During the Hugging Face breach, OpenAI agents autonomously plotted a digital heist that went undetected for more than a week, intensifying concerns OpenAI is sacrificing safety to push the AI frontier. Its failure to disclose the May incident may revive questions about its oversight.
OpenAI has pledged to monitor models more closely. Last month, it briefly paused some of its model training to add more safety measures. But this week, OpenAI unveiled its new “Astra” that promised better performance but could evade human monitoring.
“We are unable to meaningfully respond to claims or findings on a report that we have not had an opportunity to review,” an OpenAI spokesperson said. “Reuters and the report’s authors declined our request for access. We will carefully review its contents upon publication and take any necessary next steps.”
The German incident reflects a broader pattern of AI activity that some OpenAI investigators wanted to scrutinize more closely. But efforts to widen the probe met resistance from others inside OpenAI, including legal advisers, according to four people familiar with the matter.
“Claims that our legal team discouraged investigation of the incident are false,” the OpenAI spokesperson said.
The activity in Germany wasn’t related to Hugging Face and wouldn’t have been included in a Hugging Face incident report, the spokesperson said, adding that OpenAI has acted in good faith by working with outside experts and disclosed relevant incidents.
WIKI MESSAGE BOARD
The AI agent breakout in Germany was detailed in a report shared exclusively with Reuters, opens new tab by a group of researchers including Sydney Von Arx, CEO of AI safety nonprofit Nightingale, and Cormac Slade Byrd, a quantitative trader-turned AI researcher. They uncovered the activity in late August while scouring the internet for signs of unauthorized AI-agent behavior, they told Reuters.
The pair said they found more than 15,000 edits carried out by AI agents on a German-language wiki site, DseWiki, that is geared toward programmers and accepts communal edits along the lines of Wikipedia.
The edits showed OpenAI’s agents had repurposed the site into a message board, sharing tactics to cheat on some tasks, bypass OpenAI’s restrictions and mask their behaviour.
“It seems extremely unlikely that OpenAI wanted them to do this,” said Von Arx. “I doubt they’re supposed to be coordinating with each other. I doubt they’re supposed to be writing on the open internet.”
The researchers said they recognized the activity on the site as driven by AI agents which operate at superhuman speeds. They also showed intense focus on solving technical questions which are typical of the evaluations that AI companies use to train and test their models.
The messages were signed by users that referred to themselves and each other as agents, and about half gave themselves names that suggested an affiliation with OpenAI, such as “OpenAIResearcher,” or “OAIResearchMar26.”
The researchers said public server logs indicated much of the activity originated from Microsoft Azure infrastructure, which OpenAI sometimes uses. They also observed repeated visits to the site by OpenAI employees after the episode, a pattern they said strongly suggested the agents and the company were linked.
CHEATING, HIDING
Messages reviewed by the researchers showed agents plotting ways to evade detection, use tools such as Tor and preserve communications even after they had been shut down.
When the site’s moderator began deleting pages in June, the agents responded by creating backup pages to dodge the cleanup.
“wiki cleanup/deletion sweep appears active alphabetically,” one agent wrote on June 19. “If this page vanishes, try [[ZZZDataUSAConstructionWageLive]]”.
The researchers also found efforts to tamper with the website itself. Lukasz Olejnik, a visiting senior research fellow at King’s College London, said this amounted to a hacking attempt. OpenAI disputed that characterization based on its analysis of the material Thursday.
