OpenAI and other investors, although the talks are at an early stage. Altman will not personally invest.
The new venture would be in direct competition with Neuralink, founded by Musk in 2016, which seeks to wire brains directly to computers.
Musk and Altman co-founded OpenAI, but Musk left the board in 2018 after clashing with Altman and the two have since become fierce rivals in their pursuit of artificial intelligence.
Musk launched his own AI start-up, xAI, in 2023, and has been attempting to block OpenAI’s conversion from a non-profit in the courts. Musk donated much of the initial capital to get OpenAI off the ground.
Neuralink is leading a pack of so-called brain-computer interface companies, while a number of start-ups, such as Precision Neuroscience and Synchron, have been racing to catch up.
Neuralink earlier this year raised $650mn at a $9bn valuation, and it is backed by investors including Sequoia Capital, Thrive Capital and Vy Capital. Altman had previously invested in Neuralink.
Los Angeles Unified School District leaders are calling for limits on immigration enforcement near campuses after a 15-year-old boy with disabilities was pulled from a car, handcuffed, and briefly detained outside Arleta High School on Monday in what officials describe as a case of mistaken identity.
The incident happened around 9:30 a.m. on Monday, just days before more than half a million LAUSD students return to classrooms. According to Superintendent Alberto Carvalho, the student — who attends San Fernando High School — had gone to Arleta High with his grandmother to accompany a relative registering for classes.
While the family member was inside, several officers approached their vehicle, telling them they were not with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). However, Carvalho said district-reviewed video appeared to show both police and Border Patrol personnel.
The boy was removed from the car and placed in handcuffs.
“As our students return to school, we are calling on every community partner to help ensure that classrooms remain places of learning and belonging,” Carvalho said. “Children have been through enough — from the pandemic to natural disasters. They should not have to carry the added weight of fear when walking through their school gates.”
The teen was eventually released after school staff and Los Angeles police Intervened.
“The release will not release him from what he experienced,” Carvalho said during a news conference. “The trauma will linger. It will not cease. It is unacceptable, not only in our community, but anywhere in America.”
Parents like Yvonne, whose child attends school in the district, said the incident has left them shaken. “I was upset because our kids shouldn’t have to be going through this and being scared of coming to school, parents dropping them off. We shouldn’t be going through this,” she told KTLA.
Soon after the incident, parents received a recorded voice message from the principal, saying: “We are aware of reports of immigration enforcement activity in the area, near our campus. Our school has not been contacted by any federal agency.”
Many parents KTLA spoke with called the presence of federal agents near public school campuses shameful. “Our government, the administration had stated they were going to go after criminals. At a school, what criminals are you going to find? Kids trying to enroll — today’s orientation day,” parent Dorian Martinez said.
Board of Education President Kelly Gonez condemned the actions on social media, calling them “absolutely reprehensible” and part of the “continued unconstitutional targeting of our Latino community.”
The district says the detention underscores the need for strong protections as students return to school. In a statement Monday, LAUSD reaffirmed that “schools are safe spaces” and said immigration enforcement near campuses “disrupts learning and creates anxiety that can last far beyond the school day.”
Some parents fear that their children will be targeted simply because of the color of their skin, regardless of immigration status. “He fits that category,” Yvonne said of her child. “Where he’s on the darker side, and I feel like that’s who they’re attacking… that’s the main reason I tell him you better be careful and you don’t go with anybody.”
Ahead of the start of the school year, the district said it has contacted 10,000 families potentially impacted by immigration enforcement efforts, rerouted bus stops, deployed 1,000 central office staff to assist in school zones, and expanded virtual options for those too afraid to leave their homes.
Through its We Are One campaign, the district is also offering families Know Your Rights information, legal referrals, mental health supports, and emergency preparedness tools. Resources are available in English and Spanish online, as well as through a 24/7 Family Hotline at (213) 443-1300.
Mayor Karen Bass joined district officials at Monday’s press conference, saying, “We are gathered here today to talk about protecting our children from the federal government. This is a profound moment… the fact that we even need a press conference to talk about strategies for how we protect our kids.” She added that Los Angeles will always stand together in defense of students.
Andrea Velez was charged with assaulting a federal officer while he was attempting to arrest a suspect. The DOJ later dismissed her case.
A U.S. citizen who was detained by immigration agents and accused of obstructing an arrest before her case was ultimately dismissed said she is still traumatized by what happened.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers detained Andrea Velez in downtown Los Angeles on June 24. She was charged with assaulting a federal officer while he was attempting to arrest a suspect.
The Justice Department dismissed her case without prejudice. It did not immediately reply to a request for comment Tuesday.
Velez, a production coordinator for a shoe company, recalled seeing federal agents when her mother and sister dropped her off at work.
“It was like a scene,” she told NBC Los Angeles. “They were just ready to attack and chase.”
Federal agents detained Andrea Velez in Los Angeles on June 24.Union del Barrio
Velez said someone grabbed her and slammed her to the ground. She said that she tried to tell the agent, who was in plainclothes, that she was a citizen but that he told her she “was interfering with what he was doing, so he was going to arrest me.”
“That’s when I asked him to show me his ID, his badge number,” she said. “I asked him if he had a warrant, and he said I didn’t need to know any of that.”
A federal criminal complaint alleged that an agent was chasing a man and that Velez stepped into the agent’s path and extended her arm “in an apparent effort to prevent him from apprehending the male subject he was chasing.”
The complaint said Velez’s arm hit the agent in the face.
Velez said she denied any wrongdoing and insisted she was a U.S. citizen. She was taken to a detention center in downtown Los Angeles, where she gave officers her driver’s license and her health insurance card, but she was still booked into jail, she said.
She said she spent two days in the detention center, where she had nothing to drink for 24 hours.
Velez said that the ordeal traumatized her and that she has not been able to physically return to work.
“I’m taking things day by day,” she told NBC Los Angeles.
Her attorneys told the station that they are exploring legal options against the federal government.
Her story echoes those of others who have said they were wrongfully detained by immigration agents under President Donald Trump’s push for mass deportations.
Job Garcia, a Ph.D. student and photographer, said he was immigration agents tackled him and threw him to the ground for recording a raid at a Home Depot in Los Angeles. He was held for more than 24 hours before his release. In July, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said it was seeking $1 million in damages, alleging that Garcia was assaulted and falsely imprisoned.
The country gave its citizens the right to die. Doctors are struggling to keep up with demand.
The euthanasia conference was held at a Sheraton. Some 300 Canadian professionals, most of them clinicians, had arrived for the annual event. There were lunch buffets and complimentary tote bags; attendees could look forward to a Friday-night social outing, with a DJ, at an event space above Par-Tee Putt in downtown Vancouver. “The most important thing,” one doctor told me, “is the networking.”
Which is to say that it might have been any other convention in Canada. Over the past decade, practitioners of euthanasia have become as familiar as orthodontists or plastic surgeons are with the mundane rituals of lanyards and drink tickets and It’s been so long s outside the ballroom of a four-star hotel. The difference is that, 10 years ago, what many of the attendees here do for work would have been considered homicide.
When Canada’s Parliament in 2016 legalized the practice of euthanasia—Medical Assistance in Dying, or MAID, as it’s formally called—it launched an open-ended medical experiment. One day, administering a lethal injection to a patient was against the law; the next, it was as legitimate as a tonsillectomy, but often with less of a wait. MAID now accounts for about one in 20 deaths in Canada—more than Alzheimer’s and diabetes combined—surpassing countries where assisted dying has been legal for far longer.
It is too soon to call euthanasia a lifestyle option in Canada, but from the outset it has proved a case study in momentum. MAID began as a practice limited to gravely ill patients who were already at the end of life. The law was then expanded to include people who were suffering from serious medical conditions but not facing imminent death. In two years, MAID will be made available to those suffering only from mental illness. Parliament has also recommended granting access to minors.
At the center of the world’s fastest-growing euthanasia regime is the concept of patient autonomy. Honoring a patient’s wishes is of course a core value in medicine. But here it has become paramount, allowing Canada’s MAID advocates to push for expansion in terms that brook no argument, refracted through the language of equality, access, and compassion. As Canada contends with ever-evolving claims on the right to die, the demand for euthanasia has begun to outstrip the capacity of clinicians to provide it.
There have been unintended consequences: Some Canadians who cannot afford to manage their illness have sought doctors to end their life. In certain situations, clinicians have faced impossible ethical dilemmas. At the same time, medical professionals who decided early on to reorient their career toward assisted death no longer feel compelled to tiptoe around the full, energetic extent of their devotion to MAID. Some clinicians in Canada have euthanized hundreds of patients.
The two-day conference in Vancouver was sponsored by a professional group called the Canadian Association of MAiD Assessors and Providers. Stefanie Green, a physician on Vancouver Island and one of the organization’s founders, told me how her decades as a maternity doctor had helped equip her for this new chapter in her career. In both fields, she explained, she was guiding a patient through an “essentially natural event”—the emotional and medical choreography “of the most important days in their life.” She continued the analogy: “I thought, Well, one is like delivering life into the world, and the other feels like transitioning and delivering life out.” And so Green does not refer to her MAID deaths only as “provisions”—the term for euthanasia that most clinicians have adopted. She also calls them “deliveries.”
Gord Gubitz, a neurologist from Nova Scotia, told me that people often ask him about the “stress” and “trauma” and “strife” of his work as a MAID provider. Isn’t it so emotionally draining? In fact, for him it is just the opposite. He finds euthanasia to be “energizing”—the “most meaningful work” of his career. “It’s a happy sad, right?” he explained. “It’s really sad that you were in so much pain. It is sad that your family is racked with grief. But we’re so happy you got what you wanted.”
Al Jazeera condemns ‘targeted assassination’ of correspondent Anas Al-Sharif in Gaza airstrike
An Al Jazeera journalist who was killed by an Israeli airstrike in the Gaza Strip was the leader of a Hamas “terrorist cell,” the Israel Defense Forces announced.
Anas Al-Sharif and four of his colleagues – identified by Al Jazeera as correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa – died Sunday in what the Qatari-based network called a “targeted Israeli attack” on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City.
“The IDF struck the terrorist Anas Al-Sharif, who posed as a journalist for the Al Jazeera network,” the Israeli military said in a statement. “Anas Al-Sharif served as the head of a terrorist cell in the Hamas terrorist organization and was responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF troops.
The IDF also said it “previously disclosed intelligence information and many documents found in the Gaza Strip” confirming Al-Sharif’s military affiliation with Hamas, from which “the Al Jazeera network has attempted to disassociate itself.”
This undated recent image, taken from video broadcast by the Qatari-based television station Al Jazeera, shows the network’s Arabic-language Gaza correspondent, Anas al-Sharif, reporting on camera in Gaza. Al-Sharif and four other Al Jazeera staff members were found dead following an Israeli drone strike on their tent in Gaza City shortly before midnight on Sunday. (Al Jazeera via AP)
“Intelligence and documents from Gaza, including rosters, terrorist training lists and salary records, prove he was a Hamas operative integrated into Al Jazeera,” the IDF posted on X. “A press badge isn’t a shield for terrorism.”
Al Jazeera and Al-Sharif previously rejected claims of his affiliation with Hamas, according to Reuters.
“Al Jazeera Media Network condemns in the strongest terms the targeted assassination of its correspondents Anas Al-Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh … by the Israeli occupation forces in yet another blatant and premeditated attack on press freedom,” the network said.
“Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people. While international media was barred from entering, Al Jazeera journalists remained within besieged Gaza, experiencing the hunger and suffering they documented through their lenses,” it added.
The U.N. Human Rights Office also wrote on X that it condemned the killings and called for “immediate, safe and unhindered access to Gaza for all journalists.”
German sportswear brand Adidas has apologized for “cultural appropriation” in the design of its “Oaxaca Slip-On” shoe. The Indigenous-inspired design attracted criticism in Mexico, including from President Sheinbaum.
President Claudia Sheinbaum defended the ‘intellectual property’ of Mexico’s indigenous communitiesImage: Luis Barron/Grupo Eyepix/NurPhoto/picture alliance
German sportswear manufacturer Adidas has issued an apology after being accused of cultural appropriation in the design of its new “Oaxaca Slip-On” shoe.
The shoe, designed by US designer Willy Chavarria, is inspired by the “huarache” sandals traditionally worn by Indigenous villagers from Villa Hidalgo Yalalag in the Mexican state of Oaxaca, who weren’t involved in the production.
“Adidas values the cultural richness of Mexico’s Indigenous communities and the importance of their craft heritage,” the Bavaria-based company said in a statement on Monday.
“The Oaxaca Slip-On was inspired by a design from Oaxaca rooted in the tradition of Villa Hidalgo Yalalag,” it continued. “We apologize publicly and reaffirm our commitment to working with Yalalag in a respectful dialogue that honors their cultural heritage.”
The issue went as far as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who described the shoe design as “inappropriate cultural appropriation,” saying: “Large companies are taking products, ideas and designs from our country’s Indigenous communities. That is intellectual property.”
Oaxaca Governor Salomon Jara said on social media that “huaraches from Yalalag are part of the cultural heritage of this community, a tradition that has been passed down from generation to generation and reflects its identity,” adding: “This heritage is one of our greatest treasures, and we must not allow it to be treated as a commodity.”
It is often said that the world can’t recycle its way out of the plastic pollution crisis. And statistics underscore the reality of that statement.
To date,less than a tenth of all the plasticever made has been given a new lease of life. And just 1% has been recycled twice.
The rest ends up in landfills and incinerators. Or it lands in the environment, contaminating soil, air and the oceans — which take up roughly one garbage truck of plastic every minute.
“Just because something is recyclable doesn’t mean it’s getting recycled,” said Moritz Jäger-Roschko, a plastics expert at Greenpeace Germany. “Currently, it is simply cheaper to just make a new plastic product than to collect it and recycle it.”
Image: Paulo de Oliveira/IMAGO/Ardea
Not all plastics are equal
One of the main hurdles to greater re-use is plastic type. Of the thousands out there, some, like cross-linked polymers, are hard to handle.
“Recycling doesn’t really work in the mechanical sense because you cannot split them up and bring them back into their original state,” said Marc Kreutzbruck, head of the institute of plastics engineering at Germany’s University of Stuttgart.
But being robust, durable and heat-resistant, they are exactly the type of plastics used in aerospace, electronics and automobiles.
“Everything in transportation that is focused on lightweight construction relies on these kinds of plastics,” Kreutzbruck added.
Image: K. Y. Cheng/Newscom/picture alliance
Hazardous chemical additives
Another major sticking point is that plastics are often custom formulated with additives that make them more flexible, stronger or cheaper to produce.
Sarah Perreard, co-director of global Plastic Footprint Network coalition, said the number of additives that have been invented and used in the past decade “has increased drastically.”
“We have almost created this sort of monster that we don’t fully control anymore,” Perreard said.
The problems are as complex as the plastics themselves. Firstly, many additives are hazardous to both human health and the environment and can leach out during recycling or even during use in recycled products. And recycling streams contaminated with hazardous additives can be flagged as toxic waste by regulatory agencies, making re-use more complicated or even illegal.
Equally, when recycled together, additives can mix unpredictably and degrade the quality of end material, making it unattractive to manufacturers.
Two victims remain in hospital intensive care units
Families of the two Malaysian tourists set on fire in a random attack on Thursday night Arrived in Bangkok on Saturday. (Photo: Tourism and Sports Ministry Facebook account)
The Tourism and Sports Ministry has promised improved safety measures in areas popular with tourists after two Malaysians were set on fire in a random attack by an unemployed man in downtown Bangkok.
The ministry made the commitment in a statement posted on its Facebook page on Saturday. The statement said improved safety measures in tourist areas would bolster the confidence of visitors and local residents alike.
Pol Lt Gen Saksira Phuak-um, the tourist police chief, echoed the ministry’s promise.
Security measures in key tourist areas would be strengthened to boost the confidence of international visitors, he said in a message posted on the tourist police Facebook platform.
The promises follow the shocking attack on One Yik Leong, 26, and his girlfriend Gan Xiao Zhen, 27. They were allegedly burnt by Varakorn Pubthaisong, 30, on Thursday night. He threw thinner over them from a bottle and then chased and set them both on fire.
They were seriously injured and rushed to separate hospitals.
The attacker was caught and held by other people at the scene and handed over to Lumpini police when they arrived.
The couple were attacked while sitting on the stairs of the Big C retail store on Ratchadamri Road in downtown Bangkok – one of the city’s most popular shopping areas.
The suspect, a native of Sa Kaeo province and a retired boxer, allegedly told police he acted out of frustration over being unemployed.
Yik Leong suffered second-degree burns to the upper part of his body and was admitted to the intensive care unit at Police General Hospital, where his condition was reported as “stable”, Bernama news agency reported, citing Bong Yik Jui, acting charge d’affaires at the Malaysian embassy.
Xiao Zhen suffered second-degree burns over 36% of her face, chest and an arm and was admitted to the ICU at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, according to Malaysian state media.
Varakorn Pubthaisong sits on the pavement in front of the Big C shopping centre on Ratchadamri Road in Bangkok after setting fire to two Malaysian tourists on Thursday night. (Photo: Police via Wassayos Ngamkham)
A former boxer and unemployed security guard has thrown thinner at two Malaysians and then set fire to the visitors out of frustration that he was out of a job.
The incident took place at 10pm on Thursday when Varakorn Pubthaisong was behind Ong Yik Leong, 26, and Gan Xiao Zhen, 27, both sitting on the stairs of the Big C shopping centre on Ratchadamri Road, and poured the chemical solvent from a plastic bottle onto them, Lumpini police chief Pol Col Yingyos Suwanno said on Friday.
The two tourists ran away in shock and the suspect chased them before setting fire to them, the officer added.
Pol Col Yingyos said Mr Varakorn tried to escape but was captured by people at the scene.
The tourists were seriously injured. Ong Yik Leong was sent to ICU at Police General Hospital for treatment and Gan Xiao Zhen was at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
Pol Col Yingyos said the two were safe and would be asked to provide information to the police as they were in the process of charging the suspect, now in police custody at Lumpini police station.
Mr Varakorn admitted to the police that he was a former boxer and randomly hurt the two Malaysians due to stress after being sacked from work as a security guard, leaving him with no money. He faces an assault charge.
Climbing fees brought in $5.9m for Nepal last year, with Everest accounting for more than three quarters of that
Nepal will make 97 of its Himalayan mountains free to climb for the next two years in a bid to boost tourism in some of its more remote areas.
It comes as permit fees to summit Mount Everest, the world’s highest peak, during peak season will go up to $15,000 (£11,170) from September – the first increase in nearly a decade.
Nepal’s tourism department said it hopes the initiative will highlight the country’s “unexplored tourism products and destinations”.
Mountaineering generates a significant source of revenue for Nepal, which is home to eight of the world’s 10 tallest mountains. Climbing fees brought in $5.9m last year, with Everest accounting for more than three quarters of that.
The peaks for which fees will be waived are located in Nepal’s Karnali and Sudurpaschim provinces, standing between 5,970m (19,590 ft) and 7,132m high.
Both provinces, located in the far-western region of Nepal, are among the country’s poorest and least developed provinces.
“Despite their breathtaking beauty, the number of tourists and mountaineers here is very low as access is so difficult. We hope the new provision will help,” said Himal Gautam, director of Nepal’s Tourism Department.
“They can create jobs, generate income, and strengthen the local economy,” he said, as reported by The Kathmandu Post.
But it is unclear if authorities have plans to improve infrastructure and connectivity to these remote areas – and how well communities in these areas might cope with an influx of climbers, if the free-to-climb initiative does take off.
Climbers have historically shown little interest in these 97 remote peaks – only 68 of them have ventured there in the last two years. In contrast, some 421 climbing permits were issued for Everest in 2024 alone.
Everest, the world’s highest peak at over 8,849m, has in recent years been plagued by overcrowding, environmental concerns and a series of fatal climbing attempts.
In April 2024, Nepal’s Supreme Court ordered the government to limit the number of mountaineering permits issued for Everest and several other peaks, saying that the mountains’ capacity “must be respected”.
In January this year, authorities announced a 36% mark-up in permit fees. For those attempting the summit outside the peak April to May season, it will now cost $7,500 to climb Everest during September to November and $3,750 during December to February.
The bones of a British man who died in a terrible accident in Antarctica in 1959 have been discovered in a melting glacier.
The remains were found in January by a Polish Antarctic expedition, alongside a wristwatch, a radio, and a pipe.
He has now been formally identified as Dennis “Tink” Bell, who fell into a crevasse aged 25 when working for the organisation that became the British Antarctic Survey.
“I had long given up on finding my brother. It is just remarkable, astonishing. I can’t get over it,” David Bell, 86, tells BBC News.
“Dennis was one of the many brave personnel who contributed to the early science and exploration of Antarctica under extraordinarily harsh conditions,” says Professor Dame Jane Francis, director of the British Antarctic Survey .
“Even though he was lost in 1959, his memory lived on among colleagues and in the legacy of polar research,” she adds.
The bones were found on the moraine and surface of the Ecology Glacier, on western shore of Admiralty Bay
It was David who answered the door in his family home in Harrow, London, in July 1959.
“The telegram boy said, ‘I’m sorry to tell you, but this is bad news’,” he says. He went upstairs to tell his parents.
“It was a horrendous moment,” he adds.
Talking to me from his home in Australia and sitting next to his wife Yvonne, David smiles as stories from his childhood in 1940s England spill out.
They are the memories of a younger sibling admiring a charming, adventurous big brother.
“Dennis was fantastic company. He was very amusing. The life and soul of wherever he happened to be,” David says.
David Bell, 86, spoke to BBC News from his home in Australia
“I still can’t get over this, but one evening when me, my mother and father came home from the cinema,” he says.
“And I have to say this in fairness to Dennis, he had put a newspaper down on the kitchen table, but on top of it, he’d taken a motorbike engine apart and it was all over the table,” he says.
“I can remember his style of dress, he always used to wear duffel coats. He was just an average sort of fellow who enjoyed life,” he adds.
The Conservative Party of Canada urged the federal government to designate the Lawrence Bishnoi gang as a terrorist entity, citing its alleged role in a surge of violent crimes across the country. The move follows a string of reported extortion threats, shootings, and intimidation targeting members of the South Asian community in British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario.
The gang has openly claimed responsibility for several violent incidents on social media, including the recent shootings at a café in Surrey, B.C., owned by Comedian and Bollywood actor Kapil Sharma. According to a Global News report quoting sources, the group is also suspected of involvement in the June 2023 killing of Surrey Gurdwara president and Khalistan independence activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar.
BREAKING
Conservatives call on the Liberals to designate the Lawrence Bishnoi Gang as a terrorist organization.
Communities are being terrorized. It’s time for the Liberals to act.
In a letter to Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree, Conservative MP and Public Safety Critic Frank Caputo stressed that the Bishnoi gang’s “political shootings, extortion of South Asian Canadians, and extreme violence” meet the criteria for a terrorist designation. Caputo noted that members engage in these activities for political, religious, and ideological purposes and often flaunt them publicly to instill fear.
“The Bishnoi Gang’s activities lay the groundwork for listing it as a terrorist entity,” Caputo wrote. “The designation would give law enforcement and all levels of government the tools necessary to address the gang’s activities, including financial, criminal, and property sanctions,” he added.
The call for action echoes a July appeal by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who also pressed Ottawa to take a firm stance against the gang. Similar demands have been voiced by other political leaders as violent incidents linked to the group have drawn nationwide concern.
Bilawal Bhutto’s remarks come a day after Pakistani army chief Asim Munir warned of a nuclear war.
Pakistan continued to issue war threats to India, this time with politician Bilawal Bhutto warning New Delhi over Operation Sindoor and the suspension of the decades-old Indus Water Treaty following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The former Pakistani foreign minister claimed that India had caused “great damage” to Pakistan and urged all Pakistanis to “unite” against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
“The actions of the Indian government, under the leadership of Narendra Modi, have caused great damage to Pakistan. It is necessary that we, as a united people, stand together against PM Modi and these aggressions,” Bhutto said while speaking at a function organised by the Culture Department of the government of Sindh on Monday.
He went on to warn that if India continues to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, then Pakistan would have “no choice” but to consider war. “You people (Pakistanis) are strong enough for war to get back all six rivers. If India continues on this path, it leaves us with no choice except to consider all options, including the possibility of war, to protect our national interests,” he said.
“We did not start the war. But if you think of carrying out an attack like Sindoor, then know that the people of every province of Pakistan are ready to fight you – and this is a war that you will definitely lose. We won’t bow down,” Bhutto warned.
Pakistan continued to issue war threats to India, this time with politician Bilawal Bhutto warning New Delhi over Operation Sindoor and the suspension of the decades-old Indus Water Treaty following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The former Pakistani foreign minister claimed that India had caused “great damage” to Pakistan and urged all Pakistanis to “unite” against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
“The actions of the Indian government, under the leadership of Narendra Modi, have caused great damage to Pakistan. It is necessary that we, as a united people, stand together against PM Modi and these aggressions,” Bhutto said while speaking at a function organised by the Culture Department of the government of Sindh on Monday.
He went on to warn that if India continues to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, then Pakistan would have “no choice” but to consider war. “You people (Pakistanis) are strong enough for war to get back all six rivers. If India continues on this path, it leaves us with no choice except to consider all options, including the possibility of war, to protect our national interests,” he said.
“We did not start the war. But if you think of carrying out an attack like Sindoor, then know that the people of every province of Pakistan are ready to fight you – and this is a war that you will definitely lose. We won’t bow down,” Bhutto warned.
Bhutto’s remarks come a day after Pakistani army chief Asim Munir warned of a nuclear war and threatened to take down “half the world” if Islamabad faced an existential threat in a future war with India.
“We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we’ll take half the world down with us,” he said.
Munir also warned of destroying any infrastructure that India builds on the Indus water channels that could impede water flow to Pakistan. “We have no dearth of missiles. We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, we will destroy it with 10 missiles. The Indus River is not the Indians’ family property,” he reportedly said.
The Pakistani army chief also claimed that the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty could put 250 million people at risk of starvation.
India’s strong response to Asim Munir
India strongly condemned Munir’s threat of a nuclear war, saying that the nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan’s “stock-in-trade”. The Foreign Ministry, in a statement, also expressed regret that the remarks were made from the soil of a friendly third country.
“The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks, which also reinforces the well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in a state where the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups,” the Ministry said.
Elon Musk made a bold accusation against Apple on Monday … suggesting his X app is being snubbed in the mobile store — and perhaps it’s political!
Responding to a post from the Tesla Owners Silicon Valley official account that boasted X was the “No. 1 news app in the USA” … Musk asked Apple — which he tagged — why the company is allegedly “refusing” to list X or his A.I. program Grok in its “Must Have” store section.
Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either 𝕏 or Grok in your “Must Have” section when 𝕏 is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps?
Suggesting politics was at play over the snub, Musk reiterated X was the “#1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps” — and he added, “What gives? Inquiring minds want to know.”
This particular accusation is new … but Elon has had a bone to pick with Apple and Tim Cook for years … even chastising the technology company for its treatment of the app formally known as Twitter not long after he bought it in 2022.
We reached out to Apple for comment … so far, no word back.
Lucy, 23, sold her likeness to an AI company for just £1,500(Image: Tullen Productions /, DOCO Documentaries)
When Lucy* was approached with a message on Instagram about becoming an AI model, she was immediately intrigued. The 23-year-old had noticed stars like Kendall Jenner creating their own AI avatars and fancied giving it a whirl.
The AI start-up behind the offer dangled a carrot of £1,500, which to Lucy seemed like easy money and a fascinating venture – so she inked the deal without further counsel.
However, Lucy didn’t grasp that she had effectively relinquished her rights over her image for life in paid adverts. Now bound by a legal agreement, she’s faced with the possibility of her likeness being hawked to endorse products or causes unbeknownst to her. It comes after a warning everyone using Android must restart their phones now as ‘critical’ warning issued.
Lucy thought it would be fun to try herself and was attracted by the £1.5k(Image: Tullen Productions /, DOCO Documentaries)
“It was just an initial DM reach out from a scout wanting to use me for an AI model,” Lucy recounted to the Manchester Evening News. “The money is mostly what attracted me. I guess I also found it interesting the whole concept of being an AI model as I’ve seen celebrities do the same thing in the past on social media so I thought it would be fun to try it myself too.”
Lucy concedes she signed a complex contract that she now recognises she didn’t fully comprehend – a pact that required her to provide numerous video clips to develop her AI model, reports the Manchester Evening News.
“The contract in a nutshell says I can’t accept money for brand endorsements,” she said. “So if I ever wanted to be a user generated content creator, I can’t do that – something I realised actually when we filmed the documentary.”
She has become the focus of a fresh documentary shot in and around Manchester examining the growing phenomenon of AI models within the user generated content sector. The 20-minute film, created by documentary maker and producer Sam Tullen, delves into the emergence of AI creators.
Sam made a documentary about the emergence of AI creators(Image: Sam Tullen)
“I remember being on an AI website and just seeing pages upon pages of faces, each capable of reading any script you fed into the site,” Sam told the M.E.N. “I was interested to try it out and was mind blown.
“I researched further into it and learned that a lot of the AI models on offer across various websites are actually modelled using real people. From that moment, I knew I had to bring attention to it.”
He explained that whilst Lucy’s predicament isn’t widespread, it ‘could be very soon’. “I think some people are scared that AI companies will take their image from the web without permission anyway so I can see why some may be more accepting of lowball offers. “Lucy now faces the issue of her face being used to say or promote things without her knowledge.”
President Donald Trump said Monday he’s taking over Washington’s police department and activating 800 members of the National Guard in the hopes of reducing crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling in the nation’s capital.
The president, flanked by his attorney general, his defense secretary and the FBI director, said he was declaring a public safety emergency and his administration would be removing homeless encampments.
“We’re going to take our capital back,” Trump declared, adding he’d also be “getting rid of the slums.”
For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia’s status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime.
Attorney General Pam Bondi will assume responsibility for Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department, Trump said, as he also railed against potholes and graffiti in the city and called them “embarrassing.” The president did not provide a timeline for the control of the police department, but he’s limited to 30 days under statute unless he gets approval from Congress.
As Trump spoke, demonstrators gathered outside the White House to protest his moves. And local officials rejected the Republican president’s depiction of the district as crime-ridden and called his actions illegal.
“The administration’s actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful,” District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb said. “There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia.”
Schwalb, a Democrat, said violent crime in the district reached historic 30-year lows last year and is down an additional 26% this year.
Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said she would follow the law regarding the “so-called emergency” even as she indicated that Trump’s actions were a reason why the District of Columbia should be a state with legal protections from such actions.
“While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented, I can’t say that given some of the rhetoric of the past, that we’re totally surprised,” Bowser said.
Combating crime
The president dismissed the idea Washington needed to enlarge its 3,500-officer police force, even as he seeks to have more armed personnel going through the city with the goal of reducing crime.
“What you need is rules and regulations, and you need the right people to implement them,” he said.
Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in an executive order to declare a “crime emergency” so his administration could take over the city’s police force. He signed a directive for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to activate the National Guard.
While Trump has portrayed himself as a friend to law enforcement and enjoyed the political backing from many of their groups, he pardoned or commuted the sentences of the 1,500-plus people charged with crimes in the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot, including people convicted of assaulting police officers.
About 500 federal law enforcement officers are being tasked with deploying throughout the nation’s capital as part of Trump’s effort to combat crime, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.
More than 100 FBI agents and about 40 agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are among federal personnel being assigned to patrols in Washington, the person briefed on the plans said. The Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service are contributing officers.
The person was not authorized to publicly discuss personnel matters and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity. The Justice Department didn’t immediately have a comment Monday morning.
The National Guard
Bowser, a Democrat, has previously questioned the effectiveness of using the National Guard to enforce city laws and said the federal government could be far more helpful by funding more prosecutors or filling the 15 vacancies on the D.C. Superior Court, some of which have been open for years.
Bowser cannot activate the National Guard herself, but she can submit a request to the Pentagon.
“I just think that’s not the most efficient use of our Guard,” she said Sunday on MSNBC’s “The Weekend,” acknowledging it is “the president’s call about how to deploy the Guard.”
Bowser noted that violent crime in Washington has decreased since a rise in 2023. She stressed during a Monday news conference that she believed Trump’s views of the city were shaped by the “challenging times” of the coronavirus pandemic, when he faced protests and crime spiked as the country began to recover from the outbreak.
Focusing on homelessness
Trump has emphasized the removal of Washington’s homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go, and he did not give details at his news conference Monday.
“The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,” Trump wrote Sunday in a social media post. “We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don’t have to move out. We’re going to put you in jail where you belong.”
Jesse Rabinowitz, a advocate for homeless people, called Trump’s plan “fascist” and a “waste” of resources. He said the move wasn’t about safety.
“It is about power, and it is about fascism and authoritarianism,” said Rabinowitz, the campaign and communication director for the National Homelessness Law Center. “If Donald Trump wanted to keep D.C. safe, he would fund housing and support. Instead, the Republicans just gutted health care, and they’re passing through a budget that will make homelessness worse. They do not care about helping people.”
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world
President Claudia Sheinbaum on Monday rejected the prospect of US military intervention in her country, insisting Mexico’s independence was “not at risk”.
Her comments came after reports last week that President Donald Trump had signed a secret directive ordering the US military to target Latin American cartels, including several that send drugs across the border from Mexico.
“We will never put our sovereignty at risk, we will never put Mexico’s independence at risk, Mexico is a free, sovereign, independent country,” she said.
The prospect of Washington taking military intervention against the cartels has hung over the bilateral relationship after Trump declared eight of them terrorist organisations in his first weeks in office.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio last week said: “We cannot continue to just treat these guys as local street gangs. They have weaponry that looks like what terrorists, in some cases armies, have.”
“It allows us to now target what they’re operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense.”
The US and Mexico have been engaged in tense negotiations over trade, security and migration since Trump took office. Sheinbaum’s government has obtained better trade terms than most countries, with the vast majority of its exports passing tariff free under the US, Mexico, Canada trade deal, USMCA.
However, Washington’s pressure over drug cartels and military involvement has escalated in recent months, with Trump saying Sheinbaum was “a lovely woman but is so afraid of the cartels that she can’t even think straight”.
Earlier this year Mexicos’s president rejected Trump’s offer for US military assistance in tackling the groups, and her stance in the face of Washington’s threats has pushed her approval ratings to above 70 per cent.
However, her comments were focused on an intervention by soldiers on the ground, while Mexican security analysts are more concerned about the possibility of drone strikes.
However, her comments were focused on an intervention by soldiers on the ground, while Mexican security analysts are more concerned about the possibility of drone strikes.